Republicans won’t be satisfied with overturning Roe

[daveman]

No I am not a victim, because I am not a woman moron. My question is what's next? Hell the Trump candidates lied about abortion when they knew they were going to overturn it. It's the reason Republicans don't want the John Lewis Voting Bill.

Yes, yes, you're going to be back in chains. At least, that's what white Democrats want you to believe.

 

[daveman]

Or are you just stupid.

Not me. That's your fellow leftists.

Racism in our curriculums isn’t limited to history. It’s in math, too.​

 

[MarathonMike]

“Republican senators are giving us a glimpse of the culture war clashes to come. There are already warning signs — including the Texas directive that prohibits parents from legally providing gender-affirming treatment and therapies to their children, as well as various state officials’ questioning whether the Constitution sanctions contraceptive use. Indeed, some Republican senators have gestured toward these future conflicts. In his questions to Jackson, Sen. John Cornyn (R-Tex.) repeatedly sought her views of Obergefell v. Hodges, the court’s 2015 decision legalizing same-sex marriage, pressing her as to whether the decision was properly decided. Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) took her turn at the microphone to criticize Griswold v. Connecticut, the 1965 itcase that legalized contraception use. It’s not a stretch to imagine this revisionism extending to Loving v. Virginia, the ruling that legalized interracial marriage. A Republican senator recently said he was open to overturning that ruling. He later walked back his comments.

All this underscores that abortion was never the conservatives’ endgame. It is merely a way station on the path to rolling back a wide range of rights — the rights that scaffold the most intimate aspects of our lives and protect the liberty and equality of marginalized groups.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2022/03/25/ketanji-brown-jackson-roe/

Republicans’ assault on citizens’ rights and protected liberties has just begun.

The sky is falling the sky is falling!!! They are taking powers away from the Federal government it never should have had!!! Oh noooooooos!!

 

[Lesh]

Yeah....you'd like that....wouldn't you.
Nope....the fact is Roe v. Wade never should have been allowed to stand on it's own.
If Democrats wanted it so badly they should have codified it with an amendment to the constitution.
But then that would totally remove an issue they've been using for 50 years against Republicans.
If anything.....it's Democrats that want to segregate us from each other.....not the GOP.

But you freaks claimed you would never over turn Roe.

You were lying???

 

[eagle1462010]

But you freaks claimed you would never over turn Roe.

You were lying???

I never said that..............lol

States Rights............Your Blue States can still kill babies...............Just not in our Red States who are happy to tell you to go to hell on this issue.

You have no right to tell us what to believe............or what we accept as ok.................62 million plus abortions ........time to end it at least in our states.

 

[munkle]

"including the Texas directive that prohibits parents from legally providing gender-affirming treatment and therapies to their children"

oh no!

 

[Lesh]

Ben Shapiro Lets The Cat Out Of The Bag

They are coming for gay marriage next.

crooksandliars.com

Never trus a Republican.

YES...they did say they wouldn't overturn Roe...and look

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Wouldn't surprise me if they didn't go after gay marriage and interacial marriage

So you're doubly screwed.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

YES...they did say they wouldn't overturn Roe...and look

Who? Link?

 

[Zincwarrior]

God wants us to procreate.

God says quit saying what He thinks.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

BECAUSE IT'S IN THE CONSTITUTION YOU COMPLETE EGGHEAD

2nd amendment ever heard of it???

‘…the language and tone Alito uses overall could encourage more challenges, said Jason Pierceson, professor of political science at the University of Illinois, Springfield. “If the right to privacy is deconstructed or is hollowed out, or is minimized, then those cases in particular have less standing,” Pierceson said.

A challenge to same-sex marriage could come before the high court on religious liberty grounds, for example, such as someone arguing their religious faith prevents them from recognizing same-sex marriage. Cases along those lines have been mostly about exceptions to anti-discrimination laws so far, Pierceson said, “but one could see potentially a broadening of the argument to the fact that maybe same-sex marriage laws are unconstitutional in the first place.”

LGBTQ rights have made rapid progress over the past decade, and public opinion overall has become much more supportive. But especially over the past year there has been a wave of bills in state legislatures aimed at transgender youth sports and healthcare, as well as talking about LGBTQ issues in certain classrooms. Backers of those bills generally argue they’re needed to protect kids and the rights of parents.

Against that backdrop, the draft opinion, if finalized, could “send up a flare” to conservative activists, said Sharon McGowan, legal director at Lambda Legal.

“Overturning Roe will be most dangerous because of the signal it will send lower courts to disregard all the other precedents that exist,” she said.

“It’s starting with abortion. It’s not going to end with abortion,” said Mini Timmaraju, the president of NARAL Pro-Choice America. “So everyone needs to be very vigilant.”’

Advocates worry other rights at risk if court overturns Roe

Little doubt remains about what the Supreme Court plans to do with Roe v. Wade. But uncertainty abounds about the ripple effects as the court nears a final opinion expected to overturn the landmark 1973 case that created a nationwide right to abortion.

apnews.com

There is no doubt that the authoritarian right will use the overturning of Roe as ‘justification’ to attack other rights and protected liberties, to allow government further interference in citizens’ private lives, and to codify in public law rightwing racism, bigotry, and hate.

 

[SweetSue92]

‘…the language and tone Alito uses overall could encourage more challenges, said Jason Pierceson, professor of political science at the University of Illinois, Springfield. “If the right to privacy is deconstructed or is hollowed out, or is minimized, then those cases in particular have less standing,” Pierceson said.

