'Riots & Rage' - LEFT-WING Violence Explodes After Biden Inauguration

It can't be true, it just can't be. They said that all the Unicorns would start shooting rainbows out their asses again (did you know they stopped?) and everybody would just calm down, you know like the Obama years!
 
You believe that the insurrection was justified? Note that the violent dictators were eventually extricated and put out of their misery, just as the terrorists will be, as they are rounded up. Of course, they are on the run as are all violent criminals.

Why did you threaten to shoot President Trump ???
 
Always remember that 6 Ultra wealthy and powerful Globalists control every news station and the content.
They are absolute masters of information manipulation.
[. . . ]
When you see news reports of riots, you can be certain the information was manipulated for a reason which might not be readily apparent at first.

I'll bite --- Soros and Jeff Bezos are two of them. Who are the other four??
 

The REAL terrorists show themselves.....
Yeah, I had to laugh. Ted Wheeler and Kate Brown had to quell their own people as it turned out. They thought they could provoke the right, but the right doesn't work that way. More of the same happened in Seattle after Inslee fenced the capitol in order to quell right wing riots. Little did he know that his own rioters were lighting Seattle up.
 
Just a word of caution.......

NEVER, under ANY circumstances, take the news at face value.
Every story is carefully crafted to solidify an agenda. what you read is what THEY WANT YOU TO READ.
Even if you really, really like or want to hear parts of it.

Always remember that 6 Ultra wealthy and powerful Globalists control every news station and the content.
They are absolute masters of information manipulation.

For example, we know that the Agenda is to disarm America. but it will not be easy.
They will conduct voluntary buy back programs first.
The News will tout these as MASSIVELY successful with millions of guns voluntarily turned in. When in fact maybe a few hundred actually were.
You will see pictures of massive piles of guns and lines of people appearing to turn them in. Fake. Propaganda.

When you see news reports of riots, you can be certain the information was manipulated for a reason which might not be readily apparent at first.

easyt65 Just a word of caution... BasicHumanUnit might work for us...

Violence is never necessary. I hope they arrest any and all who were involved.

for throwing eggs eh... :)
Liar. Rocks too. They damaged federal property. Its an insurrection. We need the FBI to track them down and lock them up for 20-years.

if thats the scale, then what you gonna do with capitol lunatics?...
hang em?... :)
Naw, they shot the unarmed ones. However, the democrat leaders of Portland and Seattle are guilty as they condoned the destruction and arson of federal landmarks and buildings in those cities for over three months and over six weeks respectively. Indeed, they sued Trump for sending federal help. And those anarchists were back in those cities burning, rioting and looting again last night. This time they met the resistance with federal troops--do you not see the blatant partisan hypocrisy from the left?
 
GlobalCap is preparing the way to legislate a "domestic terror" law so that the Deep State can infiltrate citizen groups and make freedom of speech and assembly a crime.

It is clear as day to anyone paying attention, that the STATE is at war with the populist left and right, and all you folks do, is argue with each other seeing the other side as the enemy as the state plans to take away your civil rights and civil liberties b/c of the actions of a small minority.

:sigh2:


I have been following this.

With everything we know about how easy, and in fact, how it almost looks like the Senator and Reps. wanted that "storming" to be successful, with some filming showing how the police just let them in;

The four big lies underpinning this story show it was likely a staged event.


. . . and how we now have some evidence that this Q-Anon is in fact a psy-op, and Trump himself has denied from the start having any direct ties to it. . . it would now appear that this was the set up from the start, it was intended from the very beginning to work out this way.

Turning Americans into the enemy of the state, how convenient for those who lord over you when they start really making draconion laws you don't like. . .





Folks should, by now, and see what is happening.

I think making this partisan? Is a disservice.

We are all Americans, we all love our children, our parents, and our freedom and the bill of rights. . . well, most of us anyhow.

