Republicans have a poor understanding of economics. They should have no place in making policy

The Articles of Confederation proved a small government is too ineffective and can't work.

if so our Founders would not have created a tiny tiny govt with no income tax and no Bill of Rights.

Isn't learning shocking??



The Bill of Rights is the collective name for the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution. Proposed to assuage the fears of Anti-Federalists who had opposed Constitutional ratification, these amendments guarantee a number of personal freedoms, limit the government's power in judicial and other proceedings, and reserve some powers to the states and the public. Originally the amendments applied only to the federal government, however, most were subsequently applied to the government of each state by way of the Fourteenth Amendment, through a process known as incorporation.


On June 8, 1789 Representative James Madison introduced a series of thirty-nine amendments to the constitution in the House of Representatives. Among his recommendations Madison proposed opening up the Constitution and inserting specific rights limiting the power of Congress in Article One, Section 9. Seven of these limitations would became part of the ten ratified Bill of Rights amendments. Ultimately, on September 25, 1789, Congress approved twelve articles of amendment to the Constitution and submitted them to the states for ratification. Contrary to Madison’s original proposal that the articles be incorporated into the main body of the Constitution, they were proposed as "supplemental" additions to it. On December 15, 1791, Articles Three–Twelve, having been ratified by the required number of states, became Amendments One–Ten of the Constitution.


United States Bill of Rights - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

From my minor in history Bubba

Isn't learning shocking??
 
Republican effort to make deficits and debt illegal? .

yes by proposing 30 Balanced Budget Amendment since Jefferson's first all of which were killed by the cancerous Democrats.


Proposing? Hell do you know the Congress actually has tax/spending power? lol

it also has the power to support making debt and deficits illegal. Since Jefferson only Republicans have supported this while Demcorats have spied for HItler and Stalin and elected single payer lib commie Obama wanting not wanting to go smaller but to go far far bigger.

Do you lack the IQ to understand?
 
The drop in gas prices is putting a massive amount of money in the pockets of Americans to be spent on other things. Rest assured that Barry will lay claim to any economic benefits from that as well even though low gas prices go completely counter to what he wanted. Anyone want to wager how long it's going to be before a liberal calls for a big bump in the gas tax?

You mean TECHNOLOGY created the boom? And the GOP wants to defund education and research? lol


Let's just follow Dubya/GOP lead of pushing people to 'shop' and give tax credits of $5,000+ to buy gas sucking SUV's, that will help US right? lol

Kindly explain why oil and natural gas production on Federally controlled lands is actually down under the Obama Administration when overall production of oil and natural gas is up substantially on lands controlled privately or by the States?

So who's REALLY responsible for all those new jobs created in the oil and natural gas industries? It certainly isn't Barack Obama! Quite obviously if he had control of all the oil and gas producing land in the US the price of gasoline would be $6 a gallon right now.


A big part of the trend can be attributed to the location of shale deposits where hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, and horizontal drilling have allowed producers to tap huge oil or natural gas resources.

Much of it is in Pennsylvania, where gas production has taken off. And it's common in Texas and North Dakota, states where the federal government owns far less land than it does in several Western energy-producing states.

“There are only so many dollars out there,” said Sarah Ladislaw, an energy expert with the Center for Strategic and International Studies, noting the heavy industry investment in shale exploration outside of federal lands.

“When you overlay those two maps, the places to be weren’t necessarily on federal land,” said Ladislaw, co-director of the think tank’s Energy and National Security Program.

Obama GOP battle over credit for surging oil and gas production TheHill


BUT HEY, THE DEFICITS OBAMA INHERITED THANKS TO DUBYA/GOP POLICY (CREDIT CARDS MAXED OUT, GUTTING federal revenues 25% of GDP), WELL HELL, THOSE REST ON OBAMA'S SHOULDERS ALONE RIGHT? lol

So now you're going to claim that it was just "chance" that production increased on lands not controlled by the Federal Government and that the Obama Administration's reluctance to issue drilling permits had nothing to do with it? :rofl::rofl::rofl:

I can't make up my mind whether you're the most naive and uniformed person I've ever run across or whether you simply have no problem with distorting facts.
 
