Richard Nixon…The Communist???

[PoliticalChic]

Why do you fools use that 'so you are saying...' rather than quoting what I do say?

Brevity is not your strong suit.

Did Obama form a kill list?

Did the imposition of same result in some 2,000 innocent human being being killed?

Is this totally in line with Mao's behavior?

Are you ready to admit that you are merely one more lying sack of offal??????

Yet again you have failed to show how Obama is any different from any other president in history so why do you focus your anger on him? Are you ready to answer or are you merely one more hypocritical sack of offal??????

PS, I like the way you trust a Pakistani politician more than you trust the US military and intel agencies. You're quite the patriot, I'm just not sure for which country.

"Yet again you have failed to show blah blah blah...."


Every reader recognizes what a low-life lying Liberal you are.


Go away.

 

[Gdjjr]

Every reader recognizes what a low-life lying Liberal you are.

The founders were Liberals- conservatives are status quo (and were even in the days of our founding) since that is political speak for to keep- the root of conserve-
That people accept just 2 choices doesn't equate to being astute- it equates to being fooled- evil is evil, less or more is immaterial- being fooled is on the Individual NOT being astute-

 

[PoliticalChic]

Every reader recognizes what a low-life lying Liberal you are.

The founders were Liberals- conservatives are status quo (and were even in the days of our founding) since that is political speak for to keep- the root of conserve-
That people accept just 2 choices doesn't equate to being astute- it equates to being fooled- evil is evil, less or more is immaterial- being fooled is on the Individual NOT being astute-

"The founders were Liberals"

You couldn't be more wrong.


The Founders were classical liberals....what are called conservatives today.


Communist John Dewey prevailed on the Socialist Party to change its name to 'Liberal.'


"...[John] Dewey arguably did more than any other reformer to repackage progressive social theory in a way that obscured just how radically its principles departed from those of the American founding. Like Ely and many of his fellow progressive academics, Dewey initially embraced the term “socialism” to describe his social theory. Only after realizing how damaging the name was to the socialist cause did he, like other progressives, begin to avoid it. In the early 1930s, accordingly, Dewey begged the Socialist party, of which he was a longtime member, to change its name. “The greatest handicap from which special measures favored by the Socialists suffer,” Dewey declared, “is that they are advanced by the Socialist party as Socialism. The prejudice against the name may be a regrettable prejudice but its influence is so powerful that it is much more reasonable to imagine all but the most dogmatic Socialists joining a new party than to imagine any considerable part of the American people going over to them.” Dewey’s influential 1935 tract, Liberalism and Social Action, should be read in the light of this." The Refounding of America | National Review

 

[alang1216]

Every reader recognizes what a low-life lying Liberal you are.

Yet another lie, I bet not EVERY reader recognizes what a low-life lying Liberal I am. Or did you take a poll rather than just make up a statistic?

A more accurate statement would be: I'm sure there are readers who fail to see that you duck and dodge any question that might prove difficult to answer solely on your ideological biases.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Every reader recognizes what a low-life lying Liberal you are.

Yet another lie, I bet not EVERY reader recognizes what a low-life lying Liberal I am. Or did you take a poll rather than just make up a statistic?

A more accurate statement would be: I'm sure there are readers who fail to see that you duck and dodge any question that might prove difficult to answer solely on your ideological biases.

Was this your quote?

“You neglected to pay homage to the GOP's Richard Nixon, the man who opened the door and allowed China to enter the Western world. He actually met and paid homage to Mao.”
A Christmas Celebration For Democrats


Is he correct in suggesting that Republican Nixon was ‘infatuated’ with the homicidal psychopath, as Democrat Obama is????

 

[irosie91]

I am no Nixon fan BUT he was desperate to open a line of
communication with China------not in love with Mao

 

[Gdjjr]

he Founders were classical liberals....what are called conservatives today.

Classical Liberals-

To Conserve is to keep- status quo is political speak for to keep- today, schmoday- words mean things or there's no use pretending to use them to your advantage or disadvantage whichever the case may be- bastardizing words is just that- illegitimate, or in "today's" vernacular, *appropriating*- those who opposed the Founders were Conservative in their beliefs- The Founders were of the enlightenment age of study which were Liberal ideas of the day- they subscribed to the liberal philosophy of; all men are created equal and have certain unalienable rights- conservatives subscribed to a King, or ruler, having the authority over everyone and everything, i.e., the status quo.

 

[alang1216]

Every reader recognizes what a low-life lying Liberal you are.

