Republicans newest defense: Prove it to Putin, C.I.A.!

[buckeye45_73]

Crazy! Putin says prove it and were supposed to what? Show him how we tracked his hackers? ROFL.

Of course then they say "They should show it to Congress and they didnt. That's proof our intel agencies are lying on the good background of Russia" Lol whut? As if they are lying because they didn't show proof. Ok! They have shown proof to both parties in congress. Now what? They'll slither away again to a new excuse.

All for the defense of...Russia? What happened to you guys?

What's wrong with wanting proof?

Sorry man, not everything works on your social justice Marxism. Just calling someone a racist doesn't make it so, maybe in your fucked up world, but sane people would like to have information. YOU made the charge, YOU need to prove it....so until you do, go **** yourself.

A guy supporting an ex-KGB war criminal calls someone else a Marxist, Irony...

Regan must be spinning in his grave as he party turns to traitors...

Nope, Reagan would hate your crazy ******* stupid movement, full of race baiting and racism itself.....

 

[CowboyTed]

Crazy! Putin says prove it and were supposed to what? Show him how we tracked his hackers? ROFL.

Of course then they say "They should show it to Congress and they didnt. That's proof our intel agencies are lying on the good background of Russia" Lol whut? As if they are lying because they didn't show proof. Ok! They have shown proof to both parties in congress. Now what? They'll slither away again to a new excuse.

All for the defense of...Russia? What happened to you guys?

These are the same agencies on whose intel we launched a war against Saddam Hussein. Now we're supposed to just accept "We're pretty sure they did something, but we're not going to tell you what exactly they did or how they did it, and if you quote me by name I'll deny everything" as enough to overturn the results of the election?

Read Fiasco by Thomas Ricks and he will explain how the CIA asked to hand over all findings and the Bush Administration cherrypicked from that... Descent was met with severe punishment like outing you and thus possibly every other agent you worked with going back decades...

Trump admitted the Russians did the hacking during the election..

The question should be asked why certain people on the right (not all of them) can't see the the difference between real news be it good or bad AND fake news which tells you what you want to hear...

Here is a couple of real stories...

Hillary is innocent, there is no serious allegations today which have gone uninvestigated which she has not been cleared off...

Hillary was three times more honest than Trump during main statements... Hillary was one of the most truthful candidates in the race, Trump has been the most dishonest in history...

These are facts, you are happy that pathological liar with treasonous links is President...

 

[buckeye45_73]

Crazy! Putin says prove it and were supposed to what? Show him how we tracked his hackers? ROFL.

Of course then they say "They should show it to Congress and they didnt. That's proof our intel agencies are lying on the good background of Russia" Lol whut? As if they are lying because they didn't show proof. Ok! They have shown proof to both parties in congress. Now what? They'll slither away again to a new excuse.

All for the defense of...Russia? What happened to you guys?

These are the same agencies on whose intel we launched a war against Saddam Hussein. Now we're supposed to just accept "We're pretty sure they did something, but we're not going to tell you what exactly they did or how they did it, and if you quote me by name I'll deny everything" as enough to overturn the results of the election?

Read Fiasco by Thomas Ricks and he will explain how the CIA asked to hand over all findings and the Bush Administration cherrypicked from that... Descent was met with severe punishment like outing you and thus possibly every other agent you worked with going back decades...

Trump admitted the Russians did the hacking during the election..

The question should be asked why certain people on the right (not all of them) can't see the the difference between real news be it good or bad AND fake news which tells you what you want to hear...

Here is a couple of real stories...

Hillary is innocent, there is no serious allegations today which have gone uninvestigated which she has not been cleared off...

Hillary was three times more honest than Trump during main statements... Hillary was one of the most truthful candidates in the race, Trump has been the most dishonest in history...

These are facts, you are happy that pathological liar with treasonous links is President...

I'll have to check the rest, but that statement is utter bullshit.
She was never honest about anything and the Foundation is rife with corruption.

 

[Manonthestreet]

De.mocrats latest line.....We don't want an investigation cause it would compromise national security........ie we lied and this will expose us

 

[hadit]

Crazy! Putin says prove it and were supposed to what? Show him how we tracked his hackers? ROFL.

Of course then they say "They should show it to Congress and they didnt. That's proof our intel agencies are lying on the good background of Russia" Lol whut? As if they are lying because they didn't show proof. Ok! They have shown proof to both parties in congress. Now what? They'll slither away again to a new excuse.

All for the defense of...Russia? What happened to you guys?