Reducing the U.S. population by 20 million would creat 40 million jobs?????? That's some wonky math you're using Eddie.
.

dear, you lack the IQ to be here. I'm sorry. If you ship the illegals home that would create 20 million new jobs, bring back 30 million more by making unions illegal again, and another 20 million by eliminating the corporate tax.

Get it 1+ 1=2
What a great example of how retarded conservatives are and why their ideas are best left ignored.

Here we have a crazy one who claims his conservative ideas would add 70,000,000 jobs. But let's put that idiot's numbers under a microscope and take a closer look...

The civilian noninstitutional population in this country is about 249 million. Fruit loop dingus here wants to subtract 20 million, leaving 229 million.

Currently, there are 147 million people working. Plus fruitloop's imaginary 70 million he thinks he could get back to work is 217 million.

The idiot who struggles with 1+1 is actually claiming conservative ideas would get 217 million out of 229 million people working, or 95% of the total population age 16 and over.

:cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo:

That includes roughly 95% of 16 year olds in high school ... 95% of senior citizens, including 90 year olds with walkers, like himself.

Compare his hallucinations to reality when we had the lowest unemployment rate in the last half century. 3.9% in 2000. And even then we had 65% of the adult population employed.

Do you see now why so many people think you're insane?
 
The percentage of people in workforce is declining because Boomers are retiring.

.
The White House’s Council of Economic Advisers set out to answer that very question.

Last month, it issued a report dryly titled: “The Labor Force Participation Rate Since 2007: Causes and Policy Implications” in which economists cite three key developments:

#1) America is just getting older

About half of the decline in worker participation over the last seven years is due to demographics — the workforce is simply aging. About one-sixth of the population was at or above retirement age in 2009, according to the report. By 2029, that number will increase to 25%, per the Social Security Administration.

meanwhile unemployment is 11.4% about 50% higher than before barry's long recession.
Great. :eusa_doh: More evidence of your ignorance.

As if any were needed. :eusa_naughty:

The U6 rate (which actually includes some people who are working) went from 8.4% to 11.4% during the time frame you selected. That's an increase of 36%. Who knows what kind of math you conservatives resort to in order to think that's a 50% increase? :cuckoo:

And if that bothers you ... I can only imagine how guilt ridden you are for voting for Bush, who increased the U6 rate a whopping 126% from the time he was elected until the end of the Great Recession.
 
The drop in gas prices is putting a massive amount of money in the pockets of Americans to be spent on other things. Rest assured that Barry will lay claim to any economic benefits from that as well even though low gas prices go completely counter to what he wanted. Anyone want to wager how long it's going to be before a liberal calls for a big bump in the gas tax?

You mean TECHNOLOGY created the boom? And the GOP wants to defund education and research? lol


Let's just follow Dubya/GOP lead of pushing people to 'shop' and give tax credits of $5,000+ to buy gas sucking SUV's, that will help US right? lol

Kindly explain why oil and natural gas production on Federally controlled lands is actually down under the Obama Administration when overall production of oil and natural gas is up substantially on lands controlled privately or by the States?

So who's REALLY responsible for all those new jobs created in the oil and natural gas industries? It certainly isn't Barack Obama! Quite obviously if he had control of all the oil and gas producing land in the US the price of gasoline would be $6 a gallon right now.


A big part of the trend can be attributed to the location of shale deposits where hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, and horizontal drilling have allowed producers to tap huge oil or natural gas resources.

Much of it is in Pennsylvania, where gas production has taken off. And it's common in Texas and North Dakota, states where the federal government owns far less land than it does in several Western energy-producing states.

“There are only so many dollars out there,” said Sarah Ladislaw, an energy expert with the Center for Strategic and International Studies, noting the heavy industry investment in shale exploration outside of federal lands.

“When you overlay those two maps, the places to be weren’t necessarily on federal land,” said Ladislaw, co-director of the think tank’s Energy and National Security Program.

