Republicans don’t actually find the constitution sacred. They just pretend they do

[Billy000]

Oh sure pretty much anything a democrat president does is “unconstitutional” including EO’s. When a republican does it? Nah. All that matters is that their side won. They won’t admit this, but it’s the reason why they don’t criticize republicans for breaking the rules. Here are some examples:

1) If Trump ended up attacking Iran, his dumbass would just do it without congressional support. Legally it is congress who declares war, but that doesn’t matter. Iran is scum! Bomb em! Fuck Congress! If Trump did care about approval, he would have discussed why he sent thousands of troops to Iran.

2) Remember when McDonnell unconstitutionally blocked the vote of Obama’s Supreme Court nominee? Whether McConnell's self righteous ass likes it or not, Congress must decide the nominee choice with a VOTE. McConnell prevented the senate from even voting at all which is unconstitutional. Do republican voters care? No. Their side won! That’s all that matters.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

So if Trump doesn't declare war, he's cool, right?

There was nothing unconstitutional about McConnell's blocking a Supreme Court nominee. If you believe there is, explain using the language of the Constitution.

FYI, we've already been over all this here.

 

[Norman]

When liberals swear their oath to the constitution, they just pretend they do.

Which part of "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED", is hard to understand, Virginia?

 

[MaryL]

Nice try, I have a whole new thread lined up about how corrupt liberals have become .

 

[easyt65]

Snowflakes say some of the craziest things...

Way to go, snowflake (OP) - Jonathon Gruber is very proud of you.

 

[Crepitus]

When liberals swear their oath to the constitution, they just pretend they do.

Which part of "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED", is hard to understand, Virginia?

And there we have the one part of the Constitution they actually support.

 

[Norman]

Oh sure pretty much anything a democrat president does is “unconstitutional” including EO’s. When a republican does it? Nah. All that matters is that their side won. They won’t admit this, but it’s the reason why they don’t criticize republicans for breaking the rules. Here are some examples:

1) If Trump ended up attacking Iran, his dumbass would just do it without congressional support. Legally it is congress who declares war, but that doesn’t matter. Iran is scum! Bomb em! Fuck Congress! If Trump did care about approval, he would have discussed why he sent thousands of troops to Iran.

2) Remember when McDonnell unconstitutionally blocked the vote of Obama’s Supreme Court nominee? Whether McConnell's self righteous ass likes it or not, Congress must decide the nominee choice with a VOTE. McConnell prevented the senate from even voting at all which is unconstitutional. Do republican voters care? No. Their side won! That’s all that matters.

"If Trump ended up not winning..."

That's quite the hypothetical you wish for. However, he wins every time. That's why Trump is the president while your candidate is one of the nation's most hated.

"If Trump's impeachment was legit..."

If, if, if... that's all you got.

 

[Norman]

When liberals swear their oath to the constitution, they just pretend they do.

Which part of "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED", is hard to understand, Virginia?

And there we have the one part of the Constitution they actually support.

Yes, to be specific the second part. Right after the first part which democrats also do not support believing in hate speech and being entitled to not hear speech they do not like.

Lying in your oath, standing for some other nation than America. Haven't there been death penalties for treason for less?

 

[blackhawk]

Your selective memory or the more accurate description partisan hypocrisy is off the charts. When Obama ordered the mission to take out OBL Bin Laden was hiding in Pakistan not Afghanistan Pakistan techinally at least was and is an ally yet President Obama without the knowledge or premission of the Pakistan goverment ordered a military incursion into the country to take out the worlds leading terrorist not a single bitch or complaint about that from the left nor should there have been it was the right call just as taking out this Iranian terrorist asshole was. There was nothing unconstitional about what McConnell did the Senate majority leader no matter what party they belong to has the power to decide if they want to give a nominee a vote. What he did was purly political and partisan but not unconstitutional it wasn't the first time a party took advantage of the power they have and it won't be the last.

 

[MaryL]

I am a liberal. I hate being subsumed into the people that are exploitative and then redefine it as multicultural . We were never asked what we think or want, instead somebody from the outside TELLS us what to think. That is completely outside liberalism.

 

[deannalw]

Oh sure pretty much anything a democrat president does is “unconstitutional” including EO’s. When a republican does it? Nah. All that matters is that their side won. They won’t admit this, but it’s the reason why they don’t criticize republicans for breaking the rules. Here are some examples:

1) If Trump ended up attacking Iran, his dumbass would just do it without congressional support. Legally it is congress who declares war, but that doesn’t matter. Iran is scum! Bomb em! Fuck Congress! If Trump did care about approval, he would have discussed why he sent thousands of troops to Iran.

2) Remember when McDonnell unconstitutionally blocked the vote of Obama’s Supreme Court nominee? Whether McConnell's self righteous ass likes it or not, Congress must decide the nominee choice with a VOTE. McConnell prevented the senate from even voting at all which is unconstitutional. Do republican voters care? No. Their side won! That’s all that matters.

Phrt.

I know you can't provide a link for that horseshit, because it's horseshit you made up.

 

[Hossfly]

Oh sure pretty much anything a democrat president does is “unconstitutional” including EO’s. When a republican does it? Nah. All that matters is that their side won. They won’t admit this, but it’s the reason why they don’t criticize republicans for breaking the rules. Here are some examples:

1) If Trump ended up attacking Iran, his dumbass would just do it without congressional support. Legally it is congress who declares war, but that doesn’t matter. Iran is scum! Bomb em! Fuck Congress! If Trump did care about approval, he would have discussed why he sent thousands of troops to Iran.