Yet another lie, I bet not EVERY reader recognizes what a low-life lying Liberal I am. Or did you take a poll rather than just make up a statistic?

A more accurate statement would be: I'm sure there are readers who fail to see that you duck and dodge any question that might prove difficult to answer solely on your ideological biases.

Was this your quote?

“You neglected to pay homage to the GOP's Richard Nixon, the man who opened the door and allowed China to enter the Western world. He actually met and paid homage to Mao.”
A Christmas Celebration For Democrats


Is he correct in suggesting that Republican Nixon was ‘infatuated’ with the homicidal psychopath, as Democrat Obama is????

What I'm suggesting is that neither was ‘infatuated’ with Mao, only that they were both doing their job as president by trying to improve relations with China.

 

[PoliticalChic]

he Founders were classical liberals....what are called conservatives today.

Classical Liberals-

To Conserve is to keep- status quo is political speak for to keep- today, schmoday- words mean things or there's no use pretending to use them to your advantage or disadvantage whichever the case may be- bastardizing words is just that- illegitimate, or in "today's" vernacular, *appropriating*- those who opposed the Founders were Conservative in their beliefs- The Founders were of the enlightenment age of study which were Liberal ideas of the day- they subscribed to the liberal philosophy of; all men are created equal and have certain unalienable rights- conservatives subscribed to a King, or ruler, having the authority over everyone and everything, i.e., the status quo.

Did you miss the point?

What you call 'Liberals' are the 'Socialist Party.'

"How Socialist John Dewey Switched Labels
by Jim Peron

1. Pity the poor liberal. And I mean the real liberal. Not the modern watered-down socialist who calls himself a liberal but a real, honest, classical liberal. There is so much confusion over the term and real liberals have allowed fake liberals to get away with this subtle destruction of the language.
2. The classical liberals proposed laissez faire and this led to prosperity. The economics of 19th century liberalism brought about a major increase in the standard of living of all people. Thus real liberalism produced the effects which socialists dreamed their system would provide.
   1. Many socialists wanted prosperity and thought socialism would lead to such results faster than classical liberalism. But at the same time many socialists saw their ideology as a means of grabbing power for themselves and it was the power, not the promised prosperity, which attracted them.
3. [Socialists] knew that liberalism had a good reputation with the working classes — the very audience which they were targeting. The idea was to adopt the name liberal to describe socialism. Socialism, as socialism, was harder to sell. But by taking a name they did not deserve they felt they could make political gains on the backs of classical liberalism. And they did.
4. In the United States, where liberalism most clearly reversed its meaning, in common parlance, it was the socialist John Dewey who openly promoted the idea of stealing the liberal label. Dewey, in his book Individualism Old and New argued that liberal individualism had in fact disappeared and been replaced by state capitalism and that collectivism already existed in America.
   1. But he noted the collectivism of that day was a “collectivism of profit” and not a “collectivism of planning”. He said the only way liberalism could return to its true meaning was to adopt socialism as the means by which liberal goals would be achieved. As he put it central economic planning was “the sole method of social action by which liberalism can realize its professed aims.”
5. Peter Witonski, in his essay The Historical Roots of American Planning said: “Dewey was the first to argue that the world ‘liberal’—which once stood for liberal, free-market capitalism—could better serve the needs of social democracy in America than the world ‘socialism’.
   1. The liberalism of Adam Smith was out-of-date Dewey argued.” In his book Liberalism and Social Action, Dewey suggested that the goals of a free society could best be obtained “only by a reversal of the means to which early liberalism was committed.” But the means of liberalism were fundamentally connected to the basic premises of liberalism. A reversal of means, while keeping similar goals in mind, also changed the premises of liberalism. The “new wisdom” of Keynes with the “reversal of means” of Dewey really meant stealing the name of liberalism and applying it to another very different species. The famed economist Joseph Schumpeter noted that “the enemies of private enterprise have thought it wise to appropriate its label.”
6. Today a great deal of confusion reigns because socialists decided to deceptively call their own ideology liberal. And, to a very large degree, the academics who wrote the recent texts on liberalism were socialists. Hence they were quite willing to pretend that socialism was a modern form of classical liberalism.
7. [Classical] liberal describes individuals supporting free markets, private property, profit management and limited governments. o-called “liberals” support socialism, state ownership, bureaucratic management and statism. "
   

http://orlingrabbe.com/lfetimes/liberal_confusion.htm

Democracy & free markets vs socialism

http://forum.rottentomatoes.com/topic/show/1369713?page=2

 

[MisterBeale]

Error | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

I must wonder if you actually read any of the posts in this thread.