Obama GOP battle over credit for surging oil and gas production TheHill


BUT HEY, THE DEFICITS OBAMA INHERITED THANKS TO DUBYA/GOP POLICY (CREDIT CARDS MAXED OUT, GUTTING federal revenues 25% of GDP), WELL HELL, THOSE REST ON OBAMA'S SHOULDERS ALONE RIGHT? lol

So now you're going to claim that it was just "chance" that production increased on lands not controlled by the Federal Government and that the Obama Administration's reluctance to issue drilling permits had nothing to do with it? :rofl::rofl::rofl:

I can't make up my mind whether you're the most naive and uniformed person I've ever run across or whether you simply have no problem with distorting facts.




Comprhension issue huh?

“There are only so many dollars out there,” said Sarah Ladislaw, an energy expert with the Center for Strategic and International Studies, noting the heavy industry investment in shale exploration outside of federal lands.

“When you overlay those two maps, the places to be weren’t necessarily on federal land,” said Ladislaw, co-director of the think tank’s Energy and National Security Program.

Obama GOP battle over credit for surging oil and gas production TheHill
 
The drop in gas prices is putting a massive amount of money in the pockets of Americans to be spent on other things. Rest assured that Barry will lay claim to any economic benefits from that as well even though low gas prices go completely counter to what he wanted. Anyone want to wager how long it's going to be before a liberal calls for a big bump in the gas tax?

You mean TECHNOLOGY created the boom? And the GOP wants to defund education and research? lol


Let's just follow Dubya/GOP lead of pushing people to 'shop' and give tax credits of $5,000+ to buy gas sucking SUV's, that will help US right? lol

Kindly explain why oil and natural gas production on Federally controlled lands is actually down under the Obama Administration when overall production of oil and natural gas is up substantially on lands controlled privately or by the States?

So who's REALLY responsible for all those new jobs created in the oil and natural gas industries? It certainly isn't Barack Obama! Quite obviously if he had control of all the oil and gas producing land in the US the price of gasoline would be $6 a gallon right now.


A big part of the trend can be attributed to the location of shale deposits where hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, and horizontal drilling have allowed producers to tap huge oil or natural gas resources.

Much of it is in Pennsylvania, where gas production has taken off. And it's common in Texas and North Dakota, states where the federal government owns far less land than it does in several Western energy-producing states.

“There are only so many dollars out there,” said Sarah Ladislaw, an energy expert with the Center for Strategic and International Studies, noting the heavy industry investment in shale exploration outside of federal lands.

“When you overlay those two maps, the places to be weren’t necessarily on federal land,” said Ladislaw, co-director of the think tank’s Energy and National Security Program.

Obama GOP battle over credit for surging oil and gas production TheHill


BUT HEY, THE DEFICITS OBAMA INHERITED THANKS TO DUBYA/GOP POLICY (CREDIT CARDS MAXED OUT, GUTTING federal revenues 25% of GDP), WELL HELL, THOSE REST ON OBAMA'S SHOULDERS ALONE RIGHT? lol

So now you're going to claim that it was just "chance" that production increased on lands not controlled by the Federal Government and that the Obama Administration's reluctance to issue drilling permits had nothing to do with it? :rofl::rofl::rofl:

I can't make up my mind whether you're the most naive and uniformed person I've ever run across or whether you simply have no problem with distorting facts.




Comprhension issue huh?

“There are only so many dollars out there,” said Sarah Ladislaw, an energy expert with the Center for Strategic and International Studies, noting the heavy industry investment in shale exploration outside of federal lands.

“When you overlay those two maps, the places to be weren’t necessarily on federal land,” said Ladislaw, co-director of the think tank’s Energy and National Security Program.

Obama GOP battle over credit for surging oil and gas production TheHill

It's laughable that the Obama Administration has claimed soaring natural gas and oil production as an accomplishment of theirs. For him to sit there at a Wall Street Journal roundtable and give himself credit for that, given his record on fossil fuels is farce of the highest order! We, the American people are presently benefiting from low energy prices not because of anything that Barack Obama did...but rather DESPITE everything that Barack Obama did!
 