Most folks know my mission here on this forum, is to unite the left and the right against our true enemy, (the swamp, the Deep State,) and that was always, ostensibly, what Trump originally claimed too, he just got caught up in D.C. politics because he has an unbelievable frail ego & has the spirit of a fighter.

I think you will find, wise folks on the left, not the neo-liberal corporatists, but the Sanders folks, don't think this is a good idea either.

ACLU Statement Opposing H.R. 4192, Confronting the Threat of Domestic Terrorism Act

"In this letter to the U.S. House Judiciary Committee, the ACLU urged Members to oppose H.R. 4192, Confronting the Threat of Domestic Terrorism Act. By reifying and broadening domestic terrorism authorities, H.R. 4192 would unnecessarily expand law enforcement authorities to target and discriminate against the very communities Congress is seeking to protect. The additional crimes, criminal penalties, and expansion of the death penalty in H.R. 4192 would further incorporate abusive terrorism authorities into a discriminatory criminal justice system.

People of color and other marginalized communities have long been targeted under domestic terrorism authorities for unfair and discriminatory surveillance, investigations, and prosecutions. Law enforcement agencies' use of these authorities undermines and has violated equal protection, due process, and First Amendment rights."



Caitlin Johnson is a real liberal, never cared much for Trump, but had always railed against the Russia Hoax and the Impeachment fraud.

Consent-Manufacturing For Patriot Act II Continues
medium-6.jpg



". . . In a new article for Washington Monthly titled “It’s Time for a Domestic Terrorism Law“, Bill Scher argues against left-wing critics of the coming laws like Glenn Greenwald and Jacobin‘s Luke Savage saying such “knee-jerk reactions” against potential authoritarian abuses fail to address the growing problem. He opens with the acknowledgement that “Joe Biden’s transition team was already working on a domestic terrorism law before the insurrection,” and then he just keeps on writing as though that’s not weird or suspicious in any way.

Scher lists among the growing threat of domestic terror not just white supremacists and right-wing extremists but “extremist left-wing domestic terrorism” as well. He approvingly cites Adam Schiff’s Confronting The Threat of Terrorism Act, which “creates a definition of domestic terrorism broadly encompassing plots that carry a ‘substantial risk of serious bodily injury’ along with an ‘intent to intimidate or coerce a civilian population’ or ‘influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion.'” The ACLU has unequivocally denounced Schiff’s bill, saying it “would unnecessarily expand law enforcement authorities to target and discriminate against the very communities Congress is seeking to protect.”

<snip>

“FBI intelligence analysts gathered information about possible violence involving the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6., but the FBI never distributed a formal intelligence bulletin, in part because of concerns that doing so might have run afoul of free speech protections, a current and two former senior FBI officials familiar with the matter told NBC News,” the article warns, making sure to inform readers that “experts say the lack of a domestic terrorism statute constrains the FBI from treating far-right and far-left groups the same as Americans who are radicalized to violence by Al Qaeda or ISIS ideology.”

We can expect to see more such articles going forward.

The only way to sincerely believe more Patriot Act-like laws will benefit Americans is to believe that the US will only have wise and beneficent leaders going forward, and the only way to sincerely believe the US will only have wise and beneficent leaders going forward is to be completely shit-eating stupid. The trajectory has already been chosen, and that trajectory is the one that has already given rise to Trump. Continuing along that same trajectory can only give rise to something far uglier, and that something far uglier will have whatever new authoritarian powers are added by Joe Biden.

They’re not actually worried about “domestic terror”, they’re worried about any movement which threatens to topple the status quo. They want to make sure they can adequately spy, infiltrate, agitate and incarcerate into impotence any movement which provides a threat to America’s rulers and the system which funnels them wealth and power at the expense of everyone else. The movements which most threaten this are not rightists, who are generally more or less aligned with the interests of the oligarchic empire, but the left. . . "

 
GlobalCap is preparing the way to legislate a "domestic terror" law so that the Deep State can infiltrate citizen groups and make freedom of speech and assembly a crime.

