Rise of the informer chills free speech in nation once proud of its constitution.

[martybegan]

Regardless

Irrelevant to this discussion

It's called the hypocrisy of a Brit calling out the US on supposed Free speech issues.

Their police are arresting people for mean tweets.

Also, **** off.

 

[Lesh]

It's called the hypocrisy of a Brit calling out the US on supposed Free speech issues.

Their police are arresting people for mean tweets.

Also, **** off.

Call it anything you like but it means nothing in this thread

 

[Leo123]

Your government is persecuting non christians by refusing them the same protections as christians.
Its pretty obvious that if any group needs protection it is the minority religions, jews and muslims.
People will use this edict to settle a lot of old scores. Its symptomatic of a sick society.

Get outta here. We have freedom of religion here. No Federal employee has the right to put down the religion of others and those doing so need to be rooted out. You’re ignorant of America, friggin red coat colonist.

 

[struth]

Im educated.

Then you can explain....how is this a free speech issue? You think Govt employees have a free speech right to use their office to be bias? Why?

 

[struth]

I only get worried when I see the State wading across the separation into the Church. Nothing good at all can happen from that.

How is it wading across seperation of church and state when it's specifically trying to keep the State out of the Church here? Literally the entire point is to keep the state from being bias to people based on what church they go to

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Are you harboring alien enemies like your father of the year in Maryland? Ofcourse they will.


hahaha…yeah Apache choppers are no match for pissed off purple hair faggots.
View attachment 1103465

You and your impotent authoritarian fantasies have nothing to threaten me with.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Then you can explain....how is this a free speech issue? You think Govt employees have a free speech right to use their office to be bias? Why?

Because it puts christians on a higher pedestal than non christians. Its not complicated.

 

[struth]

Because it puts christians on a higher pedestal than non christians. Its not complicated.

How? How does not allowing the Govt to be bias to Christian, put them on a higher pedestal then non-Christians?

 

[d0gbreath]

How is it wading across seperation of church and state when it's specifically trying to keep the State out of the Church here? Literally the entire point is to keep the state from being bias to people based on what church they go to

I'll buy that, somewhat. But how does snitching fit into that?

 

[struth]

I'll buy that, somewhat. But how does snitching fit into that?

You don't think a Govt employees should tell their boss if another Govt employee is using their office to be bias against someone for their faith?

What should they do? Simply allow the bigotry?

 

[Leo123]

Because it puts christians on a higher pedestal than non christians. Its not complicated.

How does a Federal employee talking smack about someone's religion while in a Federal building put Christians on a higher pedestal? You're nuts.

 

[d0gbreath]

You don't think a Govt employees should tell their boss if another Govt employee is using their office to be bias against someone for their faith?

What should they do? Simply allow the bigotry?

No, because the snitch is a third party. The victim of the bias should be the complainer. Otherwise hearsay gets in the way.

 

[struth]

No, because the snitch is a third party. The victim of the bias should be the complainer. Otherwise hearsay gets in the way.

Why not? So if you know someone is being a bigot and bias, you are just not going to say anything? Wow. Well, that explains why you vote Dem

What if the victim isn't even aware?

 

[d0gbreath]

Why not? So if you know someone is being a bigot and bias, you are just not going to say anything? Wow. Well, that explains why you vote Dem

What if the victim isn't even aware?

If the victim isn't aware. That speaks volumes.

 

[struth]

If the victim isn't aware. That speaks volumes.

How's a 75 year old vietnam vet suppose to know his benefits were denied because he's Christian?

 

[d0gbreath]

How's a 75 year old vietnam vet suppose to know his benefits were denied because he's Christian?

Do you really believe that that could happen? Come on, man.

 

[struth]

Do you really believe that that could happen? Come on, man.

Yes, yes I do believe it could happen. During the Obama admin we saw his admin treat peopel differently because of their bias against them. So, yes, I do believe Govt employees can be bias.

 

[d0gbreath]

Yes, yes I do believe it could happen. During the Obama admin we saw his admin treat peopel differently because of their bias against them. So, yes, I do believe Govt employees can be bias.

Yes, they can certainly be biased, just like everyone else. But denying a war veteran his benefits because he's Christian? That's so far out there, that I can't even grasp it. It's impossible.

 

[struth]

Yes, they can certainly be biased, just like everyone else. But denying a war veteran his benefits because he's Christian? That's so far out there, that I can't even grasp it. It's impossible.

No it’s illegal for govt to violate people’s civil rights. They can’t treat someone different because of their creed

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Call it anything you like but it means nothing in this thread

Its a deflection.