Report: 26 FBI INFORMANTS in J6 protest, some entered the Capitol

[markef]

Lies

The strange case of the "suspicious" Georgia mail-in ballots under court-ordered review, and a break-in at the warehouse storing them | Sharyl Attkisson

Regardless of how it all turns out, the information reported in a RealClearInvestigations article would be major international news in a neutral news environment. According to the article: A Democrat-donor judge in Georgia has sided with plaintiffs in agreeing to […]

sharylattkisson.com

The strange case of the “suspicious” Georgia mail-in ballots under court-ordered review, and a break-in at the warehouse storing them​

By Sharyl Attkisson | June 10, 2021


Regardless of how it all turns out, the information reported in a RealClearInvestigations article would be major international news in a neutral news environment.

According to the article:

• A Democrat-donor judge in Georgia has sided with plaintiffs in agreeing to unseal 147,000 2020 election mail-in ballots for inspection.
• Four poll workers have filed sworn affidavits about anomalies they said they observed on absentee ballots, from their abnormal “pristine” unfolded condition, to the paper being of different stock than other ballots, to voting bubbles that appeared to be filled in by ink from toner in a printer.
• Joe Biden won the state by just 12,000 vote after a surge of tens of thousands of mail-in ballots counted after some election monitors were “shoo’d” from the venue due to false reports of a major water pipe break.
• The judge, Brian Amero, ordered a May 28 meeting at the warehouse where the ballots are stored to come to agreement on the process for inspection.
• The meeting was postponed after Fulton County filed legal objections to the inspections.
• Judge Amero requested around the clock guards of the warehouse until the inspection.
• However, on May 29, sheriff’s deputies guarding the warehouse left it unattended for several hours.
• A motion-detection alarm was triggered shortly after the deputies left.
• County officials say the ballots were not breached.
• The plaintiffs are asking for security camera video to confirm.

The following is an authorized reprint of a RealClearInvestigations article by Paul Sperry.

When Fulton County, Ga., poll manager Suzi Voyles sorted through a large stack of mail-in ballots last November, she noticed an alarmingly odd pattern of uniformity in the markings for Joseph R. Biden. One after another, the absentee votes contained perfectly filled-in ovals for Biden — except that each of the darkened bubbles featured an identical white void inside them in the shape of a tiny crescent, indicating they’d been marked with toner ink instead of a pen or pencil.

 

[Political-Junkie]

Mass-mimeographed ballots have been found and that is evidence of fraud.

Debunked:

No. Extensive state and federal investigations have thoroughly debunked the claim that "pristine," preprinted, or counterfeit ballots were introduced or counted in Georgia's 2020 presidential election.

Here is the breakdown of how this claim originated and what investigators actually found:

1. The Origin of the "Pristine Ballot" Claim​

During a statewide hand-count audit in November 2020, a few Republican vote-counters (most notably an auditor named Suzi Voyles) signed affidavits claiming they observed batches of absentee ballots that appeared suspiciously "pristine." They described ballots that lacked expected crease lines (from being folded into mail-in envelopes), felt different to the touch, and featured perfectly filled-in selection ovals that looked machine-printed or "mimeographed" rather than marked by a human hand.

2. State and Independent Investigations​

Because of these specific allegations, the Georgia Secretary of State’s office and the Georgia State Election Board launched formal investigations:

• Targeted Inspections: Investigators pulled the exact ballot boxes and batches identified by the affiants (such as Box 5 and Batches 28–36 in Fulton County). They inspected the physical paper ballots and digital ballot images.
• The Findings: Investigators found no irregularities, no counterfeits, and no ballots matching the "pristine" or preprinted descriptions. All ballots in those batches were determined to be completely legitimate.
• Why Unfolded Ballots Exist: Election officials explained that it is normal to have flat, unfolded absentee ballots mixed into the count. When a mail-in ballot arrives physically damaged or torn (making it impossible for a scanner to read), a bipartisan vote-review panel must legally duplicate the voter's choices onto a fresh, unfolded replacement ballot so it can be tabulated.