It is clear as day to anyone paying attention, that the STATE is at war with the populist left and right, and all you folks do, is argue with each other seeing the other side as the enemy as the state plans to take away your civil rights and civil liberties b/c of the actions of a small minority.

:sigh2:


I have been following this.

With everything we know about how easy, and in fact, how it almost looks like the Senator and Reps. wanted that "storming" to be successful, with some filming showing how the police just let them in;

The four big lies underpinning this story show it was likely a staged event.


. . . and how we now have some evidence that this Q-Anon is in fact a psy-op, and Trump himself has denied from the start having any direct ties to it. . . it would now appear that this was the set up from the start, it was intended from the very beginning to work out this way.

Turning Americans into the enemy of the state, how convenient for those who lord over you when they start really making draconion laws you don't like. . .





Folks should, by now, and see what is happening.

I think making this partisan? Is a disservice.

We are all Americans, we all love our children, our parents, and our freedom and the bill of rights. . . well, most of us anyhow.

Most folks know my mission here on this forum, is to unite the left and the right against our true enemy, (the swamp, the Deep State,) and that was always, ostensibly, what Trump originally claimed too, he just got caught up in D.C. politics because he has an unbelievable frail ego & has the spirit of a fighter.

I think you will find, wise folks on the left, not the neo-liberal corporatists, but the Sanders folks, don't think this is a good idea either.

ACLU Statement Opposing H.R. 4192, Confronting the Threat of Domestic Terrorism Act

"In this letter to the U.S. House Judiciary Committee, the ACLU urged Members to oppose H.R. 4192, Confronting the Threat of Domestic Terrorism Act. By reifying and broadening domestic terrorism authorities, H.R. 4192 would unnecessarily expand law enforcement authorities to target and discriminate against the very communities Congress is seeking to protect. The additional crimes, criminal penalties, and expansion of the death penalty in H.R. 4192 would further incorporate abusive terrorism authorities into a discriminatory criminal justice system.

People of color and other marginalized communities have long been targeted under domestic terrorism authorities for unfair and discriminatory surveillance, investigations, and prosecutions. Law enforcement agencies' use of these authorities undermines and has violated equal protection, due process, and First Amendment rights."



Caitlin Johnson is a real liberal, never cared much for Trump, but had always railed against the Russia Hoax and the Impeachment fraud.

Consent-Manufacturing For Patriot Act II Continues
medium-6.jpg



". . . In a new article for Washington Monthly titled “It’s Time for a Domestic Terrorism Law“, Bill Scher argues against left-wing critics of the coming laws like Glenn Greenwald and Jacobin‘s Luke Savage saying such “knee-jerk reactions” against potential authoritarian abuses fail to address the growing problem. He opens with the acknowledgement that “Joe Biden’s transition team was already working on a domestic terrorism law before the insurrection,” and then he just keeps on writing as though that’s not weird or suspicious in any way.

Scher lists among the growing threat of domestic terror not just white supremacists and right-wing extremists but “extremist left-wing domestic terrorism” as well. He approvingly cites Adam Schiff’s Confronting The Threat of Terrorism Act, which “creates a definition of domestic terrorism broadly encompassing plots that carry a ‘substantial risk of serious bodily injury’ along with an ‘intent to intimidate or coerce a civilian population’ or ‘influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion.'” The ACLU has unequivocally denounced Schiff’s bill, saying it “would unnecessarily expand law enforcement authorities to target and discriminate against the very communities Congress is seeking to protect.”

<snip>

“FBI intelligence analysts gathered information about possible violence involving the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6., but the FBI never distributed a formal intelligence bulletin, in part because of concerns that doing so might have run afoul of free speech protections, a current and two former senior FBI officials familiar with the matter told NBC News,” the article warns, making sure to inform readers that “experts say the lack of a domestic terrorism statute constrains the FBI from treating far-right and far-left groups the same as Americans who are radicalized to violence by Al Qaeda or ISIS ideology.”

