Republican Debasement of Kamala's Inexperience are all lies!

She doesn't even need them. Camels have thick pads of skin on their knees and chest which allow them to rest comfortably in the sand or other hot surfaces.



Camela :laughing0301:

1725776197636.webp
 
For the past 7 weeks (since Biden withdrew and the Democrats went with his VP), Kamala has been criticized, debased, ridiculed for her supposed inexperience. It has all been lies and misinformation.

Trump's cult members have eaten it all up and are convinced that the lies thrown about her are true. Kamala has more experience in government and leadership than 3 previous Republicans presidents "combined" and more experience than Obama.

Here are the facts that totally dispute those lies:



View attachment 1008099

The orange retard had ZERO experience and it showed.
Now that Trump has 4 years experience...........He is even dumber.
 
For the past 7 weeks (since Biden withdrew and the Democrats went with his VP), Kamala has been criticized, debased, ridiculed for her supposed inexperience. It has all been lies and misinformation.

Trump's cult members have eaten it all up and are convinced that the lies thrown about her are true. Kamala has more experience in government and leadership than 3 previous Republicans presidents "combined" and more experience than Obama.

Here are the facts that totally dispute those lies:



View attachment 1008099

like all those experienced people were just so ******* great....
 
For the past 7 weeks (since Biden withdrew and the Democrats went with his VP), Kamala has been criticized, debased, ridiculed for her supposed inexperience. It has all been lies and misinformation.

Trump's cult members have eaten it all up and are convinced that the lies thrown about her are true. Kamala has more experience in government and leadership than 3 previous Republicans presidents "combined" and more experience than Obama.

Here are the facts that totally dispute those lies:



View attachment 1008099

She is the worst VP in history. She has the lowest approval rating for any VP in history. She never earned anything legitimately (blew an old guy for the first job, the second job the DNC gave her a senate seat without her having to face any competition in the election, then she got picked as VP for being a black woman). Personality wise she is annoying as ****, she has ZERO values or principles, and she goes whichever way the political winds blow at any given moment. She will tell you that fracking is destroying the planet, then immediately turn around and say that fracking is AWESOME if it will get her a single vote. Walls are evil, until they arent. She has no principles whatsoever, and she has no policy plans either, or at least none that she is going to tell anyone about BEFORE the election results are announced. She is the quintisential dishonest politician who will say and do anything for power.

So how about you just **** off with your absurd glowing take on Kamala. :dunno:
 
Last edited:
She is the worst VP in history. She has the lowest approval rating for any VP in history. She never earned anything legitimately (blew an old guy for the first job, the second job the DNC gave her a senate seat without her having to face any competition in the election, then she got picked as VP for being a black woman). Personality wise she is annoying as ****, she has ZERO values or principles, and she goes whichever way the political winds blow at any given moment. She will tell you that fracking is destroying the planet, then immediately turn around and say that fracking is AWESOME if it will get her a single vote. Walls are evil, until they arent. She has no principles whatsoever, and she has no policy plans either, or at least none that she is going to tell anyone about BEFORE the election results are announced. She is the quintisential dishonest politician who will say and do anything for power.

So how about you just **** off with your absurd glowing take on Kamala. :dunno:
Thanks for the insulting word. Perfect example of a Trumper.

As far as your content about Kamala, all I have to say is what the video said. Facts are facts.
 
She has 20 years of experience as a prosecutor, AG, Senator and VP. All of that "experience" adds up to the worst track record of any Presidential candidate in US history.

Why don't you make your point showing data, statistics and facts, rather than with words. Words are free but facts need to be researched.
 
The Left's attempts to erase recent history have been as blatant and phony as they have been successful (unfortunately). Shall I point out that...