It appears you are agreeing with the dunce who claimed that Nixon and Obama are the same vis-a-vis Mao and Communism.


1.In a recent thread,

A Christmas Celebration For Democrats,

...a thread that established proof of Obama’s infatuation with Mao Zedong, and that Hussein had no problem finding similar views in other Democrats, it appears to have….aggravated…some government school grad.

Unable to dispute the facts therein, the government school grad found this to be his best camouflage:

“You neglected to pay homage to the GOP's Richard Nixon, the man who opened the door and allowed China to enter the Western world. He actually met and paid homage to Mao.”
A Christmas Celebration For Democrats


Is he correct in suggesting that Republican Nixon was ‘infatuated’ with the homicidal psychopath, as Democrat Obama is????





I expect more from you.

You are an ideologue PoliticalChic. You are the precisely who Quigely is referring to when he refers to as the "doctrinaire and academic thinkers."

Your posts do more to divide the little people of this nation than unite us in common cause. You don't help to SOLVE problems, you only serve the interests of the economic and cultural elites. i.e. DIVIDE AND CONQUER.

I don't expect anymore from you.

You are right, I don't read most of your posts. You believe, if someone is from the left, or a Democrat, their ideas or thoughts are not worthy of consideration. What foolishness.

I judge a person by their honesty and integrity, not whether I agree with their political ideas. Very few folks in D.C. have integrity and honesty. If they are found to be UN-corruptable? They are drummed out of that town, and IT DOES NOT MATTER WHICH PARTY THEY ARE IN.

OTH, if they are successful there? YOU CAN BET, they are garbage.

You and I not alike at all.

 

[Gdjjr]

Did you miss the point?

No, you missed mine- LOL bastardizing words is just that- illegitimate.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Every reader recognizes what a low-life lying Liberal you are.

Yet another lie, I bet not EVERY reader recognizes what a low-life lying Liberal I am. Or did you take a poll rather than just make up a statistic?

A more accurate statement would be: I'm sure there are readers who fail to see that you duck and dodge any question that might prove difficult to answer solely on your ideological biases.

Was this your quote?

“You neglected to pay homage to the GOP's Richard Nixon, the man who opened the door and allowed China to enter the Western world. He actually met and paid homage to Mao.”
A Christmas Celebration For Democrats


Is he correct in suggesting that Republican Nixon was ‘infatuated’ with the homicidal psychopath, as Democrat Obama is????

What I'm suggesting is that neither was ‘infatuated’ with Mao, only that they were both doing their job as president by trying to improve relations with China.

The good news about the hole you’re digging for yourself is that your grave is already halfway done!



Your lies are getting more and more flimsy.


You tried to claim Nixon was as infatuated with Mao and Communism as Hussein.

Now you've advancing the apocryphal tale that putting a Mao ornament on America's Christmas Tree is doing his presidential job....

.....and the Obama claim that communism and capitalism are the same is the President's job....




Believe me, I don't want to make a monkey out of you. Why should I take all the credit?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Error | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

I must wonder if you actually read any of the posts in this thread.

It appears you are agreeing with the dunce who claimed that Nixon and Obama are the same vis-a-vis Mao and Communism.


1.In a recent thread,

A Christmas Celebration For Democrats,

...a thread that established proof of Obama’s infatuation with Mao Zedong, and that Hussein had no problem finding similar views in other Democrats, it appears to have….aggravated…some government school grad.

Unable to dispute the facts therein, the government school grad found this to be his best camouflage:

“You neglected to pay homage to the GOP's Richard Nixon, the man who opened the door and allowed China to enter the Western world. He actually met and paid homage to Mao.”
A Christmas Celebration For Democrats


Is he correct in suggesting that Republican Nixon was ‘infatuated’ with the homicidal psychopath, as Democrat Obama is????





I expect more from you.

You are an ideologue PoliticalChic. You are the precisely who Quigely is referring to when he refers to as the "doctrinaire and academic thinkers."

Your posts do more to divide the little people of this nation than unite us in common cause. You don't help to SOLVE problems, you only serve the interests of the economic and cultural elites. i.e. DIVIDE AND CONQUER.

I don't expect anymore from you.

You are right, I don't read most of your posts. You believe, if someone is from the left, or a Democrat, their ideas or thoughts are not worthy of consideration. What foolishness.

