driveby
Gold Member
- Sep 6, 2008
- 8,848
- 2,339
- 183
How cow that was great!
You go Rick Sanchez.
The very last thing he said after spanking Fox...
two word.....YOU LIE.
Freaking outstanding.
Cheerleading a drunk driving murderer, outstanding ......
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How cow that was great!
You go Rick Sanchez.
The very last thing he said after spanking Fox...
two word.....YOU LIE.
Freaking outstanding.
How cow that was great!
You go Rick Sanchez.
The very last thing he said after spanking Fox...
two word.....YOU LIE.
Freaking outstanding.
Cheerleading a drunk driving murderer, outstanding ......
FOX doesn't cover GOP and related news. FOX promotes it. That is the difference. FOX is not a news station. It is a marketing station. They should be listed as "Paid Programming" in the TV listings. Their job is to promote GOP ideals.
"Fair and Balanced" as long as it doesn't conflict with republican principles.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=35eRxxZ-Ar0&feature=PlayList&p=2C93EE912FAA6DCB&index=0&playnext=1]YouTube - 100 Days of "Fair & Balanced"[/ame]
Video: Glenn Beck's Operation | The Daily Show | Comedy Central
This video pretty much sums up Fox News ^
How cow that was great!
You go Rick Sanchez.
The very last thing he said after spanking Fox...
two word.....YOU LIE.
Freaking outstanding.
Cheerleading a drunk driving murderer, outstanding ......

He reminds me of a bobble-head toy.
Having said that, his piece is strictly a smear piece, purely opinion, and not news at all. He's a hack.
He reminds me of a bobble-head toy.
Having said that, his piece is strictly a smear piece, purely opinion, and not news at all. He's a hack.
Hmm, maybe this is the issue. Some people are no longer able to tell what is fact and what is fiction.
You see, a "smear" piece indicates a lie being spread by the story. This man was not lying, he was showing proof to defend himself and his organization against a vicious lie spread by FoxNews.
Fact: FoxNews bought ads in major newspapers claiming that CNN specifically DID NOT COVER the "Tea Party" event.
Fact: Rick Sanchez specifically ran CNN coverage of CNN covering the "Tea Party" event.
Therefore FoxNews lied, not Rick Sanchez.
Therefore FoxNews is responsible for "running a smear campaign", not Rick Sanchez or CNN.
Therefore FoxNews needs to apologize to CNN for it's slanderous statement.
He reminds me of a bobble-head toy.
Having said that, his piece is strictly a smear piece, purely opinion, and not news at all. He's a hack.
Hmm, maybe this is the issue. Some people are no longer able to tell what is fact and what is fiction.
You see, a "smear" piece indicates a lie being spread by the story. This man was not lying, he was showing proof to defend himself and his organization against a vicious lie spread by FoxNews.
Fact: FoxNews bought ads in major newspapers claiming that CNN specifically DID NOT COVER the "Tea Party" event.
Fact: Rick Sanchez specifically ran CNN coverage of CNN covering the "Tea Party" event.
Therefore FoxNews lied, not Rick Sanchez.
Therefore FoxNews is responsible for "running a smear campaign", not Rick Sanchez or CNN.
Therefore FoxNews needs to apologize to CNN for it's slanderous statement.
He reminds me of a bobble-head toy.
Having said that, his piece is strictly a smear piece, purely opinion, and not news at all. He's a hack.
Hmm, maybe this is the issue. Some people are no longer able to tell what is fact and what is fiction.
You see, a "smear" piece indicates a lie being spread by the story. This man was not lying, he was showing proof to defend himself and his organization against a vicious lie spread by FoxNews.
Fact: FoxNews bought ads in major newspapers claiming that CNN specifically DID NOT COVER the "Tea Party" event.
Fact: Rick Sanchez specifically ran CNN coverage of CNN covering the "Tea Party" event.
Therefore FoxNews lied, not Rick Sanchez.
Therefore FoxNews is responsible for "running a smear campaign", not Rick Sanchez or CNN.
Therefore FoxNews needs to apologize to CNN for it's slanderous statement.
Listen to him again, nutsack. He makes supposition after supposition. Not one fact. He surmises on what Fox is "trying" to say, which is of course his OPINION, not a fact.
This is the frustrating thing about the left. I could explain the difference between "opinion" and "fact" to you all night long. You are incapable of understanding it. Just as you are incapable of discerning NEWS from EDITORIAL.
The very last thing he said after spanking Fox...
two word.....YOU LIE.
Freaking outstanding.
Cheerleading a drunk driving murderer, outstanding ......
Even a drunk driving murderer can be right about something.
The very last thing he said after spanking Fox...
two word.....YOU LIE.
Freaking outstanding.
Cheerleading a drunk driving murderer, outstanding ......
i didnt mention Beck.![]()
yes he was, it wasnt even the same angleIf Sanchez is wrong about that Camera shot on the video being from CNN that makes him an idiot and a liar too. Is it really about lying or poor research, coupled with assumption?
Care to restate that so it makes sense? Sanchez wasn't lying about the camera shot.
He reminds me of a bobble-head toy.
Having said that, his piece is strictly a smear piece, purely opinion, and not news at all. He's a hack.
Hmm, maybe this is the issue. Some people are no longer able to tell what is fact and what is fiction.
You see, a "smear" piece indicates a lie being spread by the story. This man was not lying, he was showing proof to defend himself and his organization against a vicious lie spread by FoxNews.
Fact: FoxNews bought ads in major newspapers claiming that CNN specifically DID NOT COVER the "Tea Party" event.
Fact: Rick Sanchez specifically ran CNN coverage of CNN covering the "Tea Party" event.
Therefore FoxNews lied, not Rick Sanchez.
Therefore FoxNews is responsible for "running a smear campaign", not Rick Sanchez or CNN.
Therefore FoxNews needs to apologize to CNN for it's slanderous statement.
Listen to him again, nutsack. He makes supposition after supposition. Not one fact. He surmises on what Fox is "trying" to say, which is of course his OPINION, not a fact.
This is the frustrating thing about the left. I could explain the difference between "opinion" and "fact" to you all night long. You are incapable of understanding it. Just as you are incapable of discerning NEWS from EDITORIAL.
Cheerleading a drunk driving murderer, outstanding ......
Even a drunk driving murderer can be right about something.
True, but to have that person preaching to everyone about right and wrong is questionable at best.......
you call 3 or 4 little snippets COVERING?Is Rick Sanchez now the first Hispanic pwner of a major cable news station?
Even a drunk driving murderer can be right about something.
True, but to have that person preaching to everyone about right and wrong is questionable at best.......
Who better than a reformed sinner to tell about right and wrong?
But in this case the person's character doesn't matter. If someone is producing evidence that stands by itself, that is it's not a product of the person but exists of and by itself, then the character of the producer of the evidence - in the sense of presenting the evidence, not creating it - is irrelevant to the proof value of the evidence.
you call 3 or 4 little snippets COVERING?
you call 3 or 4 little snippets COVERING?
I guess you missed the live stream that CNN.com had on all day.
Now let me ask you this Dive, when all these Iraq War protests were going on before the election in 2004, was Fox News covering them all day?
Just because CNN wasn't doing live coverage on it's television show throughout the entire day and because they realized there was actually other news to cover going on doesn't mean they didn't cover it.
They interviewed several people, and had 4 different reporters there.
