Report: 26 FBI INFORMANTS in J6 protest, some entered the Capitol

I'm not defending any of those lunatics on any way. Their actions are completely abhorrent and their deaths or lengthy prison terms are absolutely appropriate, and I'm glad every attempt failed. That said, you have no evidence that was their motivation.

I get you're desperate to play your whatabout card, but you have failed at every turn to show a direct correlation between speech and an acknowledged response. Whereas there is evidence of Trump making comments that day from the Ellipse, and some of his supporters responding to what we all witnessed unfold.
Sentencing grandma to jail for praying inside the Capitol after a Capitol police officer ushered her inside is evidence enough of leftist democrat injustice, hatred, wickedness, and depravity.
 
So the guy who SHOULD have asked for NG support defends not doing so because he THOUGHT Pelosi would want him not to.

Yeah. Sure buddy
Don't blame the one cop for refusing to accept Trump's offer of additional officers for riot control unless you think that officer acted alone with no other democrat official's knowledge.
 
Until he ended them… like on Ja 6

Which s what they did and how they took it
There is no more cause for claiming radical right-wing fringe groups influenced Trump or that Trump influenced them than there is for claiming Obama influenced radical, racist, Marxist, BLM killers to murder cops.
 
What would be the point of doing something to blame Trump?

The Dems had won. Trump was history

That entire narrative makes no sense
Congress was in the process of examining credible evidence of 2020 voter fraud on J6 when the Capitol was shut down by security, so don't mistakenly believe courts or congress proved the election was not stolen.
 
It's fake news because there was never any massive fraud proven to have occurred. It's fake news because virtually every claim of massive fraud was debunked. It's fake news because there's no evidence Democrats disrupted the counting. It's fake news because the two houses breaking out into separate sessions to debate the objects were not evidentiary hearings where evidence would be presented. Two hours were given to each house to voice their opinions before voting on the objections given for their state. Doubtful any objections from any state would have succeeded given no massive fraud was uncovered leading up to January 6th and each house, having a majority of Democrats, would have voted to not count their state's electors. Meaning Democrats neither wanted to delay or stop counting that day.

You're just constantly repeating falsehoods you can't back up with evidence. And you keep ignoring it was MAGA, not Democrats, chanting "stop the steal" as they stormed through the Capitol.
Democrats claim investigations into fraud should not be conducted because it has supposedly been proven beyond doubt that no fraud occurred. If no fraud had occurred, then why did democrats refused to allow voting machines to be examined and obstruct every investigation into voting fraud that was proposed. Only stupid people believe evidence of fraud can be disproven without examination.
 
He wasn't convicted of any crime in this case. It's unfortunate for you, you simply can't deal with how deeply flawed as a human being your guy is.
I don't see Trump with the eyes of perverts, criminals, leftists, liars, and baby killers.
 
Yeah, looks like Biden lied about that.


That was relatively meaningless. 7 people died. She said "almost 10." If getting into the weeds over how close or not 7 is to "almost 10" is what you want, that's fine for you, but I'm not interested.
There is no need to defend AOC for propagating the democrat lie that DC police officers were murdered on J6 by Trump supporters. She cannot help herself. She is fully commtted to the corrupt democrat paty and will propagate democrat lies from duty if not because of delusion.
 
You're supposed to say TRUUUUUUUUUUMP :aargh:
Do better.
1780435629521.webp
 
You mean the county where 2 ballot counters successfully sued Rudy Giuliani for $148 million for defamation because he lied about them counting ballots more than once?

Great example you found there. They'll be set for life now thanks to Rudy.
It looks like the tables have been turned now that republicans have wrenched the records from democrat crooks and found the democrats committed massive election fraud in Georgia on 2020.
 
Well from my vantage point from under this rock, I still see there was never any massive election fraud actually proven. I also see multiple attorneys for Trump either sued or disbarred for either lying about election fraud or by trying to rig the election to help Trump win the that election. It's been almost 6 years and still nothing. Anyway, you know where to find me in case you ever find actual proof of that massive election fraud in this lifetime.
Election fraud cannot be seen by blind democrat devotees who refuse to see what has clearly been revealed.
 
15th post
What many examples of voter fraud are you speaking of?
Maybe you know something Trump's lawyers didn't because they got laughed out of court something like 63 times after filing cases of voter fraud with no evidence to support the allegations.
I have files full of evidence of 2020 voter fraud that your laughing hyena court judges refused to even look at.
 
It looks like the tables have been turned now that republicans have wrenched the records from democrat crooks and found the democrats committed massive election fraud in Georgia on 2020.
Somewhere between 30,000 minimum to 309,000 maximum were fraudulent and they spent 5+ years keeping that hidden but have confessed recently
 
Who was Biden supposed to have raped?
Credible link please.
Unlike claims made against Kavanaugh, claims made against Biden were never dismissed after FBI investigations.



S

Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with the analysis below, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
$14,400 raised2026 Goal: $60,000
24%


Join Brian Dauzat, Vicki Siedow , Ron Schmidtling and 772 others​
Support independent research

How many women have publicly accused Joe Biden of sexual misconduct?

Researched on October 26, 2025
Politics
Russia
Joe Biden
Tara Reade
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

New search
Share

AnswerSources

The New York Times
Examining Tara Reade's Sexual Assault Allegation Against ...

CNN
Woman who accused Biden of sexually assaulting her in ...

BBC
What are the sex attack allegations against Joe Biden?

www.theguardian.com
Tara Reade, who accused Joe Biden of sexual assault ...
Research steps





This article may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Refresh
Executive Summary

Two public threads of reporting converge on a single prominent allegation of sexual misconduct against Joe Biden: Tara Reade’s 2020 accusation that Biden sexually assaulted her in 1993. Reporting across multiple outlets documents that Reade is the principal publicly named accuser; outlets have noted denials from Biden and raised questions about inconsistencies and corroboration [1] [2].
AccurateInaccurate
1. Who stepped forward — a single high-profile claim that dominated coverage

Tara Reade is the only widely reported, named woman who publicly accused Joe Biden of sexual assault in the material assembled here. Major examinations of the allegation describe her claim that Biden pinned her against a wall and penetrated her with his fingers in 1993, a narrative that became a focal point of national coverage during the 2020 presidential campaign. Reporting across outlets treats Reade’s claim as the central allegation of sexual assault made against Biden in these sources, and none of the supplied analyses identify other distinct named women making comparable public sexual-assault accusations [2] [1].

Same with Clintom please

Credible is the operative word.

Juanita Broaddrick​

Main article: Juanita Broaddrick § Allegations against Bill Clinton

In a 1999 episode of Dateline NBC, former Bill Clinton campaign volunteer Juanita Broaddrick alleged that, in the late 1970s, Clinton raped her in her hotel room. According to Broaddrick, she agreed to meet with Clinton for coffee in the lobby of her hotel, but Clinton asked if they could go to her room to avoid a crowd of reporters; she agreed. Broaddrick stated that once Clinton had isolated her in her hotel room, he raped her. Broaddrick stated Clinton injured her lip by biting it during the assault.

In 1999, Clinton denied Broaddrick's allegations through his lawyer.
 
Back
Top Bottom