Reuters “Fact checks” Thailand study that concluded 30% of children who get “vaxxed” experience cardiac abnormalities…Says its only 18%.

ColonelAngus

Diamond Member
Feb 25, 2015
52,296
52,273
3,615

So they claim the study is false because REUTERS says its only 18%, not 30%?

IT SHOULD BE 0%.

Reuters is running interference for BIG PHARMA.

This shot should NOT be on the CDC vax schedule for children!

18% or 30%? Both are insanely high….why should the vax cause ANY heart problems?

Children are at very low risk to get COVID at all.

THIS IS INSANITY.
 

So they claim the study is false because REUTERS says its only 18%, not 30%?

IT SHOULD BE 0%.

Reuters is running interference for BIG PHARMA.

This shot should NOT be on the CDC vax schedule for children?

18% or 30%? Both are insanely high….why should the vax cause ANY heart problems?

Children are at very low risk to get COVID at all.

THIS IS INSANITY.
This is criminal fraud by the clot shot makers & the govt because they knew all this as they insisted we all get jabbed multiple times.
It's criminal malpractice & possible attempted murder on all the medical professionals that administered these experimental gene therapies that were neither safe nor effective.

Round them all up & send them to Nuremberg for trials
 
All those fame named publishers at this point are propagandist. Anything for a buck no matter how unconscionable the products being pushed are.
 
This is criminal fraud by the clot shot makers & the govt because they knew all this as they insisted we all get jabbed multiple times.
It's criminal malpractice & possible attempted murder on all the medical professionals that administered these experimental gene therapies that were neither safe nor effective.

Round them all up & send them to Nuremberg for trials
It happens with every vaccine ever made.
 
Can you imagine Reuters called the study “FALSE” because “ONLY” 18% and not 30% of children experience heart ailments?

This is full on propaganda.

Vomitous.

Criminal.

Also, it shows how this “Fact checking” stuff it all bullshit.

”You punched 30 people? You are a bad person!”

”FALSE! I only punched 18 people! I am a great person!” :rolleyes:
 
Can you imagine Reuters called the study “FALSE” because “ONLY” 18% and not 30% of children experience heart ailments?

This is full on propaganda.

Vomitous.

Criminal.

Also, it shows how this “Fact checking” stuff it all bullshit.

”You punched 30 people? You are a bad person!”

”FALSE! I only punched 18 people! I am a great person!” :rolleyes:
How's yer hand?
 

So they claim the study is false because REUTERS says its only 18%, not 30%?

IT SHOULD BE 0%.

Reuters is running interference for BIG PHARMA.

This shot should NOT be on the CDC vax schedule for children!

18% or 30%? Both are insanely high….why should the vax cause ANY heart problems?

Children are at very low risk to get COVID at all.

THIS IS INSANITY.
Oh that’s so relieving. Lol.

Any parent who vaxxed their kids is a fucking fool.
 
Last edited:
No vaccine is totally safe for every human.

Do most of them at least (sometimes) prevent transmission?

Cuz the mRNA sure as hell doesn't.

And we were told if we didn't get the jab, we wanted Grandma to die.

Turns out that was just another cheap globalist marketing ploy - gotta keep the sheep in line.
 
Do most of them at least (sometimes) prevent transmission?

Cuz the mRNA sure as hell doesn't.

And we were told if we didn't get the jab, we wanted Grandma to die.

Turns out that was just another cheap globalist marketing ploy - gotta keep the sheep in line.
Some do some do not. As far as the propaganda well duh, it's part of society, learn to make yer own decisions and stop waiting for fer someone to tell yous what to do.

There is but one guarantee in life and that is death, everything else is random chance.
 
learn to make yer own decisions and stop waiting for fer someone to tell yous what to do.

HA!

Et tu, Democrat?

How about try not to be on the side of the Party that locked down small businesses, shut children outa school, and tried to fire anyone who wouldn't partake of their "safe and effective" pharma elixir?

Your credibility is beyond weak, it's non existent.
 
This shot should NOT be on the CDC vax schedule for children!

18% or 30%? Both are insanely high….why should the vax cause ANY heart problems?

Children are at very low risk to get COVID at all.

THIS IS INSANITY.

From the citation: that they likely saw higher rates of heart rhythm disturbance and signs of inflammation than in other studies because they did tests that detected mild changes in participants with no symptoms who would not ordinarily have been screened.

They also said the effects were temporary.

I'm sure if doctors looked close enough, they could find adverse reactions to almost anything. But those reactions would also be temporary and mild.
 
Do most of them at least (sometimes) prevent transmission?

Cuz the mRNA sure as hell doesn't.

And we were told if we didn't get the jab, we wanted Grandma to die.

Turns out that was just another cheap globalist marketing ploy - gotta keep the sheep in line.
mRNA vaccines will diminish transmission. Because of the nature of COVID, nothing can totally stop transmission of a virus that becomes infectious before it becomes symptomatic.
 
From the citation: that they likely saw higher rates of heart rhythm disturbance and signs of inflammation than in other studies because they did tests that detected mild changes in participants with no symptoms who would not ordinarily have been screened.

They also said the effects were temporary.

I'm sure if doctors looked close enough, they could find adverse reactions to almost anything. But those reactions would also be temporary and mild.

"Pure bloods" get COVID less, and therefore transmit less.

The survival rate for COVID is like 99.9999998%.

Why have the Dems become the party of Big Pharma?

Why have your critical thinking skills gone the way of CalecoVision?

All because Orange Man Rad broke your fwagile widdle mind.
 
Last edited:
HA!

Et tu, Democrat?

How about try not to be on the side of the Party that locked down small businesses, shut children outa school, and tried to fire anyone who wouldn't partake of their "safe and effective" pharma elixir?

Your credibility is beyond weak, it's non existent.

How did hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin and disinfectant injections go?
 
"Pure bloods" get COVID less, and therefore transmit less.

The mortality rate for COVID is like 99.9999998%.

Why have the Dems become the party of Big Pharma?

Why have your critical thinking skills gone the way of CalecoVision?

All because Orange Man Rad broke your fwagile widdle mind.

When did republicans become science deniers?
 
How did hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin and disinfectant injections go?

Quite well.

Africa took ivermectin (the very drug we disburse to incoming refugees - and have done so for years), and they barely got any COVID.

Hydroxy has been brilliant as well. Of course the "injections" are FAKE NEWS.

How did "electing" a stuttering, bumbling fool who is about to get his electoral ass handed to him work out?

Dems are about to go the way of the dodo.

Enjoy!
 
Quite well.

Africa took ivermectin (the very drug we disburse to incoming refugees - and have done so for years), and they barely got any COVID.

There are several reason for that:

Age has been observed as a significant risk factor for severe COVID-19 illness. Most deaths occur in those aged 65 or older. The median age in North and South America, Europe and Asia ranges from 32 to 42.5 years. The age demographic structure of sub-Saharan Africa is much younger – the median age is 18.

Second reason:

Most elderly people in sub-Saharan Africa don’t live in long-term care facilities. In sub-Saharan Africa, provision of care is mostly left to families. This limits the number of formal caregivers and thus reduces the chance of transmission. An exception to this is South Africa, which has an established long-term care sector. South Africa was the worst affected country in sub-Saharan Africa.
 

Forum List

Back
Top