Respect for Marriage Act?

Just because one provision of marriage is designed to protect any potential offspring from compromised DNA does not mean marriage is intended for the opposite sex. That's not how logic and reason work Short Bus.

And “short bus” is a derogatory statement about disabled children, most of which have far greater value than you will ever have.

Your derogatory and bigoted statements directed at their disabilities show what a vile little man you are.
 
Is that what you guess? 😆

Why? Go ahead and share your opinion on the matter so we can point and laugh at you again. 😆
No need too. You did it for me.

Thanks, but I really didn’t need the assist. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
 
And “short bus” is a derogatory statement about disabled children, most of which have far greater value than you will ever have.
Are you a disabled child because that's clearly who I'm directing my comments to. As I said, learn how to logic. 😆
Your derogatory and bigoted statements directed at their disabilities show what a vile little man you are.
I've only laughed at your disabilities and I have no shame in doing so. 😆
 
No need too. You did it for me.

Thanks, but I really didn’t need the assist. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
We can all see the logically fallacy in your argument. It was even explained to you. Do you need me to explain it to you slower? 😆
 
Are you a disabled child because that's clearly who I'm directing my comments to. As I said, learn how to logic. 😆

I've only laughed at your disabilities and I have no shame in doing so. 😆

Why do you hate disabled children?
 
We can all see the logically fallacy in your argument. It was even explained to you. Do you need me to explain it to you slower? 😆

Guess the two aren’t similarly situated. Huh hoss?

You still hate disabled kids?
 
Do you guess or do you have the balls to argue that?

You still beat your wife? 😆

Oh my balls are perfect. But no, you can’t see or touch them.

My wife? Never beaten. Always satisfied.
 
Oh my balls are perfect. But no, you can’t see or touch them.
I didn't ask to touch them, you fantasized that. What you didn't do is answer the question. The best you can do is ask a question you don't have the courage or intelligence to answer yourself.
My wife? Never beaten. Always satisfied.
And I haven't disparaged any child unless you feel like confessing something? 😆
 
I didn't ask to touch them, you fantasized that. What you didn't do is answer the question. The best you can do is ask a question you don't have the courage or intelligence to answer yourself.

And I haven't disparaged any child unless you feel like confessing something? 😆

You asked a question? Sorry, I missed that. I was busy trying to figure out why you hate the disabled kids so much. Did one beat you up in your youth?
 
You asked a question? Sorry, I missed that. I was busy trying to figure out why you hate the disabled kids so much. Did one beat you up in your youth?
Oh, I'm well aware you'd rather cosplay and fantasize than make a rational argument. That's much harder. Maybe beyond your capabilities. 😆
 
Then I guess we don’t need that pesky “not too closely related” requirement, right? Because it ONLY makes sense if the couple has the ability to create offspring, right?

That makes sense. But the "not closely related" requirement is the least of it.
 
Oh, I'm well aware you'd rather cosplay and fantasize than make a rational argument. That's much harder. Maybe beyond your capabilities. 😆

I guess this cosplay crap is important to you? Never heard of it.
 
I guess this cosplay crap is important to you? Never heard of it.

Is cosplay the defense of disabled children against those, like you that seem to hate them?
 
Back
Top Bottom