I judge a person by their honesty and integrity, not whether I agree with their political ideas. Very few folks in D.C. have integrity and honesty. If they are found to be UN-corruptable? They are drummed out of that town, and IT DOES NOT MATTER WHICH PARTY THEY ARE IN.

OTH, if they are successful there? YOU CAN BET, they are garbage.

You and I not alike at all.

Was there anything in my posts that you could refute?

No?

You are either unwilling or unable to incorporate facts into your thesis....

Witness is dismissed.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Error | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

I must wonder if you actually read any of the posts in this thread.

It appears you are agreeing with the dunce who claimed that Nixon and Obama are the same vis-a-vis Mao and Communism.


1.In a recent thread,

A Christmas Celebration For Democrats,

...a thread that established proof of Obama’s infatuation with Mao Zedong, and that Hussein had no problem finding similar views in other Democrats, it appears to have….aggravated…some government school grad.

Unable to dispute the facts therein, the government school grad found this to be his best camouflage:

“You neglected to pay homage to the GOP's Richard Nixon, the man who opened the door and allowed China to enter the Western world. He actually met and paid homage to Mao.”
A Christmas Celebration For Democrats


Is he correct in suggesting that Republican Nixon was ‘infatuated’ with the homicidal psychopath, as Democrat Obama is????





I expect more from you.

You are an ideologue PoliticalChic. You are the precisely who Quigely is referring to when he refers to as the "doctrinaire and academic thinkers."

Your posts do more to divide the little people of this nation than unite us in common cause. You don't help to SOLVE problems, you only serve the interests of the economic and cultural elites. i.e. DIVIDE AND CONQUER.

I don't expect anymore from you.

You are right, I don't read most of your posts. You believe, if someone is from the left, or a Democrat, their ideas or thoughts are not worthy of consideration. What foolishness.

I judge a person by their honesty and integrity, not whether I agree with their political ideas. Very few folks in D.C. have integrity and honesty. If they are found to be UN-corruptable? They are drummed out of that town, and IT DOES NOT MATTER WHICH PARTY THEY ARE IN.

OTH, if they are successful there? YOU CAN BET, they are garbage.

You and I not alike at all.

Notice like clockwork,how same as always,she went into evade mode on the facts you presented by professor Quigley that BOTH parties are indentical,one in the same?


you are making way too much sense with logic for PC to understand that you will overload her brain with this logic and common sense with pesky facts that she will soon be going into cardiac arrest.

Yeah I stopped reading most of her ramblings as well a long time ago because she goes into evade mode when she cant refure facts or evidence her here Reagan ran the most corrupt administration ever at the time. Myself and DOZENS of others have taken her to school on that too many times to remember so many of us dont bother with her anymore .

she has proven too many times what a hypocrite she is. she once made a thread talking about how FDR,a DEMOCRAT,of course,was a communist sympathizer, then i exposed that FDR'S pal back then General Eisenhower, how HE was pals with stalins as well as i proved on this thread below as you can see from that photoe of Ike standing next to stalin laughing with him as stalin ordered his men to rape russian women. man if that is not being a hypocrite,i dont know WHAT is.

The REAL Ike exposed for the war criminal he was.

, but she of course evades those facts same as she always evades facts on the corruption of her hero Reagan always playing dodgeball and always changing the topic whenever her bullshit lies are exposed about him being the greatest president of the 20th century.

most CORRUPT evil president of the 20th century would be 100 times more accurate the fact we are STILL paying for many of evil deeds today.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Error | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

I must wonder if you actually read any of the posts in this thread.

It appears you are agreeing with the dunce who claimed that Nixon and Obama are the same vis-a-vis Mao and Communism.


1.In a recent thread,

A Christmas Celebration For Democrats,

...a thread that established proof of Obama’s infatuation with Mao Zedong, and that Hussein had no problem finding similar views in other Democrats, it appears to have….aggravated…some government school grad.

Unable to dispute the facts therein, the government school grad found this to be his best camouflage:

“You neglected to pay homage to the GOP's Richard Nixon, the man who opened the door and allowed China to enter the Western world. He actually met and paid homage to Mao.”
A Christmas Celebration For Democrats


Is he correct in suggesting that Republican Nixon was ‘infatuated’ with the homicidal psychopath, as Democrat Obama is????





I expect more from you.

You are an ideologue PoliticalChic. You are the precisely who Quigely is referring to when he refers to as the "doctrinaire and academic thinkers."

Your posts do more to divide the little people of this nation than unite us in common cause. You don't help to SOLVE problems, you only serve the interests of the economic and cultural elites. i.e. DIVIDE AND CONQUER.