We can expect to see more such articles going forward.

The only way to sincerely believe more Patriot Act-like laws will benefit Americans is to believe that the US will only have wise and beneficent leaders going forward, and the only way to sincerely believe the US will only have wise and beneficent leaders going forward is to be completely shit-eating stupid. The trajectory has already been chosen, and that trajectory is the one that has already given rise to Trump. Continuing along that same trajectory can only give rise to something far uglier, and that something far uglier will have whatever new authoritarian powers are added by Joe Biden.

They’re not actually worried about “domestic terror”, they’re worried about any movement which threatens to topple the status quo. They want to make sure they can adequately spy, infiltrate, agitate and incarcerate into impotence any movement which provides a threat to America’s rulers and the system which funnels them wealth and power at the expense of everyone else. The movements which most threaten this are not rightists, who are generally more or less aligned with the interests of the oligarchic empire, but the left. . . "

 
Looks like an "insurrection" to me. Where are the democrats condemning the violence?
Wake us up when they overrun the US Capitol Building and assault Congress in-session executing its Constitutional duty to certify election results.

Incited by an Orange Baboon-God of a demagogue who was mistakenly granted executive power until his traitorous lack of character triggered his removal.

To the Liberals, Why is the certification of an election in the Capitol so much more important than the safety of the lives of everyday Americans? Ask yourself this, had Trump won and his victory were being certified and ANTIFA busted into the Capitol, would you really show this much concern for the Constitution?
 
GlobalCap is preparing the way to legislate a "domestic terror" law so that the Deep State can infiltrate citizen groups and make freedom of speech and assembly a crime.

It is clear as day to anyone paying attention, that the STATE is at war with the populist left and right, and all you folks do, is argue with each other seeing the other side as the enemy as the state plans to take away your civil rights and civil liberties b/c of the actions of a small minority.

:sigh2:


I have been following this.

With everything we know about how easy, and in fact, how it almost looks like the Senator and Reps. wanted that "storming" to be successful, with some filming showing how the police just let them in;

The four big lies underpinning this story show it was likely a staged event.


. . . and how we now have some evidence that this Q-Anon is in fact a psy-op, and Trump himself has denied from the start having any direct ties to it. . . it would now appear that this was the set up from the start, it was intended from the very beginning to work out this way.

Turning Americans into the enemy of the state, how convenient for those who lord over you when they start really making draconion laws you don't like. . .





Folks should, by now, and see what is happening.

I think making this partisan? Is a disservice.

We are all Americans, we all love our children, our parents, and our freedom and the bill of rights. . . well, most of us anyhow.

Most folks know my mission here on this forum, is to unite the left and the right against our true enemy, (the swamp, the Deep State,) and that was always, ostensibly, what Trump originally claimed too, he just got caught up in D.C. politics because he has an unbelievable frail ego & has the spirit of a fighter.

I think you will find, wise folks on the left, not the neo-liberal corporatists, but the Sanders folks, don't think this is a good idea either.

ACLU Statement Opposing H.R. 4192, Confronting the Threat of Domestic Terrorism Act

"In this letter to the U.S. House Judiciary Committee, the ACLU urged Members to oppose H.R. 4192, Confronting the Threat of Domestic Terrorism Act. By reifying and broadening domestic terrorism authorities, H.R. 4192 would unnecessarily expand law enforcement authorities to target and discriminate against the very communities Congress is seeking to protect. The additional crimes, criminal penalties, and expansion of the death penalty in H.R. 4192 would further incorporate abusive terrorism authorities into a discriminatory criminal justice system.

People of color and other marginalized communities have long been targeted under domestic terrorism authorities for unfair and discriminatory surveillance, investigations, and prosecutions. Law enforcement agencies' use of these authorities undermines and has violated equal protection, due process, and First Amendment rights."



