Report: FBI says no direct ties between Russia, Donald Trump's campaign

It does not require us to believe that Trump has any connection to the Kremlin to consider that Putin has a preference to have Trump as the president. There is reason to believe that Putin would like to see Trump in the Oval Office if only to expect that the American government will grind to a halt and implode under Donald Trump's erratic and bizarre personality.



It would be the Dems behind the government grinding to a halt. Hillary has done more for Russia than anyone by allowing them to have uranium. The State Dept was for sale during her stint and the chickens have come home to roost.
 
The same FBI that couldn't find anything chargeable wrt Hillary's emails? You're touting the FBI now?


So what happened to the regressives nomination of Comey for sainthood? This is driven from the bottom up, the top are still in hildabitch protection mode. My how things on the left change in less than 60 days.
I was hoping they'd dig up dirt on both Trump and Hillary so the country would be spared.


My hope is for anything that will prevent the hildabitch from filling the court with a bunch of regressives that have no respect for the country or it's founding documents. We can deal with anything short of that.

Yep, Repugs have a lot of respect for the Constitution...which is why they are never going to hold a vote in Congress for any of Hillary's Supreme Court nominees once she becomes President. Just like they haven't held a vote yet for Scalia's replacement, which is an unprecedented violation of the Constitution.

Repugs only care about the Constitution when it's convenient for them. Hopefully, Democrats will control both houses after this election.


Maybe you should try actually reading it. No supreme court appointment can be made without the CONSENT of the senate. There is nothing in the Constitution that REQUIRES the senate to give that consent if they feel it is not in the best interest of the country. BTW the court didn't always have 9 justices, no reason it has to today.

Yes, the Founding Fathers intended for obstructionist, extremist political parties like the Republicans to refuse to vote for a President's Supreme Court nominee indefinitely. That's utterly logical, dumb ass. If the shoe was on the other foot and the Democrats pulled a stunt like this, you would be crying like the little right-wing bitch that you are.

If your main motivation for voting for Trump is the appointment of Republican Supreme Court Justices, then you are sorely misguided. The Supreme Court simply won't matter if Trump becomes President because democracy in this country will end as we know it. Trump already talks about changing libel laws to limit the ability of the press to criticize him and of locking up his political opponents, like some third-rate dictator from the Middle East. Trump is extremely dangerous, but a Limbaugh cartoon boy like you will never understand that.
 
So what happened to the regressives nomination of Comey for sainthood? This is driven from the bottom up, the top are still in hildabitch protection mode. My how things on the left change in less than 60 days.
I was hoping they'd dig up dirt on both Trump and Hillary so the country would be spared.


My hope is for anything that will prevent the hildabitch from filling the court with a bunch of regressives that have no respect for the country or it's founding documents. We can deal with anything short of that.

Yep, Repugs have a lot of respect for the Constitution...which is why they are never going to hold a vote in Congress for any of Hillary's Supreme Court nominees once she becomes President. Just like they haven't held a vote yet for Scalia's replacement, which is an unprecedented violation of the Constitution.

Repugs only care about the Constitution when it's convenient for them. Hopefully, Democrats will control both houses after this election.


Maybe you should try actually reading it. No supreme court appointment can be made without the CONSENT of the senate. There is nothing in the Constitution that REQUIRES the senate to give that consent if they feel it is not in the best interest of the country. BTW the court didn't always have 9 justices, no reason it has to today.

Yes, the Founding Fathers intended for obstructionist, extremist political parties like the Republicans to refuse to vote for a President's Supreme Court nominee indefinitely. That's utterly logical, dumb ass. If the shoe was on the other foot and the Democrats pulled a stunt like this, you would be crying like the little right-wing bitch that you are.

If your main motivation for voting for Trump is the appointment of Republican Supreme Court Justices, then you are sorely misguided. The Supreme Court simply won't matter if Trump becomes President because democracy in this country will end as we know it. Trump already talks about changing libel laws to limit the ability of the press to criticize him and of locking up his political opponents, like some third-rate dictator from the Middle East. Trump is extremely dangerous, but a Limbaugh cartoon boy like you will never understand that.


