Republican priorities

[Weatherman2020]

They hold both houses. They hold the White House. They could pass all kinds of jobs bills, their great healthcare plan, save SS & Medicare, etc.

But what did they do yesterday?

The voted to allow mining companies to dump their waste into streams and to allow oil companies to bribe people overseas.

Really?

10 days asswipe........and of course anything you post is a lie or a distortion of the truth...

What distortion? Did they vote on those things or not?

Where is the ******* jobs bills. Republicans have run the House for 4 ******* yesrs & they have no bill?

Glad to see America becoming great again.

if by great you mean white Christian supremacist males trying to run things.

Thanks for working so hard on Trumps 2020 Reelection so soon.

 

[Weatherman2020]

because he didn't HAVE to when he was president.

So pollution that was okay under Obama is now bad under Trump? DERP!

The rule had been in process for quite a while. Getting anything about the environment done with Republicans running Congress is not easy.

The rule had been in process for quite a while.

Thank goodness he finally took care of that. LOL!

So, you don't know the process. You should really become better informed before shooting off you big mouth.

Creating a regulation
Get Involved!
Learn more about commenting on EPA regulations and how you can get involved

When developing regulations, the first thing we do is ask if a regulation is needed at all. Every regulation is developed under slightly different circumstances, but this is the general process:

Step 1: EPA Proposes a Regulation
The Agency researches the issues and, if necessary, proposes a regulation, also known as a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM). The proposal is listed in the Federal Register (FR) so that members of the public can consider it and send their comments to us. The proposed rule and supporting documents are also filed in EPA's official docket on Regulations.gov.

Step 2: EPA Considers Your Comments and Issues a Final Rule
Generally, once we consider the comments received when the proposed regulation was issued, we revise the regulation accordingly and issue a final rule. This final rule is also published in the FR and in EPA's official docket on Regulations.gov.

Step 3: The Regulation is Codified in the Code of Federal Regulations
Once a regulation is completed and has been printed in the FR as a final rule, it is codified when it is added to the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). The CFR is the official record of all regulations created by the federal government. It is divided into 50 volumes, called titles, each of which focuses on a particular area. Almost all environmental regulations appear in Title 40. The CFR is revised yearly, with one fourth of the volumes updated every three months. Title 40 is revised every July 1.

• Code of Federal Regulations database - a searchable database of the entire CFR from GPO.

We all know the process.
Step One: Unelected moonbats in the EPA dream up an anti-American regulation.
Step Two: Unelected moonbats in the EPA wait the required number of days.
Step Three: Unelected moonbats in the EPA make the anti-Amercian regulations official.

Only in Whiner World, it polluting pro-American.

Dufus does not know he is polluting right now.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

If the regulation was so good and so important, why did Obama wait until he was leaving office after 8 years to implement it?

because he didn't HAVE to when he was president.

but he had to after you installed the orange sociopath.

get it now?

because he didn't HAVE to when he was president.

So pollution that was okay under Obama is now bad under Trump? DERP!

The rule had been in process for quite a while. Getting anything about the environment done with Republicans running Congress is not easy.

The rule had been in process for quite a while.

Thank goodness he finally took care of that. LOL!

So, you don't know the process. You should really become better informed before shooting off you big mouth.

Creating a regulation
Get Involved!
Learn more about commenting on EPA regulations and how you can get involved

When developing regulations, the first thing we do is ask if a regulation is needed at all. Every regulation is developed under slightly different circumstances, but this is the general process:

Step 1: EPA Proposes a Regulation
The Agency researches the issues and, if necessary, proposes a regulation, also known as a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM). The proposal is listed in the Federal Register (FR) so that members of the public can consider it and send their comments to us. The proposed rule and supporting documents are also filed in EPA's official docket on Regulations.gov.

Step 2: EPA Considers Your Comments and Issues a Final Rule
Generally, once we consider the comments received when the proposed regulation was issued, we revise the regulation accordingly and issue a final rule. This final rule is also published in the FR and in EPA's official docket on Regulations.gov.