These are the same agencies on whose intel we launched a war against Saddam Hussein. Now we're supposed to just accept "We're pretty sure they did something, but we're not going to tell you what exactly they did or how they did it, and if you quote me by name I'll deny everything" as enough to overturn the results of the election?

Read Fiasco by Thomas Ricks and he will explain how the CIA asked to hand over all findings and the Bush Administration cherrypicked from that... Descent was met with severe punishment like outing you and thus possibly every other agent you worked with going back decades...

Trump admitted the Russians did the hacking during the election..

The question should be asked why certain people on the right (not all of them) can't see the the difference between real news be it good or bad AND fake news which tells you what you want to hear...

Here is a couple of real stories...

Hillary is innocent, there is no serious allegations today which have gone uninvestigated which she has not been cleared off...

Hillary was three times more honest than Trump during main statements... Hillary was one of the most truthful candidates in the race, Trump has been the most dishonest in history...

These are facts, you are happy that pathological liar with treasonous links is President...

Please quote Trump where he said Russia did "the hacking during the election".

 

[buckeye45_73]

De.mocrats latest line.....We don't want an investigation cause it would compromise national security........ie we lied and this will expose us

]
No shit, they just put stuff out there and were calling for hearings, until people said, yeah lets look into this....then all of sudden, national security became an issue........I love to call their bluffs....they have nothing but deception and lies.....they are bullies, you stand up to them and they crumble like the pussies they are.

 

[Lewdog]

They didn't prove anything to both parties in Congress. They specifically refused to show up to Congress yesterday

I think Obama told us exactly why they didn't show up in Congress yesterday. When they do testify in Congress, that information becomes public knowledge, and the intelligence community isn't ready for that information to come out yet... they need to figure out what exactly they can release to the public without giving away how they know who hacks what and how.

Both parties have had a classified briefing... Choosing to ignore that doesn't mean it didn't happen...

I've said several times that the CIA has briefed Congressmen in private meetings...

 

[buckeye45_73]

They didn't prove anything to both parties in Congress. They specifically refused to show up to Congress yesterday

I think Obama told us exactly why they didn't show up in Congress yesterday. When they do testify in Congress, that information becomes public knowledge, and the intelligence community isn't ready for that information to come out yet... they need to figure out what exactly they can release to the public without giving away how they know who hacks what and how.

Both parties have had a classified briefing... Choosing to ignore that doesn't mean it didn't happen...

I've said several times that the CIA has briefed Congressmen in private meetings...

If so, I guess it's not too bad....sorry guys....you guys just can't win......all those elites and you guys are still idiots.......

 

[CowboyTed]

Crazy! Putin says prove it and were supposed to what? Show him how we tracked his hackers? ROFL.

Of course then they say "They should show it to Congress and they didnt. That's proof our intel agencies are lying on the good background of Russia" Lol whut? As if they are lying because they didn't show proof. Ok! They have shown proof to both parties in congress. Now what? They'll slither away again to a new excuse.

All for the defense of...Russia? What happened to you guys?

What's wrong with wanting proof?

Sorry man, not everything works on your social justice Marxism. Just calling someone a racist doesn't make it so, maybe in your fucked up world, but sane people would like to have information. YOU made the charge, YOU need to prove it....so until you do, go **** yourself.

A guy supporting an ex-KGB war criminal calls someone else a Marxist, Irony...

Regan must be spinning in his grave as he party turns to traitors...

Nope, Reagan would hate your crazy ******* stupid movement, full of race baiting and racism itself.....

Yes, Reagan had his moments with racism...

But lets consider he wanted to trade with South Africa while having an embargo with Cuba....

An you think he wouldn't be horrified at ye bunch of sell outs.... Reagan would have never supported Trump for the same reason no living President supported Trump, they did the job and thought he didn't have it)

Michael Reagan Blasts Trump: My Father Would Not Support This Campaign

Again your fake news...

Crazy! Putin says prove it and were supposed to what? Show him how we tracked his hackers? ROFL.

Of course then they say "They should show it to Congress and they didnt. That's proof our intel agencies are lying on the good background of Russia" Lol whut? As if they are lying because they didn't show proof. Ok! They have shown proof to both parties in congress. Now what? They'll slither away again to a new excuse.

All for the defense of...Russia? What happened to you guys?

These are the same agencies on whose intel we launched a war against Saddam Hussein. Now we're supposed to just accept "We're pretty sure they did something, but we're not going to tell you what exactly they did or how they did it, and if you quote me by name I'll deny everything" as enough to overturn the results of the election?

