Riddle me this:

[GMCGeneral]

Do the resident Leftists here really think that America would be much better off with them exclusively in charge? IOW zero Republican/Conservative representation or governance?

 

[Confederate Soldier]

Well of course they do, each party thinks this way. Nearly every person on this board thinks America would run better with their party in power only.

 

[Votto]

Do the resident Leftists here really think that America would be much better off with them exclusively in charge? IOW zero Republican/Conservative representation or governance?

You mean like now?

 

[rightwinger]

Bipartisan leadership works best when you have bipartisanship

In the absence of parties working to reach common ground, complete leadership from one party is the best alternative.

Since Republicans have no agenda for our country, Democrats are the best option

 

[Mac1958]

It would be a terrible idea. Both ridiculous parties need the other ridiculous party to keep them in check.

The problem is that, since we've become so tribal, the parties aren't allowed to work together so that they both have skin in the game, and so that we can come up with some NEW IDEAS together.

It's like a reverse tug of war: Both parties are doing everything they can to push the rest of us away, instead of pulling us in.

 

[BULLDOG]

Depends. It worked fairly well when the repubs still had integrity,and cared more about the good of the country than the good of their party. Since the crazy extreme MAGAs have consumed the republican party, they shouldn't be allowed anywhere near the governance of our country.

 

[occupied]

That's not what anyone wants. Don't be ridiculous.

 

[TNHarley]

Fuck that. 24/7 gridlock all the way!
The less those ridiculous fuckers do in DC, the better off we are.

 

[White 6]

Do the resident Leftists here really think that America would be much better off with them exclusively in charge? IOW zero Republican/Conservative representation or governance?

Independents don't. There needs to be a balancing side. Too bad, the loudest nut-balls in the house and senate are just loudmouth attention seeking assholes, more about party than country in that trumpist corrupted party, with few (if any) actual conservative legislators, left after their primary purges to support party populism.

 

[strollingbones]

yes

 

[strollingbones]

That's not what anyone wants. Don't be ridiculous.

i am good with it i dont care for traitors who are trying to take my rights...

 

[occupied]

i am good with it i dont care for traitors who are trying to take my rights...

I'd be OK if they just started dealing in good faith.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Do the resident Leftists here really think that America would be much better off with them exclusively in charge? IOW zero Republican/Conservative representation or governance?

Not really a leftist but I would say yes if you are referring to the Trump portion of the Republican party. Traditional Republicans however is a different story.

 

[fncceo]

Since Republicans have no agenda for our country, Democrats are the best option

Unless, of course, you have a problem with the Democrats agenda.

Shitting the bed is not preferable to not shitting the bed.

 

[GMCGeneral]

Not really a leftist but I would say yes if you are referring to the Trump portion of the Republican party. Traditional Republicans however is a different story.

You mean mealymouthed RINOs who arw not conservative at all.

 

[1srelluc]

At this point I'd prefer a strongman just to see how it works out.

 

[GMCGeneral]

yes

Nice of you to admit, Bolshevik scumbag.

 

[GMCGeneral]

That's not what anyone wants. Don't be ridiculous.

Sure it is. You suckhole Communists want norhing more than zero opposition to your sick diseased agenda.

 

[GMCGeneral]

Depends. It worked fairly well when the repubs still had integrity,and cared more about the good of the country than the good of their party. Since the crazy extreme MAGAs have consumed the republican party, they shouldn't be allowed anywhere near the governance of our country.

You mean when the RINOs agree with the enemy. That's your definition of integrity.

 

[occupied]

Sure it is. You suckhole Communists want norhing more than zero opposition to your sick diseased agenda.

Ever heard of something called a "strawman argument"? Apparently not.