You mean TECHNOLOGY created the boom? And the GOP wants to defund education and research? lol


Let's just follow Dubya/GOP lead of pushing people to 'shop' and give tax credits of $5,000+ to buy gas sucking SUV's, that will help US right? lol

Kindly explain why oil and natural gas production on Federally controlled lands is actually down under the Obama Administration when overall production of oil and natural gas is up substantially on lands controlled privately or by the States?

So who's REALLY responsible for all those new jobs created in the oil and natural gas industries? It certainly isn't Barack Obama! Quite obviously if he had control of all the oil and gas producing land in the US the price of gasoline would be $6 a gallon right now.


A big part of the trend can be attributed to the location of shale deposits where hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, and horizontal drilling have allowed producers to tap huge oil or natural gas resources.

Much of it is in Pennsylvania, where gas production has taken off. And it's common in Texas and North Dakota, states where the federal government owns far less land than it does in several Western energy-producing states.

“There are only so many dollars out there,” said Sarah Ladislaw, an energy expert with the Center for Strategic and International Studies, noting the heavy industry investment in shale exploration outside of federal lands.

“When you overlay those two maps, the places to be weren’t necessarily on federal land,” said Ladislaw, co-director of the think tank’s Energy and National Security Program.

Obama GOP battle over credit for surging oil and gas production TheHill


BUT HEY, THE DEFICITS OBAMA INHERITED THANKS TO DUBYA/GOP POLICY (CREDIT CARDS MAXED OUT, GUTTING federal revenues 25% of GDP), WELL HELL, THOSE REST ON OBAMA'S SHOULDERS ALONE RIGHT? lol

So now you're going to claim that it was just "chance" that production increased on lands not controlled by the Federal Government and that the Obama Administration's reluctance to issue drilling permits had nothing to do with it? :rofl::rofl::rofl:

I can't make up my mind whether you're the most naive and uniformed person I've ever run across or whether you simply have no problem with distorting facts.




Comprhension issue huh?

“There are only so many dollars out there,” said Sarah Ladislaw, an energy expert with the Center for Strategic and International Studies, noting the heavy industry investment in shale exploration outside of federal lands.

“When you overlay those two maps, the places to be weren’t necessarily on federal land,” said Ladislaw, co-director of the think tank’s Energy and National Security Program.

Obama GOP battle over credit for surging oil and gas production TheHill

It's laughable that the Obama Administration has claimed soaring natural gas and oil production as an accomplishment of theirs. For him to sit there at a Wall Street Journal roundtable and give himself credit for that, given his record on fossil fuels is farce of the highest order! We, the American people are presently benefiting from low energy prices not because of anything that Barack Obama did...but rather DESPITE everything that Barack Obama did!
Most f the good stuff happening in this country is despite Obama's policies, not because of them.
 
You mean TECHNOLOGY created the boom? And the GOP wants to defund education and research? lol


Let's just follow Dubya/GOP lead of pushing people to 'shop' and give tax credits of $5,000+ to buy gas sucking SUV's, that will help US right? lol

Kindly explain why oil and natural gas production on Federally controlled lands is actually down under the Obama Administration when overall production of oil and natural gas is up substantially on lands controlled privately or by the States?

So who's REALLY responsible for all those new jobs created in the oil and natural gas industries? It certainly isn't Barack Obama! Quite obviously if he had control of all the oil and gas producing land in the US the price of gasoline would be $6 a gallon right now.


A big part of the trend can be attributed to the location of shale deposits where hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, and horizontal drilling have allowed producers to tap huge oil or natural gas resources.

Much of it is in Pennsylvania, where gas production has taken off. And it's common in Texas and North Dakota, states where the federal government owns far less land than it does in several Western energy-producing states.

“There are only so many dollars out there,” said Sarah Ladislaw, an energy expert with the Center for Strategic and International Studies, noting the heavy industry investment in shale exploration outside of federal lands.

“When you overlay those two maps, the places to be weren’t necessarily on federal land,” said Ladislaw, co-director of the think tank’s Energy and National Security Program.

Obama GOP battle over credit for surging oil and gas production TheHill


BUT HEY, THE DEFICITS OBAMA INHERITED THANKS TO DUBYA/GOP POLICY (CREDIT CARDS MAXED OUT, GUTTING federal revenues 25% of GDP), WELL HELL, THOSE REST ON OBAMA'S SHOULDERS ALONE RIGHT? lol

So now you're going to claim that it was just "chance" that production increased on lands not controlled by the Federal Government and that the Obama Administration's reluctance to issue drilling permits had nothing to do with it? :rofl::rofl::rofl:

I can't make up my mind whether you're the most naive and uniformed person I've ever run across or whether you simply have no problem with distorting facts.




Comprhension issue huh?

“There are only so many dollars out there,” said Sarah Ladislaw, an energy expert with the Center for Strategic and International Studies, noting the heavy industry investment in shale exploration outside of federal lands.

“When you overlay those two maps, the places to be weren’t necessarily on federal land,” said Ladislaw, co-director of the think tank’s Energy and National Security Program.

Obama GOP battle over credit for surging oil and gas production TheHill

It's laughable that the Obama Administration has claimed soaring natural gas and oil production as an accomplishment of theirs. For him to sit there at a Wall Street Journal roundtable and give himself credit for that, given his record on fossil fuels is farce of the highest order! We, the American people are presently benefiting from low energy prices not because of anything that Barack Obama did...but rather DESPITE everything that Barack Obama did!


Yeah, but you Klowns blamed him for $4 gas prices right? lol
 
Kindly explain why oil and natural gas production on Federally controlled lands is actually down under the Obama Administration when overall production of oil and natural gas is up substantially on lands controlled privately or by the States?

So who's REALLY responsible for all those new jobs created in the oil and natural gas industries? It certainly isn't Barack Obama! Quite obviously if he had control of all the oil and gas producing land in the US the price of gasoline would be $6 a gallon right now.


A big part of the trend can be attributed to the location of shale deposits where hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, and horizontal drilling have allowed producers to tap huge oil or natural gas resources.

Much of it is in Pennsylvania, where gas production has taken off. And it's common in Texas and North Dakota, states where the federal government owns far less land than it does in several Western energy-producing states.

“There are only so many dollars out there,” said Sarah Ladislaw, an energy expert with the Center for Strategic and International Studies, noting the heavy industry investment in shale exploration outside of federal lands.

“When you overlay those two maps, the places to be weren’t necessarily on federal land,” said Ladislaw, co-director of the think tank’s Energy and National Security Program.

Obama GOP battle over credit for surging oil and gas production TheHill


BUT HEY, THE DEFICITS OBAMA INHERITED THANKS TO DUBYA/GOP POLICY (CREDIT CARDS MAXED OUT, GUTTING federal revenues 25% of GDP), WELL HELL, THOSE REST ON OBAMA'S SHOULDERS ALONE RIGHT? lol

So now you're going to claim that it was just "chance" that production increased on lands not controlled by the Federal Government and that the Obama Administration's reluctance to issue drilling permits had nothing to do with it? :rofl::rofl::rofl:

I can't make up my mind whether you're the most naive and uniformed person I've ever run across or whether you simply have no problem with distorting facts.




Comprhension issue huh?

“There are only so many dollars out there,” said Sarah Ladislaw, an energy expert with the Center for Strategic and International Studies, noting the heavy industry investment in shale exploration outside of federal lands.

“When you overlay those two maps, the places to be weren’t necessarily on federal land,” said Ladislaw, co-director of the think tank’s Energy and National Security Program.

Obama GOP battle over credit for surging oil and gas production TheHill

It's laughable that the Obama Administration has claimed soaring natural gas and oil production as an accomplishment of theirs. For him to sit there at a Wall Street Journal roundtable and give himself credit for that, given his record on fossil fuels is farce of the highest order! We, the American people are presently benefiting from low energy prices not because of anything that Barack Obama did...but rather DESPITE everything that Barack Obama did!
Most f the good stuff happening in this country is despite Obama's policies, not because of them.