2) Remember when McDonnell unconstitutionally blocked the vote of Obama’s Supreme Court nominee? Whether McConnell's self righteous ass likes it or not, Congress must decide the nominee choice with a VOTE. McConnell prevented the senate from even voting at all which is unconstitutional. Do republican voters care? No. Their side won! That’s all that matters.

Oh sure pretty much anything a democrat president does is “unconstitutional” including EO’s. When a republican does it? Nah. All that matters is that their side won. They won’t admit this, but it’s the reason why they don’t criticize republicans for breaking the rules. Here are some examples:

1) If Trump ended up attacking Iran, his dumbass would just do it without congressional support. Legally it is congress who declares war, but that doesn’t matter. Iran is scum! Bomb em! Fuck Congress! If Trump did care about approval, he would have discussed why he sent thousands of troops to Iran.

2) Remember when McDonnell unconstitutionally blocked the vote of Obama’s Supreme Court nominee? Whether McConnell's self righteous ass likes it or not, Congress must decide the nominee choice with a VOTE. McConnell prevented the senate from even voting at all which is unconstitutional. Do republican voters care? No. Their side won! That’s all that matters.

When are liberals going to stop their gaslighting? It's getting old.

 

[Hossfly]

I am a liberal. I hate being subsumed into the people that are exploitative and then redefine it as multicultural . We were never asked what we think or want, instead somebody from the outside TELLS us what to think. That is completely outside liberalism.

Here's a good explanation to help you understand. It's called gaslighting.

11 Warning Signs of Gaslighting

 

[Crepitus]

When liberals swear their oath to the constitution, they just pretend they do.

Which part of "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED", is hard to understand, Virginia?

And there we have the one part of the Constitution they actually support.

Yes, to be specific the second part. Right after the first part which democrats also do not support believing in hate speech and being entitled to not hear speech they do not like.

Lying in your oath, standing for some other nation than America. Haven't there been death penalties for treason for less?

Wow, it's no wonder you don't support it.

You've just demonstrated you don't understand it.

 

[Norman]

When liberals swear their oath to the constitution, they just pretend they do.

Which part of "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED", is hard to understand, Virginia?

And there we have the one part of the Constitution they actually support.

Yes, to be specific the second part. Right after the first part which democrats also do not support believing in hate speech and being entitled to not hear speech they do not like.

Lying in your oath, standing for some other nation than America. Haven't there been death penalties for treason for less?

Wow, it's no wonder you don't support it.

You've just demonstrated you don't understand it.

Of course I support the constitution.

It is 100% an anti left-wing document. The document of supreme liberty. Truth and facts over lies and misrepresentation.

 

[lennypartiv]

Yes, to be specific the second part. Right after the first part which democrats also do not support believing in hate speech and being entitled to not hear speech they do not like.
Lying in your oath, standing for some other nation than America. Haven't there been death penalties for treason for less?

Liberals are just bizarre. Calling something a crime is not good enough for them, they insist on labeling some of them as hate crimes.

 

[MaryL]

I am a liberal. I hate being subsumed into the people that are exploitative and then redefine it as multicultural . We were never asked what we think or want, instead somebody from the outside TELLS us what to think. That is completely outside liberalism.

Here's a good explanation to help you understand. It's called gaslighting.

11 Warning Signs of Gaslighting

I recently watched that old movie "Gaslight".

 

[Billy000]

So if Trump doesn't declare war, he's cool, right?

There was nothing unconstitutional about McConnell's blocking a Supreme Court nominee. If you believe there is, explain using the language of the Constitution.

FYI, we've already been over all this here.

Uh no. The senate MUST have a vote on a Supreme Court nominee. Otherwise it would be pointless for a president to nominate someone to begin with if the majority leader is just going to say no. That isn’t how fucking Congress works.

 

[MaryL]

Actually since this is still a Democratic Republic, explain that entire "Sanctuary City" thing...we, "We the PEOPLE" were NEVER asked, It hurt many of us, and it certainly wasn't on any democratic ballot if we wanted it or not. So...

 

[OKTexas]

Oh sure pretty much anything a democrat president does is “unconstitutional” including EO’s. When a republican does it? Nah. All that matters is that their side won. They won’t admit this, but it’s the reason why they don’t criticize republicans for breaking the rules. Here are some examples:

1) If Trump ended up attacking Iran, his dumbass would just do it without congressional support. Legally it is congress who declares war, but that doesn’t matter. Iran is scum! Bomb em! Fuck Congress! If Trump did care about approval, he would have discussed why he sent thousands of troops to Iran.

2) Remember when McDonnell unconstitutionally blocked the vote of Obama’s Supreme Court nominee? Whether McConnell's self righteous ass likes it or not, Congress must decide the nominee choice with a VOTE. McConnell prevented the senate from even voting at all which is unconstitutional. Do republican voters care? No. Their side won! That’s all that matters.

Thanks for proving you are totally ignorant on the Constitution, each house of congress makes their own rules and procedures. McConnell didn't violate any rules of the senate by not giving Garland a hearing or a vote. The rest of your post is just opinion and bullshit. How about quoting what portions of the Constitution you think were violated and how.

.