Riddle Me This AGW Cult

[CrusaderFrank]

Scientists have found trees under the ice in both the Arctic (2,300 years old) and in the Antarctic (4MM years old).

How is that possible?

If all that ice melted, wouldn't these tree be under 300 feet of water?

 

[konradv]

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Underwater trees, right?

Antarctica bombshell: Four-million-year-old discovery stuns scientist – ‘Phenomenal!’

Receding Swiss glaciers incoveniently reveal 4000 year old forests – and make it clear that glacier retreat is nothing new

 

[CrusaderFrank]

No answer

"Shocked, I'm not," said Master Yoda

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Well science deniers, how do you answer?

 

[Crepitus]

Can't seem to find anything about it.

Link to something that isn't a denier website?

 

[Confounding]

Link to something that isn't a denier website?

LOL!

You ask far too much.

 

[Confounding]

Hey science deniers, want to know who would prove AGW false if that were the case? Scientists, the same kinds you call liars and frauds for saying it's true.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Can't seem to find anything about it.

Link to something that isn't a denier website?

230 feet just from the Arctic melt...lol. Do any AGW predictions ever come true?

 

[Crepitus]

Can't seem to find anything about it.

Link to something that isn't a denier website?

230 feet just from the Arctic melt...lol. Do any AGW predictions ever come true?

How is that pertinent to my post?

Got that link?

 

[DOTR]

Scientists have found trees under the ice in both the Arctic (2,300 years old) and in the Antarctic (4MM years old).

How is that possible?

If all that ice melted, wouldn't these tree be under 300 feet of water?

She is changing her brake fluid.. Actually I would look at the AOC parody account for her but Twitter has stepped in and banned it. Parody is dangerous to them because at times it was damn hard to figure out what she was really supporting. Most of her positions look like parody..

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Can't seem to find anything about it.

Link to something that isn't a denier website?

230 feet just from the Arctic melt...lol. Do any AGW predictions ever come true?

How is that pertinent to my post?

Got that link?

Post #3 had the links. I just skipped to the end of the debate knowing you have no valid, on point response

 

[Crepitus]

Can't seem to find anything about it.

Link to something that isn't a denier website?

230 feet just from the Arctic melt...lol. Do any AGW predictions ever come true?

How is that pertinent to my post?

Got that link?

Post #3 had the links. I just skipped to the end of the debate knowing you have no valid, on point response

Links from places other than denier websites. I looked at those and found them wanting.

 

[karpenter]

Are Climate Change 'Facts'
From AGW Proponent Sites Unacceptable Then ??

 

[edthecynic]

Scientists have found trees under the ice in both the Arctic (2,300 years old) and in the Antarctic (4MM years old).

How is that possible?

It is "possible" only because it is a big fat LIE, as you well know!
Here is what your OWN link actually says, "discovery of 4,000-year-old chunks of wood at the leading edge of a Swiss glacier."
That's right, no trees, no forests only a few CHUNKS of driftwood.
Damn you idiots are desperate.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Can't seem to find anything about it.

Link to something that isn't a denier website?

230 feet just from the Arctic melt...lol. Do any AGW predictions ever come true?

How is that pertinent to my post?

Got that link?

Post #3 had the links. I just skipped to the end of the debate knowing you have no valid, on point response

Links from places other than denier websites. I looked at those and found them wanting.

Your hurt feelings are not science

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Scientists have found trees under the ice in both the Arctic (2,300 years old) and in the Antarctic (4MM years old).

How is that possible?

It is "possible" only because it is a big fat LIE, as you well know!
Here is what your OWN link actually says, "discovery of 4,000-year-old chunks of wood at the leading edge of a Swiss glacier."
That's right, no trees, no forests only a few CHUNKS of driftwood.
Damn you idiots are desperate.

So the "driftwood" drilled its way under the ice 4,000 years ago?

What are you trying to say?

 

[Crepitus]

Can't seem to find anything about it.

Link to something that isn't a denier website?

230 feet just from the Arctic melt...lol. Do any AGW predictions ever come true?

How is that pertinent to my post?

Got that link?

Post #3 had the links. I just skipped to the end of the debate knowing you have no valid, on point response

Links from places other than denier websites. I looked at those and found them wanting.

Your hurt feelings are not science

What hurt feelings?

Are you projecting again? We've talked about this Frank, what you feel has nothing to do with what I feel.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

230 feet just from the Arctic melt...lol. Do any AGW predictions ever come true?

How is that pertinent to my post?

Got that link?

Post #3 had the links. I just skipped to the end of the debate knowing you have no valid, on point response

Links from places other than denier websites. I looked at those and found them wanting.

Your hurt feelings are not science

What hurt feelings?

Are you projecting again? We've talked about this Frank, what you feel has nothing to do with what I feel.

You don't like the sites that reported wood found under Arctic and Antarctic. I can't help you with that

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Mummified Forest Found on Treeless Arctic Island

So, once again, if there was no ice in the Arctic, the sea level was supposed to be 200 to 250 feet higher.

See the problem?