Report: 26 FBI INFORMANTS in J6 protest, some entered the Capitol

Commies, what is it like to never have an objective thought?

IS it LIBERATING?

Seems like ALL OF YOU ARE MISERABLE. JUST MIRED IN MISERY. Seems like an awful existence.
 
Commies, what is it like to never have an objective thought?

IS it LIBERATING?

Seems like ALL OF YOU ARE MISERABLE. JUST MIRED IN MISERY. Seems like an awful existence.

....skipping meds today?

You sound kinda unhinged.
 
Commies, what is it like to never have an objective thought?

IS it LIBERATING?

Seems like ALL OF YOU ARE MISERABLE. JUST MIRED IN MISERY. Seems like an awful existence.

All their days are gray....

1779382531222.webp
 
Just an interesting example of brainwashing.

None of the commies will point out that Behar lied about a cop being murdered. Commies do not care. TRUTH IS MEANINGLESS.

THE ENDS JUSTIFY THE MEANS.
 
This is how Canadian police operates. Canada has serious civil liberty issues that are impeding our economy and standard of living. Canadas decline has impacted us so much that we are in the G7 though we are the 11th or 12th largest economy on earth.

Tell your police to not be like Canada unless you want the same economic and social decline. The FBI are renowned for being top notch and professional. These actions are more of a 3rd World Country approach.

If there were violators of rights or provocateurs, Patel would do well to admit it and discipline those officers, pass the mandate that no false flags or dirty trick campaigns will be a part of FBI vernacular.
The FBI had every right to send informants into that mob populated by Proud Boys & Oath Keeper thugs called out by Trump to stop the certification of that election. Btw, why did Trump demand that the Secret Service take down magnetometers which were there to prevent those fu**kers from bringing weapons into the capital area?
 
That's old news. They've been saying that since January 2021. One of the Capital police cops dropped dead a couple of days later and they tried claiming it was due to injuries from Jan 6th. Democrats tried their best to do murder chargers over the incident but the medical reports determined his death was unrelated to the peaceful protest, errrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr, I mean the "insurrection".
You mean the cop who collapsed and was taken to the hospital on January 6th?
 
You mean the cop who collapsed and was taken to the hospital on January 6th?
Maybe. I don't remember the exact details, but I remember he died just a couple of days later and the democrats really tried hanging a murder charge on the Jan 6'rs over it. They tried their very best but, ultimately, the medical people ruled that his death was NOT a result of anything that happened as a result of the events on Jan 6th. Still doesn't stop some democrats claiming the guy was murdered. But, I don't remember it that they took him to the hospital on Jan 6th.
 
The FBI had every right to send informants into that mob populated by Proud Boys & Oath Keeper thugs called out by Trump to stop the certification of that election. Btw, why did Trump demand that the Secret Service take down magnetometers which were there to prevent those fu**kers from bringing weapons into the capital area?
Undercovers peacefully observing for intelligence collection, sure. If encouraging crime, egging others on, or even participating in crimes? No, and they should be reprimanded, charged or fired if they do.
 
Maybe. I don't remember the exact details, but I remember he died just a couple of days later and the democrats really tried hanging a murder charge on the Jan 6'rs over it. They tried their very best but, ultimately, the medical people ruled that his death was NOT a result of anything that happened as a result of the events on Jan 6th. Still doesn't stop some democrats claiming the guy was murdered. But, I don't remember it that they took him to the hospital on Jan 6th.
He was hospitalized on January 6th and died the next day. The coroner reported the events of January 6th played a role in his death.
 
Undercovers peacefully observing for intelligence collection, sure. If encouraging crime, egging others on, or even participating in crimes? No, and they should be reprimanded, charged or fired if they do.
And guess what?

No one has provided a shred of proof that these informants did anything that day other than gather information

Kash Patel should be able to tell us exactly what they did and yet he is saying nothing

Why do you suppose that is
 
He was hospitalized on January 6th and died the next day. The coroner reported the events of January 6th played a role in his death.
Well, that can't be the whole story because they didn't even charge anyone for his death, even though they wanted to very badly. You're leaving something out. The way you worded it, he could have been at least charged but as much as Democrats rounded up a bunch of protesters and charged them just simply for being there, they didn't even charge those who tussled with that officer for murder or attempted murder or even wrongful death. In short, he was not murdered as Joy Behr and others claim he was.
 
If they were waved in, why were they smashing windows and door and fighting with police to gain entry into the building?

And how does 3 informants incite that riot, but not Trump, who spent an hour riling them up over being robbed of the election before sending them to the Capitol?

"Riling them up"? That's silly.

Trump urged the protesters to "peacefully and patriotically" march to the Capitol. He also exhorted the crowd to "fight like hell," stating that "if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore." But how is that any different from the rhetoric I've heard from virtually every Democrat candidate, going all the way back to the 60's? You folks are always "fighting" this and "fighting" that. "Fighting" for this and "fighting" against that.

