RETIRED PROFESSOR TURNS WHISTLEBLOWER ON CLIMATE CHANGE

[Porker]

One of their newer comebacks^^^^^^^^^it's related to changing global warming to climate change.

**** are you dumb.

Global warming causes climate change. It's been that way for 30 years.

Your stupid ******* talking point just makes you look all the more pathetic.

Then when all else fails...BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.

 

[bripat9643]

how much does his book sell for?

The article didn't mention a book.

 

[bripat9643]

There ya go folks, someone on the inside admitted it, so-called "climate scientists" prostitute their science to conform to the AGW cult's agenda and keep the gravy coming in.

Andrew Desiderio 8211 George Washington University

While much of the debate over climate change surrounds whether or not it is occurring, one glaciologist and retired professor says the real issue is that the topic is being used as a political pawn to siphon money and votes.

Dr. Terry Hughes, in an interview with The College Fix, said researchers want to keep federal funding for climate change alive, and politicians want to earn environmentalist votes, and both predict global pandemonium to that end.

Hughes, a professor emeritus of earth sciences and climate change at the University of Maine, said for years his colleagues urged him to be in lockstep with former Vice President Al Gore – “the drum major in the parade denouncing global warming as an unmitigated disaster,” he told The College Fix.

But Hughes – who believes global warming is actually a good thing because more carbon dioxide is good for the environment in many ways – said he does not want to march to that beat.

“Too many (the majority) of climate research scientists are quite willing to prostitute their science by giving these politicians what they want,” he said.​

A retired professor talks to "The College Fix" and bripat gets a boner.

What a loser.

Please take your hate somewhere else. Soon goons like you will be massacring anyone who dares to challenge the AGW Taliban orthodoxy.

You deniers are like truthers-- all a bunch of drama queens when your moronic evidence is shredded in minutes.

Your little pathetic thread is over. Done. And now you're like, shit, what do I do? DRAMA QUEEN "goons like you…"

I don't need to come to your house to make you my *****. No massacre required. Just a daily ***** slapping on USMB.

When did you shred any evidence against AGW? I must have missed that.

BTW, please try to keep the hate down to an incandescent level.

 

[JoeMoma]

From skimming the article it seems that this retired professor isn't saying that Global warming is not happening; however, he is saying that global warming is a good thing -- the sky is not falling because of it.

 

[bripat9643]

From skimming the article it seems that this retired professor isn't saying that Global warming is not happening; however, he is saying that global warming is a good thing -- the sky is not falling because of it.

Wrong, he said CO2 is good for the environment. He didn't say global warming was happening. When he accuses climate researches of skewing their results, he pretty much says it's not happening.

 

[Rexx Taylor]

so it is global warming that caused the south pole to freeze over itself? too bad those rescue boats got stuck in the ice.

 

[OKTexas]

There ya go folks, someone on the inside admitted it, so-called "climate scientists" prostitute their science to conform to the AGW cult's agenda and keep the gravy coming in.

Andrew Desiderio 8211 George Washington University

While much of the debate over climate change surrounds whether or not it is occurring, one glaciologist and retired professor says the real issue is that the topic is being used as a political pawn to siphon money and votes.

Dr. Terry Hughes, in an interview with The College Fix, said researchers want to keep federal funding for climate change alive, and politicians want to earn environmentalist votes, and both predict global pandemonium to that end.

Hughes, a professor emeritus of earth sciences and climate change at the University of Maine, said for years his colleagues urged him to be in lockstep with former Vice President Al Gore – “the drum major in the parade denouncing global warming as an unmitigated disaster,” he told The College Fix.

But Hughes – who believes global warming is actually a good thing because more carbon dioxide is good for the environment in many ways – said he does not want to march to that beat.

“Too many (the majority) of climate research scientists are quite willing to prostitute their science by giving these politicians what they want,” he said.​

A retired professor talks to "The College Fix" and bripat gets a boner.

What a loser.

Please take your hate somewhere else. Soon goons like you will be massacring anyone who dares to challenge the AGW Taliban orthodoxy.

