NotfooledbyW
Gold Member
- Jul 9, 2014
- 24,908
- 4,911
- 245
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Saint Papageorgeo supports Trump by proxy through appreciation of Trickledown Reaganomics. see post #820You support Trump, so you are one of the American commie fascist MAGAts.
Joe says: “I don’t see red or blue states, I see the United States,” we need to be united in better addressing the real divide in this country: the gap between the haves and the have-nots.
Wealthy Americans who vote for Joe must be rejecting Reaganomics trickle down policies when they do.
Do you reject Reaganomics Saint Papageorgeo?
Trump tax policy is trickle down favorable to the wealthy - all wealthy including me because I am “wealthy enough” to leave my kids a 1000 times more wealth than I got got from the generation before me, but I do not vote for trickle down. Trickle down is the bane of the working class.
Will you take four minutes to read this Saint Papageorgeo?:
Hawaii News: In-Depth Local News From Honolulu Civil Beat
Hawaii news daily. In-depth reporting on breaking news and more for Honolulu, Big Island, Maui and Kauai counties. No paywall.www.civilbeat.orgThe wealthiest 10% of Americans own 84% of stocks. Nearly 100 of the Fortune 500 companies paid zero taxes in 2018. Whether it’s dressed up as Republican or Democrat, the increasing gap between rich and poor factors into virtually every political issue: perpetuating systemic racism, the rationale for health coverage, the basis of tax policy, the impetus for education reform, the list goes on and on.
Trickle Down
political_economics Reaganomics wealth_gap
Let’s all remember al gore....in 2006, shall we? 240113 {post•360}. Papageorgio said: the rich, which is 99% of Congress is rich works for the rich, the power goes with the money. #360
Trump can't lead...He's a loser 240126 {post•1]. wihosa said: Trump fancies himself a great leader and his cult followers agree, but where does he plan to lead them? They don't know...and neither does he. There is no GOP platform, they don't even have a couple planks! #1
Trump can't lead...He's a loser 240207 {post•90]. Papageorgio said: We haven’t had a leader in the WH for decades, Reagan and Kennedy were the last true leaders, not much else since. #90
Trump can't lead...He's a loser 240207 {post•901]. Dagosa said: Reagan spent his second term with dementia.#91
Trump can't lead...He's a loser 240207 {post•92]. Papageorgio said: And still a much better leader than anyone since then. #92
Trump can't lead...He's a loser 240207 {post•93]. Dagosa said: instituted trickle down. #93
Trump can't lead...He's a loser 240207 {post•94]. Papageorgio said: I’ll take him and Kennedy Over any of the last 5 presidents. #94
CNN — President Joe Biden and congressional Democrats want to raise taxes on the rich to pay for their $3.5 trillion plan to expand the nation’s safety net, saying the wealthy should pay their fair share.The rich would be hit in a variety of ways under the proposal advanced by the House Ways & Means Committee.
I don’t let the patron Saint of stupidity tell me what post to read or not, you Post no facts just opinion. I’m pretty much done dealing with you and your in ability to stay on topic, Saint Stupid.Grab some bench Reagan Lover see post #820
The above data was
I noticed you cut my link proving the party of the rich are Democrats a
Now you are playing dumb. Wow!What do you mean by the phrase “party of the rich“?
Of course, many Democrats can be super rich which is the point I’m making on this thread to you. It is true that the Democrats, including rich Democrats advocate policies that are beneficial to the middle class and lower and detrimental to the rich themselves.
Republicans advocate for trickle down, piss on the poor economics, and I see you are in navigator for Ronnie Reagan, who got that deficit producing bullshit started in 1980
That’s the distinction you seem to miss and do not want to talk about.
Why would you bring up Warren Buffet?How much extra has Warren Buffet who claims the tax laws are unfair, paid in taxes?
Buffet is saying tax laws are unfair to the working class. Are you confused about that little detail.How much extra has Warren Buffet who claims the tax laws are unfair, paid in taxes?
I noticed you cut my link proving the party of the rich are Democrats and then throw in a bunch of BS.
/—-/ You want a rational argument not to murder babies in the womb. And Nazis wanted a rational argument not to gas the Jews.Republicans fail to make any rational argument why society must force full term gestation on all women. It is why Republicans are suffering politically since they won a states rights argument with the Dobbs decision.
But state’s rights do not supersede individual right’s including the unenumerated individual right to privacy for impregnated women.
One of Saint Ding’s failed arguments goes something like this:
ding said: It's extremely clear that the reason you are playing word games in your dehumanization of human life is to make it easier to kill them and dismiss their right to life. dvng. #4,716
An argument based upon what Saint Ding thinks I am thinking being evil, is not an argument at all.
Protected unborn life from the instant of conception has not been a norm for Americans for centuries. The norm the past fifty years has been that protected life begins at reasonable expectation of life outside the womb.
Saint Heynorm does the same thing by accusing me of thinking ZEFs are worthless clump of cells,
HeyNorm said: “ ….. all they are carrying is a worthless clump of cells, right? Like a parasite, right?” hynrm.23.11.19 #772
I don’t think that at all. My response is here:
nf.23.11.21 #11,948 to hynrm.23.11.19 #772
nf.23.11.21 #1
You want a rational argument not to murder babies in the womb.
