Republica attacks Obama's daughters, calling them "sluts".

[rightwinger]

In the "class" department......17 yr old Lauten was arrested for shoplifting.
Fine role model to lecture the Obama girls

You really are stupid.

She was clearly using the girls to get at Obama.

Unbelievable.

Seems the "Communications Director" was the stupid one allowing her attempt to pander to Obama haters to cost her a job

More than a job now. Now it's out that she's a hyper-partisan, none too bright about social media, and a shoplifter. Her career is toast at the moment.

She will lay low for a while and Republicans will reward her for taking one for the team

No attack against Obama goes unrewarded

This one's gonna take a while. Hope she likes to knit because she won't be doing much shopping, and not without the guards watching.

She does tend to have light fingers while shopping

And with the Holiday Season upon us.....what else can she do?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

You really are stupid.

She was clearly using the girls to get at Obama.

Unbelievable.

Seems the "Communications Director" was the stupid one allowing her attempt to pander to Obama haters to cost her a job

More than a job now. Now it's out that she's a hyper-partisan, none too bright about social media, and a shoplifter. Her career is toast at the moment.

She will lay low for a while and Republicans will reward her for taking one for the team

No attack against Obama goes unrewarded

This one's gonna take a while. Hope she likes to knit because she won't be doing much shopping, and not without the guards watching.

She does tend to have light fingers while shopping

And with the Holiday Season upon us.....what else can she do?

Pray...

 

[rightwinger]

Seems the "Communications Director" was the stupid one allowing her attempt to pander to Obama haters to cost her a job

More than a job now. Now it's out that she's a hyper-partisan, none too bright about social media, and a shoplifter. Her career is toast at the moment.

She will lay low for a while and Republicans will reward her for taking one for the team

No attack against Obama goes unrewarded

This one's gonna take a while. Hope she likes to knit because she won't be doing much shopping, and not without the guards watching.

She does tend to have light fingers while shopping

And with the Holiday Season upon us.....what else can she do?

Pray...

On the bright side, she does have plenty of time to post on Facebook

 

[Sarah G]

In the "class" department......17 yr old Lauten was arrested for shoplifting.
Fine role model to lecture the Obama girls

She probably stole that ugly pink suit with the pearls and the black shirt I saw her in.

 

[teapartysamurai]

I'm not defending calling the Obama girls anything. They are lovely little girls.

BUT, any of you liberal hypocrites want to remember how the Bush twins were treated?

Even Comedy Central did a show portraying them as lesbian lovers.

That s My Bush - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

But that's okaaaaaaaaaaaay, that's "free expression."

It's only attacking the President's children when the president is a Democrat!

 

[Stephanie]

This thread has went to rabid dogs

let it die with them

 

[Stephanie]

Here's something you can chew on. enjoy the power you lib/dems believe you have

SNIP:
Democrats Paved the Way for Their Own Decline
They have subordinated their traditional focus on helping working-class Americans move up the economic ladder in favor of other priorities.
By Charlie Cook

+
Democrats on the left went crazy when Schumer suggested that the early focus on health care reform in 2009 and 2010, when the party should have been concentrating on economic growth and job creation, had come with great costs.(SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images)

December 1, 2014 Much has been said about the long-term demographic challenges facing the Republican Party. Given how dismally Republicans fare with African-American voters—Mitt Romney and congressional Republicans garnered only 6 percent and 8 percent, respectively, in 2012, and this year congressional Republicans got 10 percent—it matters how the GOP does with other minority voters.

In 2012, Romney picked up 27 percent and congressional Republicans received 30 percent of the Latino vote. This year, House Republicans got 36 percent. This doesn't matter that much in the House, because of natural residential patterns and, to a lesser extent, gerrymandering. But it is a big deal in presidential matters and in some Senate election years more than others (the Latino vote will be much more critical in the 2016 class of Senate seats than it was in the 2014 grouping).

