Revealed; Four Supreme Court Justices Attend Right Wing Gala After Roe Decision

[martybegan]

When a judge should recuse himself?

A judge in order to maintain fairness and impartiality in his duty to perform an action should recuse himself in the following situations:

•When the judge is interested in the subject matter or he has a relationship with someone who has an interest in it.

Again, ThomasBash 2022.

 

[postman]

Are those the rules for Supreme Court Justices? because you do know there are two sets of rules, one for the SC, and one for everyone else.

Actually because of how they are administered, they apply to the supreme court, but are also administered by the supreme court. So a justice gets to be the decider in his own case.

 

[postman]

Again, ThomasBash 2022.

Those recusal rules existed wall before Thomas, and will exist well after Thomas is gone.

Thomas decided not to recuse himself. Surprise, surprise, surprise.

 

[martybegan]

You admitted the TOP law schools, which have been the TOP schools for decades, have to be on TOP because what they teach is right and has been right for a long long time.

No different than M.I.T. being the best at teaching science, math and engineering.

Law isn't science, and is far more easily perverted by partisans to fit their worldview.

What they teach isn't right, it is progressive claptrap mostly.

When the top law schools decades ago taught separate but equal was good sound constitutional law were they "right"?

 

[martybegan]

Actually because of how they are administered, they apply to the supreme court, but are also administered by the supreme court. So a justice gets to be the decider in his own case.

Show me where they legally apply to the SC in the US code.

 

[martybegan]

Those recusal rules existed wall before Thomas, and will exist well after Thomas is gone.

Thomas decided not to recuse himself. Surprise, surprise, surprise.

If you want to apply them to all the justices like you apply them to Thomas, we would have to lock up the spouses of SC justices in sealed boxes for the term of their tenure.

 

[postman]

Law isn't science, and is far more easily perverted by partisans to fit their worldview.

What they teach isn't right, it is progressive claptrap mostly.

But you said they were the TOP schools.

TOP schools have to teach the right set of skills and positions, in order to maintain being the TOP schools.

It's no different than being the top at anything. You can't be the top football or baseball coach, without teaching the right stuff.

 

[postman]

Show me where they legally apply to the SC in the US code.

Code of Conduct for Judicial Employees

Code of Conduct for Judicial Employees (pdf) (Guide to Judiciary Policy, Vol. 2, Pt. A, Ch. 3)

www.uscourts.gov

And the courts view:

Roberts noted that in the lower courts, judges who decide to recuse can always be replaced by another judge, and that their decision is subject to review by a higher court. Such is not the case with the Supreme Court, since there is no higher court to review their decision, and no other Justices to take their place. Consequently, in the event that a Justice did decide to recuse, the Court would have to sit with less than a full panel.

Roberts also noted that if the other justices were permitted to review an individual Justice’s decision not to recuse, this could have the effect of giving the other justices the power to determine who would be able hear the affected cases. Therefore, Justices make their own determination, sometimes using the Code and other available authorities for guidance, and their final decision is not subject to review.

The supreme court on being in judgement of only themselves.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Four U.S. Supreme Court justices attended the black-tie dinner gala at the first Federal Society convention since the court overturned Roe vs. Wade in its controversial Dobbs vs. Jackson Women's Health decision.

M'kay So?
All of justices attend all kinds of events put on by people from their side.

All credibility with the court is gone. It is now a majority of partisan perjurers. Any steps to needed to restore democracy hat credibility is now justified. Any steps.

Ah. You want total war.
Ok. You asked for it. The gloves come off.

 

[martybegan]

Code of Conduct for Judicial Employees

Code of Conduct for Judicial Employees (pdf) (Guide to Judiciary Policy, Vol. 2, Pt. A, Ch. 3)

www.uscourts.gov

They aren't employees technically, this has been fought over for decades.

 

[hadit]

So you can't count on SCOTUS. Deal with it.

Frankly, the biggest mistake liberals have made was counting on the courts to protect reproductive choice. Instead, they let RW politicians pass goofy laws in the red states, thinking the court would never do anything so stupid as to overturn Roe.

Now they need to do what they did this year. Bring this issue to the forefront. Make the GOP defend these dumb laws.

And therein lies your misunderstanding. It's not the court's job to "protect reproductive choice" and never has been. It's the court's job to weigh a law against the Constitution to see if it follows the Constitution or violates it. What this court did was revisit the work of a prior court and find it to have been done incorrectly. The court is not the Catholic Church, wherein the edicts of the Pope are considered infallible. Subsequent courts can and do find prior courts to have been incorrect. Tell you what, in 50 years a future court may go back the other way. If you were still around, would you be arguing that this court's ruling was settled law and they shouldn't mess with it, or would you champion them overturning it?

The bottom line remains, the left had 50 years in which they could have codified Roe into law, making it much harder to overturn, but they did nothing. They hid behind Roe, thinking that no one would dare gore such a sacred liberal cow. In their arrogance, they forgot that the court is not beholden to liberal ideals.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Four U.S. Supreme Court justices attended the black-tie dinner gala at the first Federal Society convention since the court overturned Roe vs. Wade in its controversial Dobbs vs. Jackson Women's Health decision.

