Yea because the states would have abolished slavery, Jim Crow, given everyone the right to vote. Oh my bad I was in fantasyland for a moment.The sky is falling the sky is falling!!! They are taking powers away from the Federal government it never should have had!!! Oh noooooooos!!
Supreme Court set to overturn Roe v. Wade, leaked draft opinion shows: report
The Supreme Court has voted to strike down Roe v. Wade, according to an unprecedented leak of a draft opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito and obtained by Politico.www.foxnews.com
"We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled," Justice Samuel Alito writes in the document,
I say that we hold that the Supreme Court is no longer legitimate. The Democrats need to RISE UP and start civil war to protect women and their right to privacy. This is unbelievable to see 5 people try and change 50 years of precedent. This will destroy the COUNTRY.
Supreme Court set to overturn Roe v. Wade, leaked draft opinion shows: report
The Supreme Court has voted to strike down Roe v. Wade, according to an unprecedented leak of a draft opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito and obtained by Politico.
"We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled," Justice Samuel Alito writes in the document,
I say that we hold that the Supreme Court is no longer legitimate. The Democrats need to RISE UP and start civil war to protect women and their right to privacy. This is unbelievable to see 5 people try and change 50 years of precedent. This will destroy the COUNTRY.
"It's not fair! Mom said it was the left's turn to be authoritarian and opppressive!"
But you're okay with that when it's Muslim countries.
Conservatives have no obligation to validate your hyper-emotional fear-mongering.
Nobody tells you how to sit in your shithole country and draw dole checks.
How about people just stop having unprotected sex with pieces of shit?
OP is correct.
‘Justices who comprise the conservative majority on the Supreme Court have long been hostile to the right to privacy that was articulated in Griswold v. Connecticut, which protects the right to use contraception. Strict textualist justices claim the word “privacy” is not in the Constitution and thus the right to privacy does not exist.
www.vox.com
‘Lawrence v. Texas, a 2003 decision decriminalizing same-sex sodomy; Obergefell v. Hodges, a 2015 decision legalizing same-sex marriage; Griswold v. Connecticut, a 1965 decision that legalized contraceptive use; and Loving v. Virginia, the 1967 decision legalizing interracial marriage.
You might be interesting to talk to if you'd stop drama-queening for two minutes in a row.‘Justices who comprise the conservative majority on the Supreme Court have long been hostile to the right to privacy that was articulated in Griswold v. Connecticut, which protects the right to use contraception. Strict textualist justices claim the word “privacy” is not in the Constitution and thus the right to privacy does not exist.
This is the same rhetorical move that Justice Alito makes in his leaked opinion overturning Roe v. Wade. He claims that because the word “abortion” is not in the Constitution ... consequently the right to abortion does not exist.
The problem for our modern society is that many rights we care about have been protected as progeny of Griswold. This decision also gave us Loving v. Virginia, which invalidated an anti-miscegenation law, as well as Windsor and Obergefell, which articulated a right to marriage equality for same-sex couples.
After this [opinion], Loving, Windsor, and Obergefell are all on constitutionally thin ice. And the frustrating thing is Justice Alito’s ignoring the Ninth Amendment, which protects Americans’ unenumerated rights. As Roe recognized 49 years ago, the right to abortion is protected by the Ninth Amendment.
Or at least it did until this opinion becomes the law of the land.'
After Roe: 9 legal experts on what rights the Supreme Court might target next
Does Justice Alito’s draft opinion hint at future rollbacks on marriage equality, birth control, and other issues?
Pursuant to this extremist, wrongheaded rightwing judicial dogma, conservatives will continue their attack on the rights and civil liberties of the American people, allowing government to interfere in all manner of personal, private matters clearly not within the purview of the state.