But considerably less is being said about a parallel problem that Democrats are facing. Although the national red-blue maps of the partisan makeup of the House, the governorships, and, somewhat less so, the Senate are misleading in that they equate population with land area, the maps do illustrate where Democrats are strong and where they are not (interesting factoid: Only 14 percent of the land area in the U.S. is represented by a Democrat in the House). Increasingly, Democratic strength is concentrated primarily in urban areas and college towns, among minorities, and in narrow bands along the West Coast (but only the first 50-100 miles from the beaches) and the East Coast (but only from New York City northward). The South and the Border South, as well as small-town and rural America, are rapidly becoming no-fly zones for Democrats. Few Democrats represent small-town and rural areas, and the party is find it increasingly difficult to attract noncollege-educated white voters.

This challenge for Democrats can be sliced and diced a number of ways: by race, by where people live, and—very acutely—by combining race with socioeconomic status. A Nov. 25 report by the Gallup Organization underscored Democrats' problems with noncollege-educated white voters. According to Gallup Editor Frank Newport, "President Barack Obama's job-approval rating among white noncollege graduates is at 27 percent so far in 2014, 14 percentage points lower than among white college graduates. This is the largest yearly gap between these two groups since Obama took office. These data underscore the magnitude of the Democratic Party's problem with working-class whites, among whom Obama lost in the 2012 presidential election, and among whom Democratic House candidates lost in the 2014 U.S. House voting by 30 points."

all of it here:
Democrats Paved the Way for Their Own Decline - NationalJournal.com

 

[rightwinger]

Here's something you can chew on. enjoy the power you lib/dems believe you have

SNIP:
Democrats Paved the Way for Their Own Decline
They have subordinated their traditional focus on helping working-class Americans move up the economic ladder in favor of other priorities.
By Charlie Cook

+
Democrats on the left went crazy when Schumer suggested that the early focus on health care reform in 2009 and 2010, when the party should have been concentrating on economic growth and job creation, had come with great costs.(SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images)

December 1, 2014 Much has been said about the long-term demographic challenges facing the Republican Party. Given how dismally Republicans fare with African-American voters—Mitt Romney and congressional Republicans garnered only 6 percent and 8 percent, respectively, in 2012, and this year congressional Republicans got 10 percent—it matters how the GOP does with other minority voters.

In 2012, Romney picked up 27 percent and congressional Republicans received 30 percent of the Latino vote. This year, House Republicans got 36 percent. This doesn't matter that much in the House, because of natural residential patterns and, to a lesser extent, gerrymandering. But it is a big deal in presidential matters and in some Senate election years more than others (the Latino vote will be much more critical in the 2016 class of Senate seats than it was in the 2014 grouping).

But considerably less is being said about a parallel problem that Democrats are facing. Although the national red-blue maps of the partisan makeup of the House, the governorships, and, somewhat less so, the Senate are misleading in that they equate population with land area, the maps do illustrate where Democrats are strong and where they are not (interesting factoid: Only 14 percent of the land area in the U.S. is represented by a Democrat in the House). Increasingly, Democratic strength is concentrated primarily in urban areas and college towns, among minorities, and in narrow bands along the West Coast (but only the first 50-100 miles from the beaches) and the East Coast (but only from New York City northward). The South and the Border South, as well as small-town and rural America, are rapidly becoming no-fly zones for Democrats. Few Democrats represent small-town and rural areas, and the party is find it increasingly difficult to attract noncollege-educated white voters.

This challenge for Democrats can be sliced and diced a number of ways: by race, by where people live, and—very acutely—by combining race with socioeconomic status. A Nov. 25 report by the Gallup Organization underscored Democrats' problems with noncollege-educated white voters. According to Gallup Editor Frank Newport, "President Barack Obama's job-approval rating among white noncollege graduates is at 27 percent so far in 2014, 14 percentage points lower than among white college graduates. This is the largest yearly gap between these two groups since Obama took office. These data underscore the magnitude of the Democratic Party's problem with working-class whites, among whom Obama lost in the 2012 presidential election, and among whom Democratic House candidates lost in the 2014 U.S. House voting by 30 points."

all of it here:
Democrats Paved the Way for Their Own Decline - NationalJournal.com

What does that have to do with the OP?:

 

[Sarah G]

Here's something you can chew on. enjoy the power you lib/dems believe you have

SNIP:
Democrats Paved the Way for Their Own Decline
They have subordinated their traditional focus on helping working-class Americans move up the economic ladder in favor of other priorities.
By Charlie Cook

+
Democrats on the left went crazy when Schumer suggested that the early focus on health care reform in 2009 and 2010, when the party should have been concentrating on economic growth and job creation, had come with great costs.(SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images)

December 1, 2014 Much has been said about the long-term demographic challenges facing the Republican Party. Given how dismally Republicans fare with African-American voters—Mitt Romney and congressional Republicans garnered only 6 percent and 8 percent, respectively, in 2012, and this year congressional Republicans got 10 percent—it matters how the GOP does with other minority voters.

