Right to keep and bear arms....

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

why would I go to a gun shop when I dont have to?? their prices are to high,,

The word "don't" has an ' in it, and "to" should be "too". No need for two commas when a period will suffice.

People usually make those kinds of errors when they lie. Which is it?

 

[progressive hunter]

That's why we fill out a 4473...................jeez.


Criminals don't fill out a 4473 usually.

FZ..............now you gone and done it.

I dont fill them out be because I am a constitution supporting american and dont have to,,,,,,

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

I dont fill them out be because I am a constitution supporting american and dont have to,,,,,,

Tell that to the judge! He'll need a good laugh!

 

[Failzero]

youre repeating yourself,,

Your not keeping up

 

[Delldude]

they can interpret not change it,,,

It's their sole authority to render opinions in cases before them. You gotta ***** about their opinions, you should vent your ire on the people bringing the cases before them.

and we are talking about your position against the original intent of the 2nd A not theirs,,

My position is in supporting the Constitution of which they and the second amendment are an integral part of.

once again youre arguing like a leftist not a constitution supporting american,,

I see anybody who doesn't agree with you is a leftist. Commies behind every tree?

I dont fill them out be because I am a constitution supporting american and dont have to,,,,,,

Sounds more and more like you are a law breaker trying to hide behind the second amendment.

 

[progressive hunter]

Your not keeping up

how so??

 

[progressive hunter]

It's their sole authority to render opinions in cases before them. You gotta ***** about their opinions, you should vent your ire on the people bringing the cases before them.


My position is in supporting the Constitution of which they and the second amendment are an integral part of.

I see anybody who doesn't agree with you is a leftist. Commies behind every tree?

Sounds more and more like you are a law breaker trying to hide behind the second amendment.

exactly "OPINIONS"

opinion isnt the way you change the constitution,,

god forbid I stand behind the constitution in favor of my rights,,
I must be a criminal,, NOT!!

this is one more example of you not supporting the 2nd A,,


why are you using leftist talking points and tactics??

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

exactly "OPINIONS"

opinion isnt the way you change the constitution,,

this is one more example of you not supporting the 2nd A,,

SCOTUS opinions have the force of law, dumbass!

 

[Failzero]

how so??

I say there should be Prohibited Persons , you agree , then rail about “ not be infringed “

 

[Delldude]

exactly "OPINIONS"

An interpretation which is the law of the land after it is rendered.

opinion isnt the way you change the constitution,,

Nobody is changing the Constitution.........just interpreting it and applying the interpretation as law.

this is one more example of you not supporting the 2nd A,,

You're in way over your head.

 

[progressive hunter]

I say there should be Prohibited Persons , you agree , then rail about “ not be infringed “

I am not railing against that,,

I am railing against the infringements applied to law abiding people,,

prohibited people dont care about laws and will get guns other ways that dont involve filling out paper work,,

if you want a law that forces prohibited people to fill out forms I am OK with that,,

 

[progressive hunter]

An interpretation which is the law of the land after it is rendered.


Nobody is changing the Constitution.........just interpreting it and applying the interpretation as law.


You're in way over your head.

another example of how you dont support the 2nd A,,

please continue mr leftist,,

 

[Delldude]

legally abiding the 2nd A means you have NO INFRINGMENTS, but you said we must accept some infringements,,
which is you admitting you dont support the 2nd A,, AGAIN!!

There are Prohibited Persons ( I’m OK with that )

for the most part so am I,,

but I dont see what that has to do with infringing on my right to keep and bear arms as protecting by the 2nd A,,

You just admitted you don't support 2A because you're ok with infringing on peoples rights......people....not all prohibited persons are criminals either.

I say there should be Prohibited Persons , you agree , then rail about “ not be infringed “

I am not railing against that,,

You just admitted you don't support 2A because you're ok with infringing on peoples rights......people....not all prohibited persons are criminals either.

another example of how you dont support the 2nd A,,

Dude, you are a self admitted 2A hypocrite.

 

[progressive hunter]

You just admitted you don't support 2A because you're ok with infringing on peoples rights......people....not all prohibited persons are criminals either.




You just admitted you don't support 2A because you're ok with infringing on peoples rights......people....not all prohibited persons are criminals either.



Dude, you are a self admitted 2A hypocrite.

how am I a hypocrite??

if its what I think did you consider our 5th amendment rights??

 

[marvin martian]

^ now this mother ****** loves to lie or make shit up.

You don't know what constitutional carry is, and expect us to believe you're American?

LOL

 

[Failzero]

You don't know what constitutional carry is, and expect us to believe you're American?

LOL

It’s known as RTC to some of us also

 

[Delldude]

how am I a hypocrite??

Rambling on about my statement on limited infringements then you come out and agree limited infingements are ok for prohibited persons.

But but but......

That's the definition of a hypocrite.

 

[progressive hunter]

Rambling on about my statement on limited infringements then you come out and agree limited infingements are ok for prohibited persons.

But but but......

That's the definition of a hypocrite.

the 2nd A says SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED",,

that means no infringements,,

if you also look at the 5th amendment is says you can loose rights through due process,,

so since prohibited person loose rights through due process that doesnt violate the 2nd A,,
ie,, no hypocrisy

anything else stupid you want to say??

 

[Delldude]

the 2nd A says SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED",,

that means no infringements,,

if you also look at the 5th amendment is says you can loose rights through due process,,

so since prohibited person loose rights through due process that doesnt violate the 2nd A,,
ie,, no hypocrisy

anything else stupid you want to say??

But but but but.......

Cut the bullshit. You're still a hypocrite.

Have a nice evening.... Happy New Year

 

[progressive hunter]

But but but but.......

Cut the bullshit. You're still a hypocrite.

Have a nice evening.... Happy New Year

but but but the constitution,,

you are free to walk me through it how I am wrong and our rights cant be taken away using due process as per the 5th amendment