Reporter Behind CNN Story Questioning Success of Iran Strikes also Wrote Ex-Intel Officials Declaring Hunter Biden Laptop Russian Disinfo

Oswald Was Innocent

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2025
Messages
376
Reaction score
775
Points
158
This is two hoaxes in two days from CNN. 1. Iran didn't agree to ceasefire hoax. 2. The strikes on Iran nuclear plants were unsuccessful. This woman needs to be waterboarded.



 
This is two hoaxes in two days from CNN. 1. Iran didn't agree to ceasefire hoax. 2. The strikes on Iran nuclear plants were unsuccessful. This woman needs to be waterboarded.



I don't know why you are picking on this CNN reporter. Trump's own military intelligence is saying the same thing. --

An initial U.S. intelligence report assesses that airstrikes ordered by President Donald Trump against Iran’s nuclear facilities set Tehran’s program back by months but did not eliminate it, contradicting claims by Trump and his top aides about the mission’s success, according to three people familiar with the report.

The classified report by the Defense Intelligence Agency is based on the Pentagon’s early bomb damage assessment of the strikes on nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan using earth-penetrating munitions carried by B-2 bombers and submarine-launched Tomahawk missiles.

It assesses that the strikes did not destroy the core components of Iran’s nuclear program and probably set it back by several months, not years, one of the people said.

U.S. intelligence reports also indicate that Iran moved multiple batches of its highly enriched uranium out of the nuclear sites before the strikes occurred and that the uranium stockpiles were unaffected, said the person, who like others spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive intelligence matters.


 
Last edited:
I don't know why you are picking on this CNN reporter. Trump's own military intelligence is saying the same thing. --

An initial U.S. intelligence report assesses that airstrikes ordered by President Donald Trump against Iran’s nuclear facilities set Tehran’s program back by months but did not eliminate it, contradicting claims by Trump and his top aides about the mission’s success, according to three people familiar with the report.

The classified report by the Defense Intelligence Agency is based on the Pentagon’s early bomb damage assessment of the strikes on nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan using earth-penetrating munitions carried by B-2 bombers and submarine-launched Tomahawk missiles.

It assesses that the strikes did not destroy the core components of Iran’s nuclear program and probably set it back by several months, not years, one of the people said.

U.S. intelligence reports also indicate that Iran moved multiple batches of its highly enriched uranium out of the nuclear sites before the strikes occurred and that the uranium stockpiles were unaffected, said the person, who like others spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive intelligence matters.


You are making a claim that the newspaper actually read and is reporting from a classified report

Sounds like treason, right
 
Part of a leaked low confidence report that has fallen apart in 24 hours moving on.
That doesn't matter. The FAKE news blasts this shit out for maximum damage on purpose knowing by the time it's debunked the damage has already been done. The retraction will be on page 49 in this font Dems are Scum.
 
Back
Top Bottom