In 2012, Romney picked up 27 percent and congressional Republicans received 30 percent of the Latino vote. This year, House Republicans got 36 percent. This doesn't matter that much in the House, because of natural residential patterns and, to a lesser extent, gerrymandering. But it is a big deal in presidential matters and in some Senate election years more than others (the Latino vote will be much more critical in the 2016 class of Senate seats than it was in the 2014 grouping).

But considerably less is being said about a parallel problem that Democrats are facing. Although the national red-blue maps of the partisan makeup of the House, the governorships, and, somewhat less so, the Senate are misleading in that they equate population with land area, the maps do illustrate where Democrats are strong and where they are not (interesting factoid: Only 14 percent of the land area in the U.S. is represented by a Democrat in the House). Increasingly, Democratic strength is concentrated primarily in urban areas and college towns, among minorities, and in narrow bands along the West Coast (but only the first 50-100 miles from the beaches) and the East Coast (but only from New York City northward). The South and the Border South, as well as small-town and rural America, are rapidly becoming no-fly zones for Democrats. Few Democrats represent small-town and rural areas, and the party is find it increasingly difficult to attract noncollege-educated white voters.

This challenge for Democrats can be sliced and diced a number of ways: by race, by where people live, and—very acutely—by combining race with socioeconomic status. A Nov. 25 report by the Gallup Organization underscored Democrats' problems with noncollege-educated white voters. According to Gallup Editor Frank Newport, "President Barack Obama's job-approval rating among white noncollege graduates is at 27 percent so far in 2014, 14 percentage points lower than among white college graduates. This is the largest yearly gap between these two groups since Obama took office. These data underscore the magnitude of the Democratic Party's problem with working-class whites, among whom Obama lost in the 2012 presidential election, and among whom Democratic House candidates lost in the 2014 U.S. House voting by 30 points."

all of it here:
Democrats Paved the Way for Their Own Decline - NationalJournal.com

What does that have to do with the OP?:

She's just been waiting to slap that down on the table.

Nice picture of Chuck Schumer though.

 

[g5000]

Hannity s memory lapse I don t remember Chelsea Clinton being attacked

HANNITY: We're running out of time, but they tried to make the attack that she has a young daughter, pregnant and engaged. Is that fair that they would attack that? I mean, I don't remember Chelsea Clinton being attacked. I don't remember Al Gore's children being attacked. I thought there was a general rule that children of candidates ought to be left alone. And Alan knows I've said that many times.

MATALIN: Right, and in fairness, Barack Obama did --

HANNITY: He did say that, yeah.

MATALIN: -- pretty fast out of the box, said, "off-limits, off-limits." So, credit to him. Credit to every -- let the games begin.



So Obama right away said Palin's kids were off limits.

Hannity doesn't remember Chelsea Clinton being attacked. I guess he forgot that time Rush Limbaugh on his TV show said, "Did you know there's a White House dog?" and then put up a photo of Chelsea.

He also doesn't remember John McCain telling a joke, "Why is Chelsea Clinton so ugly? Because Janet Reno is her father."

 

[bodecea]

I'm not defending calling the Obama girls anything. They are lovely little girls.

BUT, any of you liberal hypocrites want to remember how the Bush twins were treated?

Even Comedy Central did a show portraying them as lesbian lovers.

That s My Bush - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

But that's okaaaaaaaaaaaay, that's "free expression."

It's only attacking the President's children when the president is a Democrat!

Comparing young adults getting drunk in bars to young teenage girls standing at a WH event. Oh my!

 

[ABikerSailor]

You know.......................I find it interesting that the Obama girls dressed more conservatively than just about any female anchor that you see on FAUX Nooze, yet it's the conservatives that are pissed about how they looked.

Yes, their dresses were above their knees, but they didn't show cleavage.

ALL of the FAUX Nooze females show cleavage and have dresses that are as short (if not shorter) than what the Obama girls wore.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Listened to the video. She didn't say "fuckabee". You leftists are desperate.

 

[Sarah G]

Listened to the video. She didn't say "fuckabee". You leftists are desperate.

She definitely said fuckabee. All the late night talk shows joked about it. She said it alright, the moron.

 

[blackhawk]

As I have been reading these post and watching the news cover this something occurred to me when the Jonathon Gruber videos surfaced which showed him basically bragging about how they had bamboozled and suckered the stupid voters his words into supporting Obamacare something that impacts the whole country it got virtually no coverage from the press. Now fast forward a facebook post granted a tasteless and stupid one from an irrelevant staffer of a low ranking Rep which has no impact on the country at all gets massive attention from this same press rather interesting which one they considered newsworthy and which they did not.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Listened to the video. She didn't say "fuckabee". You leftists are desperate.

She definitely said fuckabee. All the late night talk shows joked about it. She said it alright, the moron.

No she didn't. She was about to say Fox News but then changed it to Huckabee. Only a pitched moron would have missed the hiatus in her voice, one common in speech when one suddenly changes what they're saying. You Leftists are just sad, pathetic, desperate little people that will grasp at straws because nothing else works for you. Shameful.

 

[Stephanie]

As I have been reading these post and watching the news cover this something occurred to me when the Jonathon Gruber videos surfaced which showed him basically bragging about how they had bamboozled and suckered the stupid voters his words into supporting Obamacare something that impacts the whole country it got virtually no coverage from the press. Now fast forward a facebook post granted a tasteless and stupid one from an irrelevant staffer of a low ranking Rep which has no impact on the country at all gets massive attention from this same press rather interesting which one they considered newsworthy and which they did not.

But they got all their hate going no matter it shows them to be shallow and petty

over something off personal Facebook page of a lowly staffer...they're unbelievable.

 

[Synthaholic]

I liked it when Meagan on Fox called him Fuckabee.

Megan Fox?

No the one that does the news on Fox.

I just wanted an opportunity to post a photo of Megan Fox.

 

[teapartysamurai]

I'm not defending calling the Obama girls anything. They are lovely little girls.

BUT, any of you liberal hypocrites want to remember how the Bush twins were treated?

Even Comedy Central did a show portraying them as lesbian lovers.

That s My Bush - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

But that's okaaaaaaaaaaaay, that's "free expression."

It's only attacking the President's children when the president is a Democrat!

Comparing young adults getting drunk in bars to young teenage girls standing at a WH event. Oh my!

Are they or are they NOT the daughters of the president?

If we are to keep then off limits THEN WE KEEP THEM OFF LIMITS.

You libs can't have it both ways. You bash the Palin kids, you bash the Bush kids BUT you want the Obama kids left alone.

Now I AGREE on this. No one should attack the kids, BUT THAT INCLUDES ALL OF THEM, THE PALINS, THE BUSHS, THE OBAMAS.

You libs had NO HONOR WHATSOEVER when it came to Palins and Bush's kids.

So TOO LATE TO GET SELF-RIGHTEOUS NOW!

 

[Synthaholic]

Republican staffer says Obama daughters are disrespectful and dress like bar sluts

If this vile ***** still has a job on Monday, the GOP should be dead to this country.

According to Gawker, Elizabeth Lauten, former new media political director for the Republican National Committee, wrote an open letter to the two girls, attacking their facial expressions and clothing choices.

“Dear Sasha and Malia,” wrote Lauten, “I get that you’re both in those awful teen years, but you’re part of the First Family, try showing a little class. At least respect the part that you play. Then again your mother and father don’t respect their positions very much, or the nation for that matter, so I’m guessing you’re coming up a little short in the ‘good role model’ department.”

Inappropriate comment. But their body language does speak volumes. This staffer wasn't the first to notice it.

Since they are not on the payroll, this whole issue is just basically catty gossip in an increasingly silly and petty country.