A challenge to same-sex marriage could come before the high court on religious liberty grounds, for example, such as someone arguing their religious faith prevents them from recognizing same-sex marriage. Cases along those lines have been mostly about exceptions to anti-discrimination laws so far, Pierceson said, “but one could see potentially a broadening of the argument to the fact that maybe same-sex marriage laws are unconstitutional in the first place.”

LGBTQ rights have made rapid progress over the past decade, and public opinion overall has become much more supportive. But especially over the past year there has been a wave of bills in state legislatures aimed at transgender youth sports and healthcare, as well as talking about LGBTQ issues in certain classrooms. Backers of those bills generally argue they’re needed to protect kids and the rights of parents.

Against that backdrop, the draft opinion, if finalized, could “send up a flare” to conservative activists, said Sharon McGowan, legal director at Lambda Legal.

“Overturning Roe will be most dangerous because of the signal it will send lower courts to disregard all the other precedents that exist,” she said.

“It’s starting with abortion. It’s not going to end with abortion,” said Mini Timmaraju, the president of NARAL Pro-Choice America. “So everyone needs to be very vigilant.”’

Advocates worry other rights at risk if court overturns Roe

Little doubt remains about what the Supreme Court plans to do with Roe v. Wade. But uncertainty abounds about the ripple effects as the court nears a final opinion expected to overturn the landmark 1973 case that created a nationwide right to abortion.

apnews.com

There is no doubt that the authoritarian right will use the overturning of Roe as ‘justification’ to attack other rights and protected liberties, to allow government further interference in citizens’ private lives, and to codify in public law rightwing racism, bigotry, and hate.

Two days later and already this is not having the impact you wanted.

Gosh. Losing again.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

This subject has just been covered on UK tv news. It was an extraordinary report with prominent GOPs refusing to discuss the issue, running down corridors and scuttling into offices.

By contrast they had no problem finding dems willing to talk and ondemn this nonsense.

Biden looked like a dog with two dicks as these loons have just handed him and his party their big issue to win elections for years to come.

Anybody left of centre or just normal will not tolerate this nonsense. This is the crazies taking over the right. Joe and kamala have just guaranteed their jobs and trump is fucked.

Correct.

Now that the Supreme Court has abandoned its role and responsibility as the means by which citizens can seek relief from rightwing authoritarianism and oppression, Americans will need to use the political process to defend their rights and protected liberties from attack by conservatives.

 

[scruffy]

Correct.

Now that the Supreme Court has abandoned its role and responsibility as the means by which citizens can seek relief from rightwing authoritarianism and oppression, Americans will need to use the political process to defend their rights and protected liberties from attack by conservatives.

Political process is fine.

But violence will result in dead lefties.

You fuckers think you can protest without looting anything or burning anything to the ground?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

They'll be coming after birth control next.

Oh they'll say they won't but they said that about abortion too

True.

Conservatives will also attack the rights of gay and transgender Americans, seek to allow the states to ban same-sex marriage, seek to allow the states to again criminalize being gay and transgender.

We’ll see the balkanization of our rights and protected liberties – indeed, our liberties will no longer be protected, one’s rights will be contingent upon his state of residence, where those in Republican-controlled states will have their rights in constant jeopardy, subject to the capricious whims of partisan politics, no longer safeguarded by the Constitution and rule of law.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Wouldn't surprise me if they didn't go after gay marriage and interacial marriage

Also true.

If conservatives are to be consistent with their “states’ rights” dogma, then Loving v. Virginia should be overturned, allowing the states to prohibit interracial marriage, and overturn Brown v. Board of Education, allowing the states implement segregation:

“On Tuesday, Republican Sen. Mike Braun of Indiana held a press conference discussing Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, President Joe Biden’s nominee for the Supreme Court. During his press conference, he asserted that the Supreme Court was wrong in its decision of Loving v. Virginia.”

Republican Senator Suggests Supreme Court Should Reconsider Loving v. Virginia

On Tuesday, Republican Sen. Mike Braun of Indiana held a press conference discussing Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, President Joe Biden’s nominee for the Supreme Court. During his press conference, he asserted that the Supreme Court was wrong in its decision of Loving v. Virginia. Loving v...

pwperspective.com

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

But you freaks claimed you would never over turn Roe.

You were lying???

Of course conservatives were lying – that’s all dishonest conservatives do.

And conservatives are lying now with they claim they won’t attack other rights and protected liberties.

 

[scruffy]

Of course conservatives were lying – that’s all dishonest conservatives do.

And conservatives are lying now with they claim they won’t attack other rights and protected liberties.

Link?

No one made such a claim

YOU are lying

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Of course conservatives were lying – that’s all dishonest conservatives do.

And conservatives are lying now with they claim they won’t attack other rights and protected liberties.

This is what you get when yu elect a liar and then h appoints liars.

The Supreme Court is broken and Biden needs to deal with the fact that liars sit there in very important roles making decisions on narrow political lines.

What that should look likeus probably a bigger court to nullify the liars influence.

 

[scruffy]

This is what you get when yu elect a liar and then h appoints liars.

The Supreme Court is broken and Biden needs to deal with the fact that liars sit there in very important roles making decisions on narrow political lines.

What that should look likeus probably a bigger court to nullify the liars influence.

What a petty human being you are.

Typical leftard, though

So now the SCOTUS is "broken" because you don't agree with one of its rulings?

It's "full of liars" because they're telling you there's no Constitutionally protected Right to murder?

You lefties are INSANE. Completely incapable of logic, among other things