Yet we had 8 years of Dubya/GOP 'job creator' policies and what happened? Oops
 
Kindly explain why oil and natural gas production on Federally controlled lands is actually down under the Obama Administration when overall production of oil and natural gas is up substantially on lands controlled privately or by the States?

So who's REALLY responsible for all those new jobs created in the oil and natural gas industries? It certainly isn't Barack Obama! Quite obviously if he had control of all the oil and gas producing land in the US the price of gasoline would be $6 a gallon right now.


A big part of the trend can be attributed to the location of shale deposits where hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, and horizontal drilling have allowed producers to tap huge oil or natural gas resources.

Much of it is in Pennsylvania, where gas production has taken off. And it's common in Texas and North Dakota, states where the federal government owns far less land than it does in several Western energy-producing states.

“There are only so many dollars out there,” said Sarah Ladislaw, an energy expert with the Center for Strategic and International Studies, noting the heavy industry investment in shale exploration outside of federal lands.

“When you overlay those two maps, the places to be weren’t necessarily on federal land,” said Ladislaw, co-director of the think tank’s Energy and National Security Program.

Obama GOP battle over credit for surging oil and gas production TheHill


BUT HEY, THE DEFICITS OBAMA INHERITED THANKS TO DUBYA/GOP POLICY (CREDIT CARDS MAXED OUT, GUTTING federal revenues 25% of GDP), WELL HELL, THOSE REST ON OBAMA'S SHOULDERS ALONE RIGHT? lol

So now you're going to claim that it was just "chance" that production increased on lands not controlled by the Federal Government and that the Obama Administration's reluctance to issue drilling permits had nothing to do with it? :rofl::rofl::rofl:

I can't make up my mind whether you're the most naive and uniformed person I've ever run across or whether you simply have no problem with distorting facts.




Comprhension issue huh?

“There are only so many dollars out there,” said Sarah Ladislaw, an energy expert with the Center for Strategic and International Studies, noting the heavy industry investment in shale exploration outside of federal lands.

“When you overlay those two maps, the places to be weren’t necessarily on federal land,” said Ladislaw, co-director of the think tank’s Energy and National Security Program.

Obama GOP battle over credit for surging oil and gas production TheHill

It's laughable that the Obama Administration has claimed soaring natural gas and oil production as an accomplishment of theirs. For him to sit there at a Wall Street Journal roundtable and give himself credit for that, given his record on fossil fuels is farce of the highest order! We, the American people are presently benefiting from low energy prices not because of anything that Barack Obama did...but rather DESPITE everything that Barack Obama did!
Most f the good stuff happening in this country is despite Obama's policies, not because of them.

This whole thread is a laugher.

Bush was a moron. He didn't help the economy.

Obama came along....he's like Bush.

End of story.
 
A big part of the trend can be attributed to the location of shale deposits where hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, and horizontal drilling have allowed producers to tap huge oil or natural gas resources.

Much of it is in Pennsylvania, where gas production has taken off. And it's common in Texas and North Dakota, states where the federal government owns far less land than it does in several Western energy-producing states.

“There are only so many dollars out there,” said Sarah Ladislaw, an energy expert with the Center for Strategic and International Studies, noting the heavy industry investment in shale exploration outside of federal lands.

“When you overlay those two maps, the places to be weren’t necessarily on federal land,” said Ladislaw, co-director of the think tank’s Energy and National Security Program.

Obama GOP battle over credit for surging oil and gas production TheHill


BUT HEY, THE DEFICITS OBAMA INHERITED THANKS TO DUBYA/GOP POLICY (CREDIT CARDS MAXED OUT, GUTTING federal revenues 25% of GDP), WELL HELL, THOSE REST ON OBAMA'S SHOULDERS ALONE RIGHT? lol

So now you're going to claim that it was just "chance" that production increased on lands not controlled by the Federal Government and that the Obama Administration's reluctance to issue drilling permits had nothing to do with it? :rofl::rofl::rofl:

I can't make up my mind whether you're the most naive and uniformed person I've ever run across or whether you simply have no problem with distorting facts.






Comprhension issue huh?