  • KH was a pure "token." Joe Biden never even hinted that he was going to seek out the most qualified person to be his VP choice. He openly said that his running mate would be a "Black" woman, thus immediately disqualifying 95% of the possible nominees. This is what it means to be a "token." Unqualified and highly visible.
  • Many political sages also noted that she was "Impeachment Insurance," a VP so bad that no impeachment campaign in Congress would ever get traction, knowing that her ascension to the WH would result,
  • While VP's generally don't accomplish much, this particular VP was specifically and prominently given the faux title of "Border Czar," and failed spectacularly in that role. No American even pretends to deny this.
  • Harris' name was so infamous that the New York [*******] Times editorialized last December, that Biden would be well advised to figure out a way to remove Harris from the ticket for 2024, as she was costing Biden votes,
  • KH's personal approval ratings were actually record-setting, running in the low thirties and even the twenties, even though she was largely out of the public eye.
...and now we are supposed to believe that she is a good and worthy candidate?

Gimme a fukkin' break.
 
The Left's attempts to erase recent history have been as blatant and phony as they have been successful (unfortunately). Shall I point out that...

  • KH was a pure "token." Joe Biden never even hinted that he was going to seek out the most qualified person to be his VP choice. He openly said that his running mate would be a "Black" woman, thus immediately disqualifying 95% of the possible nominees. This is what it means to be a "token." Unqualified and highly visible.
  • Many political sages also noted that she was "Impeachment Insurance," a VP so bad that no impeachment campaign in Congress would ever get traction, knowing that her ascension to the WH would result,
  • While VP's generally don't accomplish much, this particular VP was specifically and prominently given the faux title of "Border Czar," and failed spectacularly in that role. No American even pretends to deny this.
  • Harris' name was so infamous that the New York [*******] Times editorialized last December, that Biden would be well advised to figure out a way to remove Harris from the ticket for 2024, as she was costing Biden votes,
  • KH's personal approval ratings were actually record-setting, running in the low thirties and even the twenties, even though she was largely out of the public eye.
...and now we are supposed to believe that she is a good and worthy candidate?

Gimme a fukkin' break.
Let us analyze your post

1) Let us say (for the sake of this debate) that Kamala was a "token" pick. Why would that immediately disqualify her? Does that mean that she could not be the most qualified or simply "able to do the job"?

2) Impeachment insurance? That is pure BS. Why would any candidate (who was VP for 8 years and never at risk of impeachment) even think that "Impeachment Insurance" was needed before even being elected? and even then, why would he pick someone "supposedly" unqualified if he was even thinking of that? After all, picking someone that was unqualified would actually open the door for being impeached to begin with!!

3) the "border czar" title was not for her handling immigration (that is the job of Homeland Security Secretary) but for her to study the reasons why immigrants were coming to the U.S. She could not make decisions. All she was there to do was inform the president as to what was happening and why.

‘Border czar’? Kamala Harris assigned to tackle immigration’s causes, not border security

Claims that Harris was named the "border czar," responsible for overseeing U.S. border enforcement, have become a talking point for Republicans. But Biden didn’t put Harris in charge of overseeing border security.

4) Harris was infamous? an editorial was written about it? Do I need to remind you that "editorials" are OPINION pieces? There was no "infamous" tag based on facts. It was based on opinion on how she handled her prosecutorial history. Nonetheless, the truth is that she "followed the law" and results of that are opinion only.

5) KH ratings were low? Perhaps in the past but right now her ratings are high enough to where she is above Trump in most polls.

I am showing facts and you are giving Republican views.
 
Does that mean that she could not be the most qualified or simply "able to do the job"?
I think the last 3+ years pretty much answers that question. She has been an unmitigated failure in anything she has been assigned. Same with the senate, known as the most liberal member of that body. AG of CA? LOL, get real, she didn't even carry her own state in the 2020 primary. Lip service literally gave her the SF DA job.
the "border czar" title was not for her handling immigration (that is the job of Homeland Security Secretary)
The are mountains of documentation that bear out that Biden put her in charge of the border. That is the classic definition of a Border Czar. You really should try to get a better handle on the truth.
Do I need to remind you that "editorials" are OPINION pieces?
As is your entire disingenuous post.
 
