Right vs. Left is Logic vs. Emotion

[Papageorgio]

So now you're saying the "general welfare clause" doesn't say what you previously claimed it did? How interesting.

Please cite for everyone where the Bill of Righfs mentions (and I quote) "what was meant by the general welfare".

The General welfare is General, not major or specific. Any more questions, dear?

Yeah - the general welfare of their explicit 18 enumerated powers, snowflake.

Only in the Republican Doctrine. I am a federalist; my doctrine has not changed, from Inception, that is how good a job real federalists do.

Lol! Not that is funny. Thanks for the laughs!

I was serious. It is not that our Founding Fathers slacked with our supreme law of the land; it is their Posterity that slacked.

Lol! Thanks for posting, you provide a laugh a day! Lol! You are real funny!

 

[P@triot]

I was serious. It is not that our Founding Fathers slacked with our supreme law of the land; it is their Posterity that slacked.

You are proof of that every day...

 

[P@triot]

Yeah - the general welfare of their explicit 18 enumerated powers, snowflake.

Only in the Republican Doctrine. I am a federalist; my doctrine has not changed, from Inception, that is how good a job real federalists do.

No - only in the legal grounds of the U.S. Constitution. Unfortunately for Americans, in the doctrine of the progressives such as yourself, the federal government's powers are whatever you pretend they are.

Thankfully we have real Americans such as Papageorgio standing up every day to protect this nation from you people.

 

[danielpalos]

Yeah - the general welfare of their explicit 18 enumerated powers, snowflake.

Only in the Republican Doctrine. I am a federalist; my doctrine has not changed, from Inception, that is how good a job real federalists do.

No - only in the legal grounds of the U.S. Constitution. Unfortunately for Americans, in the doctrine of the progressives such as yourself, the federal government's powers are whatever you pretend they are.

Thankfully we have real Americans such as Papageorgio standing up every day to protect this nation from you people.

lol. Y'all can't even abolish the drug war, with nothing but repeal.

 

[P@triot]

Y'all can't even abolish the drug war, with nothing but repeal.

Well that's an idiotic comment. The Democrats haven't "abolished the drug war". They haven't even tried. So why would you attempt to call out one side on that?

 

[danielpalos]

Y'all can't even abolish the drug war, with nothing but repeal.

Well that's an idiotic comment. The Democrats haven't "abolished the drug war". They haven't even tried. So why would you attempt to call out one side on that?

The Republicans claim to have a Republican doctrine. They only invoke it to reduce social benefits for the poor, not the rich.

 

[Papageorgio]

Y'all can't even abolish the drug war, with nothing but repeal.

Well that's an idiotic comment. The Democrats haven't "abolished the drug war". They haven't even tried. So why would you attempt to call out one side on that?

The Republicans claim to have a Republican doctrine. They only invoke it to reduce social benefits for the poor, not the rich.

If you can't answer P@triots question, say you can't. No need to divert from the question.

 

[danielpalos]

Y'all can't even abolish the drug war, with nothing but repeal.

Well that's an idiotic comment. The Democrats haven't "abolished the drug war". They haven't even tried. So why would you attempt to call out one side on that?

The Republicans claim to have a Republican doctrine. They only invoke it to reduce social benefits for the poor, not the rich.

If you can't answer P@triots question, say you can't. No need to divert from the question.

The democrats, don't have a Republican doctrine.

 

[Papageorgio]

Y'all can't even abolish the drug war, with nothing but repeal.

Well that's an idiotic comment. The Democrats haven't "abolished the drug war". They haven't even tried. So why would you attempt to call out one side on that?

The Republicans claim to have a Republican doctrine. They only invoke it to reduce social benefits for the poor, not the rich.

If you can't answer P@triots question, say you can't. No need to divert from the question.

The democrats, don't have a Republican doctrine.

So you can't answer the question, thanks for continuing to confirm that you don't know.

 

[danielpalos]

Y'all can't even abolish the drug war, with nothing but repeal.

Well that's an idiotic comment. The Democrats haven't "abolished the drug war". They haven't even tried. So why would you attempt to call out one side on that?

The Republicans claim to have a Republican doctrine. They only invoke it to reduce social benefits for the poor, not the rich.

If you can't answer P@triots question, say you can't. No need to divert from the question.

The democrats, don't have a Republican doctrine.

So you can't answer the question, thanks for continuing to confirm that you don't know.

This is why nobody should ever take the right wing seriously about economics, the law, or morals.

