is pro life but would not work to overturn Roe v Wade
But will appoint judges and justices who would.
is pro unalienable rights and personal freedoms as the Constitution intended
is pro states rights
These two are a possible conflict, as states are subject to Federal law per the Supremacy Clause and at least half a dozen Supreme Court rulings. State and local jurisdictions are notorious violators of civil rights – does Perry understand this and will he appoint judges and justices who understand it as well.
Provided he understands Federal law requires provisional ballots for those without an ID.
would repeal Obamacare as quickly as could be done and promote real reforms that would push healthcare costs to more affordable levels.
Only the Legislative branch is empowered by the Constitution to repeal laws, not the Executive.
pro sealing the border, making sanctuary states/cities illegal, denying all but immediate humanitarian assistance to illegals, and pro temporary legal work programs.
Depending on the details, this may run afoul of the Constitution, as per
Plyler illegal immigrants are entitled to basic equal protection and due process rights, in accordance with the 14th Amendment.
The rest are moot non-issues for various reasons, meaningless rightwing talking points.
Rick Perry is a Dominionist. If he's elected, we can kiss religious freedom and separation of church and state goodbye.
The very best insurance to protect religious freedom in this country is to put Christian conservatives into power.
Your both off the mark – Perry himself can do nothing directly; what’s of concern, however, is the type of jurists he appoints to the courts and justices to the High Court. If he does as GWB did and appoints radical rightwing ideologue to the Court, yes, we may see some fundamental liberties threatened accordingly, Establishment Clause issues in particular.