Step 3: The Regulation is Codified in the Code of Federal Regulations
Once a regulation is completed and has been printed in the FR as a final rule, it is codified when it is added to the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). The CFR is the official record of all regulations created by the federal government. It is divided into 50 volumes, called titles, each of which focuses on a particular area. Almost all environmental regulations appear in Title 40. The CFR is revised yearly, with one fourth of the volumes updated every three months. Title 40 is revised every July 1.

• Code of Federal Regulations database - a searchable database of the entire CFR from GPO.

So, you don't know the process.

Apparently it involves taking 8 years to get anything done. And now it's undone. Oops.

the first thing we do is ask if a regulation is needed at all.

If that's the case, Trump can easily get rid of 75% of them.

 

[RealDave]

because he didn't HAVE to when he was president.

but he had to after you installed the orange sociopath.

get it now?

because he didn't HAVE to when he was president.

So pollution that was okay under Obama is now bad under Trump? DERP!

The rule had been in process for quite a while. Getting anything about the environment done with Republicans running Congress is not easy.

The rule had been in process for quite a while.

Thank goodness he finally took care of that. LOL!

So, you don't know the process. You should really become better informed before shooting off you big mouth.

Creating a regulation
Get Involved!
Learn more about commenting on EPA regulations and how you can get involved

When developing regulations, the first thing we do is ask if a regulation is needed at all. Every regulation is developed under slightly different circumstances, but this is the general process:

Step 1: EPA Proposes a Regulation
The Agency researches the issues and, if necessary, proposes a regulation, also known as a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM). The proposal is listed in the Federal Register (FR) so that members of the public can consider it and send their comments to us. The proposed rule and supporting documents are also filed in EPA's official docket on Regulations.gov.

Step 2: EPA Considers Your Comments and Issues a Final Rule
Generally, once we consider the comments received when the proposed regulation was issued, we revise the regulation accordingly and issue a final rule. This final rule is also published in the FR and in EPA's official docket on Regulations.gov.

Step 3: The Regulation is Codified in the Code of Federal Regulations
Once a regulation is completed and has been printed in the FR as a final rule, it is codified when it is added to the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). The CFR is the official record of all regulations created by the federal government. It is divided into 50 volumes, called titles, each of which focuses on a particular area. Almost all environmental regulations appear in Title 40. The CFR is revised yearly, with one fourth of the volumes updated every three months. Title 40 is revised every July 1.

• Code of Federal Regulations database - a searchable database of the entire CFR from GPO.

So, you don't know the process.

Apparently it involves taking 8 years to get anything done. And now it's undone. Oops.

the first thing we do is ask if a regulation is needed at all.

If that's the case, Trump can easily get rid of 75% of them.

So you think we can trust corporations not to pollute. Wow, what a fool.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

because he didn't HAVE to when he was president.

So pollution that was okay under Obama is now bad under Trump? DERP!

The rule had been in process for quite a while. Getting anything about the environment done with Republicans running Congress is not easy.

The rule had been in process for quite a while.

Thank goodness he finally took care of that. LOL!

So, you don't know the process. You should really become better informed before shooting off you big mouth.

Creating a regulation
Get Involved!
Learn more about commenting on EPA regulations and how you can get involved

When developing regulations, the first thing we do is ask if a regulation is needed at all. Every regulation is developed under slightly different circumstances, but this is the general process:

Step 1: EPA Proposes a Regulation
The Agency researches the issues and, if necessary, proposes a regulation, also known as a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM). The proposal is listed in the Federal Register (FR) so that members of the public can consider it and send their comments to us. The proposed rule and supporting documents are also filed in EPA's official docket on Regulations.gov.

Step 2: EPA Considers Your Comments and Issues a Final Rule
Generally, once we consider the comments received when the proposed regulation was issued, we revise the regulation accordingly and issue a final rule. This final rule is also published in the FR and in EPA's official docket on Regulations.gov.

Step 3: The Regulation is Codified in the Code of Federal Regulations
Once a regulation is completed and has been printed in the FR as a final rule, it is codified when it is added to the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). The CFR is the official record of all regulations created by the federal government. It is divided into 50 volumes, called titles, each of which focuses on a particular area. Almost all environmental regulations appear in Title 40. The CFR is revised yearly, with one fourth of the volumes updated every three months. Title 40 is revised every July 1.