 

[P@triot]

This is why nobody should ever take the right wing seriously about economics, the law, or morals.

Says the progressive who is completely clueless about all three...

 

[danielpalos]

The Republicans claim to have a Republican doctrine. They only invoke it to reduce social benefits for the poor, not the rich.

End the drug to pay for health care, right wingers.

Admit it, y'all Only complain Because the poor may benefit.

 

[P@triot]

The Republicans claim to have a Republican doctrine. They only invoke it to reduce social benefits for the poor, not the rich.

There is a name for those type of Republicans, Danny-boy. They are called liberals.

 

[Papageorgio]

Well that's an idiotic comment. The Democrats haven't "abolished the drug war". They haven't even tried. So why would you attempt to call out one side on that?

The Republicans claim to have a Republican doctrine. They only invoke it to reduce social benefits for the poor, not the rich.

If you can't answer P@triots question, say you can't. No need to divert from the question.

The democrats, don't have a Republican doctrine.

So you can't answer the question, thanks for continuing to confirm that you don't know.

This is why nobody should ever take the right wing seriously about economics, the law, or morals.

It is you that is not being taken seriously in this thread. We are laughing at you and your stupidity. Is that an act or are you really as stupid as you are coming off?

When are you going to answer P@triot's question?

 

[danielpalos]

The Republicans claim to have a Republican doctrine. They only invoke it to reduce social benefits for the poor, not the rich.

There is a name for those type of Republicans, Danny-boy. They are called liberals.

the left calls them, right wingers.

 

[danielpalos]

The Republicans claim to have a Republican doctrine. They only invoke it to reduce social benefits for the poor, not the rich.

If you can't answer P@triots question, say you can't. No need to divert from the question.

The democrats, don't have a Republican doctrine.

So you can't answer the question, thanks for continuing to confirm that you don't know.

This is why nobody should ever take the right wing seriously about economics, the law, or morals.

It is you that is not being taken seriously in this thread. We are laughing at you and your stupidity. Is that an act or are you really as stupid as you are coming off?

When are you going to answer P@triot's question?

Only the clueless and the Causeless, don't take me seriously.

 

[Papageorgio]

If you can't answer P@triots question, say you can't. No need to divert from the question.

The democrats, don't have a Republican doctrine.

So you can't answer the question, thanks for continuing to confirm that you don't know.

This is why nobody should ever take the right wing seriously about economics, the law, or morals.

It is you that is not being taken seriously in this thread. We are laughing at you and your stupidity. Is that an act or are you really as stupid as you are coming off?

When are you going to answer P@triot's question?

Only the clueless and the Causeless, don't take me seriously.

Yeah, that is a real weak comeback there nutter. If anyone is clueless, we all know it is you.

 

[danielpalos]

The democrats, don't have a Republican doctrine.

So you can't answer the question, thanks for continuing to confirm that you don't know.

This is why nobody should ever take the right wing seriously about economics, the law, or morals.

It is you that is not being taken seriously in this thread. We are laughing at you and your stupidity. Is that an act or are you really as stupid as you are coming off?

When are you going to answer P@triot's question?

Only the clueless and the Causeless, don't take me seriously.

Yeah, that is a real weak comeback there nutter. If anyone is clueless, we all know it is you.

The Republicans claim to have a Republican doctrine. They only invoke it to reduce social benefits for the poor, not the rich. How can the right wing justify a War on Drugs that is not in the Republican doctrine?

 

[Papageorgio]

So you can't answer the question, thanks for continuing to confirm that you don't know.

This is why nobody should ever take the right wing seriously about economics, the law, or morals.

It is you that is not being taken seriously in this thread. We are laughing at you and your stupidity. Is that an act or are you really as stupid as you are coming off?

When are you going to answer P@triot's question?

Only the clueless and the Causeless, don't take me seriously.

Yeah, that is a real weak comeback there nutter. If anyone is clueless, we all know it is you.

The Republicans claim to have a Republican doctrine. They only invoke it to reduce social benefits for the poor, not the rich. How can the right wing justify a War on Drugs that is not in the Republican doctrine?

Why hasn't the Democrats stopped the war on drugs? They had a chance to stop the war just after Obama was elected and did nothing, didn't even address the issue. Sorry, the Democrats are empty headed fools that can't take responsibility for their part in the issue. Divert and deflect, is that the Democratic Party's doctrine?

 

[P@triot]

the left calls them, right wingers.

No...the liars call them "right wingers". The world calls them what they are - liberals.