Burgermeister
Diamond Member
- Jan 23, 2021
- 6,728
- 7,661
- 1,938
They found that it was one in six. Not one in three. WHEW!
A study of 301 teens in Thailand found mild and temporary heart rhythm changes after a second dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine among one in six teenagers, not one-third as social media posts claim. The study also saw possible signs of heart inflammation in just seven of those teens with rhythm changes and confirmed myocarditis in only one of the seven.
Social media users are circulating the study of post-vaccination heart effects in Thai teenagers with the claim that a third of participants experienced heart effects, and the suggestion that the results indicate a new danger level for children. These posts are missing context: the study’s authors concluded, “We found the risk of these symptoms to be not as low as reported elsewhere, but in all cases, symptoms were mild with full recovery within 14 days.”
I don't think they can possibly know if the effects are temporary and the recoveries full. Regardless, do you think the parents of these teenagers would have had their children get the jab if they knew they had a one in six chance of it causing abnormal heart function, "mild and temporary" or not?
A study of 301 teens in Thailand found mild and temporary heart rhythm changes after a second dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine among one in six teenagers, not one-third as social media posts claim. The study also saw possible signs of heart inflammation in just seven of those teens with rhythm changes and confirmed myocarditis in only one of the seven.
Social media users are circulating the study of post-vaccination heart effects in Thai teenagers with the claim that a third of participants experienced heart effects, and the suggestion that the results indicate a new danger level for children. These posts are missing context: the study’s authors concluded, “We found the risk of these symptoms to be not as low as reported elsewhere, but in all cases, symptoms were mild with full recovery within 14 days.”
I don't think they can possibly know if the effects are temporary and the recoveries full. Regardless, do you think the parents of these teenagers would have had their children get the jab if they knew they had a one in six chance of it causing abnormal heart function, "mild and temporary" or not?