The senate is acting within it's constitutional powers, the fact that is pisses you off is irrelevant.

Also Trump would be the easiest president in history to impeach and remove if he really steps on it. That is not the case with commiecrats, they will defend any action by the hildabitch to the death, just like they did your dear leader. Thank God the courts held him in check a bit.
 
I was hoping they'd dig up dirt on both Trump and Hillary so the country would be spared.


My hope is for anything that will prevent the hildabitch from filling the court with a bunch of regressives that have no respect for the country or it's founding documents. We can deal with anything short of that.

Yep, Repugs have a lot of respect for the Constitution...which is why they are never going to hold a vote in Congress for any of Hillary's Supreme Court nominees once she becomes President. Just like they haven't held a vote yet for Scalia's replacement, which is an unprecedented violation of the Constitution.

Repugs only care about the Constitution when it's convenient for them. Hopefully, Democrats will control both houses after this election.


Maybe you should try actually reading it. No supreme court appointment can be made without the CONSENT of the senate. There is nothing in the Constitution that REQUIRES the senate to give that consent if they feel it is not in the best interest of the country. BTW the court didn't always have 9 justices, no reason it has to today.

Yes, the Founding Fathers intended for obstructionist, extremist political parties like the Republicans to refuse to vote for a President's Supreme Court nominee indefinitely. That's utterly logical, dumb ass. If the shoe was on the other foot and the Democrats pulled a stunt like this, you would be crying like the little right-wing bitch that you are.

If your main motivation for voting for Trump is the appointment of Republican Supreme Court Justices, then you are sorely misguided. The Supreme Court simply won't matter if Trump becomes President because democracy in this country will end as we know it. Trump already talks about changing libel laws to limit the ability of the press to criticize him and of locking up his political opponents, like some third-rate dictator from the Middle East. Trump is extremely dangerous, but a Limbaugh cartoon boy like you will never understand that.


The senate is acting within it's constitutional powers, the fact that is pisses you off is irrelevant.

Also Trump would be the easiest president in history to impeach and remove if he really steps on it. That is not the case with commiecrats, they will defend any action by the hildabitch to the death, just like they did your dear leader. Thank God the courts held him in check a bit.

And all of your whining about Hillary every day is irrelevant, Limbaugh cartoon boy. Because Hillary is going to beat the living shit out of you Repug fuckholes on Nov. 8 and you're going to have to take it up the ass from her for at least 4 years.

And your wrong about the Constitution also, lightweight. The Constitution is clear and George Washington was also clear about this:

Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution clearly delineates the roles the president and the Senate must play in the appointment process: “The President . . . shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint . . . judges of the Supreme Court . . . .” The language chosen by the Framers was the product of a compromise worked out during the deliberations in Philadelphia. Some delegates preferred giving the Senate the responsibility to appoint judges; others, led by Pennsylvania’s James Wilson, thought that “Experience shewed the impropriety of such appointmts. by numerous bodies” and wished to give the President the power to appoint judges so that “officers might be appointed by a single, responsible person.” At the outset of the Convention, the power to appoint judges was assigned to the legislature. But over the course of the debates, the Framers determined that the choice of a Supreme Court nominee should be made by the president. Today, the president made that choice.

The Framers understood that the Senate’s advice and consent power was a narrow one. That power, President George Washington wrote, “extend no further than to an approbation or disapprobation of the person being nominated by the President, all the rest being Executive and vested in the President by the Constitution.” The Senate cannot perform its constitutional role if it refuses to meet with the nominee, hear the nominee’s views, learn about the nominee’s record, and then determine whether or not to confirm the nominee.

Republicans Who Block Obama’s Supreme Court Pick Are Violating the Constitution
 
I was hoping they'd dig up dirt on both Trump and Hillary so the country would be spared.


My hope is for anything that will prevent the hildabitch from filling the court with a bunch of regressives that have no respect for the country or it's founding documents. We can deal with anything short of that.

Yep, Repugs have a lot of respect for the Constitution...which is why they are never going to hold a vote in Congress for any of Hillary's Supreme Court nominees once she becomes President. Just like they haven't held a vote yet for Scalia's replacement, which is an unprecedented violation of the Constitution.

Repugs only care about the Constitution when it's convenient for them. Hopefully, Democrats will control both houses after this election.


Maybe you should try actually reading it. No supreme court appointment can be made without the CONSENT of the senate. There is nothing in the Constitution that REQUIRES the senate to give that consent if they feel it is not in the best interest of the country. BTW the court didn't always have 9 justices, no reason it has to today.

Yes, the Founding Fathers intended for obstructionist, extremist political parties like the Republicans to refuse to vote for a President's Supreme Court nominee indefinitely. That's utterly logical, dumb ass. If the shoe was on the other foot and the Democrats pulled a stunt like this, you would be crying like the little right-wing bitch that you are.

If your main motivation for voting for Trump is the appointment of Republican Supreme Court Justices, then you are sorely misguided. The Supreme Court simply won't matter if Trump becomes President because democracy in this country will end as we know it. Trump already talks about changing libel laws to limit the ability of the press to criticize him and of locking up his political opponents, like some third-rate dictator from the Middle East. Trump is extremely dangerous, but a Limbaugh cartoon boy like you will never understand that.


The senate is acting within it's constitutional powers, the fact that is pisses you off is irrelevant.

Also Trump would be the easiest president in history to impeach and remove if he really steps on it. That is not the case with commiecrats, they will defend any action by the hildabitch to the death, just like they did your dear leader. Thank God the courts held him in check a bit.

And if you think Trump would voluntarily resign from office due to impeachment, you're kidding yourself. Plus, the current crop of cowardly Repug "leaders" in Congress such as Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell would never take that step in a million years.
 
My hope is for anything that will prevent the hildabitch from filling the court with a bunch of regressives that have no respect for the country or it's founding documents. We can deal with anything short of that.

Yep, Repugs have a lot of respect for the Constitution...which is why they are never going to hold a vote in Congress for any of Hillary's Supreme Court nominees once she becomes President. Just like they haven't held a vote yet for Scalia's replacement, which is an unprecedented violation of the Constitution.

Repugs only care about the Constitution when it's convenient for them. Hopefully, Democrats will control both houses after this election.


Maybe you should try actually reading it. No supreme court appointment can be made without the CONSENT of the senate. There is nothing in the Constitution that REQUIRES the senate to give that consent if they feel it is not in the best interest of the country. BTW the court didn't always have 9 justices, no reason it has to today.

Yes, the Founding Fathers intended for obstructionist, extremist political parties like the Republicans to refuse to vote for a President's Supreme Court nominee indefinitely. That's utterly logical, dumb ass. If the shoe was on the other foot and the Democrats pulled a stunt like this, you would be crying like the little right-wing bitch that you are.

If your main motivation for voting for Trump is the appointment of Republican Supreme Court Justices, then you are sorely misguided. The Supreme Court simply won't matter if Trump becomes President because democracy in this country will end as we know it. Trump already talks about changing libel laws to limit the ability of the press to criticize him and of locking up his political opponents, like some third-rate dictator from the Middle East. Trump is extremely dangerous, but a Limbaugh cartoon boy like you will never understand that.


The senate is acting within it's constitutional powers, the fact that is pisses you off is irrelevant.

Also Trump would be the easiest president in history to impeach and remove if he really steps on it. That is not the case with commiecrats, they will defend any action by the hildabitch to the death, just like they did your dear leader. Thank God the courts held him in check a bit.

And all of your whining about Hillary every day is irrelevant, Limbaugh cartoon boy. Because Hillary is going to beat the living shit out of you Repug fuckholes on Nov. 8 and you're going to have to take it up the ass from her for at least 4 years.

And your wrong about the Constitution also, lightweight. The Constitution is clear and George Washington was also clear about this:

Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution clearly delineates the roles the president and the Senate must play in the appointment process: “The President . . . shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint . . . judges of the Supreme Court . . . .” The language chosen by the Framers was the product of a compromise worked out during the deliberations in Philadelphia. Some delegates preferred giving the Senate the responsibility to appoint judges; others, led by Pennsylvania’s James Wilson, thought that “Experience shewed the impropriety of such appointmts. by numerous bodies” and wished to give the President the power to appoint judges so that “officers might be appointed by a single, responsible person.” At the outset of the Convention, the power to appoint judges was assigned to the legislature. But over the course of the debates, the Framers determined that the choice of a Supreme Court nominee should be made by the president. Today, the president made that choice.

The Framers understood that the Senate’s advice and consent power was a narrow one. That power, President George Washington wrote, “extend no further than to an approbation or disapprobation of the person being nominated by the President, all the rest being Executive and vested in the President by the Constitution.” The Senate cannot perform its constitutional role if it refuses to meet with the nominee, hear the nominee’s views, learn about the nominee’s record, and then determine whether or not to confirm the nominee.

Republicans Who Block Obama’s Supreme Court Pick Are Violating the Constitution


And the constitutional time frame for providing advice and consent is?
 
My hope is for anything that will prevent the hildabitch from filling the court with a bunch of regressives that have no respect for the country or it's founding documents. We can deal with anything short of that.

Yep, Repugs have a lot of respect for the Constitution...which is why they are never going to hold a vote in Congress for any of Hillary's Supreme Court nominees once she becomes President. Just like they haven't held a vote yet for Scalia's replacement, which is an unprecedented violation of the Constitution.

Repugs only care about the Constitution when it's convenient for them. Hopefully, Democrats will control both houses after this election.


Maybe you should try actually reading it. No supreme court appointment can be made without the CONSENT of the senate. There is nothing in the Constitution that REQUIRES the senate to give that consent if they feel it is not in the best interest of the country. BTW the court didn't always have 9 justices, no reason it has to today.

Yes, the Founding Fathers intended for obstructionist, extremist political parties like the Republicans to refuse to vote for a President's Supreme Court nominee indefinitely. That's utterly logical, dumb ass. If the shoe was on the other foot and the Democrats pulled a stunt like this, you would be crying like the little right-wing bitch that you are.

If your main motivation for voting for Trump is the appointment of Republican Supreme Court Justices, then you are sorely misguided. The Supreme Court simply won't matter if Trump becomes President because democracy in this country will end as we know it. Trump already talks about changing libel laws to limit the ability of the press to criticize him and of locking up his political opponents, like some third-rate dictator from the Middle East. Trump is extremely dangerous, but a Limbaugh cartoon boy like you will never understand that.


The senate is acting within it's constitutional powers, the fact that is pisses you off is irrelevant.

Also Trump would be the easiest president in history to impeach and remove if he really steps on it. That is not the case with commiecrats, they will defend any action by the hildabitch to the death, just like they did your dear leader. Thank God the courts held him in check a bit.

And if you think Trump would voluntarily resign from office due to impeachment, you're kidding yourself. Plus, the current crop of cowardly Repug "leaders" in Congress such as Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell would never take that step in a million years.


See what happens when you treat a petulant child as a grown up. Run along sonny you're boring me again.
 
Yep, Repugs have a lot of respect for the Constitution...which is why they are never going to hold a vote in Congress for any of Hillary's Supreme Court nominees once she becomes President. Just like they haven't held a vote yet for Scalia's replacement, which is an unprecedented violation of the Constitution.

Repugs only care about the Constitution when it's convenient for them. Hopefully, Democrats will control both houses after this election.


Maybe you should try actually reading it. No supreme court appointment can be made without the CONSENT of the senate. There is nothing in the Constitution that REQUIRES the senate to give that consent if they feel it is not in the best interest of the country. BTW the court didn't always have 9 justices, no reason it has to today.

Yes, the Founding Fathers intended for obstructionist, extremist political parties like the Republicans to refuse to vote for a President's Supreme Court nominee indefinitely. That's utterly logical, dumb ass. If the shoe was on the other foot and the Democrats pulled a stunt like this, you would be crying like the little right-wing bitch that you are.

If your main motivation for voting for Trump is the appointment of Republican Supreme Court Justices, then you are sorely misguided. The Supreme Court simply won't matter if Trump becomes President because democracy in this country will end as we know it. Trump already talks about changing libel laws to limit the ability of the press to criticize him and of locking up his political opponents, like some third-rate dictator from the Middle East. Trump is extremely dangerous, but a Limbaugh cartoon boy like you will never understand that.


The senate is acting within it's constitutional powers, the fact that is pisses you off is irrelevant.

Also Trump would be the easiest president in history to impeach and remove if he really steps on it. That is not the case with commiecrats, they will defend any action by the hildabitch to the death, just like they did your dear leader. Thank God the courts held him in check a bit.

And if you think Trump would voluntarily resign from office due to impeachment, you're kidding yourself. Plus, the current crop of cowardly Repug "leaders" in Congress such as Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell would never take that step in a million years.


See what happens when you treat a petulant child as a grown up. Run along sonny you're boring me again.

In other words, I'm right. You know damn well none of those Repug pussies in Congress would ever impeach Trump.
 
Yep, Repugs have a lot of respect for the Constitution...which is why they are never going to hold a vote in Congress for any of Hillary's Supreme Court nominees once she becomes President. Just like they haven't held a vote yet for Scalia's replacement, which is an unprecedented violation of the Constitution.

Repugs only care about the Constitution when it's convenient for them. Hopefully, Democrats will control both houses after this election.


Maybe you should try actually reading it. No supreme court appointment can be made without the CONSENT of the senate. There is nothing in the Constitution that REQUIRES the senate to give that consent if they feel it is not in the best interest of the country. BTW the court didn't always have 9 justices, no reason it has to today.

Yes, the Founding Fathers intended for obstructionist, extremist political parties like the Republicans to refuse to vote for a President's Supreme Court nominee indefinitely. That's utterly logical, dumb ass. If the shoe was on the other foot and the Democrats pulled a stunt like this, you would be crying like the little right-wing bitch that you are.

If your main motivation for voting for Trump is the appointment of Republican Supreme Court Justices, then you are sorely misguided. The Supreme Court simply won't matter if Trump becomes President because democracy in this country will end as we know it. Trump already talks about changing libel laws to limit the ability of the press to criticize him and of locking up his political opponents, like some third-rate dictator from the Middle East. Trump is extremely dangerous, but a Limbaugh cartoon boy like you will never understand that.


The senate is acting within it's constitutional powers, the fact that is pisses you off is irrelevant.

Also Trump would be the easiest president in history to impeach and remove if he really steps on it. That is not the case with commiecrats, they will defend any action by the hildabitch to the death, just like they did your dear leader. Thank God the courts held him in check a bit.

And all of your whining about Hillary every day is irrelevant, Limbaugh cartoon boy. Because Hillary is going to beat the living shit out of you Repug fuckholes on Nov. 8 and you're going to have to take it up the ass from her for at least 4 years.

And your wrong about the Constitution also, lightweight. The Constitution is clear and George Washington was also clear about this:

Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution clearly delineates the roles the president and the Senate must play in the appointment process: “The President . . . shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint . . . judges of the Supreme Court . . . .” The language chosen by the Framers was the product of a compromise worked out during the deliberations in Philadelphia. Some delegates preferred giving the Senate the responsibility to appoint judges; others, led by Pennsylvania’s James Wilson, thought that “Experience shewed the impropriety of such appointmts. by numerous bodies” and wished to give the President the power to appoint judges so that “officers might be appointed by a single, responsible person.” At the outset of the Convention, the power to appoint judges was assigned to the legislature. But over the course of the debates, the Framers determined that the choice of a Supreme Court nominee should be made by the president. Today, the president made that choice.

The Framers understood that the Senate’s advice and consent power was a narrow one. That power, President George Washington wrote, “extend no further than to an approbation or disapprobation of the person being nominated by the President, all the rest being Executive and vested in the President by the Constitution.” The Senate cannot perform its constitutional role if it refuses to meet with the nominee, hear the nominee’s views, learn about the nominee’s record, and then determine whether or not to confirm the nominee.

Republicans Who Block Obama’s Supreme Court Pick Are Violating the Constitution


And the constitutional time frame for providing advice and consent is?

So this justifies irresponsible, obstructionist behavior by the Repugs in Congress. I see, Limbaugh cartoon boy.

Your shit is weak. It matters not, you'll be pissing yourself on Nov. 8.
 

Forum List

Back
Top