Caitlin Johnson is a real liberal, never cared much for Trump, but had always railed against the Russia Hoax and the Impeachment fraud.

Consent-Manufacturing For Patriot Act II Continues
medium-6.jpg



". . . In a new article for Washington Monthly titled “It’s Time for a Domestic Terrorism Law“, Bill Scher argues against left-wing critics of the coming laws like Glenn Greenwald and Jacobin‘s Luke Savage saying such “knee-jerk reactions” against potential authoritarian abuses fail to address the growing problem. He opens with the acknowledgement that “Joe Biden’s transition team was already working on a domestic terrorism law before the insurrection,” and then he just keeps on writing as though that’s not weird or suspicious in any way.

Scher lists among the growing threat of domestic terror not just white supremacists and right-wing extremists but “extremist left-wing domestic terrorism” as well. He approvingly cites Adam Schiff’s Confronting The Threat of Terrorism Act, which “creates a definition of domestic terrorism broadly encompassing plots that carry a ‘substantial risk of serious bodily injury’ along with an ‘intent to intimidate or coerce a civilian population’ or ‘influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion.'” The ACLU has unequivocally denounced Schiff’s bill, saying it “would unnecessarily expand law enforcement authorities to target and discriminate against the very communities Congress is seeking to protect.”

<snip>

“FBI intelligence analysts gathered information about possible violence involving the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6., but the FBI never distributed a formal intelligence bulletin, in part because of concerns that doing so might have run afoul of free speech protections, a current and two former senior FBI officials familiar with the matter told NBC News,” the article warns, making sure to inform readers that “experts say the lack of a domestic terrorism statute constrains the FBI from treating far-right and far-left groups the same as Americans who are radicalized to violence by Al Qaeda or ISIS ideology.”

We can expect to see more such articles going forward.

The only way to sincerely believe more Patriot Act-like laws will benefit Americans is to believe that the US will only have wise and beneficent leaders going forward, and the only way to sincerely believe the US will only have wise and beneficent leaders going forward is to be completely shit-eating stupid. The trajectory has already been chosen, and that trajectory is the one that has already given rise to Trump. Continuing along that same trajectory can only give rise to something far uglier, and that something far uglier will have whatever new authoritarian powers are added by Joe Biden.

They’re not actually worried about “domestic terror”, they’re worried about any movement which threatens to topple the status quo. They want to make sure they can adequately spy, infiltrate, agitate and incarcerate into impotence any movement which provides a threat to America’s rulers and the system which funnels them wealth and power at the expense of everyone else. The movements which most threaten this are not rightists, who are generally more or less aligned with the interests of the oligarchic empire, but the left. . . "

Terrorist groups that promote violence should be infiltrated whether or not they are made up of citizens. Citizens groups or individuals have no right to commit violence against other citizens or anybody else. Infiltration does not prevent free speech.
 
GlobalCap is preparing the way to legislate a "domestic terror" law so that the Deep State can infiltrate citizen groups and make freedom of speech and assembly a crime.

It is clear as day to anyone paying attention, that the STATE is at war with the populist left and right, and all you folks do, is argue with each other seeing the other side as the enemy as the state plans to take away your civil rights and civil liberties b/c of the actions of a small minority.

:sigh2:


I have been following this.

With everything we know about how easy, and in fact, how it almost looks like the Senator and Reps. wanted that "storming" to be successful, with some filming showing how the police just let them in;

The four big lies underpinning this story show it was likely a staged event.


. . . and how we now have some evidence that this Q-Anon is in fact a psy-op, and Trump himself has denied from the start having any direct ties to it. . . it would now appear that this was the set up from the start, it was intended from the very beginning to work out this way.

Turning Americans into the enemy of the state, how convenient for those who lord over you when they start really making draconion laws you don't like. . .





Folks should, by now, and see what is happening.

I think making this partisan? Is a disservice.

