AllieBaba
Rookie
- Oct 2, 2007
- 33,778
- 3,927
- 0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As to the retaliation issue, the revised suit states Cook lost his job at Simtech Inc., a corporation that does Department of Defense contracting in the field of information technology/systems integration, because of the suit. It also states that Cook has been subjected to gossip from people who believed Cook was manipulating his deployment orders to create a platform for political purposes.
In a pleading revised after the revocation of Cook’s orders, Taitz argues that the application for preliminary injunction is not moot and that retired Maj. Gen. Carol Dean Childers and active U.S. Air Force reservist Lt. Col. David Earl Graeff have joined the suit “because it is a matter of unparalleled public interest and importance and because it is clearly a matter arising from issues of a recurring nature that will escape review unless the Court exercises its discretionary jurisdiction.”
The courts have never determined anything about Obama's eligibility. What have you been smoking?
The courts have never determined anything about Obama's eligibility. What have you been smoking?
Uh, how about when the courts rejected hearing the case due to LACK OF MERIT. What do you call that?
So we are all in agreement that the comment that the courts had previously determined Obama is "eligible" was a lie.
Thank you.
So we are all in agreement that the comment that the courts had previously determined Obama is "eligible" was a lie.
Thank you.
Smoking some wicked stuff, obviously.
Actually, I don't think any court has ever made a determination about the eligibility for office of ANY President of the United States.
Know why?
Because Congress ultimately makes that determination.
They did that for President Obama in January.
It was in all the papers...