• Code of Federal Regulations database - a searchable database of the entire CFR from GPO.

So, you don't know the process.

Apparently it involves taking 8 years to get anything done. And now it's undone. Oops.

the first thing we do is ask if a regulation is needed at all.

If that's the case, Trump can easily get rid of 75% of them.

So you think we can trust corporations not to pollute. Wow, what a fool.

You think if we add another couple of thousand regulations that pollution will disappear?
With no negative impact on the economy? Wow, what a fool.

 

[Iceweasel]

They hold both houses. They hold the White House. They could pass all kinds of jobs bills, their great healthcare plan, save SS & Medicare, etc.

But what did they do yesterday?

The voted to allow mining companies to dump their waste into streams and to allow oil companies to bribe people overseas.

Really?

10 days asswipe........and of course anything you post is a lie or a distortion of the truth...

What distortion? Did they vote on those things or not?

Where is the ******* jobs bills. Republicans have run the House for 4 ******* yesrs & they have no bill?

What's a jobs bill? Making your neighbor pay for your employment check?

 

[RealDave]

The rule had been in process for quite a while. Getting anything about the environment done with Republicans running Congress is not easy.

The rule had been in process for quite a while.

Thank goodness he finally took care of that. LOL!

So, you don't know the process. You should really become better informed before shooting off you big mouth.

Creating a regulation
Get Involved!
Learn more about commenting on EPA regulations and how you can get involved

When developing regulations, the first thing we do is ask if a regulation is needed at all. Every regulation is developed under slightly different circumstances, but this is the general process:

Step 1: EPA Proposes a Regulation
The Agency researches the issues and, if necessary, proposes a regulation, also known as a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM). The proposal is listed in the Federal Register (FR) so that members of the public can consider it and send their comments to us. The proposed rule and supporting documents are also filed in EPA's official docket on Regulations.gov.

Step 2: EPA Considers Your Comments and Issues a Final Rule
Generally, once we consider the comments received when the proposed regulation was issued, we revise the regulation accordingly and issue a final rule. This final rule is also published in the FR and in EPA's official docket on Regulations.gov.

Step 3: The Regulation is Codified in the Code of Federal Regulations
Once a regulation is completed and has been printed in the FR as a final rule, it is codified when it is added to the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). The CFR is the official record of all regulations created by the federal government. It is divided into 50 volumes, called titles, each of which focuses on a particular area. Almost all environmental regulations appear in Title 40. The CFR is revised yearly, with one fourth of the volumes updated every three months. Title 40 is revised every July 1.

• Code of Federal Regulations database - a searchable database of the entire CFR from GPO.

So, you don't know the process.

Apparently it involves taking 8 years to get anything done. And now it's undone. Oops.

the first thing we do is ask if a regulation is needed at all.

If that's the case, Trump can easily get rid of 75% of them.

So you think we can trust corporations not to pollute. Wow, what a fool.

You think if we add another couple of thousand regulations that pollution will disappear?
With no negative impact on the economy? Wow, what a fool.

Without regulations, there is no enforcement & you think that will lead to clean streams. Just how ******* stupid are you.

You want a negative impact to our economy, pollute our water.

If a regulation makes our water cleaner, yes it leads to cleaner water.

Pollution will never end because there are too many jackasses like you wanting to pollute it if it saves a fricken nickel.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The rule had been in process for quite a while.

Thank goodness he finally took care of that. LOL!

So, you don't know the process. You should really become better informed before shooting off you big mouth.

Creating a regulation
Get Involved!
Learn more about commenting on EPA regulations and how you can get involved

When developing regulations, the first thing we do is ask if a regulation is needed at all. Every regulation is developed under slightly different circumstances, but this is the general process:

Step 1: EPA Proposes a Regulation
The Agency researches the issues and, if necessary, proposes a regulation, also known as a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM). The proposal is listed in the Federal Register (FR) so that members of the public can consider it and send their comments to us. The proposed rule and supporting documents are also filed in EPA's official docket on Regulations.gov.

Step 2: EPA Considers Your Comments and Issues a Final Rule
Generally, once we consider the comments received when the proposed regulation was issued, we revise the regulation accordingly and issue a final rule. This final rule is also published in the FR and in EPA's official docket on Regulations.gov.

Step 3: The Regulation is Codified in the Code of Federal Regulations
Once a regulation is completed and has been printed in the FR as a final rule, it is codified when it is added to the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). The CFR is the official record of all regulations created by the federal government. It is divided into 50 volumes, called titles, each of which focuses on a particular area. Almost all environmental regulations appear in Title 40. The CFR is revised yearly, with one fourth of the volumes updated every three months. Title 40 is revised every July 1.

• Code of Federal Regulations database - a searchable database of the entire CFR from GPO.

So, you don't know the process.

Apparently it involves taking 8 years to get anything done. And now it's undone. Oops.

the first thing we do is ask if a regulation is needed at all.

If that's the case, Trump can easily get rid of 75% of them.

So you think we can trust corporations not to pollute. Wow, what a fool.

You think if we add another couple of thousand regulations that pollution will disappear?
With no negative impact on the economy? Wow, what a fool.

Without regulations, there is no enforcement & you think that will lead to clean streams. Just how ******* stupid are you.

You want a negative impact to our economy, pollute our water.

If a regulation makes our water cleaner, yes it leads to cleaner water.

Pollution will never end because there are too many jackasses like you wanting to pollute it if it saves a fricken nickel.

Without regulations, there is no enforcement & you think that will lead to clean streams.

You'll have to let me know where I made that claim. Thanks!

You want a negative impact to our economy, pollute our water.

Is that why Obama had such a weak economic recovery, he gave us 8 years of dirty water? Bastard!

Pollution will never end because there are too many jackasses like you wanting to pollute it

Obama was a jackass for 8 years?

 

[RealDave]

They hold both houses. They hold the White House. They could pass all kinds of jobs bills, their great healthcare plan, save SS & Medicare, etc.

But what did they do yesterday?

The voted to allow mining companies to dump their waste into streams and to allow oil companies to bribe people overseas.

Really?

10 days asswipe........and of course anything you post is a lie or a distortion of the truth...

What distortion? Did they vote on those things or not?

Where is the ******* jobs bills. Republicans have run the House for 4 ******* yesrs & they have no bill?

What's a jobs bill? Making your neighbor pay for your employment check?

You being a Republican would not know what a job's bill is.

You do know what a "hand money to rich people & hope they hire people" bill is.

 

[RealDave]

So, you don't know the process. You should really become better informed before shooting off you big mouth.

Creating a regulation
Get Involved!
Learn more about commenting on EPA regulations and how you can get involved

When developing regulations, the first thing we do is ask if a regulation is needed at all. Every regulation is developed under slightly different circumstances, but this is the general process:

Step 1: EPA Proposes a Regulation
The Agency researches the issues and, if necessary, proposes a regulation, also known as a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM). The proposal is listed in the Federal Register (FR) so that members of the public can consider it and send their comments to us. The proposed rule and supporting documents are also filed in EPA's official docket on Regulations.gov.

Step 2: EPA Considers Your Comments and Issues a Final Rule
Generally, once we consider the comments received when the proposed regulation was issued, we revise the regulation accordingly and issue a final rule. This final rule is also published in the FR and in EPA's official docket on Regulations.gov.

Step 3: The Regulation is Codified in the Code of Federal Regulations
Once a regulation is completed and has been printed in the FR as a final rule, it is codified when it is added to the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). The CFR is the official record of all regulations created by the federal government. It is divided into 50 volumes, called titles, each of which focuses on a particular area. Almost all environmental regulations appear in Title 40. The CFR is revised yearly, with one fourth of the volumes updated every three months. Title 40 is revised every July 1.

• Code of Federal Regulations database - a searchable database of the entire CFR from GPO.

So, you don't know the process.

Apparently it involves taking 8 years to get anything done. And now it's undone. Oops.

the first thing we do is ask if a regulation is needed at all.

If that's the case, Trump can easily get rid of 75% of them.

So you think we can trust corporations not to pollute. Wow, what a fool.

You think if we add another couple of thousand regulations that pollution will disappear?
With no negative impact on the economy? Wow, what a fool.

Without regulations, there is no enforcement & you think that will lead to clean streams. Just how ******* stupid are you.