We are all Americans, we all love our children, our parents, and our freedom and the bill of rights. . . well, most of us anyhow.

Most folks know my mission here on this forum, is to unite the left and the right against our true enemy, (the swamp, the Deep State,) and that was always, ostensibly, what Trump originally claimed too, he just got caught up in D.C. politics because he has an unbelievable frail ego & has the spirit of a fighter.

I think you will find, wise folks on the left, not the neo-liberal corporatists, but the Sanders folks, don't think this is a good idea either.

ACLU Statement Opposing H.R. 4192, Confronting the Threat of Domestic Terrorism Act

"In this letter to the U.S. House Judiciary Committee, the ACLU urged Members to oppose H.R. 4192, Confronting the Threat of Domestic Terrorism Act. By reifying and broadening domestic terrorism authorities, H.R. 4192 would unnecessarily expand law enforcement authorities to target and discriminate against the very communities Congress is seeking to protect. The additional crimes, criminal penalties, and expansion of the death penalty in H.R. 4192 would further incorporate abusive terrorism authorities into a discriminatory criminal justice system.

People of color and other marginalized communities have long been targeted under domestic terrorism authorities for unfair and discriminatory surveillance, investigations, and prosecutions. Law enforcement agencies' use of these authorities undermines and has violated equal protection, due process, and First Amendment rights."



Caitlin Johnson is a real liberal, never cared much for Trump, but had always railed against the Russia Hoax and the Impeachment fraud.

Consent-Manufacturing For Patriot Act II Continues
medium-6.jpg



". . . In a new article for Washington Monthly titled “It’s Time for a Domestic Terrorism Law“, Bill Scher argues against left-wing critics of the coming laws like Glenn Greenwald and Jacobin‘s Luke Savage saying such “knee-jerk reactions” against potential authoritarian abuses fail to address the growing problem. He opens with the acknowledgement that “Joe Biden’s transition team was already working on a domestic terrorism law before the insurrection,” and then he just keeps on writing as though that’s not weird or suspicious in any way.

Scher lists among the growing threat of domestic terror not just white supremacists and right-wing extremists but “extremist left-wing domestic terrorism” as well. He approvingly cites Adam Schiff’s Confronting The Threat of Terrorism Act, which “creates a definition of domestic terrorism broadly encompassing plots that carry a ‘substantial risk of serious bodily injury’ along with an ‘intent to intimidate or coerce a civilian population’ or ‘influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion.'” The ACLU has unequivocally denounced Schiff’s bill, saying it “would unnecessarily expand law enforcement authorities to target and discriminate against the very communities Congress is seeking to protect.”

<snip>

“FBI intelligence analysts gathered information about possible violence involving the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6., but the FBI never distributed a formal intelligence bulletin, in part because of concerns that doing so might have run afoul of free speech protections, a current and two former senior FBI officials familiar with the matter told NBC News,” the article warns, making sure to inform readers that “experts say the lack of a domestic terrorism statute constrains the FBI from treating far-right and far-left groups the same as Americans who are radicalized to violence by Al Qaeda or ISIS ideology.”

We can expect to see more such articles going forward.

The only way to sincerely believe more Patriot Act-like laws will benefit Americans is to believe that the US will only have wise and beneficent leaders going forward, and the only way to sincerely believe the US will only have wise and beneficent leaders going forward is to be completely shit-eating stupid. The trajectory has already been chosen, and that trajectory is the one that has already given rise to Trump. Continuing along that same trajectory can only give rise to something far uglier, and that something far uglier will have whatever new authoritarian powers are added by Joe Biden.

They’re not actually worried about “domestic terror”, they’re worried about any movement which threatens to topple the status quo. They want to make sure they can adequately spy, infiltrate, agitate and incarcerate into impotence any movement which provides a threat to America’s rulers and the system which funnels them wealth and power at the expense of everyone else. The movements which most threaten this are not rightists, who are generally more or less aligned with the interests of the oligarchic empire, but the left. . . "

Terrorist groups that promote violence should be infiltrated whether or not they are made up of citizens. Citizens groups or individuals have no right to commit violence against other citizens or anybody else. Infiltration does not prevent free speech.