3. Final Dismissals​

The Georgia State Election Board unanimously dismissed the fraudulent "pristine ballot" claims after reviewing the evidence. While subsequent audits and reviews highlighted various administrative errors and disorganized record-keeping common to a high-volume election run during a pandemic, multiple hand and machine recounts consistently verified the accuracy of the overall vote totals.

 

[markef]

IMO, this is a piss poor excuse to get around the fact you haven't proven millions of illegal aliens have voted, no less registered to vote.

Be honest for once. Democrats knew if they blocked access to voting and immigration records that no evidence of illegal immigrant voting would be found. However, the fact that democrats blocked investigations does not prove no fraud occurred by that democrats had every reason to hide the fraud. Democrats cannot claim only a few illegal immigrants voted because none of that has been proven or disproven.

 

[markef]

Debunked:

No. Extensive state and federal investigations have thoroughly debunked the claim that "pristine," preprinted, or counterfeit ballots were introduced or counted in Georgia's 2020 presidential election.

Here is the breakdown of how this claim originated and what investigators actually found:

1. The Origin of the "Pristine Ballot" Claim​

During a statewide hand-count audit in November 2020, a few Republican vote-counters (most notably an auditor named Suzi Voyles) signed affidavits claiming they observed batches of absentee ballots that appeared suspiciously "pristine." They described ballots that lacked expected crease lines (from being folded into mail-in envelopes), felt different to the touch, and featured perfectly filled-in selection ovals that looked machine-printed or "mimeographed" rather than marked by a human hand.

2. State and Independent Investigations​

Because of these specific allegations, the Georgia Secretary of State’s office and the Georgia State Election Board launched formal investigations:

• Targeted Inspections: Investigators pulled the exact ballot boxes and batches identified by the affiants (such as Box 5 and Batches 28–36 in Fulton County). They inspected the physical paper ballots and digital ballot images.
• The Findings: Investigators found no irregularities, no counterfeits, and no ballots matching the "pristine" or preprinted descriptions. All ballots in those batches were determined to be completely legitimate.
• Why Unfolded Ballots Exist: Election officials explained that it is normal to have flat, unfolded absentee ballots mixed into the count. When a mail-in ballot arrives physically damaged or torn (making it impossible for a scanner to read), a bipartisan vote-review panel must legally duplicate the voter's choices onto a fresh, unfolded replacement ballot so it can be tabulated.

3. Final Dismissals​

The Georgia State Election Board unanimously dismissed the fraudulent "pristine ballot" claims after reviewing the evidence. While subsequent audits and reviews highlighted various administrative errors and disorganized record-keeping common to a high-volume election run during a pandemic, multiple hand and machine recounts consistently verified the accuracy of the overall vote totals.

A state judge sealed the suspicious ballots in a warehouse early in 2021 and did not open the warehouse to inspect the ballots until after there had been a breach in security in which the evidence was quite likely altered. The fact that the ballots had to be seized and sealed under court order in early 2021 proves there was validity to the claim that the ballots appeared to have been mass mimeographed.

 

[Political-Junkie]

Be honest for once. Democrats knew if they blocked access to voting and immigration records that no evidence of illegal immigrant voting would be found. However, the fact that democrats blocked investigations does not prove no fraud occurred by that democrats had every reason to hide the fraud. Democrats cannot claim only a few illegal immigrants voted because none of that has been proven or disproven.

That's not evidence it occurred. You can't find one single undocumented immigrant who voted in 2020. That's all the evidence needed to show you're full of it.

 

[Political-Junkie]

A state judge sealed the suspicious ballots in a warehouse early in 2021 and did not open the warehouse to inspect the ballots until after there had been a breach in security in which the evidence was quite likely altered. The fact that the ballots had to be seized and sealed under court order in early 2021 proves there was validity to the claim that the ballots appeared to have been mass mimeographed.

What breach of security?

 

[markef]

That's not evidence it occurred. You can't find one single undocumented immigrant who voted in 2020. That's all the evidence needed to show you're full of it.

Don't be stupid. Illegal immigrants voted and the reason we don't know exactly how many voted is because democrats refused to allow investigators to examine the voting and immigration records to determine just how many did illegally vote. Democrats claim illegals did not vote but that claim cannot possibly be proven because it is not true.

This report exposes why democrats fight like hell to prevent investigators from comparing immigration records with voting records:


Nevada DMV revealed thousands of noncitizens voted in 2020, The New American 12-16-20

No Evidence? Nevada DMV Data Reveals Thousands of Non-citizens Voted in 2020 Election

byLuis MiguelDecember 16, 2020

Information obtained via subpoena by the Nevada Republican Party from the state’s Department of Motor Vehicles revealed that thousands of non-citizens not only were registered to vote, but actually cast ballots in the 2020 election.

The fraudulent votes were cast thanks to the DMV’s registering of all those who applied for driver’s licenses. Since legal and illegal “non-citizens” can hold driver’s licenses in the state, it’s easy for them to get registered to vote if the DMV employees “do their due diligence.”

The information obtained under a subpoena displayed green-card holders and non citizens who had obtained driver’s licenses. Based on the official data set, the Nevada GOP “compared this detailed information against the county voter records in Nevada” and “discovered that 6,260 non citizens were registered to vote and 3,987 non-citizens had voted.”

In a signed statement “under the penalty of perjury,” the group’s data analyst Jesse Kamzol outlined his findings, which he emphasized “merit further investigation.”

Kamzol explained his findings:

6,360 positive matches were made from within the DMV file to the Voter File

 

[markef]

What breach of security?

Here are the details:

Why a Judge Has Georgia Vote Fraud on His Mind: ‘Pristine’ Biden Ballots That Looked Xeroxed | RealClearInvestigations

“We have what is almost surely major absentee-ballot fraud in Fulton County involving 10,000 to 20,000 probably false ballots,” said Garland Favorito, the lead petitioner in the case and a certified poll watcher who runs VoterGa.org, one of the leading advocates for election integrity in the state.

He said the suspect ballots remain in the custody of the election officials and inaccessible from public view.

“We have confirmed that there are five pallets of shrink-wrapped ballots in a county warehouse,” Favorito said in an interview with RealClearInvestigations.

“We have confirmed that there are five pallets of shrink-wrapped ballots in a county warehouse,” Favorito said in an interview with RealClearInvestigations.

He and other petitioners were ordered to meet at the warehouse May 28 to settle the terms of the inspection of the absentee ballots. But the day before the scheduled meeting, the county filed a flurry of motions to dismiss the case, delaying the inspection indefinitely.

“We will be in court on June 21 to resolve these motions,” said Favorito, calling them another “roadblock” the county has tried to throw in their way. He expects talks over the logistics of the inspection to resume after the Fourth of July holiday.

As part of his May 21 order, Superior Court Judge Brian Amero requested officials guard the warehouse around the clock until an inspection date can be set. But just eight days later, a breach in security was reported after sheriff’s deputies left their post for a couple of hours.

“The front door was [found] unlocked and wide open in violation of the court order,” Favorito said.

Former President Trump: After deputies interrupted their watch on the ballots on May 29, he implied election officials in the Democratic-controlled county are trying to hide evidence of fraud.
(AP Photo/John Raoux)
County officials confirmed that a motion-detection alarm was triggered Saturday, May 29, shortly after the deputies drove away from the building in their patrol cars around 4 p.m. But they said a locked room where the ballots are kept “was never breached or compromised.”

 

[Political-Junkie]

Don't be stupid. Illegal immigrants voted and the reason we don't know exactly how many voted is because democrats refused to allow investigators to examine the voting and immigration records to determine just how many did illegally vote. Democrats claim illegals did not vote but that claim cannot possibly be proven because it is not true.

This report exposes why democrats fight like hell to prevent investigators from comparing immigration records with voting records:


Nevada DMV revealed thousands of noncitizens voted in 2020, The New American 12-16-20

No Evidence? Nevada DMV Data Reveals Thousands of Non-citizens Voted in 2020 Election

byLuis MiguelDecember 16, 2020

Information obtained via subpoena by the Nevada Republican Party from the state’s Department of Motor Vehicles revealed that thousands of non-citizens not only were registered to vote, but actually cast ballots in the 2020 election.

The fraudulent votes were cast thanks to the DMV’s registering of all those who applied for driver’s licenses. Since legal and illegal “non-citizens” can hold driver’s licenses in the state, it’s easy for them to get registered to vote if the DMV employees “do their due diligence.”

The information obtained under a subpoena displayed green-card holders and non citizens who had obtained driver’s licenses. Based on the official data set, the Nevada GOP “compared this detailed information against the county voter records in Nevada” and “discovered that 6,260 non citizens were registered to vote and 3,987 non-citizens had voted.”

In a signed statement “under the penalty of perjury,” the group’s data analyst Jesse Kamzol outlined his findings, which he emphasized “merit further investigation.”

Kamzol explained his findings:

6,360 positive matches were made from within the DMV file to the Voter File

Debunked years ago.

The quote you referenced originates from a legal declaration filed by the Nevada Republican Party in December 2020 as part of an attempt to challenge the results of the 2020 Nevada Presidential election. [1]
The specific statement comes from a supplementary declaration by Jesse Kamzol, who was acting as a data analyst for the Republican National Committee (RNC). [1, 2]
Context of the Data Match
In the document, Kamzol detailed a data-matching exercise between two distinct databases in Nevada: [1]

1. The Nevada DMV Non-Citizen File: A list provided on December 1, 2020, containing 110,164 records of individuals who had documented their non-citizen status at some point while obtaining a driver's license or ID.
2. The Nevada Statewide Voter File: A list of registered voters downloaded from the Nevada Secretary of State on November 10, 2020. [1]

By cross-referencing names, addresses, and zip codes, the analyst claimed that 6,360 positive matches were found between the non-citizen DMV list and the registered voter rolls. The declaration further alleged that 3,987 of those matched individuals successfully cast a ballot in the 2020 election. [1]
Outcome and Resolution
The Nevada GOP used these figures in lawsuits to claim that thousands of undocumented immigrants or non-citizens voted illegally. However, election officials, independent fact-checkers, and Nevada courts ultimately rejected or dismissed these challenges due to several significant flaws in the data-matching methodology: [1]

• Outdated DMV Records: The DMV list tracked individuals' legal status at the time they applied for their driver’s licenses. Because Nevada DMV licenses can be valid for up to eight years, many individuals on the "non-citizen list" had naturally become naturalized U.S. citizens—and therefore legally eligible to register and vote—in the intervening years before November 2020.
• Lack of Unique Identifiers: The data analysis relied heavily on partial name and address matching rather than foolproof identifiers like Social Security Numbers, leading to false positives (different people with similar names living at the same or previous addresses).
• Dismissal in Court: Carson City District Court Judge James Russell dismissed the lawsuit (and subsequent appeals failed), ruling that the contestors failed to provide credible or admissible evidence of voter fraud or illegal non-citizen voting that would alter the election outcome.

 

[markef]

Debunked years ago.

The quote you referenced originates from a legal declaration filed by the Nevada Republican Party in December 2020 as part of an attempt to challenge the results of the 2020 Nevada Presidential election. [1]
The specific statement comes from a supplementary declaration by Jesse Kamzol, who was acting as a data analyst for the Republican National Committee (RNC). [1, 2]
Context of the Data Match
In the document, Kamzol detailed a data-matching exercise between two distinct databases in Nevada: [1]

1. The Nevada DMV Non-Citizen File: A list provided on December 1, 2020, containing 110,164 records of individuals who had documented their non-citizen status at some point while obtaining a driver's license or ID.
2. The Nevada Statewide Voter File: A list of registered voters downloaded from the Nevada Secretary of State on November 10, 2020. [1]

By cross-referencing names, addresses, and zip codes, the analyst claimed that 6,360 positive matches were found between the non-citizen DMV list and the registered voter rolls. The declaration further alleged that 3,987 of those matched individuals successfully cast a ballot in the 2020 election. [1]
Outcome and Resolution
The Nevada GOP used these figures in lawsuits to claim that thousands of undocumented immigrants or non-citizens voted illegally. However, election officials, independent fact-checkers, and Nevada courts ultimately rejected or dismissed these challenges due to several significant flaws in the data-matching methodology: [1]

• Outdated DMV Records: The DMV list tracked individuals' legal status at the time they applied for their driver’s licenses. Because Nevada DMV licenses can be valid for up to eight years, many individuals on the "non-citizen list" had naturally become naturalized U.S. citizens—and therefore legally eligible to register and vote—in the intervening years before November 2020.
• Lack of Unique Identifiers: The data analysis relied heavily on partial name and address matching rather than foolproof identifiers like Social Security Numbers, leading to false positives (different people with similar names living at the same or previous addresses).
• Dismissal in Court: Carson City District Court Judge James Russell dismissed the lawsuit (and subsequent appeals failed), ruling that the contestors failed to provide credible or admissible evidence of voter fraud or illegal non-citizen voting that would alter the election outcome.

Democrats failed to prove any of those thousands of illegals who voted had become naturalized citizens by the time they voted.

 

[Political-Junkie]

Here are the details:

Why a Judge Has Georgia Vote Fraud on His Mind: ‘Pristine’ Biden Ballots That Looked Xeroxed | RealClearInvestigations

“We have what is almost surely major absentee-ballot fraud in Fulton County involving 10,000 to 20,000 probably false ballots,” said Garland Favorito, the lead petitioner in the case and a certified poll watcher who runs VoterGa.org, one of the leading advocates for election integrity in the state.

He said the suspect ballots remain in the custody of the election officials and inaccessible from public view.

“We have confirmed that there are five pallets of shrink-wrapped ballots in a county warehouse,” Favorito said in an interview with RealClearInvestigations.

“We have confirmed that there are five pallets of shrink-wrapped ballots in a county warehouse,” Favorito said in an interview with RealClearInvestigations.

He and other petitioners were ordered to meet at the warehouse May 28 to settle the terms of the inspection of the absentee ballots. But the day before the scheduled meeting, the county filed a flurry of motions to dismiss the case, delaying the inspection indefinitely.

“We will be in court on June 21 to resolve these motions,” said Favorito, calling them another “roadblock” the county has tried to throw in their way. He expects talks over the logistics of the inspection to resume after the Fourth of July holiday.

As part of his May 21 order, Superior Court Judge Brian Amero requested officials guard the warehouse around the clock until an inspection date can be set. But just eight days later, a breach in security was reported after sheriff’s deputies left their post for a couple of hours.

“The front door was [found] unlocked and wide open in violation of the court order,” Favorito said.

Former President Trump: After deputies interrupted their watch on the ballots on May 29, he implied election officials in the Democratic-controlled county are trying to hide evidence of fraud.
(AP Photo/John Raoux)
County officials confirmed that a motion-detection alarm was triggered Saturday, May 29, shortly after the deputies drove away from the building in their patrol cars around 4 p.m. But they said a locked room where the ballots are kept “was never breached or compromised.”

Debunked years ago. Thrown out of court after a state inspection of the ballots (by Republicans) found no fraudulent ballots.

Judge dismisses VoterGA's Fulton County ballot inspection lawsuit

A Henry County judge has dismissed all defendants in a lawsuit seeking to inspect Fulton County's absentee votes for counterfeits after state officials reported an investigation found no evidence to support the claims.

www.gpb.org