You want a negative impact to our economy, pollute our water.

If a regulation makes our water cleaner, yes it leads to cleaner water.

Pollution will never end because there are too many jackasses like you wanting to pollute it if it saves a fricken nickel.

Without regulations, there is no enforcement & you think that will lead to clean streams.

You'll have to let me know where I made that claim. Thanks!

You want a negative impact to our economy, pollute our water.

Is that why Obama had such a weak economic recovery, he gave us 8 years of dirty water? Bastard!

Pollution will never end because there are too many jackasses like you wanting to pollute it

Obama was a jackass for 8 years?

Obama fought for the environment for 8 years. The mining rule was just one rule.

You, on the other hand, have been an ignorant asshole all of your life by thinking that liminating regulations will lead to a cleaner environment.

 

[2aguy]

The rule had been in process for quite a while.

Thank goodness he finally took care of that. LOL!

So, you don't know the process. You should really become better informed before shooting off you big mouth.

Creating a regulation
Get Involved!
Learn more about commenting on EPA regulations and how you can get involved

When developing regulations, the first thing we do is ask if a regulation is needed at all. Every regulation is developed under slightly different circumstances, but this is the general process:

Step 1: EPA Proposes a Regulation
The Agency researches the issues and, if necessary, proposes a regulation, also known as a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM). The proposal is listed in the Federal Register (FR) so that members of the public can consider it and send their comments to us. The proposed rule and supporting documents are also filed in EPA's official docket on Regulations.gov.

Step 2: EPA Considers Your Comments and Issues a Final Rule
Generally, once we consider the comments received when the proposed regulation was issued, we revise the regulation accordingly and issue a final rule. This final rule is also published in the FR and in EPA's official docket on Regulations.gov.

Step 3: The Regulation is Codified in the Code of Federal Regulations
Once a regulation is completed and has been printed in the FR as a final rule, it is codified when it is added to the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). The CFR is the official record of all regulations created by the federal government. It is divided into 50 volumes, called titles, each of which focuses on a particular area. Almost all environmental regulations appear in Title 40. The CFR is revised yearly, with one fourth of the volumes updated every three months. Title 40 is revised every July 1.

• Code of Federal Regulations database - a searchable database of the entire CFR from GPO.

So, you don't know the process.

Apparently it involves taking 8 years to get anything done. And now it's undone. Oops.

the first thing we do is ask if a regulation is needed at all.

If that's the case, Trump can easily get rid of 75% of them.

So you think we can trust corporations not to pollute. Wow, what a fool.

You think if we add another couple of thousand regulations that pollution will disappear?
With no negative impact on the economy? Wow, what a fool.

Without regulations, there is no enforcement & you think that will lead to clean streams. Just how ******* stupid are you.

You want a negative impact to our economy, pollute our water.

If a regulation makes our water cleaner, yes it leads to cleaner water.

Pollution will never end because there are too many jackasses like you wanting to pollute it if it saves a fricken nickel.

moron...no one wants pollution...what we don't want is members of the Green Religion, attacking businesses because they hate business and worship mother earth.......right now, the EPA is nuts.....they see business like you do...and use their power to attack legitimate businesses while they themselves cause environmental damage...like Flint, and Poisoning the colorado river....moron.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Yelling fire in a crowd is not protected by law. Anyone who knows Berkeley knows the street people who have no connection to the campus are the rabble rousers - a loud protest is in the DNA at CAL, within the non violent genre of Gandhi and MLK; the protest was not an attack on free speech, but on hate speech, which has no place in academia or the White House nor is it protected by the First Amendment.

The left are well known for shutting down free speech many times.
Your attempt to justify yesterdays actions by supporting it simply validates you are also a fascist.

Name calling is your single forte. I did not justify violence, thus your straw man effort failed. Too bad you cannot abstract meaning from the written word, your biases prevent cognition.

By saying people should be prevented to speak because you disagree simply validates you are a fascist. A shitforbrains fascist.

"Simply" validates my evaluation of you. You fail to understand, or choose not to comprehend, the comparison of hate speech and the legally limited rights of free speech.

Inciting a riot, which is in fact what Milo Yiannopoulos seeks, is an effort by him to change the Conversation. Does the term agent provocateur ring a bell with you?

