Retarded cuss filtering

Cuss filters, yay or nay?


  • Total voters
    15
Free speech is not impurities, dude. False analogy

I won't repeat it again ... you can SAY whatever you like, not a single person on this Earth (or any other planet) is obligated to listen.

When my neighbor gets liquored up and starts cussing-out the squirrels in his yard, I just put on headphones so I don't have to listen.

That's a filter,
 
I won't repeat it again ... you can SAY whatever you like, not a single person on this Earth (or any other planet) is obligated to listen.
In this case, we dont even have the option to listen. It was taken away by this stupid ******* filter.
 
It bugs me that they won’t even engage in discussion on the issue

I don’t respect people who won’t engage in debate to defend their beliefs/actions
 
What kind of PC garbage in 2026 is this?
It's not doing anything but limiting free expression, seriously.
It truly is silly, IMO.
Stifling free speech is anti-American!

Jordan Peterson was quite outspoken about the dangers of controlling speech, that was in Canada.

Instead of using retard or retarded, we could use Intellectually Disability.
 
I don’t think it’s a violation of anyone’s free speech. The site owners have a right to censor cussing if they want to

I just find it rather pussified
 
Well, it is definitely a problem since it affected a link someone tried to post in their OP of a thread. And we know what happens if we don't post source in the OP. Here is the thread, are any Mods going to chime in here?

 
Well, it is definitely a problem since it affected a link someone tried to post in their OP of a thread. And we know what happens if we don't post source in the OP. Here is the thread, are any Mods going to chime in here?

Well that's pretty crazy. Lemme put that to the test:
"Operation *******, U.S. immigration law enforcement campaign during the summer of 1954 that resulted in the mass deportation of Mexican nationals—1,100,000 persons according to the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), though most estimates put the figure closer to 300,000. Drafted by U.S. Attorney General Herbert Brownell, Jr., and vetted by Pres. Dwight D. Eisenhower, Operation ******* arose at least partly in response to a portion of the American public that had become angry at the widespread corruption among employers of sharecroppers and growers along the Mexican border and at the Border Patrol’s inability to stem the influx of illegal workers."
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Operation-*******
^Okay, that's fail right there. :(
Can't even link to and properly quote Brittanica about history because of a cussing filter?
Not good. :(
 
Last edited:
I think the site owners should allow only paying members to curse. That would be a spectacular social experiment of haves and have nots.
 
Free speech is not impurities, dude. False analogy, or "Post Hoc" fallacy.

"This fallacy gets its name from the Latin phrase “post hoc, ergo propter hoc,” which translates as “after this, therefore because of this.”
A filter, by definition, removes unwanted impurities from a source medium before it arrives at the destination.

So, the sender may say what the please, it's only the receiver that doesn't have to read it.
I don't think this is a false analogy. However, there is a logical gap between sending a message and reading it
 
What kind of PC garbage in 2026 is this?
It's not doing anything but limiting free expression, seriously.
It truly is silly, IMO.
Stifling free speech is anti-American!


It's a classic left-wing scenario: you can't say the word "a$$hole", but you can call for the assassination of the president, and the extermination of every conservative, Christian, Jew, gun owner, or white person in America.
 
15th post
It's a classic left-wing scenario: you can't say the word "a$$hole", but you can call for the assassination of the president, and the extermination of every conservative, Christian, Jew, gun owner, or white person in America.
Provide a link to anyone who has said any of those things on these boards….
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom