Report: 26 FBI INFORMANTS in J6 protest, some entered the Capitol

[AntonToo]

How many of those Democrats flat out refused to tell their supporters to stop the violence as it was happening?

ZERO

 

[Political-Junkie]

Of course you have to manipulate common parlance into what suits your feelings and wishes.
It means to engage with resolve. You are a beta that lacks Any resolve and exists in wishes as your chosen reality

I think I'll take the word of the actual felons who say they did it for Trump over yours. They know better than you why they did it.



Their #1 reason, among reasons given, was because Trump told them to or at Trump's invitation.

https://mediamanipulation.org/sites/default/files/media-files/j6_motivations_working_paper.pdf

Motivation Code*	# of Defendants	% of Defendants	Description
Support Trump	86	20.62%	Donald Trump or "the president/my president" explicitly mentioned as a specific reason for attending; "Trump told me to" or "at Trump's invitation."

[td]
86

[/td][td]
20.62%

[/td]​

 

[Rand]

Stop breating around the stupid bush and just explain what is it that footage that even remotely refutes that Trump refused to tell his supporters to stop the violent break in?

Here is McCarthy, on tape, talking to Congressmen in the aftermath of J6th, about Trump's reponsibility for it:



What don't you get?

McCarthy and Trump have a history of problems. The point being that here again, it's all subject to opinion and interpretation. Not a smoking gun. Trump denies he said it. Even the NBC commentator said that McCarthy was "making sure that his Speakership ambitions are secure" (around 3:30).

There were tens of thousands of hours of Cap Bldg security footage. The footage House Democrats released to the media was selective and fit the narrative they desired. The footage later released by force contradicted the narrative. Yes, the riots we see looping on Lib media wee accurate, but were selected based on how they could profit the anti-Trump narrative.

Here is some of that footage. Yes, it's Tucker, but the footage speaks for itself. Besides, since Tucker revolted against Trump and Maga, it shouldn't present the problem for Liberals it might have in the past.

Democrat media glossed over it, claiming it 'sugarcoated' the event. Wrong. It merely presents the realities the Democrats tried to keep hidden, as it didn't serve their objectives and Narrative.

First, a link to the entire Jan 6 security cam archive:

CHA Subcommittee Reading Room

U.S. House of Representatives Committee on House Administration

cha.house.gov

Please watch the below in entirety. Ignore the source and focus on the video and facts.

Again, I'm not denying that some Trump supporters rioted and were subject to the full extent of the law.

But that's not the whole story by a long shot.

 

[WEATHER53]

Protest vigorously but peacefully was exactly what he said. They did until they heard the ruckus inside instigated by the Pelosi pksbtsv

 

[Rand]

How many of those Democrats flat out refused to tell their supporters to stop the violence as it was happening?

ZERO

Surely you know that Democrats practically endorsed the Summer of Love riots (AKA George Floyd riots) in 2020? And those lasted for months. Kamala even went public encouraging donations to provide for bail for rioters.

Donate to the Minnesota Freedom Fund

Your support will help post bail for those protesting on the ground in Minnesota.

secure.actblue.com

Cities destroyed, city blocks commandeered, business looted and burned, billions in damage, scores of police and SS agents injured, murders, assaults, attacks on federal bldgs, etc, etc.

All while democrats stood by and offered endorsements.

 

[Political-Junkie]

That was after the Pelosi plants had started the ruckus inside and those outside heard it and tried to enter. No fighting, just trying to enter

I won't even bother to ask you to prove Pelosi had plants since no one else has been able to prove that actually happened.

 

[AntonToo]

McCarthy and Trump have a history of problems. The point being that here again, it's all subject to opinion and interpretation.

Trump has a history of problems with everyone who contradicts his many many many piles of bullshit. From Congressmen, to his Vice President, to his Attorney General, to his advisors and cabinet members.


Facts are very simple understand - Trump never told his supporters to stop the break in.

You don't need anyone's word on that, all you need to know is the simple fact that IT NEVER HAPPENED. Trump never made such attempts as the violence was happening and Congressmen were being evacuated.

The only reason for your confusion is that you DON'T WANT TO understand them. You don't want to, or maybe can't, deal directly with Trump's degenerate behavior in the aftermath of 2020 election.

 

[Rand]

Trump has a history of problems with everyone who contradicts his many many many piles of bullshit.


Facts are very simple understand - Trump never told his supporters to stop the break in.

You don't need anyone's word on that, all you need to know is the simple fact that IT NEVER HAPPENED. Trump never made such attempts as the violence was happening and Congressmen were being evacuated.

The only reason for your confusion is that you DON'T WANT TO understand them. You don't want to, or maybe can't, deal directly with Trump's degenerate behavior in the aftermath of 2020 election.

Yeah. You're stuck on that. And you either didn't watch the video or are choosing to ignore it. Too bad. I invite you to expand your horizons. Go back and objectively watch the video and comment. Don't swallow the narrative whole. There's much more to it than your perspective.

 

[AntonToo]

Yeah. You're stuck on that. And you either didn't watch the video or are choosing to ignore it. Too bad. I invite you to expand your horizons. Go back and objectively watch the video and comment. Don't swallow the narrative whole. There's much more to it than your perspective.

Where in the video does Trump tell his supporters to stop the criminal break in?

You telling me i'm stuck on that is kinda like you complaining that I keep on pointing out that 1+1 equates to 2.

Trump refusing to do anything to stop this attack on the Congress makes his complicity crystal clear - he went along with it as means to disrupt the certification of the 2020 election.

 

[Political-Junkie]

You won't get an argument from me that some Trump supporters rioted, nor that they should have been made accountable for their actions. That said, they weren't the majority there, and the Capitol Bldg security video that Democrats fought to keep the public from seeing confirms that and defies the Narrative the Democrats perpetuated for the next several years. I can post video of that footage if you'd like.

Democrats falsely portray Trump's "Fight Like Hell" declarations as 'evidence' of incitation. Nonsense. I can also post footage of Democrats declaring 'fight like hell'. It has as much veracity as the accusations of Hitler and nazi salute nonsense. That is to say - none.

The truth is that there was absolutely no evidence of Trump inciting the crowd to riot beyond what Democrats could twisted and disseminate to the TDS masses. A majority of voters in the 2024 election seem to have come to the same conclusion.

When you say "fight like hell" but nobody does in connection with you saying it, it's just colloquialism. When you say "fight like hell" and people do right after you say it, it's a strong argument in favor of incitement. When you're the president of the United States with a following as committed as they are to Trump and he says to them "fight like hell" and the people he says it to turn around, go to the Capitol as he told them to do and then fight like hell, it's impossible to deny that they were incited without appearing to be a sycophant.

 

[Rand]

Where in the video does Trump tell his supporters to stop the criminal break in?

It doesn't. Perhaps you'll be able to move on now to the bigger picture of the false narrative.

 

[ColonelAngus]

…and yet Harris still lost and Joe is seriously brain damaged.

WHO IS THE DEMOCRAT BENCH?

NEWSOM? AOC?

 

[Rand]

When you say "fight like hell" but nobody does in connection with you saying it, it's just colloquialism. When you say "fight like hell" and people do right after you say it, it's a strong argument in favor of incitement. When you're the president of the United States with a following as committed as they are to Trump and he says to them "fight like hell" and the people he says it to turn around, go to the Capitol as he told them to do and then fight like hell, it's impossible to deny that they were incited without appearing to be a sycophant.

An opinion you're entitled to, but doesn't constitute evidence.

 

[Political-Junkie]

It should be noted that House Sergeant-at-Arms reports to the Speaker of the House, at that time, Nancy Pelosi.

Ex-Capitol Police Chief Says Requests For National Guard Denied 6 Times In Riots

...The former chief of U.S. Capitol Police says security officials at the House and Senate rebuffed his early requests to call in the National Guard ahead of a demonstration in support of President Trump that turned into a deadly attack on Congress.

Former chief Steven Sund -- who resigned his post last week after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called for him to step down -- made the assertions in an interview with The Washington Post published Sunday.

Sund contradicts claims made by officials after Wednesday's assault on Capitol Hill. Sund's superiors said previously that the National Guard and other additional security support could have been provided, but no one at the Capitol requested it.

Sund told the Post that House Sergeant-at-Arms Paul Irving was concerned with the "optics" of declaring an emergency ahead of the protests and rejected a National Guard presence. He says Senate Sergeant-at-Arms Michael Stenger recommended that he informally request the Guard to be ready in case it was needed to maintain security.

Like Sund, Irving and Stenger have also since resigned their posts.

Sund says he requested assistance six times ahead of and during the attack on the Capitol. Each of those requests was denied or delayed, he says....

That's just one vote out of three. The Senate Sergeant at Arms reports to the Senate Majority Leader, but no one on the right ever blames him. I know why, do you?

 

[Robert W]

Here is a lot of people fighting FOR Trump

Police officer crushed in doorway by rioters during Capitol breach – video

The officer can be seen screaming in pain as rioters heave against Capitol police

www.theguardian.com

1 Cop does not make a riot.

 

[Rand]

That's just one vote out of three. The Senate Sergeant at Arms reports to the Senate Majority Leader, but no one on the right ever blames him. I know why, do you?

I'm not blaming him.

 

[Robert W]

When you say "fight like hell" but nobody does in connection with you saying it, it's just colloquialism. When you say "fight like hell" and people do right after you say it, it's a strong argument in favor of incitement. When you're the president of the United States with a following as committed as they are to Trump and he says to them "fight like hell" and the people he says it to turn around, go to the Capitol as he told them to do and then fight like hell, it's impossible to deny that they were incited without appearing to be a sycophant.

The visitors were not first fighting. When they got shot at by the cops, and flash bangs hurled at them some were escaping and not fighting at all. They were fleeing.

 

[AntonToo]

It doesn't. Perhaps you'll be able to move on now to the bigger picture of the false narrative.

That is the critical element establishing Trump's complicity with J6 violence, aside from the fact that he indescriminately pardoned all of these cop beaters as soon as he got back into power.

You can't aknowledge that obvious point because you are emotionally invested in blatant denials, not sober assessment.

 

[Political-Junkie]

The security footage later released renders the Democrat narrative as false. Yes, there were rioters, which the media showed ad nauseam (much of it the same scene), but countless people were led in by Capitol police and some (like the "Q-Shaman") were given a tour, and even allowed in to chambers being used. The 'shaman' even led members in a chamber in prayer at the podium while police looked calmly on.

This in no way excuses those who rioted, but puts the lie to the narrative.

No one was let into the Capitol from outside by police. That stems from a corridor where protesters were already inside and a cop held the inside door open for them. No cops held the outside door open for them.

 

[Political-Junkie]

So you see those maga rats blowing out doors and windows and pretend it didn’t happen??

And I have yet to document the mayhem on the tunnels

Here that is. Hard to watch

Police officer crushed in doorway by rioters during Capitol breach – video

The officer can be seen screaming in pain as rioters heave against Capitol police

www.theguardian.com

They think denial is a river.