You are missing the point.

They aren't terrorists. They are your fellow Americans being excluded by powerful monied interests from meaningful participation in the political process.
 
Federal buildings have been attacked. Federal workers almost murdered. The capitol(not capital) has been broken into a couple times since then. People have been murdered. WHole blocks of cities have been taken over. Have you been in a fuckin coma?

Biden, Pelosi, and the Democrats rushed to brand all Conservatives and Trump Supporters as 'terrorists' and 'threats to our democracy while ignoring Antifa and BLM crimes and violence after the Capitol riot.

Portland is burning again as foreign-funded, Democrat-supported domestic terrorists add to their already hundreds of BILLIONS of dollars worth of damage already resulting from previous 'riots and rage'.

Newly-elected President Biden and Speaker of the House Pelosi her fellow Democrats who seek to Impeach FORMER President Trump AGAIN for 'Incitement of an Insurrection' refuse to condemn the real terrorists and the real threat to our democracy they pose.

The last Democrat to comment on the violence and terrorists was now VP Harris, who declared the "violence will not stop after the election. It SHOULD not stop. WE should not stop", identifying herself as one of them.

** During the last Leftist 'Insurrection' Harris helped raise money to pay the bail of the violent extremists to get them back out on the streets to cause more damage and commit more crimes.
 
GlobalCap is preparing the way to legislate a "domestic terror" law so that the Deep State can infiltrate citizen groups and make freedom of speech and assembly a crime.

It is clear as day to anyone paying attention, that the STATE is at war with the populist left and right, and all you folks do, is argue with each other seeing the other side as the enemy as the state plans to take away your civil rights and civil liberties b/c of the actions of a small minority.

:sigh2:


I have been following this.

With everything we know about how easy, and in fact, how it almost looks like the Senator and Reps. wanted that "storming" to be successful, with some filming showing how the police just let them in;

The four big lies underpinning this story show it was likely a staged event.


. . . and how we now have some evidence that this Q-Anon is in fact a psy-op, and Trump himself has denied from the start having any direct ties to it. . . it would now appear that this was the set up from the start, it was intended from the very beginning to work out this way.

Turning Americans into the enemy of the state, how convenient for those who lord over you when they start really making draconion laws you don't like. . .





Folks should, by now, and see what is happening.

I think making this partisan? Is a disservice.

We are all Americans, we all love our children, our parents, and our freedom and the bill of rights. . . well, most of us anyhow.

Most folks know my mission here on this forum, is to unite the left and the right against our true enemy, (the swamp, the Deep State,) and that was always, ostensibly, what Trump originally claimed too, he just got caught up in D.C. politics because he has an unbelievable frail ego & has the spirit of a fighter.

I think you will find, wise folks on the left, not the neo-liberal corporatists, but the Sanders folks, don't think this is a good idea either.

ACLU Statement Opposing H.R. 4192, Confronting the Threat of Domestic Terrorism Act

"In this letter to the U.S. House Judiciary Committee, the ACLU urged Members to oppose H.R. 4192, Confronting the Threat of Domestic Terrorism Act. By reifying and broadening domestic terrorism authorities, H.R. 4192 would unnecessarily expand law enforcement authorities to target and discriminate against the very communities Congress is seeking to protect. The additional crimes, criminal penalties, and expansion of the death penalty in H.R. 4192 would further incorporate abusive terrorism authorities into a discriminatory criminal justice system.

People of color and other marginalized communities have long been targeted under domestic terrorism authorities for unfair and discriminatory surveillance, investigations, and prosecutions. Law enforcement agencies' use of these authorities undermines and has violated equal protection, due process, and First Amendment rights."