Not so funny when the shoe is on the other foot, is it?
 
15th post
Undercovers peacefully observing for intelligence collection, sure. If encouraging crime, egging others on, or even participating in crimes? No, and they should be reprimanded, charged or fired if they do.
You got any evidence that FBI agents did what you're claiming? If so, post it.
 
Trump urged the protesters to "peacefully and patriotically" march to the Capitol. He also exhorted the crowd to "fight like hell," stating that "if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore." But how is that any different from the rhetoric I've heard from virtually every Democrat candidate, going all the way back to the 60's?
It was Jan 6th the year after a federal election. I don't think you can find a democrat in post Nixon era that bellowed out a more vile, disgusting screed after losing every single challenge he made in court to his election fraud claims leading up to the riot and fail coup attempt. Was it just Democrats?

"January 6th was a disgrace. American citizens attacked their own government. They use terrorism to try to stop a specific piece of domestic business they did not like. Fellow Americans beat and bloodied our own police. They stormed the center floor. They tried to hunt down the Speaker of the House. They built a gallows and chatted about murdering the vice president. They did this because they'd been fed wild, falsehoods by the most powerful man on earth because he was angry. He lost an election. Former President Trump's actions preceded the riot or a disgraceful dereliction of duty. The House accused the former president of quote "Incitement". That is a specific term from the criminal law. Let me just put that aside for a moment and reiterate something I said weeks ago. There's no question, none, that President Trump is practically and morally responsible for provoking the events of the day. No question about it.

Mitch McConnell: (01:46)

The people who stormed this building believed they were acting on the wishes and instructions of their president and having that belief was a foreseeable consequence of the growing crescendo of false statements, conspiracy theories, and reckless hyperbole, which the defeated president kept shouting into the largest megaphone on planet Earth. The issue is not only the president in temperate language on January 6th. It is not just his endorsement of remarks in which an associate urged quote "Trial by combat". It was also the entire manufactured atmosphere of looming catastrophe. The increasingly wild myths about a reverse landslide election that was somehow being stolen. Some secret coup by our now president.

Mitch McConnell: (03:09)

Now I defended the president's right to bring any complaints to our legal system. The legal system spoke, the electoral college spoke. As I stood up and said, clearly at that time, the election was settled. It was over, but that just really opened a new chapter of even wilder and more unfounded claims. The leader of the free world cannot spend weeks thundering that shadowy forces are stealing our country and then feign surprise when people believe him and do reckless things. I sadly many politicians sometimes make overheated comments or use metaphors. We saw that. That unhinged listeners might take literally, but that was different. That's different from what we saw. This was an intensifying crescendo of conspiracy theories orchestrated by an outgoing president who seemed determined to either overturn the voter's decision or else torch our institutions on the way out. The unconscionable behavior did not end when the violence actually began.

Mitch McConnell: (04:47)

Whatever our ex president claims he thought might happen a day, whatever right reaction he's says he meant to produce by that afternoon we know he was watching the same live television as the rest of us. A mob was assaulting the Capitol in his name, these criminals who are carrying his banners, hanging his flags and screaming their loyalty to him. It was obvious that only President Trump could end this. He was the only one who could. Former aides publicly begged him to do so. Loyal allies frantically called the administration. The president did not act swiftly. He did not do his job. He didn't take steps so federal law could be faithfully executed and order restored. No, instead, according to public reports, he watched television happily as the chaos unfolded. He kept pressing his scheme to overturn the election. Now, even after it was clear to any reasonable observer that Vice President Pence was in serious danger. Even as the mob carrying Trump banners was beating cops and breaching perimeters their president sent a further tweet, attacking his own vice president.
 
You got any evidence that FBI agents did what you're claiming? If so, post it.
Ummm, no. I am responding to the OP.

It is a warning based on Canadian criminal cops. If you do not hire men of the highest character but instead choose the most obedient, you will destroy your reputation and your nations influence.

FBI under Reagan were ordered to be professional when dealing with Russian spies for instance. It always impressed me that they would purposely NOT arrest a person they knew to be guilty unless they had absolute evidence.. The original G Men were most respected as well, juxtaposing themselves from foreign corrupt police agencies..

The proper assertion in this discussion and my posting is the word "IF": Here is what I said: "If encouraging crime, egging others on, or even participating in crimes? No." Some are providing a video of a well masked and covered up guy who took a glass window down and was caught on video who has not been arrested by the FBI as as evidence of this potential undercover provocateur but I do not have proof of course, it is a binary choice of honest vs dishonest

No one knows if he is a cop or not. The police certainly should know if they watched all of the video evidence.

Let me put this into perspective, the Iranian government are justifying the murder of 1000s of their own citizens because they said the were all combatants and even attacking Iranian police so they were valid exterminations.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom