- Moderator
- #21
They cut the funding.
So yeah.
Lets blame the fucks.
Perhaps if Obama hadn't wasted so much money paying back campaign contributers with tax money, we would have had some more money for security. Or Maybe if it was placed it bills that weren't full of corruption, it might have passed.
Regardless, you are still trying to avoid responsibility for Benghazai and the cover up. The Administration screwed up. They lied about it. They got caught. But no it's got to be someone elses fault.
Do you know why Obama's such a crappy leader? It's because no matter what happens it's someone elses fault. The man wont take an iota of responsibility for anything that happens. Even when it's his direct policies that caused them to occur. The man is a coward and unfit for the Presidency.
Nixon had to resign over the cover up of a burglary. Obama is covering up a terrorist attack and the murder of American citizens. But he doesn't have the integrity Nixon did to take responsibility for what he did. He doesn't even have to resign, just freaking man up.
How sad is that? He has less integrity than Nixon.
No man.
They cut funding.
They've been saying no to almost everything.
There's no backing out of this.
The VERY GUY holding the hearings..voted to CUT funding for the embassies.
And yet, there was not cut in funding for CIA safe houses was there? And that's what's really going on here. The Ambassador was working with the CIA to track the weapons Obama gave Al Qaeda. Him and the agents had to take refuges at a CIA safehouse we are now calling a consulate and the rest is history.
Oh, and if there isn't funding to protect an ambassador in Libya, we shouldn't have an Ambassador in Libya. If you don't have the funding to protect someone, you don't send them INTO A WAR ZONE.
That would have been the Adminstration/State department responsible for that. Though Im sure you somehow think Republicans have the power to give out diplomatic assignments.