Retired general, lt colonel join reservist’s lawsuit over Obama's birth status

As to the retaliation issue, the revised suit states Cook lost his job at Simtech Inc., a corporation that does Department of Defense contracting in the field of information technology/systems integration, because of the suit. It also states that Cook has been subjected to “gossip” from people who believed Cook was “manipulating his deployment orders to create a platform for political purposes.”


"believed Cook was “manipulating his deployment orders to create a platform for political purposes.”???


What the fuck else do you call it when a guy volunteers and then cries foul when he gets the orders???
 
In a pleading revised after the revocation of Cook’s orders, Taitz argues that the application for preliminary injunction is not moot and that retired Maj. Gen. Carol Dean Childers and active U.S. Air Force reservist Lt. Col. David Earl Graeff have joined the suit “because it is a matter of unparalleled public interest and importance and because it is clearly a matter arising from issues of a recurring nature that will escape review unless the Court exercises its discretionary jurisdiction.”


Even if the court rules (again) that Pres. Obama is eligible the issue will keep cropping because there are some who won't stop no matter what a court rules.


Ultimately, there is no case here. I think the idea that they have to keep a case going just because someone else thinks a side issue (and to this case, that's what the BC issue really is) has to be addressed isn't gonna fly with a judge.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #4
The courts have never determined anything about Obama's eligibility. What have you been smoking?
 
The courts have never determined anything about Obama's eligibility. What have you been smoking?

Uh, how about when the courts rejected hearing the case due to LACK OF MERIT. What do you call that?
 
Hey Allie, I found a colonel who might be willing to join your lawsuit.

$colonel-sanders.jpg
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #9
So we are all in agreement that the comment that the courts had previously determined Obama is "eligible" was a lie.

Thank you.
 
So we are all in agreement that the comment that the courts had previously determined Obama is "eligible" was a lie.

Thank you.

Are you delusional? Have you finally lost it?

The minute the courts came to the conclusion that any case in which Obama's eligibility is challenged after looking at the merits of the case and found A LACK OF, that means they made a DETERMINATION.

:cuckoo:
 
Actually, I don't think any court has ever made a determination about the eligibility for office of ANY President of the United States.

Know why?

Because Congress ultimately makes that determination.

They did that for President Obama in January.

It was in all the papers...
 
Actually, I don't think any court has ever made a determination about the eligibility for office of ANY President of the United States.

Know why?

Because Congress ultimately makes that determination.

They did that for President Obama in January.

It was in all the papers...

So right there answers the question! If congress is the one that determined if he was eligible, then we KNOW it can't be true!
 

Forum List

Back
Top