In fact the protest was peaceful, an example of the protesters invoking their right to free speech and free expression. Not until a small group wearing face masks showed up around 6pm, when they created the disturbance carried on live TV News. Which gave Yiannopoulos exactly what he wanted.

So, now trump has threatened CAL with withholding federal funds because the campus does not allow free speech. He and you have no clue.

Dufus says the protest was peaceful.
View attachment 110256
View attachment 110257
View attachment 110261
View attachment 110262

Agent provocateurs: one employed to associate with suspected persons and by pretending sympathy with their aims to incite them to some incriminating action.

Examples of agent provocateur in a sentence:

The government, trumpeters or Bannon used agents provocateurs to try to undermine the opposition to Right Wing Fascism.

Students do not wear masks, I know, since I went to CAL '65-67 & '70-'71 & SFSU '72--'73 for grad school; Iwatched my share of protests, saw the students at Kent St. shot and killed not wearing masks and protests of George Bush's invasion and occupation of Iraq, packed by families not wearing masks with their kids not wearing masks in downtown Walnut Creek, CA, drawing people from Danville, Alamo, San Ramon, Lafayette and Orinda,

Look up the demographics in those communities buster, you couldn't rent a home let alone buy one in my neighborhood.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

So, you don't know the process.

Apparently it involves taking 8 years to get anything done. And now it's undone. Oops.

the first thing we do is ask if a regulation is needed at all.

If that's the case, Trump can easily get rid of 75% of them.

So you think we can trust corporations not to pollute. Wow, what a fool.

You think if we add another couple of thousand regulations that pollution will disappear?
With no negative impact on the economy? Wow, what a fool.

Without regulations, there is no enforcement & you think that will lead to clean streams. Just how ******* stupid are you.

You want a negative impact to our economy, pollute our water.

If a regulation makes our water cleaner, yes it leads to cleaner water.

Pollution will never end because there are too many jackasses like you wanting to pollute it if it saves a fricken nickel.

Without regulations, there is no enforcement & you think that will lead to clean streams.

You'll have to let me know where I made that claim. Thanks!

You want a negative impact to our economy, pollute our water.

Is that why Obama had such a weak economic recovery, he gave us 8 years of dirty water? Bastard!

Pollution will never end because there are too many jackasses like you wanting to pollute it

Obama was a jackass for 8 years?

Obama fought for the environment for 8 years. The mining rule was just one rule.

You, on the other hand, have been an ignorant asshole all of your life by thinking that liminating regulations will lead to a cleaner environment.

Obama fought for the environment for 8 years. The mining rule was just one rule.

It must have been super important, if he waited until the last minute.

 

[EverCurious]

RE Flint - my understanding is that a lot of the lead leeching was from old pipes in homes - which fall outside EPA jurisdiction and responsibility? I haven't followed Flint for a while though, did I miss something?

RE EPA in general - they're not just attacking businesses. ~ring, ring, ring~ EPA in DC: "Hey, you need to stop burning firewood so you can meet our standards of 2.5 particulates in the uninhabited valley 20 miles from there." Alaskan's: "It's 70 below zero!!!??!!?? We trie-" EPA: "Whatever, not our problem. If you don't fix it we're taking your Federal Highway Funds. Have a nice day." ~click~ Alaskan's: "Uhm....I guess we're supposed to freeze to death to make them happy??!??"


That bastard agency has been running over people left and right all over the nation in their quest to 'save the world' - They've got a serious problem with logical implementation and egotistical authority. As we say in Alaska, they need to get knocked down the totem pole.

 

[Iceweasel]

They hold both houses. They hold the White House. They could pass all kinds of jobs bills, their great healthcare plan, save SS & Medicare, etc.

But what did they do yesterday?

The voted to allow mining companies to dump their waste into streams and to allow oil companies to bribe people overseas.

Really?

10 days asswipe........and of course anything you post is a lie or a distortion of the truth...

What distortion? Did they vote on those things or not?

Where is the ******* jobs bills. Republicans have run the House for 4 ******* yesrs & they have no bill?

What's a jobs bill? Making your neighbor pay for your employment check?

You being a Republican would not know what a job's bill is.