“There are only so many dollars out there,” said Sarah Ladislaw, an energy expert with the Center for Strategic and International Studies, noting the heavy industry investment in shale exploration outside of federal lands.

“When you overlay those two maps, the places to be weren’t necessarily on federal land,” said Ladislaw, co-director of the think tank’s Energy and National Security Program.

Obama GOP battle over credit for surging oil and gas production TheHill

It's laughable that the Obama Administration has claimed soaring natural gas and oil production as an accomplishment of theirs. For him to sit there at a Wall Street Journal roundtable and give himself credit for that, given his record on fossil fuels is farce of the highest order! We, the American people are presently benefiting from low energy prices not because of anything that Barack Obama did...but rather DESPITE everything that Barack Obama did!
Most f the good stuff happening in this country is despite Obama's policies, not because of them.

This whole thread is a laugher.

Bush was a moron. He didn't help the economy.

Obama came along....he's like Bush.

End of story.

Sure. Conservatives and their simple minds


Explain how Reagan had a top rate of 50% the first 6 years, yet it didn't slow his economy down? Though it drove deficits up? Supply side is a failure EVERY-TIME it's tried, except for the 1%ers
 
15th post
A big part of the trend can be attributed to the location of shale deposits where hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, and horizontal drilling have allowed producers to tap huge oil or natural gas resources.

Much of it is in Pennsylvania, where gas production has taken off. And it's common in Texas and North Dakota, states where the federal government owns far less land than it does in several Western energy-producing states.

“There are only so many dollars out there,” said Sarah Ladislaw, an energy expert with the Center for Strategic and International Studies, noting the heavy industry investment in shale exploration outside of federal lands.

“When you overlay those two maps, the places to be weren’t necessarily on federal land,” said Ladislaw, co-director of the think tank’s Energy and National Security Program.

Obama GOP battle over credit for surging oil and gas production TheHill


BUT HEY, THE DEFICITS OBAMA INHERITED THANKS TO DUBYA/GOP POLICY (CREDIT CARDS MAXED OUT, GUTTING federal revenues 25% of GDP), WELL HELL, THOSE REST ON OBAMA'S SHOULDERS ALONE RIGHT? lol

So now you're going to claim that it was just "chance" that production increased on lands not controlled by the Federal Government and that the Obama Administration's reluctance to issue drilling permits had nothing to do with it? :rofl::rofl::rofl:

I can't make up my mind whether you're the most naive and uniformed person I've ever run across or whether you simply have no problem with distorting facts.




Comprhension issue huh?

“There are only so many dollars out there,” said Sarah Ladislaw, an energy expert with the Center for Strategic and International Studies, noting the heavy industry investment in shale exploration outside of federal lands.

“When you overlay those two maps, the places to be weren’t necessarily on federal land,” said Ladislaw, co-director of the think tank’s Energy and National Security Program.

Obama GOP battle over credit for surging oil and gas production TheHill

It's laughable that the Obama Administration has claimed soaring natural gas and oil production as an accomplishment of theirs. For him to sit there at a Wall Street Journal roundtable and give himself credit for that, given his record on fossil fuels is farce of the highest order! We, the American people are presently benefiting from low energy prices not because of anything that Barack Obama did...but rather DESPITE everything that Barack Obama did!
Most f the good stuff happening in this country is despite Obama's policies, not because of them.

This whole thread is a laugher.

Bush was a moron. He didn't help the economy.

Obama came along....he's like Bush.

End of story.
Bush was a moron? He cleared up the Clinton Recession in 18 months. We had 7 years of low inflation, low unemployment, and growth during that time. Obamass in his wildest dreams wishes he had half the accomplishments of Bush.
 
So now you're going to claim that it was just "chance" that production increased on lands not controlled by the Federal Government and that the Obama Administration's reluctance to issue drilling permits had nothing to do with it? :rofl::rofl::rofl:

I can't make up my mind whether you're the most naive and uniformed person I've ever run across or whether you simply have no problem with distorting facts.




Comprhension issue huh?

“There are only so many dollars out there,” said Sarah Ladislaw, an energy expert with the Center for Strategic and International Studies, noting the heavy industry investment in shale exploration outside of federal lands.

“When you overlay those two maps, the places to be weren’t necessarily on federal land,” said Ladislaw, co-director of the think tank’s Energy and National Security Program.

Obama GOP battle over credit for surging oil and gas production TheHill

It's laughable that the Obama Administration has claimed soaring natural gas and oil production as an accomplishment of theirs. For him to sit there at a Wall Street Journal roundtable and give himself credit for that, given his record on fossil fuels is farce of the highest order! We, the American people are presently benefiting from low energy prices not because of anything that Barack Obama did...but rather DESPITE everything that Barack Obama did!
Most f the good stuff happening in this country is despite Obama's policies, not because of them.

This whole thread is a laugher.

Bush was a moron. He didn't help the economy.

Obama came along....he's like Bush.

End of story.
Bush was a moron? He cleared up the Clinton Recession in 18 months. We had 7 years of low inflation, low unemployment, and growth during that time. Obamass in his wildest dreams wishes he had half the accomplishments of Bush.


LOL, AT LEAST YOU STICK WITH YOUR FANTASIES BUBBA

Bush Lead During Weakest Economy in Decades

"The expansion was a continuation of the way the U.S. has grown for too long, which was a consumer-led expansion that was heavily concentrated in housing," said Douglas Holtz-Eakin, a onetime Bush White House staffer and one of Sen. John McCain's top economic advisers for his presidential campaign. "There was very little of the kind of saving and export-led growth that would be more sustainable."

..."It's sad to say, but we really went nowhere for almost ten years, after you extract the boost provided by the housing and mortgage boom," said Mark Zandi, chief economist of Moody's Economy.com, and an informal adviser to McCain's campaign. "It's almost a lost economic decade."


Even excluding the 2008 recession, however, Bush presided over a weak period for the U.S. economy. For example, for the first seven years of the Bush administration, gross domestic product grew at a paltry 2.1 percent annual rate.

Bush Lead During Weakest Economy in Decades


I GUESS DUBYA'S HOUSING PONZI SCHEME HE CHEERED ON DIDN'T WORK OUT TO WELL?



DEC 2007

The Economic Consequences of Mr. Bush
The next president will have to deal with yet another crippling legacy of George W. Bush: the economy. A Nobel laureate, Joseph E. Stiglitz, sees a generation-long struggle to recoup.

The Economic Consequences of Mr. Bush Vanity Fair

FACTS on Dubya s great recession US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
 
Bush, who increased the U6 rate a whopping 126% from the time he was elected until the end of the Great Recession.

too stupid of course since 1) Bush was a liberal and 2) his policies did not cause the housing bubble.

See why we say liberalism is based in pure ignorance.
 
Reducing the U.S. population by 20 million would creat 40 million jobs?????? That's some wonky math you're using Eddie.
.

dear, you lack the IQ to be here. I'm sorry. If you ship the illegals home that would create 20 million new jobs, bring back 30 million more by making unions illegal again, and another 20 million by eliminating the corporate tax.

Get it 1+ 1=2
What a great example of how retarded conservatives are and why their ideas are best left ignored.

Here we have a crazy one who claims his conservative ideas would add 70,000,000 jobs. But let's put that idiot's numbers under a microscope and take a closer look...

The civilian noninstitutional population in this country is about 249 million. Fruit loop dingus here wants to subtract 20 million, leaving 229 million.

Currently, there are 147 million people working. Plus fruitloop's imaginary 70 million he thinks he could get back to work is 217 million.

The idiot who struggles with 1+1 is actually claiming conservative ideas would get 217 million out of 229 million people working, or 95% of the total population age 16 and over.

:cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo:

That includes roughly 95% of 16 year olds in high school ... 95% of senior citizens, including 90 year olds with walkers, like himself.

Compare his hallucinations to reality when we had the lowest unemployment rate in the last half century. 3.9% in 2000. And even then we had 65% of the adult population employed.

Do you see now why so many people think you're insane?


dear, are you saying that making unions illegal again would not bring back 30 million jobs? This is a yes or no question.
 
Back
Top Bottom