I don't expect anymore from you.

You are right, I don't read most of your posts. You believe, if someone is from the left, or a Democrat, their ideas or thoughts are not worthy of consideration. What foolishness.

I judge a person by their honesty and integrity, not whether I agree with their political ideas. Very few folks in D.C. have integrity and honesty. If they are found to be UN-corruptable? They are drummed out of that town, and IT DOES NOT MATTER WHICH PARTY THEY ARE IN.

OTH, if they are successful there? YOU CAN BET, they are garbage.

You and I not alike at all.

Was there anything in my posts that you could refute?

No?

You are either unwilling or unable to incorporate facts into your thesis....

Witness is dismissed.

as always the clown evades the facts of what misterbeal said and proved that both parties are corrupt that she could NOT refute.she is dismised from class indeed.

 

[whitehall]

It's no secret that democrats and the media dig up poor old Tricky Dick when they get in trouble. Cable showtime and HBO was filled with old Nixon movies during the time when the Clinton's were impeached. You almost gotta laugh that JFK looks like a commie compared to the current crop of democrat candidates.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

It's no secret that democrats and the media dig up poor old Tricky Dick when they get in trouble. Cable showtime and HBO was filled with old Nixon movies during the time when the Clinton's were impeached. You almost gotta laugh that JFK looks like a commie compared to the current crop of democrat candidates.

would expect this post from this clown,a nut who believes in the warren commission report and magic bullets.

 

[PoliticalChic]

It's no secret that democrats and the media dig up poor old Tricky Dick when they get in trouble. Cable showtime and HBO was filled with old Nixon movies during the time when the Clinton's were impeached. You almost gotta laugh that JFK looks like a commie compared to the current crop of democrat candidates.

Today’s Democrat Party is closer to Lee Harvey Oswald, than to John F. Kennedy.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Why do you fools use that 'so you are saying...' rather than quoting what I do say?

Brevity is not your strong suit.

Did Obama form a kill list?

Did the imposition of same result in some 2,000 innocent human being being killed?

Is this totally in line with Mao's behavior?

Are you ready to admit that you are merely one more lying sack of offal??????

Yet again you have failed to show how Obama is any different from any other president in history so why do you focus your anger on him? Are you ready to answer or are you merely one more hypocritical sack of offal??????

PS, I like the way you trust a Pakistani politician more than you trust the US military and intel agencies. You're quite the patriot, I'm just not sure for which country.

she indeed HAS failed MAJOR BIG TIME how Obama is any different than any other president in history so unable to accept that little fact,she keeps rambling on and on about him being a communist.

well i just proved REPUBLICAN Eisenhower was a communist as well but as always,notice how she goes into evade mode same as she did when i exposed reagan and nixon as evil warmongers?


thats interesting what you said about Trump,looks like he is following the same footsteps of her hero mass murderer reagan who ALSO only became pro choice shortly before running for president. reagan as governor of california ,was pro abortion more than any other politician in the country at the time. history seems to repeat itself here.

man i could not have said it any better,you nailed it totally when you said she is not a patriot for THIS country,thats an UNDERSTATEMENT.

 

[alang1216]

Why do you fools use that 'so you are saying...' rather than quoting what I do say?

Brevity is not your strong suit.

Did Obama form a kill list?

Did the imposition of same result in some 2,000 innocent human being being killed?

Is this totally in line with Mao's behavior?

Are you ready to admit that you are merely one more lying sack of offal??????

Yet again you have failed to show how Obama is any different from any other president in history so why do you focus your anger on him? Are you ready to answer or are you merely one more hypocritical sack of offal??????

PS, I like the way you trust a Pakistani politician more than you trust the US military and intel agencies. You're quite the patriot, I'm just not sure for which country.

she indeed HAS failed MAJOR BIG TIME how Obama is any different than any other president in history so unable to accept that little fact,she keeps rambling on and on about him being a communist.

well i just proved REPUBLICAN Eisenhower was a communist as well but as always,notice how she goes into evade mode same as she did when i exposed reagan and nixon as evil warmongers?


thats interesting what you said about Trump,looks like he is following the same footsteps of he hero mass murderer reagan who ALSO only became pro choice shortly before running for president. reagan as governor of california ,was pro abortion more than any other politician in the country at the time. history seems to repeat itself here.

man i could not have said it any better,you nailed it totally when you said she is not a patriot for THIS country,thats an UNDERSTATEMENT.

She is either a Russian bot or an extreme ideologue. Neither is grounded in reality, only their programming.