You deniers are like truthers-- all a bunch of drama queens when your moronic evidence is shredded in minutes.

Your little pathetic thread is over. Done. And now you're like, shit, what do I do? DRAMA QUEEN "goons like you…"

I don't need to come to your house to make you my *****. No massacre required. Just a daily ***** slapping on USMB.

What a pathetic loser, the climate has been changing from day one and will continue to change in the future regardless of anything we may or may not do. I'v always said if you want the facts, just follow the money and this story just confirms that.

 

[JoeMoma]

From skimming the article it seems that this retired professor isn't saying that Global warming is not happening; however, he is saying that global warming is a good thing -- the sky is not falling because of it.

Wrong, he said CO2 is good for the environment. He didn't say global warming was happening. When he accuses climate researches of skewing their results, he pretty much says it's not happening.

From the article:

His reasons for why global warming is a good thing, Hughes told the Capital Journal, isthat “atmospheric CO2 would greatly increase agricultural production,” “thawing permafrost would increase by one-seventh Earth’s landmass open to extensive human habitation,” and “if the sea level did rise, there would be a global economic boom,” among other arguments.

 

[bripat9643]

From skimming the article it seems that this retired professor isn't saying that Global warming is not happening; however, he is saying that global warming is a good thing -- the sky is not falling because of it.

Wrong, he said CO2 is good for the environment. He didn't say global warming was happening. When he accuses climate researches of skewing their results, he pretty much says it's not happening.

From the article:

His reasons for why global warming is a good thing, Hughes told the Capital Journal, isthat “atmospheric CO2 would greatly increase agricultural production,” “thawing permafrost would increase by one-seventh Earth’s landmass open to extensive human habitation,” and “if the sea level did rise, there would be a global economic boom,” among other arguments.

He still didn't say global warming was happening. He only said the consequences would be good if it did happen.

 

[Rexx Taylor]

Right, the climate has always been changing since God Created man in 2876 BC! (give or take a thousand years), I wonder if the cavemen often complained about global warming and blamed it on Al Gore senior.

 

[Carib Gyal]

YOU BUNCH OF STUPID DUMB ASSES! I KNOW MORE THAN THIS IMPOSTER!!!!

 

[JoeMoma]

From skimming the article it seems that this retired professor isn't saying that Global warming is not happening; however, he is saying that global warming is a good thing -- the sky is not falling because of it.

Wrong, he said CO2 is good for the environment. He didn't say global warming was happening. When he accuses climate researches of skewing their results, he pretty much says it's not happening.

From the article:

His reasons for why global warming is a good thing, Hughes told the Capital Journal, isthat “atmospheric CO2 would greatly increase agricultural production,” “thawing permafrost would increase by one-seventh Earth’s landmass open to extensive human habitation,” and “if the sea level did rise, there would be a global economic boom,” among other arguments.

He still didn't say global warming was happening. He only said the consequences would be good if it did happen.

by arguing that global warming is a good thing without saying that it is not happening, he is implying that it is happening. If his argument were that it is not happening, then why not simply make that argument and say so.

 

[bripat9643]

From skimming the article it seems that this retired professor isn't saying that Global warming is not happening; however, he is saying that global warming is a good thing -- the sky is not falling because of it.

Wrong, he said CO2 is good for the environment. He didn't say global warming was happening. When he accuses climate researches of skewing their results, he pretty much says it's not happening.

From the article:

His reasons for why global warming is a good thing, Hughes told the Capital Journal, isthat “atmospheric CO2 would greatly increase agricultural production,” “thawing permafrost would increase by one-seventh Earth’s landmass open to extensive human habitation,” and “if the sea level did rise, there would be a global economic boom,” among other arguments.

He still didn't say global warming was happening. He only said the consequences would be good if it did happen.

by arguing that global warming is a good thing without saying that it is not happening, he is implying that it is happening. If his argument were that it is not happening, then why not simply make that argument and say so.

No, he is not implying a thing.

