Report: 26 FBI INFORMANTS in J6 protest, some entered the Capitol

[markef]

Your party tried to steal the election and cover up that crime by claiming fraud.

You never had evidence to support your allegations.

Only someone blind or ignorant would falsely claim I have collected no evidence of 2020 voting fraud.

 

[markef]

You’re a radical who thinks police don’t have a right to defend themselves from assault.

But only if they’re assaulted by your MAGA brownshirts.

I believe Police do have a right to defend themselves from assault which is why Good and Priddy ended up dead.

 

[markef]

That not a thing. They can’t vote to send it back. Voting for an objection means the electors are discarded and the process continues without them.

And Gore never wanted Congress to object to anyone’s votes. That’s idiotic.

Gore tried to steal the 2000 election but failed.

 

[markef]

That’s false. The intelligence agencies never proclaimed any such thing.

Even if they did, that doesn’t overthrow Trump. That’s idiotic.

Brennan was instructed by Obama to ignore the official intelligence and write a bogus assessment that agreed with Hillary's lie about Trump and the Russians.

 

[Marener]

Brennan was instructed by Obama to ignore the official intelligence and write a bogus assessment that agreed with Hillary's lie about Trump and the Russians.

One, Brennan’s assessment IS the official assessment.

Two, Obama told him no such thing.

 

[markef]

Impeachment is perfectly legal, it’s all right there in the constitution.

Or do you hate the constitution too?

Besides, the impeachment had nothing to do with Obama. You’re paranoid and delusional.

Democrats had the power so they abused it by impeaching Trump on bogus charges after suspending his rights and due process.

 

[markef]

You obviously didn’t read it because nowhere does it say that Trump and Russia were working hand in hand.

It said Russia interfered do help Trump.

You lied.

The intelligence that Obama told Brennan to ignore in his bogus report showed that Russia had no involvement in seeking Trump's win. Putin and pals lost $40 million they had invested with Hillary's handler Podesta who was in business with them and banking on government funding for their bogus climate change startup after Clinton was elected.

 

[Lockback]

One, Brennan’s assessment IS the official assessment.

Two, Obama told him no such thing.

Actually ... he did.

 

[markef]

I’ve shown you pics and videos of those “visitors” beating the shit out of cops and smashing their way into the Capitol

All you are doing is making yourself and your maga crew look WORSE

How seriously were the cops 'beaten"? Any broken bones? Any loss of blood? Any dangerous concussions? There were hundreds of such serious injuries to cops in the democrat riots of 2020. Democrats raised money to help violent leftist cop beers get off in 2020,.

You obviously didn’t read it because nowhere does it say that Trump and Russia were working hand in hand.

It said Russia interfered do help Trump.

You lied.

Brennan's bogus assessment claimed Russia was trying to help Trump win the 2016 election which was a complete lie according to official government intelligence documents.

 

[Political-Junkie]

I see where it could have been misunderstood. There have been examples cited of why the case could be reversed, including procedural violations, improper evidentiary rulings and improper witnesses, but I didn't hunt them down. It will be these that are argued before SCOTUS.

In any individual assessment, the venue and 'actors' should also be considered as well. Manhattan is one of the most Liberal districts in the nation and came with Liberal judges, prosecution and jury. I find it difficult to believe that objectivity ruled at most points.

He has several.

1. Presidential immunity. I don't see that working. The first suit stems from him calling her a liar and not his type. Doesn't sound like official act of his office to me. The second suit was when he was no longer president, so no immunity there either.

2. Changing the defendant to be the US. That would nullify the case because the US can't be sued for defamation. This was already rejected because he waited too long to request it, but the SCOTUS could still give that to him.

3. Excessive damages.

4. Several indefensible evidentiary rulings. Possibly his best shot, I think.

 

[markef]

It’s hilarious how you paste all this info here that just shows you don’t know what you’re talking about.

Democrats throw stupid rocks at facts they cannot refute.

 

[markef]

Only an idiot would characterize it as such.

Democrats do not believe stealing political power by fraud is sedition or treason.

 

[markef]

There was no lie. An intelligence assessment is a work of opinion. That’s what makes it an assessment. Of course a bunch of far right Republicans are going to disagree with that opinion.

Remember at the time that Trump was claiming Russia didn’t intervene in the election at all. That was the lie.

Brennan's assessment was not just a lie but also not an opinion truly believed by the liars who crafted it.

 

[Political-Junkie]

No honest person can say that it has been proven that democrat fighting words inspired specific acts of violence any more than any honest person can claim Trump incited anyone to commit violence.

Not true, IMO. Raskin says "fight like hell" but there's no fighting like hell connected to it. Then we have Trump saying "fight like hell" and points them to the Capitol where they go and fight like hell. That's incitement.

 

[Lesh]

How seriously were the cops 'beaten"? Any broken bones? Any loss of blood? Any dangerous concussions? There were hundreds of such serious injuries to cops in the democrat riots of 2020. Democrats raised money to help violent leftist cop beers get off in 2020,.

Brennan's bogus assessment claimed Russia was trying to help Trump win the 2016 election which was a complete lie according to official government intelligence documents.

So wait.

You don’t care about how badly cops were beaten on Jan 6 . They were of course

They lost eyes, fingers, had heart attacks from being tazed.

But you care deeply about cops injured in “democratic riots”.

Clearly it is not the cops you care about but rather the politics

 

[markef]

You ignore anything your fragile ego can’t handle.

Like the evidence of Trump rioters initiating violence on January 6th.

Ignoring the volume of evidence showing leftist rioters' involvement with the incitement and commission of violence on J6 is dishonesty leading to blindness and ignorance.

 

[markef]

They hacked the DNC and released the emails.

Although it’s more likely a fringe weirdo like you probably thinks Seth Rich did it.

Both Mueller and the president of CrowdStrike testified that the emails were not stolen by hacking.

 

[Political-Junkie]

Sentencing grandma to jail for praying inside the Capitol after a Capitol police officer ushered her inside is evidence enough of leftist democrat injustice, hatred, wickedness, and depravity.

Grandma wasn't sentenced to jail.

 

[markef]

You're not seriously saying Hodgkinson shot Scalice because Mad Dog PAC said 'take out' Scalice?

Explain the connection?

Trump is not to blame for any violence on J6 any more than Schumer's threat to Kavanaugh is responsible for the attempted assassination of Kavanaugh.

 

[Lesh]

Actually ... he did.

Prove it