How much extra Buffet Contribute to the government? The answer is he only pays what he has to and not a penny more, so he is just a rabble rouser who doesn’t earn income, it is mostly passive, so Buffet paying a hire percentage of earned income won’t hurt him as much as it would hurt you, that is why he advocates for it.Why would you bring up Warren Buffet?
He is with Biden and the working class.
Billionaire Warren Buffet on Raising Taxes on the Rich: “I’m Fine with It”
By: Sergei Klebnikov
Published: Feb 25, 2019 3 min read
Photo illustration by Sarina Finkelstein for Money; Getty Images (1); (1040 form) Courtesy of the IRS
Legendary investor Warren Buffett said on Monday that rich Americans, including himself, are not paying enough in taxes. “The wealthy are definitely undertaxed relative to the general population,” the Berkshire Hathaway Chairman told CNBC in an interview.
Indeed, Buffett has supported the idea for a while. In 2011, he wrote an op-ed in The New York Times entitled ‘Stop Coddling the Super-Rich,’ where he called for higher rates on taxable income above $1 million, with an additional increase for those who make more than $10 million. To prove his point, Buffett has also pointed out that he pays a lower tax rate than his secretary.
Over the last few decades, wealth inequality in the U.S. has gotten worse, with the gap between the rich and poor continuing to balloon out of control. The richest 1% of American households now own 40% of the country’s wealth – that’s more than at any time in the past 50 years, according to a 2018 study by economist Edward Wolff, who uses data from the federal Survey of Consumer Finances.
“I think the income tax credit is the best way to address that,” Buffett told CNBC. “That probably means more taxes for guys like me, and I’m fine with it,” he said Monday.
Again, just your silly opinions and trying to twist my words, I’m good with that Saint Stupid, as it makes you look even more stupider than ever. Thanks for the good work.NotfooledbyW May’24 Vrftma: Both Party’s have rich politicians and donors. The truth is Saint Papageorgeo has not ever provided a link to some sort of “proof” that the party of the rich are Democrats. St.PapaG is a liar in the above quote from post #824. nfbw 240527 rftma00830
Republican voters are just painfully stupid. 240522 {post•1}. Papageorgio said: I don’t expect the rich to look out for the middle class. So expect nothing from politicians and so far they haven’t disappointed. ppgrg 240522 Srvajs00007
Republicans fail to make any rational argument why society must force full term gestation on all women. 240523 {post•642}.
NotfooledbyW May’24 Vrftma: I wonder how the middle class can get government to look out for their interest when government functions primarily on politicians being elected by middle class voters; but in Saint Papageorgeo’s world wealthy politicians apparently don’t ever champion policies that would benefit the middle class.
Is Saint Papageorgia stupid or just simply an old grumpy assed homeowner screaming at kids to get off his lawn. nfbw 240527 rftma00830
And he wants to raise taxes earned income, why? Because most of his money comes from passive income which is most of his earnings, you aren’t very bzright when it comes to taxes are you, Saint Stupid.Buffet is saying tax laws are unfair to the working class. Are you confused about that little detail.
Surely you have example where I specifically twisted your words.Again, just your silly opinions and trying to twist my words,
Just read the post, it is all over the post.Surely you have an idea cample where I specifically twisted your words.
We can’t have a rational national argument about why women can’t be forced to become a parent, when Men are always forced to become a parent at the woman whim.Republicans fail to make any rational argument why society must force full term gestation on all women. 240527 {post•832}
NotfooledbyW May’24 Vrftma: No. It is very clear I want a rational argument why society must force full term gestation on all women.
Banning reasonable access to a safe legal abortion by a government is the deprivation of liberty of adult law abiding human beings.
You brought up Jews being deprived of their liberty being herded into cattle cars and taken to death camps, so I know you know Saint Cellblock2429 what being deprived of individual liberty means.
So why do you want government to deprive law abiding pregnant women of the liberty to stop gestating the fetus inside her body when she does not want to assume the risk of childbirth.
One argument here is that protected unborn life from the instant of conception has not been a norm for Americans for centuries. The norm the past fifty years has been that protected life begins at reasonable expectation of life outside the womb. Post Partim : After separation from its birth mother.
Note to you before you get the urge again to bring the extermination of Jews into a rational argument about abortion politics you should know that the Jewish religion has a belief that the sanctity of life begins at childbirth when God breathes the soul into our mortal newly separated and newly born bodies,
The Nazis henceforth murdered human beings that definitively had souls. A fetus may or may not have a soul forcing on religion.
Think about it.
nfbw 240527 Vrftam00832 to cllblcknnnn 240527 Vrftma00831
Twisted what about that? That involves no facts or logic to twist. . Thats just you ragging on both major parties with no substance there either.Not only are Republicans painfully stupid, so are Democrats. I said both, you twist
And he wants to raise taxes earned income, why?
Men don’t gestate fetuses - only women do.We can’t have a rational national argument about why women can’t be forced to become a parent