Republican drive to end social programs UNCONSTITUTIONAL

How is if fair for you not to contribute to the government that provides the common defense?

Because it is constitutionally provided for, and a proper use of government. As are courts and law enforcement, weights and measures, consumer protection, treaties with foreign nations, and settling disputes between the states.

How is it fair to me, a taxpayer, that the money I earn is stolen by the government and given to others in the name of the common defense, when I don't want any of my money used for that purpose?
 
I see TONS of medicaid fraud, especially in the area I work (labor and delivery).
Why haven't you reported these crimes?

The system is being abused and is in desperate need for an intervention.
I thought conservatives were always for less government intervention.

I, personally, would love to see drug testing become mandatory to obtain and maintain government benefits.
I thought conservatives were always for less government control over our lives.

Oh, and let me tell you, there is nothing more frustrating than taking a medicaid patient to their car when they have been discharged and their baby daddy pulls up in a Lincoln Navigator (no lie, my jaw dropped), while my tax paying self walked out to my Dodge Neon after my 12 hour shift! This abuse happens ALL the time!

It sounds to me like you're just jealous of those who have achieved more financial success than you have.

That said, I believe that helping people - temporarily - is fine. It is what we are called to do, whether is be through our churches or state funded programs.
During the early days of the Republic, Congress thought it was obligated to provide financial support for poverty stricken individuals.

Just keep in mind, bleeding heart liberals, when the people who make the money have their pockets turned out like the poor Monopoly man, where are you going to get your money from to fund all of these programs???
What programs, exactly, are you talking about and how much money does the government spend on the programs?
 
Last edited:
I have no problem with the working poor since they are able to go out and work. I have a problem with the ones who sit at home and expect the government to take care of them. But you should know that if you had been keeping up with my posts...You really are a moron aren't you?

Moron, the poor includes working poor who actually make up the majority of the workforce, the ones who sit around and are lazy are not the majority so why play a dumb ass magnifying glass?



So which group are you in...welfare section 8 welfare collecting crowd or the poor working class?


I'm an E-7(P) in the active duty Army, which one do you think I am moron?
 
I just did a google search for Peggy Joseph, the woman in that video and isn't it amazing how the Republitards and Tea Bastards are using this one woman, an African American woman on top of that, to smear all African Americans, the working poor and poor people as moochers, but these same shitheads get heated and cry like ******* babies when people shit on the Tea Bastards for carrying racist stupid ass signs. They don't even know if this woman is working or not, they see that she's black and heard her statement and just to concluded she's a moocher, well if it was true of her she still would be as big a moocher and Michelle Bachmann.
 
Moron, the poor includes working poor who actually make up the majority of the workforce, the ones who sit around and are lazy are not the majority so why play a dumb ass magnifying glass?



So which group are you in...welfare section 8 welfare collecting crowd or the poor working class?


I'm an E-7(P) in the active duty Army, which one do you think I am moron?

Cough <bullshit> cough
 
I just did a google search for Peggy Joseph, the woman in that video and isn't it amazing how the Republitards and Tea Bastards are using this one woman, an African American woman on top of that, to smear all African Americans, the working poor and poor people as moochers, but these same shitheads get heated and cry like ******* babies when people shit on the Tea Bastards for carrying racist stupid ass signs. They don't even know if this woman is working or not, they see that she's black and heard her statement and just to concluded she's a moocher, well if it was true of her she still would be as big a moocher and Michelle Bachmann.


Yeah right...How about a link?
 
How is it fair to me, a taxpayer, that the money I earn is stolen by the government and given to others in the name of the common defense, when I don't want any of my money used for that purpose?

Because it is one of the few services shared equally by all members of society: the need to defend it from foreign and domestic threats to that system. That is why it's fair. Your equivalency fails.
 
If money is being taken from me by force of law or threat of imprisonment, this is theft.
Nope. You're wrong. Theft is illegal. Taxing is legal.
Redacto In Absurdum Fail.

340x.jpg


There are some things, very limited that are required duties of government. Benefiting one citizen over another is not one of them.

BTW, you suck at fisking.
 
The Preamble

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare,

Depends on how you define General Welfare doesn't it?

That could go a number of ways, but the 2 most likely to the discussion are:

1. Gov't is responsible for ALL social wellbeing.

2. Gov't is only responsible for creating an environment where people can prosper.

It's a vague statement, and I think that was done on purpose. "Promote the general welfare" to me means creating an environment wherin the people can be safe, and prosper. NOT one where the Gov't calls all the shots.
 
The Preamble

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare,

Depends on how you define General Welfare doesn't it?

That could go a number of ways, but the 2 most likely to the discussion are:

1. Gov't is responsible for ALL social wellbeing.

2. Gov't is only responsible for creating an environment where people can prosper.

It's a vague statement, and I think that was done on purpose. "Promote the general welfare" to me means creating an environment wherin the people can be safe, and prosper. NOT one where the Gov't calls all the shots.

This is where I got on this merry-go-round. I will simply say, that IF it was intended to be a power of the federal government, they would have enumerated it in an article, not the preamble.
 
I just did a google search for Peggy Joseph, the woman in that video and isn't it amazing how the Republitards and Tea Bastards are using this one woman, an African American woman on top of that, to smear all African Americans, the working poor and poor people as moochers, but these same shitheads get heated and cry like ******* babies when people shit on the Tea Bastards for carrying racist stupid ass signs. They don't even know if this woman is working or not, they see that she's black and heard her statement and just to concluded she's a moocher, well if it was true of her she still would be as big a moocher and Michelle Bachmann.

This is the 7th time asking you to respond to my argument I presented like 20 pages ago that you still haven't responded to.
 
Moron, the poor includes working poor who actually make up the majority of the workforce, the ones who sit around and are lazy are not the majority so why play a dumb ass magnifying glass?



So which group are you in...welfare section 8 welfare collecting crowd or the poor working class?


I'm an E-7(P) in the active duty Army, which one do you think I am moron?

Military has obviously lowered it's standards.
 
15th post
I'm an E-7(P) in the active duty Army, which one do you think I am moron?

Cough <bullshit> cough


Shut up numbskull, it must suck being you.

Yeah... SFC, most usually being a daybagger unless they are field deployable... neither of which conducive to the amount of posting and the time you post on this board continually.... I will stick with the call of bullshit...

Not to mention your language and attitude which is unlike what is seen in the Army... and you have a LOT of Army vets on here who have the knowledge of how things are, who will almost assuredly call bullshit on your claim as well
 
Cough <bullshit> cough


Shut up numbskull, it must suck being you.

Yeah... SFC, most usually being a daybagger unless they are field deployable... neither of which conducive to the amount of posting and the time you post on this board continually.... I will stick with the call of bullshit...

Not to mention your language and attitude which is unlike what is seen in the Army... and you have a LOT of Army vets on here who have the knowledge of how things are, who will almost assuredly call bullshit on your claim as well


I'm a young hothead that tells it like it and I'm an ex-drill sergeant, if I'm not an asshole I'm not doing my job.
 
How is it fair to me, a taxpayer, that the money I earn is stolen by the government and given to others in the name of the common defense, when I don't want any of my money used for that purpose?

Because it is one of the few services shared equally by all members of society
Nope. You're wrong. The benefits of the common defense aren't shared equally, dude. Those who have more that needs protection benefit more from the common defense.

For example:

I have accumulated enormous wealth, whereas you are a little person and have probably accumulated very little wealth. Thus, I benefit much more than you, because I have much more that needs defending.
 
Back
Top Bottom