Read Fiasco by Thomas Ricks and he will explain how the CIA asked to hand over all findings and the Bush Administration cherrypicked from that... Descent was met with severe punishment like outing you and thus possibly every other agent you worked with going back decades...

Trump admitted the Russians did the hacking during the election..

The question should be asked why certain people on the right (not all of them) can't see the the difference between real news be it good or bad AND fake news which tells you what you want to hear...

Here is a couple of real stories...

Hillary is innocent, there is no serious allegations today which have gone uninvestigated which she has not been cleared off...

Hillary was three times more honest than Trump during main statements... Hillary was one of the most truthful candidates in the race, Trump has been the most dishonest in history...

These are facts, you are happy that pathological liar with treasonous links is President...

I'll have to check the rest, but that statement is utter bullshit.
She was never honest about anything and the Foundation is rife with corruption.

Have you got any actual proof?

Your kind and your Russian friends have been spreading fake stories from the start... You have got so bad you don't know the truth anymore...

So why have there been no charges and no convictions....

Your Russian buddies are going to be pissed... There was Hitler appeasers in UK in the 1930s as well... HE is going to start getting his appeasement real soon... First will be the mass genocide in Aleppo followed by a $500bn oil deal...

Give proof or accept you have been made a fool of by fake news...

 

[CowboyTed]

Crazy! Putin says prove it and were supposed to what? Show him how we tracked his hackers? ROFL.

Of course then they say "They should show it to Congress and they didnt. That's proof our intel agencies are lying on the good background of Russia" Lol whut? As if they are lying because they didn't show proof. Ok! They have shown proof to both parties in congress. Now what? They'll slither away again to a new excuse.

All for the defense of...Russia? What happened to you guys?

What's wrong with wanting proof?

Sorry man, not everything works on your social justice Marxism. Just calling someone a racist doesn't make it so, maybe in your fucked up world, but sane people would like to have information. YOU made the charge, YOU need to prove it....so until you do, go **** yourself.

A guy supporting an ex-KGB war criminal calls someone else a Marxist, Irony...

Regan must be spinning in his grave as he party turns to traitors...

Nope, Reagan would hate your crazy ******* stupid movement, full of race baiting and racism itself.....

Yes, Reagan had his moments with racism...

But lets consider he wanted to trade with South Africa while having an embargo with Cuba....

An you think he wouldn't be horrified at ye bunch of sell outs.... Reagan would have never supported Trump for the same reason no living President supported Trump, they did the job and thought he didn't have it)

Michael Reagan Blasts Trump: My Father Would Not Support This Campaign

Again your fake news...

 

[CowboyTed]

De.mocrats latest line.....We don't want an investigation cause it would compromise national security........ie we lied and this will expose us

Where is the source of your information that Iran are making a Nuclear Bomb? Do we have witnessed in public hearings...

The CIA has briefed bought parties on both the unclassified & classified information.

More FAKE news from the same sources..

 

[CowboyTed]

Crazy! Putin says prove it and were supposed to what? Show him how we tracked his hackers? ROFL.

Of course then they say "They should show it to Congress and they didnt. That's proof our intel agencies are lying on the good background of Russia" Lol whut? As if they are lying because they didn't show proof. Ok! They have shown proof to both parties in congress. Now what? They'll slither away again to a new excuse.

All for the defense of...Russia? What happened to you guys?

These are the same agencies on whose intel we launched a war against Saddam Hussein. Now we're supposed to just accept "We're pretty sure they did something, but we're not going to tell you what exactly they did or how they did it, and if you quote me by name I'll deny everything" as enough to overturn the results of the election?

Read Fiasco by Thomas Ricks and he will explain how the CIA asked to hand over all findings and the Bush Administration cherrypicked from that... Descent was met with severe punishment like outing you and thus possibly every other agent you worked with going back decades...

Trump admitted the Russians did the hacking during the election..

The question should be asked why certain people on the right (not all of them) can't see the the difference between real news be it good or bad AND fake news which tells you what you want to hear...

Here is a couple of real stories...

Hillary is innocent, there is no serious allegations today which have gone uninvestigated which she has not been cleared off...

Hillary was three times more honest than Trump during main statements... Hillary was one of the most truthful candidates in the race, Trump has been the most dishonest in history...

These are facts, you are happy that pathological liar with treasonous links is President...

Please quote Trump where he said Russia did "the hacking during the election".

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/28/us/politics/donald-trump-russia-clinton-emails.html?_r=0

 

[BlackSand]

Crazy! Putin says prove it and were supposed to what? Show him how we tracked his hackers? ROFL.

