Wait -- Obama is better than Bush yet . . . . Obama is Bush on steroids. How can Obama be better when he's worse?
And now Perry is Bush on steroids? So does that make Perry better than Bush or better than Obama? Or is that worse?
It's gonna be a long year.
You present with empty opinions. You say Obama is Bush on steroids. Now tell us in specifically what way.
I said Perry is Bush on steroids because he is another cowboy
emulation. The same white hat, cowboy boots and brush-clearing bullshit, except that Perry is a real Texan whereas Bush is a Connecticut Yankee with an affected Texas accent.
Bush was Governor of Texas, so is Perry. Perry even resembles Bush. So I see them as being cut from the same cloth -- except that Perry is a much thicker cut.
Now how is Obama like Bush?
Bush spent like a madman . . . two unfunded wars, Medicare part D, etc.
Obama is spending like a madman. He's added how much to the debt in what, 2 1/2 years?
If Bush sucked and Obama is a third term Bush . . then wouldn't it stand to reason that Obama sucks? Yes, yes it would.
Drawing parallels between Perry and Bush because each were/are Gov of Texas and you liken them to white-hat-wearing-cowboys? Oh, that's a nifty reason to give someone a yea or nay.
I'm going to research how Perry governs and his stance on things before forming an opinion.