Revealed: Four Supreme Court justices attended right-wing gala â risking the credibility of the court

Four U.S. Supreme Court justices attended the black-tie dinner gala at the first Federal Society convention since the court overturned Roe vs. Wade in its controversial Dobbs vs. Jackson Women's Health decision.Associated Press correspondent Mark Sherman reported Justices Samuel Alito, Amy Coney...

www.rawstory.com

All credibility with the court is gone. It is now a majority of partisan perjurers. Any steps to needed to restore democracy hat credibility is now justified. Any steps.

Like that never happened before, get a grip

 

[M14 Shooter]

And therein lies your misunderstanding. I

Said misunderstanding is willful.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

They aren't even trying to hide it any more. But here's the thing. Dems need to start their own long game movement to fight back against what the FS has done. Namely, infest the nation's courts with extremist conservatives.
Frankly, I don't think the Dems can pull it off. It takes the kind of devious, unscrupulous mind of singular focus Mitch McTreason has had over the years, stuffing the courts with radicals. We don't have anyone like that. Nor do we have someone like Leonard Leo, willing to put forth unqualified hacks to fill vacant seats on the bench. Not to mention that no series of Dem prez's would ever allow a radically leftist organization to pick nominees for them as Repub prez's have.

Lol, seek help immediately.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Four U.S. Supreme Court justices attended the black-tie dinner gala at the first Federal Society convention since the court overturned Roe vs. Wade in its controversial Dobbs vs. Jackson Women's Health decision.

Revealed: Four Supreme Court justices attended right-wing gala â risking the credibility of the court

Four U.S. Supreme Court justices attended the black-tie dinner gala at the first Federal Society convention since the court overturned Roe vs. Wade in its controversial Dobbs vs. Jackson Women's Health decision.Associated Press correspondent Mark Sherman reported Justices Samuel Alito, Amy Coney...

www.rawstory.com

All credibility with the court is gone. It is now a majority of partisan perjurers. Any steps to needed to restore democracy hat credibility is now justified. Any steps.

/----/ People attend party - Libs howl at moon.

 

[marvin martian]

Four U.S. Supreme Court justices attended the black-tie dinner gala at the first Federal Society convention since the court overturned Roe vs. Wade in its controversial Dobbs vs. Jackson Women's Health decision.

Revealed: Four Supreme Court justices attended right-wing gala â risking the credibility of the court

Four U.S. Supreme Court justices attended the black-tie dinner gala at the first Federal Society convention since the court overturned Roe vs. Wade in its controversial Dobbs vs. Jackson Women's Health decision.Associated Press correspondent Mark Sherman reported Justices Samuel Alito, Amy Coney...

www.rawstory.com

All credibility with the court is gone. It is now a majority of partisan perjurers. Any steps to needed to restore democracy hat credibility is now justified. Any steps.

It's just their version of going on The View.

 

[MinTrut]

RBG thought no such thing.

She thought there were other stronger arguments to support it than the “privacy” one used in Roe

Translation:

She correctly thought it was crap.

That it took half a century to overturn is nothing short of astonishing.

And the Demoncraps could protect choice, but prefer to use uteruses as political footballs.

Or as Biden would say, finger food.

I'd point out that Demoncraps are Nazis, but is that fair to Nazis?

 

[Cellblock2429]

Translation:

She correctly thought it was crap.

That it took half a century to overturn is nothing short of astonishing.

And the Demoncraps could protect choice, but prefer to use uteruses as political footballs.

Or as Biden would say, finger food.

I'd point out that Demoncraps are Nazis, but is that fair to Nazis?

/——/ Not really. Nazis wore snappy uniforms, after all.

 

[JoeB131]

Just wait until some woman in an "abortion at any time" State gets a headache and finds a doctor to sign off on the abortion 2 weeks before birth.

Are you really so delusional that you think any woman would through 8 1/2 months of pregnancy and say, "Naw, I have a headache!"

If a woman is having an abortion in the third trimester, it's because something has gone horribly wrong with the pregnancy. But you ghouls keep going on about it.

Couple things to chew/suck on:

1) Even RBG thought RvW was crap, and she was right.

2) Democraps in Congress could protect choice, but choose not to for political reasons.

I'd agree. . RvW was a crap decision dealing with crap laws. Before 1973, abortion laws were like prostitution laws... they were on the books, but no one enforced them unless someone was making a nusciance of themselves.

 

[JoeB131]

And therein lies your misunderstanding. It's not the court's job to "protect reproductive choice" and never has been. It's the court's job to weigh a law against the Constitution to see if it follows the Constitution or violates it. What this court did was revisit the work of a prior court and find it to have been done incorrectly.

Which was stupid. The underlying problem with abortion is that you really can't regulate what people do with or to their own bodies. This is the very argument you gun nuts make when you whine that 60% of gun deaths are suicides. It's why prohibition failed miserably, it's why the war on drugs failed miserably, it's why prostitution laws are a bad joke.

A finding of a right to privacy in the 14th Amendment might have been a stretch, but it was the same reasoning they used in Griswold v. Connecticut. (Ending bans on contraception.) So when do the courts overturn Griswold?

The bottom line remains, the left had 50 years in which they could have codified Roe into law, making it much harder to overturn, but they did nothing. They hid behind Roe, thinking that no one would dare gore such a sacred liberal cow. In their arrogance, they forgot that the court is not beholden to liberal ideals.

That works both ways. The right wing had 50 years to codify abortion bans into law, but were happy to leave Roe where it was. No one really wanted to deal with it, and past Republican presidents had the good sense to appoint moderates like O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter and even Roberts who realized what a mess overturning Roe was.