Of course then they say "They should show it to Congress and they didnt. That's proof our intel agencies are lying on the good background of Russia" Lol whut? As if they are lying because they didn't show proof. Ok! They have shown proof to both parties in congress. Now what? They'll slither away again to a new excuse.

All for the defense of...Russia? What happened to you guys?

It's all under control ... Senators McCain and McConnell will make sure we get to the bottom of all this skullduggery.
With any luck that nit-wit can breathe new life into his "Maverick" brand ... Doing the establishment's business.

It won't be long and we will have concrete evidence how Putin made failed Democrat Presidential Nominee Clinton stab Bernie Sanders in the back.
We will finally figure out why John Podesta was in cohorts with Assange in attempts to sabotage the elections.
All will be well after we find out how the KGB blackmailed Donna Brazile into conspiring with the media to influence the debates.

.

 

[boedicca]

Here's a reality check for the OP (this is going evergreen, methinks):

 

[skookerasbil]

meh......another Misery of Sour Grapes thread.

In 24 hours, nobody is going to care about this.

 

[Constructive Anarchy]

Crazy! Putin says prove it and were supposed to what? Show him how we tracked his hackers? ROFL.

Of course then they say "They should show it to Congress and they didnt. That's proof our intel agencies are lying on the good background of Russia" Lol whut? As if they are lying because they didn't show proof. Ok! They have shown proof to both parties in congress. Now what? They'll slither away again to a new excuse.

All for the defense of...Russia? What happened to you guys?

These are the same agencies on whose intel we launched a war against Saddam Hussein. Now we're supposed to just accept "We're pretty sure they did something, but we're not going to tell you what exactly they did or how they did it, and if you quote me by name I'll deny everything" as enough to overturn the results of the election?

Read Fiasco by Thomas Ricks and he will explain how the CIA asked to hand over all findings and the Bush Administration cherrypicked from that... Descent was met with severe punishment like outing you and thus possibly every other agent you worked with going back decades...

Trump admitted the Russians did the hacking during the election..

The question should be asked why certain people on the right (not all of them) can't see the the difference between real news be it good or bad AND fake news which tells you what you want to hear...

Here is a couple of real stories...

Hillary is innocent, there is no serious allegations today which have gone uninvestigated which she has not been cleared off...

Hillary was three times more honest than Trump during main statements... Hillary was one of the most truthful candidates in the race, Trump has been the most dishonest in history...

These are facts, you are happy that pathological liar with treasonous links is President...

Those examples you gave are entirely false.

 

[toomuchtime_]

You sure do assure and assert things a whole lot.

It sure would be nice to see some evidence of this alleged secret report. Or are we just supposed to take their word for it?

You take Putin's word for it without question.

Putin's word for what? I'd like to see our own government substantiate the allegations. But they don't seem very anxious to do that.

The CIA said the Russians did it.

Russia said prove it but didn't deny it

You rush to defend Putin non denial.

When can we have some kind of independent verification of this "secret report"?

Not until after Obama leaves office because he is preventing the intel services from testifying on this matter before Congress.

 

[Constructive Anarchy]

It sure would be nice to see some evidence of this alleged secret report. Or are we just supposed to take their word for it?

You take Putin's word for it without question.

Putin's word for what? I'd like to see our own government substantiate the allegations. But they don't seem very anxious to do that.

The CIA said the Russians did it.

Russia said prove it but didn't deny it

You rush to defend Putin non denial.

When can we have some kind of independent verification of this "secret report"?

Not until after Obama leaves office because he is preventing the intel services from testifying on this matter before Congress.

Or the secret report isn't nearly as compelling as the Washington Post and the New York Times would like us to believe.

 

[BlindBoo]

These are the same agencies on whose intel we launched a war against Saddam Hussein

That was the Bush Administration highlighting any intel, vetted or not that bolstered their claim and ignoring any intel to the contrary, including a briefing by CIA director himself.

Bush knew Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction

and if you quote me by name I'll deny everything

I think we know the names of the guy who leaked this.

Joint DHS and ODNI Election Security Statement

 

[hadit]

These are the same agencies on whose intel we launched a war against Saddam Hussein

That was the Bush Administration highlighting any intel, vetted or not that bolstered their claim and ignoring any intel to the contrary, including a briefing by CIA director himself.

Bush knew Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction

and if you quote me by name I'll deny everything

I think we know the names of the guy who leaked this.

Joint DHS and ODNI Election Security Statement

And, have you seen the entirety of the intel that implicates the Russians as well as any other that implicates other parties, or have you just read some things that other people, who also have not seen any of the intel, have said? IOW, what cherry picking is going on here?