I think the last 3+ years pretty much answers that question. She has been an unmitigated failure in anything she has been assigned. Same with the senate, known as the most liberal member of that body. AG of CA? LOL, get real, she didn't even carry her own state in the 2020 primary. Lip service literally gave her the SF DA job.

The are mountains of documentation that bear out that Biden put her in charge of the border. That is the classic definition of a Border Czar. You really should try to get a better handle on the truth.

As is your entire disingenuous post.
The wanker is a paid demofascist stooge. It is paid to lie.

So it does.
 
Does that mean that she could not be the most qualified or simply "able to do the job"?
I think the last 3+ years pretty much answers that question. She has been an unmitigated failure in anything she has been assigned. Same with the senate, known as the most liberal member of that body. AG of CA? LOL, get real, she didn't even carry her own state in the 2020 primary. Lip service literally gave her the SF DA job.
the "border czar" title was not for her handling immigration (that is the job of Homeland Security Secretary)
The are mountains of documentation that bear out that Biden put her in charge of the border. That is the classic definition of a Border Czar. You really should try to get a better handle on the truth.
Do I need to remind you that "editorials" are OPINION pieces?
As is your entire disingenuous post.
The wanker is a paid demofascist stooge. It is paid to lie.

So it does.
There seems to be a few of them lately--Crusty Drawers, (un)Lucky one, and Slow Donkey. They have to be getting something for the continuous spew.
 
I think the last 3+ years pretty much answers that question. She has been an unmitigated failure in anything she has been assigned. Same with the senate, known as the most liberal member of that body. AG of CA? LOL, get real, she didn't even carry her own state in the 2020 primary. Lip service literally gave her the SF DA job.

The are mountains of documentation that bear out that Biden put her in charge of the border. That is the classic definition of a Border Czar. You really should try to get a better handle on the truth.

As is your entire disingenuous post.

There seems to be a few of them lately--Crusty Drawers, (un)Lucky one, and Slow Donkey. They have to be getting something for the continuous spew.
The demofascists are trying to make their coming election steal "believable" by spreading bullshit polling results.

Based on their lies you should see hundreds of Harris signs all over Reno.

But you don't.

You see Trump signs, but in incredibly California like Reno, I have only seen a couple.

And washoe county is biased democrat. Californication has been going on for over two decades now, but still...virtually no visible support for Harris.

The local progressive newspaper, the Reno news and review, owned by a California corporation...surprise...is the only consistent supporter of her, and the same 5 dudes write their letters of support.
 
Is there any chance that you are a Clamper? If you don't know the organization, its OK, the usage above just makes me wonder. I wanted to PM you but couldn't find a way.
No, but I know a few of them.
 
15th post
For the past 7 weeks (since Biden withdrew and the Democrats went with his VP), Kamala has been criticized, debased, ridiculed for her supposed inexperience. It has all been lies and misinformation.

Trump's cult members have eaten it all up and are convinced that the lies thrown about her are true. Kamala has more experience in government and leadership than 3 previous Republicans presidents "combined" and more experience than Obama.

Here are the facts that totally dispute those lies:



View attachment 1008099


Biden: More government experience than any of our Founders and 99% of anyone before him, and ran the WORST, most Corrupt, most irresponsible, most anti-American, most dangerous Administration ever.

Has us closer to WWIII than Cuban missile crisis and the Berlin Airlift
 
Biden: More government experience than any of our Founders and 99% of anyone before him, and ran the WORST, most Corrupt, most irresponsible, most anti-American, most dangerous Administration ever.

Has us closer to WWIII than Cuban missile crisis and the Berlin Airlift
You are entitled to your opinion. Nonetheless, with the wording you used, your opinion seems to be biased and opinionated, as well as misinformed.
 
You are entitled to your opinion. Nonetheless, with the wording you used, your opinion seems to be biased and opinionated, as well as misinformed.
And accurate. Joey bribem has never been correct about a single foreign policy decision. Even obummer said Joey bribem could **** up a guaranteed win.
 

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom