Fewer questions would be generated by the miraculous jump in Biden support that followed the pause if people were not seeing the miraculous jump for Biden in real time.So what was gained by that delay?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Fewer questions would be generated by the miraculous jump in Biden support that followed the pause if people were not seeing the miraculous jump for Biden in real time.So what was gained by that delay?
What fraud? The fraud you're making up?
Michigan dummycraps: What fraud? I ain't seen no fraud!What fraud? The fraud you're making up?
Why would they need to delay counting to print up ballots, had they actually done that? If they wanted to print up ballots, couldn't they do that while other ballots were being counted?I have read various theories, all of which should be taken seriously until irrefutably disproven. One theory is that democrats became aware early on election night that they needed time to print hundreds of thousands of new ballots for Biden due to Trump's commanding lead, which seems consistent with the fact that new pristine ballots were later dumped in Georgia without the required documentations and verifications of legitimacy.
Most leftists political opinions are worse than slop.AI generated slop is not a “report”.
Makes no sense. There was no jump for Biden while they delayed counting during the repair to the leak.Fewer questions would be generated by the miraculous jump in Biden support that followed the pause if people were not seeing the miraculous jump for Biden in real time.
Now you're jumping from Georgia to Michigan? What fraud in Michigan are you talking about?Michigan dummycraps: What fraud? I ain't seen no fraud!
I do not mean that every statement in a posted artical supports the one or two points I may have posted the article as support for those few points I made. Furthermore, a flaw in other points in an article does nothing to disprove the points that are not disproved.This was in a link you posted.
Joe Biden won the state by just 12,000 vote after a surge of tens of thousands of mail-in ballots counted after some election monitors were “shoo’d” from the venue due to false reports of a major water pipe break
That leaked caused a delay in tabulating votes. So if they weren't counting votes during the repair to the leak, why do you believe that delay do wonders for Biden's vote count?
If their "facts" are are false, that source is not trustworthy.I do not mean that every statement in a posted artical supports the one or two points I may have posted the article as support for those few points I made. Furthermore, a flaw in other points in an article does nothing to disprove the points that are not disproved.
Seriously, if you want to make an argument try posting something from a human being.Most leftists political opinions are worse than slop.
If we should trust no politician who sometimes lies then we should thrust no politician except maybe for the most moral and upright ones?If their "facts" are are false, that source is not trustworthy.
AI is no more human than Wikipedia or CNN, for example, and AI as well as other outlets post news biased by the bias of the writers.Seriously, if you want to make an argument try posting something from a human being.
Nobody would take AI as a serious substitution for human research.
Correct. AI is no more human than Wikipedia or CNN. AI is FAR LESS human than Wikipedia or CNN.AI is no more human than Wikipedia or CNN, for example, and AI as well as other outlets post news biased by the bias of the writers.
That wasn't a politician, it was your news source.If we should trust no politician who sometimes lies then we should thrust no politician except maybe for the most moral and upright ones?
You need to climb out of your internet rabbit holes.I have read various theories, all of which should be taken seriously until irrefutably disproven. One theory is that democrats became aware early on election night that they needed time to print hundreds of thousands of new ballots for Biden due to Trump's commanding lead, which seems consistent with the fact that new pristine ballots were later dumped in Georgia without the required documentations and verifications of legitimacy.
The claim: 2020 was the most secure election in history lacked any proof whatsoever.You need to climb out of your internet rabbit holes.
Here’s food for thought
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof
You seem to get that backwards
It must have been. Almost 6 years later, you still can't find proof of massive fraud that would have changed the outcome of the election.The claim: 2020 was the most secure election in history lacked any proof whatsoever.
The evidence of fraud is massive but remains neither proven nor disproven.It must have been. Almost 6 years later, you still can't find proof of massive fraud that would have changed the outcome of the election.
There seems to be no reason apart from after election panic for why thousands of mimeographed ballots did not show up until after polls closed. However, I suspect delays in counting in democrat election wards had more to do with adjusting Dominion voting machine counts rather than paper ballot dumps.Why would they need to delay counting to print up ballots, had they actually done that? If they wanted to print up ballots, couldn't they do that while other ballots were being counted?
Remains unprovenThe evidence of fraud is massive but remains neither proven nor disproven.
Perhaps you are right. The miraculous jump in Biden numbers came overnight after the polls closed with the mysterious dumps of unverified ballots without the required security protections in so many democrat wards.Makes no sense. There was no jump for Biden while they delayed counting during the repair to the leak.