You do know what a "hand money to rich people & hope they hire people" bill is.

I'm not a party member and you prove you're an idiot with every post. You couldn't even respond to the simple question except to spew even more hate and stupidity.

 

[L.K.Eder]

Had the EPA existed at the time the Gold Mine was developed, the accident would not have occurred.

Republican/conservative political and economic ideas are ironic, at best. They warn that the national debt will be passed on to our children and grandchildren, and yet have more concern for corporate profit than they do for the health and well being of future generations.

The EPA openly pollutes our rivers and no one is held accountable.

"Your fired!!" The thinking of a trumpeter.

The matter will be settled in the court's, the EPA is protecting taxpayer money something which conservatives ought to support. We don't know the damage done, the river is now open and I suspect most of the claims are for loss of business.

Do you support writing an almost bland check? I don't, it is fiscally responsible to see the claims and verify they are valid, something the court will decide.

So if the EPA can turn rivers yellow and you blow it off as unimportant, what's the wild hair up your ass about a regulation Obama created in his last day in office after 8 years?

Shows that the EPA should of been started earlier and given more power.

So the EPA could turn more rivers yellow?

who filled the mine with toxic orange sludge? the EPA?

 

[Iceweasel]

The EPA openly pollutes our rivers and no one is held accountable.

"Your fired!!" The thinking of a trumpeter.

The matter will be settled in the court's, the EPA is protecting taxpayer money something which conservatives ought to support. We don't know the damage done, the river is now open and I suspect most of the claims are for loss of business.

Do you support writing an almost bland check? I don't, it is fiscally responsible to see the claims and verify they are valid, something the court will decide.

So if the EPA can turn rivers yellow and you blow it off as unimportant, what's the wild hair up your ass about a regulation Obama created in his last day in office after 8 years?

Shows that the EPA should of been started earlier and given more power.

So the EPA could turn more rivers yellow?

who filled the mine with toxic orange sludge? the EPA?

Who created the incompetence of the agency?

 

[Wry Catcher]

The EPA openly pollutes our rivers and no one is held accountable.

"Your fired!!" The thinking of a trumpeter.

The matter will be settled in the court's, the EPA is protecting taxpayer money something which conservatives ought to support. We don't know the damage done, the river is now open and I suspect most of the claims are for loss of business.

Do you support writing an almost bland check? I don't, it is fiscally responsible to see the claims and verify they are valid, something the court will decide.

So if the EPA can turn rivers yellow and you blow it off as unimportant, what's the wild hair up your ass about a regulation Obama created in his last day in office after 8 years?

Shows that the EPA should of been started earlier and given more power.

So the EPA could turn more rivers yellow?

who filled the mine with toxic orange sludge? the EPA?

Clear, Concise and something even iceweasel might be able to comprehend

 

[Conservative65]

They hold both houses. They hold the White House. They could pass all kinds of jobs bills, their great healthcare plan, save SS & Medicare, etc.

But what did they do yesterday?

The voted to allow mining companies to dump their waste into streams and to allow oil companies to bribe people overseas.

Really?

You forgot to back it up. And the GOP is working on jobs by reducing regulations and taxes. If you are going to hang out here you should do some basic research.

Working ion? Where the **** is it. They have been running the House for 4 ******* years, you'd think they would have a plan?

As for backing it up, pull your head out of your ass & become informed. My God.

They had to deal with your black boy for 4 years who was trying to push away people like you that were kissing his ass. Pucker up.

 

[L.K.Eder]

"Your fired!!" The thinking of a trumpeter.

The matter will be settled in the court's, the EPA is protecting taxpayer money something which conservatives ought to support. We don't know the damage done, the river is now open and I suspect most of the claims are for loss of business.

Do you support writing an almost bland check? I don't, it is fiscally responsible to see the claims and verify they are valid, something the court will decide.

So if the EPA can turn rivers yellow and you blow it off as unimportant, what's the wild hair up your ass about a regulation Obama created in his last day in office after 8 years?

Shows that the EPA should of been started earlier and given more power.

So the EPA could turn more rivers yellow?

who filled the mine with toxic orange sludge? the EPA?

Who created the incompetence of the agency?

you?