I misspelled. She was supervisor of elections in Broward County for more than a decade before she was fired for corruption.What does Brenda Snipes have to do with Brevard County?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I misspelled. She was supervisor of elections in Broward County for more than a decade before she was fired for corruption.What does Brenda Snipes have to do with Brevard County?
But you said the Clinton's were paid $145 million to get Hillary to approve Rosatom's control of Uranium One. Are you backing away from that now that you've been shown the vast majority of that money came years before that approval and from someone with no connection at all to Rosatom?Guistra did not transfer his unjustly gained interest in Uranium 1 to Russian businessmen in 2007, that happened later but the Clintons were involved in helping Giustra obtain Eastern European mining rights in 2005 which he later parlayed into an ownership stake in Uranium 1 and the Clintons were still involved in the sale of Uranium 1 assets to Russian businessmen in 2010.
She was fired for "misfeasance, incompetence and neglect of duty," not corruption and she became supervisor of elections years after the 2000 election, having nothing to do with it.I misspelled. She was supervisor of elections in Broward County for more than a decade before she was fired for corruption.
I don't remember saying that Guistra gave the Clintons $145 million to get approval of the Uranium 1 sale to the Russian interest.But you said the Clinton's were paid $145 million to get Hillary to approve Rosatom's control of Uranium One. Are you backing away from that now that you've been shown the vast majority of that money came years before that approval and from someone with no connection at all to Rosatom?
Brenda Snipes was appointed in 2003 to replace her predecessor because of her predecessor's connection to election fraud in 2000.She was fired for "misfeasance, incompetence and neglect of duty," not corruption and she became supervisor of elections years after the 2000 election, having nothing to do with it.
Do you understand how dates work?
- In summary: Frank Giustra’s role in the Uranium One controversy was as the seller of UrAsia Energy to Uranium One in 2007. The controversy centered on alleged Clinton Foundation donations linked to the 2010 sale of Uranium One to Rosatom, but all official investigations concluded without evidence of wrongdoing.
Odd? You posted this just a few days ago.I don't remember saying that Guistra gave the Clintons $145 million to get approval of the Uranium 1 sale to the Russian interest.
Do you admit now that story is false?The Uranium One controversy emerged in 2015 when conservative media and commentators, citing Peter Schweizer’s 2015 book Clinton Cash, alleged that the 2010 sale of Uranium One to Russia’s state-owned nuclear company Rosatom involved a $145 million bribery scheme tied to Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation Wikipedia. The core of the allegation was that Giustra had donated $31.3 million to the Clinton Foundation in 2005 and pledged at least $100 million more, which was said to have been used to secure the uranium deal Wikipedia.
Why do you say she was removed for fraud when your own link says she was removed for "...grave neglect, mismanagement and incompetence."Brenda Snipes was appointed in 2003 to replace her predecessor because of her predecessor's connection to election fraud in 2000.
As Supervisor of Elections
On November 20, 2003, Snipes was appointed supervisor of elections for Broward County by Governor Jeb Bush to take over from her predecessor, Miriam Oliphant, after Oliphant was removed from office for irregularities and fraud in the handling of ballots in the 2000 United States presidential election in that county.
Wikipedia
No grandma was sentenced to 20 years.We see Ray Epps telling people “WE HAVE TO GO INTO THE CAPITOL” on January 5th. It is a shame none of the 26 FBI INFORMANTS HEARD ABOUT THIS.
The FBI could have bolstered security on January 6th.
There is plenty of video of Ray urging people to go in.
Some people got years in prison. He got a year of probation….so obviously he had nothing to do with the Fed.
THE ONE PERSON COMMIES DID NOT WANT HARSHLY PUNISHED.
Send Grandma to prison for 20 years…but Epps? A year of probation is fine!![]()
So?Do you understand how dates work?
For instance 2007 happened BEFORE 2010
I admit that Wikipedia is rarely 100% accurate but can be relied on to lean toward the lying left if leaning at all.Odd? You posted this just a few days ago.
Do you admit now that story is false?
OK. Let's call it gross negligence and incompetence without worrying whether or not she knew she was deliberately committing fraud for the democrat party.Why do you say she was removed for fraud when your own link says she was removed for "...grave neglect, mismanagement and incompetence."
There is no doubt the corrupt democrats unjustly persecuted Christians and conservatives because of their devotion to the degenerate democrat party.No grandma was sentenced to 20 years.
You have to ask?
Still doesn't explain how the Clinton's were bribed between 2006-2007 by someone who had nothing to do with Rosatom in 2010. Plus, in 2007 when this supposed bribe was paid, Hillary was in the US Senate, not a voting member of CFIUS. So why would she be bribed to approve a deal she wasn't in position to approve?I admit that Wikipedia is rarely 100% accurate but can be relied on to lean toward the lying left if leaning at all.
Well let's call it what your own source says it is, not what you want it to be. Facts matter, right?OK. Let's call it gross negligence and incompetence without worrying whether or not she knew she was deliberately committing fraud for the democrat party.
Then why was no Christian grandma sentenced to 20 years?There is no doubt the corrupt democrats unjustly persecuted Christians and conservatives because of their devotion to the degenerate democrat party.
If you follow the history of unfolding events, you will find a Clinton at the beginning of Giustra's questionable acquisition of European mining rights and at the end when Giustra sold uranium mining rights to Russian interests. Of course one date precedes another. So what?You have to ask?
I don't think Giustra's massive donation to the Clinton piggy bank foundation was a bribe but more of a thank you gift or payment for services rendered.Still doesn't explain how the Clinton's were bribed between 2006-2007 by someone who had nothing to do with Rosatom in 2010. Plus, in 2007 when this supposed bribe was paid, Hillary was in the US Senate, not a voting member of CFIUS. So why would she be bribed to approve a deal she wasn't in position to approve?