REPORT: Hillary Clinton Physically Attacked Staff, Had To Be "Briefly Restrained" After Loss...

[Redfish]

When you settle out of court is proof enough.

Paula Jones never claimed that Clinton raped her. She sued because SHE DIDN'T HAVE SEX WITH CLINTON, and a magazine writer claimed she did.

Jones sexual harassment case was dismissed with prejudice - which means she couldn't re-file, because it was without merit. Neither she nor her husband lost their jobs because she refused to have sex with Clinton. She Appealed the dismissal. Clinton settled out of court to stop the legal action so he could fight the impeachment. There was no admission of guilt, and no apology.

PRECISELY!

precisely wrong

What was not factual in the above post.

a financial settlement is an admission of guilt no matter how you spin it. Innocent people do not make such settlements.

 

[Redfish]

Trump has practically the same sexual history as Clinton.

Now the Right has elected their own Clinton.

give it a rest, dudette. Hillary lost, Trump won. Stop the BS and act like an adult.

 

[Tom Horn]

InfoWars? Really??? You'll believe anything the alt-right tells you.

Here's another source....

Reports: Clinton Had a Violent Meltdown on Election Night

it's true alright...she got into with Willy too...told him his ideas were out of date. His pal said the traitor/rapist got beet red in the face and threw his cell phone into the Arkansas River.

 

[Tom Horn]

Mooch just was quoted as saying Hildabeast was wrecked on speed just to make public appearances. Luckily she didn't have a pistol on election night or Podesta and Mook would be dirt-napped.

 

[sartre play]

This is the kind of BS is why half the population wonders about the other half ability to sort fact from fiction.

 

[Dragonlady]

Back to the OP. You libs raved about "temperament". What kind of temperament do her actions display?

She has been an evil bitch for years. Everyone who has ever been around her confirms that.

No they don't. Only the alt-right claims that about her. Those who work with her say she is hard working, caring, and respectful of her co-workers. If you'd bothered to read HER emails, you'd have seen that.

16 investigations. If she is SO HATED, why didn't anyone turn on her?

And just to be clear, Hillary may not be an evil bitch, but you've proven yourself to be misogynist pig, because your opinion of her isn't based on reality, it's what you want to believe about her.

 

[sartre play]

The question was not about what kind of bitch she is, it was about the truth, she did not hit any one on her staff.

 

[Tom Horn]

you've proven yourself to be misogynist pig, because your opinion of her isn't based on reality, it's what you want to believe about her.

 

[sartre play]

How so?

 

[Care4all]

When you settle out of court is proof enough.

Paula Jones never claimed that Clinton raped her. She sued because SHE DIDN'T HAVE SEX WITH CLINTON, and a magazine writer claimed she did.

Jones sexual harassment case was dismissed with prejudice - which means she couldn't re-file, because it was without merit. Neither she nor her husband lost their jobs because she refused to have sex with Clinton. She Appealed the dismissal. Clinton settled out of court to stop the legal action so he could fight the impeachment. There was no admission of guilt, and no apology.

PRECISELY!

precisely wrong

What was not factual in the above post.

a financial settlement is an admission of guilt no matter how you spin it. Innocent people do not make such settlements.

of course they do, especially ones that have spent 6 years with one partisan accusation after another with investigation after another, with NONE finding them guilty on...

It was not clinton's money that settled....if it had been, you may have a point... but it was donor's who donated to the Clinton defense fund's money that paid the settlement, NOT Clinton's....he didn't lose any of his own money in the settlement.

 

[Tom Horn]

The question was not about what kind of bitch she is, it was about the truth, she did not hit any one on her staff.

Were you there?

 

[sartre play]

Were you?

 

[Tom Horn]

Were you?

Nope and neither were you....A CNN reporter was and they'll do anything to cover up the psychotic old witch's antics so it must have been a bizarre episode.

 

[Silhouette]

“CNN reporter tells me Hillary became physically violent towards Robby Mook..

But Mook is married — to the campaign. Don’t expect to see much of him or hear much about him, at least as long as the candidate is doing well. If not, we may see the worst of Hillaryland coming back. Of course, it won’t earn Clinton any points with the LGBT community if she trashes or cans the first openly gay man to run a major presidential campaign. Meet The Gay Man Who Is Going To Be Running Hillary’s Presidential Campaign / Queerty

Hidden message ^^ "even if Hillary senses Mook is sabotaging her campaign, she'd better not fire him, or WE will sabotage her campaign.."

That's him in the back there in the photo. She ran on the LGBT cult agenda. It was a gamble she should've been smart enough not to make. But then again, what choice did she have?

I'm surprised she didn't attack Obama too... (Light display up the same day of Obergefell decision...Whitehouse always needs weeks of pre-clearance for special displays or events)

 

[LeftofLeft]

Compared to Trump being a rapist,

this is a big deal?

You people believe Trump is a rapist and Hillary has the temperament to be President.

Someone accused Trump of rape, therefore he passes the Bill Clinton test for rapist. You're accused, you're guilty.

Clinton had multiple accusations. Hillary stood by him and defended others accused of rape. Why then would you people have issue with rape based on one accusation that was dropped?

 

[Dragonlady]

When you settle out of court is proof enough.

Paula Jones never claimed that Clinton raped her. She sued because SHE DIDN'T HAVE SEX WITH CLINTON, and a magazine writer claimed she did.

Jones sexual harassment case was dismissed with prejudice - which means she couldn't re-file, because it was without merit. Neither she nor her husband lost their jobs because she refused to have sex with Clinton. She Appealed the dismissal. Clinton settled out of court to stop the legal action so he could fight the impeachment. There was no admission of guilt, and no apology.

PRECISELY!

precisely wrong

What was not factual in the above post.

a financial settlement is an admission of guilt no matter how you spin it. Innocent people do not make such settlements.

Yes they do - all of the time. That's why accident litigators settle minor claims without litigation. That's why Donald Trump sues people - because it's cheaper to settle than to fight on.

Jones' lawsuit was being defended by lawyers paid by the Republican Parywho wanted to continue to harass Bill Clinton as he prepared for his impeachment hearing. The suit had already been dismissed - with prejudice, which meant that Jones would have to pay Clinton's legal fees. The judge said there was "no basis for the suit" because neither Jones nor her husband saw any loss of pay or promotions because of her refusal to have sex with Bill Clinton.

Some magazine wrote an article about how Bill Clinton got a blow job from some State Employee named Paula with a State Trooper husband, and up jumped Paula Jones to say "I did not give that man a blow job", and she demanded a retraction and an apology. The Republican Party was currently on a witch hunt for the Clintons, so they offered to fund a "sexual harassment" suit against Clinton was was State Attorney General at the time of the alleged incident.

The case was dimissed by the presiding judge, "with prejudice", which strongly suggests the judge considered it a nuisance lawsuit brought by the Republican Party for political reasons, and there is strong evidence that this is exactly what it was.

Jones was presented as a gift to the Republican Party by a right-wing California based PR firm. Jones was subsequently totally repackaged with cosmetic dentistry, a new wardrobe, and all new hair and make-up to improve her creditability.

All Jones ever asked for was an apology for the slander in the magazine article, not an unreasonable request. But the Republican Party used her shamelessly, to harass and bedevil Bill Clinton throughout the middle 4 years of his Administration.

I'd pay $850,000 to make this go away if I were Bill Clinton. They could never come after him for it again, otherwise he could be tied up until the end of time in appeals. Paula Jones got $200,000 which works out to $50,000 a year to let the Republican Party do to her what Bill Clinton didn't.

As a person interested in politics, this is the most shameful behaviour I have ever seen by an opposition party against a sitting head of state and everyone involved in the Republican Party should have been called up on charges of treason for trying to undermine the President in this manner.

 

[sartre play]

Can any one stay on point? the question was did Hillary hit her staff? over the last 30 years there are 0 reports of any kind of hitting people reports on Hillary until this election cycle. anger, smart ass remarks, cookies any one, but no abuse.

 

[williepete]

 

[sartre play]

Conversations must be tough on people with this mind set. can't reply to a question, just throw out funny pictures, lost art of discussion.

 

[Silhouette]

Conversations must be tough on people with this mind set. can't reply to a question, just throw out funny pictures, lost art of discussion.

That often happens when they don't want to discuss the elephant in the living room. See post #94 for details...