 

[initforme]

I don't believe in global warming but my dream job would be a whistleblower who goes against those industries who pollute air and water. If I had the power I would have just taken duke energies to the cleaners for toxifying the water near Charleston..instead the CEO probably got a huge bonus since the greedy filthy, slimeball company got away with murder.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

2 decades, no warming

 

[JoeMoma]

From skimming the article it seems that this retired professor isn't saying that Global warming is not happening; however, he is saying that global warming is a good thing -- the sky is not falling because of it.

Wrong, he said CO2 is good for the environment. He didn't say global warming was happening. When he accuses climate researches of skewing their results, he pretty much says it's not happening.

From the article:

His reasons for why global warming is a good thing, Hughes told the Capital Journal, isthat “atmospheric CO2 would greatly increase agricultural production,” “thawing permafrost would increase by one-seventh Earth’s landmass open to extensive human habitation,” and “if the sea level did rise, there would be a global economic boom,” among other arguments.

He still didn't say global warming was happening. He only said the consequences would be good if it did happen.

by arguing that global warming is a good thing without saying that it is not happening, he is implying that it is happening. If his argument were that it is not happening, then why not simply make that argument and say so.

No, he is not implying a thing.

Okay then, the article does not have him saying that global warming is not happening. If he is not implying anything, then at best he is neutral on whether global warming is happening or not. He does say, not just imply, that global warming is a good thing.

 

[Carib Gyal]

Wrong, he said CO2 is good for the environment. He didn't say global warming was happening. When he accuses climate researches of skewing their results, he pretty much says it's not happening.

From the article:

His reasons for why global warming is a good thing, Hughes told the Capital Journal, isthat “atmospheric CO2 would greatly increase agricultural production,” “thawing permafrost would increase by one-seventh Earth’s landmass open to extensive human habitation,” and “if the sea level did rise, there would be a global economic boom,” among other arguments.

He still didn't say global warming was happening. He only said the consequences would be good if it did happen.

by arguing that global warming is a good thing without saying that it is not happening, he is implying that it is happening. If his argument were that it is not happening, then why not simply make that argument and say so.

No, he is not implying a thing.

Okay then, the article does not have him saying that global warming is not happening. If he is not implying anything, then at best he is neutral on whether global warming is happening or not. He does say, not just imply, that global warming is a good thing.

So we really need to be doing all we can to make it happen.

 

[LeftofLeft]

I am still waiting for Al Gore and John Kerry to explain the weather this week.

You are another idiot who confuses weather with climate.

BTW - it takes a tremendous amount of heat to create a winter storm. Climate change is the shortening of Spring and Fall with longer and harsher winters and summer.



Wrap your small head around that one.

Why are you name calling and insulting? The Climate changes and has been for 4.5 Billion years without rich white guys in the USA.

 

[bripat9643]

I am still waiting for Al Gore and John Kerry to explain the weather this week.

You are another idiot who confuses weather with climate.

BTW - it takes a tremendous amount of heat to create a winter storm. Climate change is the shortening of Spring and Fall with longer and harsher winters and summer.



Wrap your small head around that one.

Why are you name calling and insulting? The Climate changes and has been for 4.5 Billion years without rich white guys in the USA.

When their con begins to unravel the AGW cult members will become hysterical and incoherent. They've been in denial for decades. it's a sad thing to watch people implode.

 

[JoeMoma]

From the article:

His reasons for why global warming is a good thing, Hughes told the Capital Journal, isthat “atmospheric CO2 would greatly increase agricultural production,” “thawing permafrost would increase by one-seventh Earth’s landmass open to extensive human habitation,” and “if the sea level did rise, there would be a global economic boom,” among other arguments.

He still didn't say global warming was happening. He only said the consequences would be good if it did happen.

by arguing that global warming is a good thing without saying that it is not happening, he is implying that it is happening. If his argument were that it is not happening, then why not simply make that argument and say so.

No, he is not implying a thing.

Okay then, the article does not have him saying that global warming is not happening. If he is not implying anything, then at best he is neutral on whether global warming is happening or not. He does say, not just imply, that global warming is a good thing.

So we really need to be doing all we can to make it happen.

Right! Let's use that coal to produce affordable energy.