Caitlin Johnson is a real liberal, never cared much for Trump, but had always railed against the Russia Hoax and the Impeachment fraud.

Consent-Manufacturing For Patriot Act II Continues
medium-6.jpg



". . . In a new article for Washington Monthly titled “It’s Time for a Domestic Terrorism Law“, Bill Scher argues against left-wing critics of the coming laws like Glenn Greenwald and Jacobin‘s Luke Savage saying such “knee-jerk reactions” against potential authoritarian abuses fail to address the growing problem. He opens with the acknowledgement that “Joe Biden’s transition team was already working on a domestic terrorism law before the insurrection,” and then he just keeps on writing as though that’s not weird or suspicious in any way.

Scher lists among the growing threat of domestic terror not just white supremacists and right-wing extremists but “extremist left-wing domestic terrorism” as well. He approvingly cites Adam Schiff’s Confronting The Threat of Terrorism Act, which “creates a definition of domestic terrorism broadly encompassing plots that carry a ‘substantial risk of serious bodily injury’ along with an ‘intent to intimidate or coerce a civilian population’ or ‘influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion.'” The ACLU has unequivocally denounced Schiff’s bill, saying it “would unnecessarily expand law enforcement authorities to target and discriminate against the very communities Congress is seeking to protect.”

<snip>

“FBI intelligence analysts gathered information about possible violence involving the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6., but the FBI never distributed a formal intelligence bulletin, in part because of concerns that doing so might have run afoul of free speech protections, a current and two former senior FBI officials familiar with the matter told NBC News,” the article warns, making sure to inform readers that “experts say the lack of a domestic terrorism statute constrains the FBI from treating far-right and far-left groups the same as Americans who are radicalized to violence by Al Qaeda or ISIS ideology.”

We can expect to see more such articles going forward.

The only way to sincerely believe more Patriot Act-like laws will benefit Americans is to believe that the US will only have wise and beneficent leaders going forward, and the only way to sincerely believe the US will only have wise and beneficent leaders going forward is to be completely shit-eating stupid. The trajectory has already been chosen, and that trajectory is the one that has already given rise to Trump. Continuing along that same trajectory can only give rise to something far uglier, and that something far uglier will have whatever new authoritarian powers are added by Joe Biden.

They’re not actually worried about “domestic terror”, they’re worried about any movement which threatens to topple the status quo. They want to make sure they can adequately spy, infiltrate, agitate and incarcerate into impotence any movement which provides a threat to America’s rulers and the system which funnels them wealth and power at the expense of everyone else. The movements which most threaten this are not rightists, who are generally more or less aligned with the interests of the oligarchic empire, but the left. . . "

Terrorist groups that promote violence should be infiltrated whether or not they are made up of citizens. Citizens groups or individuals have no right to commit violence against other citizens or anybody else. Infiltration does not prevent free speech.

You are missing the point.

They aren't terrorists. They are your fellow Americans being excluded by powerful monied interests from meaningful participation in the political process.
I got the point. They are my fellow Americans who became terrorists and who had plenty of participation in the political process. They simply didn't like the results of that process and decided to take matters into their own hands.
 
Looks like an "insurrection" to me. Where are the democrats condemning the violence?
Wake us up when they overrun the US Capitol Building and assault Congress in-session executing its Constitutional duty to certify election results.

Incited by an Orange Baboon-God of a demagogue who was mistakenly granted executive power until his traitorous lack of character triggered his removal.

To the Liberals, Why is the certification of an election in the Capitol so much more important than the safety of the lives of everyday Americans? Ask yourself this, had Trump won and his victory were being certified and ANTIFA busted into the Capitol, would you really show this much concern for the Constitution?
Absolutely! It is not about "who" invaded our Capitol, but "that" they invaded our Capitol. Antifa is no better than that mob of Jan 6, but their choice of spots to destroy is different. Round 'em all up and throw away the key.
 

Forum List

Back
Top