Report: 26 FBI INFORMANTS in J6 protest, some entered the Capitol

Liars, leftists, and libtards believe Trump incited violence but honest English-speaking Americans know he didn't.
I showed you video of Trump saying "because you'll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength and you have to be strong." Followed by members of his audience shouting out "take the Capitol" and "storm the Capitol." If Trump didn't elicit that response, who did? If not Trump, who elicited that crowd to chant "fight for Trump" repeatedly. Why was that crowd so mad at Pence that some were calling for his execution?
 
She took responsibility for the Capitol police not being prepared enough. What about it?
What was her failure? She had plenty of cameras arranged to film the show but failed to ensure the Capitol security teams had properly prepared for the increased flow of protesters like Trump had warned them about.
 
Some claim Trump raped the accuser who cannot remember key details from 30 years ago, especially why she never reported the alleged crime before being paid large money from democrats just a few years ago. Only one victim I know of claimed Biden raped her and only one victim I know of claimed Clinton raped her but as with Trump, those charges were never proven in court.
Actually, they were proven beyond a preponderance of the evidence in court.
 
Many Americans believe Pelosi's pre-arrangement to have her daughter film her on Jan 6 coupled with Pelosi's refusal to take advantage of Trump's offer of increased security seem to suggest a staged event.

e604b46bf2d5b0c84e17acea11173b52.jpg
598e0f1c330a8fbedf4d925e15b18297.jpg

Benny Johnson
stated on June 3, 2023 in a Facebook post:
“New tapes” of Nancy Pelosi show that the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol “was all planned.”
true
false


Prove Trump offered Pelosi extra National Guard.
 
In any event… Trump said far worse than Epps and he said it to tens of thousands
When democrats use the word "fight" to incite violence that is ok for democrats, but when Trump uses the word like a high school cheerleader would then to democrats that is an unforgiveable use of the word.
 
Her point was that if she had realized how dangerous Trump supporters were she would have urged for more protection

From the likes of the maga tards on this thread
Democrats had violent protesters inciting the violence that day so they could blame Trump as if the issue was not widespread voter fraud but about so-called republican efforts to overthrow the election that democrats falsely claimed was honest.
 
I didn't call it an insurrection. I called it a riot. So? Trump says over and over, "fight like hell," and his peeps there are chanting "fight for Trump!" Who incited that if not Trump?
When leftist rubes murder, loot, destroy, and commit violence and blame it on democrats calling for them to fight like hell, no honest judge in the country allows such nonsense to be used as an excuse in his court.
 
Who are you claiming was the scumbag who refused to send in National Guard security teams even though Trump and democrats asked for them?
The only people with the authority to request DC National Guard were Trump, Trump's Secretary of the Army and the Chief of Police of the CPB.
 
So are you saying sexual assault is more "presidential" behavior than rape?
By the way a U.S. District Judge clarified that Donald Trump "raped" E. Jean Carroll as the term is commonly understood.
Think about it. If some female you know and love was cornered in a private place and sexually assaulted by some slimy creep with his fingers you probably wouldn't be splitting hairs over whether it was a "technical rape" or not would you?
So why is it any different with our Felon in Chief?
Did a Trump-hating leftist judge declare Trump guilty of rape without a jury? That sounds like leftist democrat spokespeople declaring without a trial that Tara Reade was lying about Joe Biden's sexual assault. So much for the leftist call to "believe the victims."
 
He absolutely urged tens of thousands to march down to the Capitol and FIGHT LIKE HELL to stop the counting of the ballots
Trump did not urge followers to go to the Capitol to try to "stop the counting of the ballots." The truth is that millions of unverified questionable ballots for Biden were repeatedly counted and accepted before J6 but that on Jan 6 Congress was scheduled to hold hours of hearings to examine the evidence of 2020 voting fraud that lazy and leftist courts had simply refused to hear without giving proper reasons. The planned democrat disruption that day in effect shut down congressional examinations of voter fraud which is exactly what democrats wanted to shut down.
 
Dems Lose Their Minds Over Trump Saying 'Fight Like Hell,' But Here Are All the Times They've Said It (westernjournal.com) 2-11-21


Dems Lose Their Minds Over Trump Saying 'Fight Like Hell,' But Here Are All the Times They've Said It

By Grant Atkinson February 11, 2021 at 3:30pm

Democrats have utilized double standards for years now, but the latest one thrown out at the impeachment trial of former President Donald Trump may be the most blatant.

According to Breitbart, Democrats focused on Trump’s “fight like hell” comment on Wednesday, the second day of the former president’s second impeachment trial.

“He told them to fight like hell and they brought us hell on that day,” Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin of Maryland said.

There’s one glaring issue that Raskin seems to have forgotten, however — he has used the phrase “fight like hell” multiple times in his own political career.

In 2017, Raskin promised to “fight like hell” against Trump’s budget plan, claiming that it was “a sweeping attack on active & retired civil servants.”

Trending:

Jim Jordan Flabbergasted When Top DOJ Official Admits She's Clueless About Key Case: 'I Don't Know What We Say'

8/ #TrumpBudget is a sweeping attack on active & retired civil servants. I will fight like hell for the 88k+ fed workers in my district. pic.twitter.com/6f0tvwr2Mv

— Rep. Jamie Raskin (@RepRaskin) May 23, 2017

In that case, Raskin said he would fight like hell but did not necessarily call on anyone else to do so. He could use that excuse to claim he was not “inciting” violence.

Unfortunately, Raskin also decided to use the phrase on another occasion less than a year ago.

“We must fight like hell to stop this assault on health care and the Constitution,” he said in September, regarding Trump’s appointment of Justice Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court.

With this comment, he crossed over into the territory of “incitement” by the Democrats’ own standard. He was no longer just promising that he would “fight like hell” — Raskin was calling for others to join him.

Even without the direct call to fight, Raskin’s lie, in and of itself, is inflammatory. Of course, it is not true that a president appointing a Supreme Court justice is destructive to voting rights, because presidents have been given such powers by the Constitution itself.

Yet if people believed Trump was destroying voters’ rights by the appointment, it would give them a legitimate reason to want to fight.

That lie — along with the call to “fight like hell” — could have been considered incitement just as easily as Trump’s speech on Jan. 6.

Raskin is not the only Democrat to utter the phrase “fight like hell” in the not-so-distant past. Rep. Eric Swalwell of California also used the phrase in 2019, regarding the Mueller report.

Considering that the report ended without finding any real impeachable evidence against Trump, it seems like a strange hill for Swalwell to die on.

Rep. Ted Lieu, also of California, has used the phrase multiple times in regard to “racist,” “sexist” and “anti-immigration” policies over the past five years.

Yes. I will fight like hell to oppose any anti-immigration policies.

— Ted Lieu (@tedlieu) November 11, 2016

Finally, President Joe Biden’s Twitter team seemed to have no issue with the phrase being utilized during Biden’s campaign in May of 2019.

In a Twitter thread, the account wrote, “[T]he longest walk a parent can make is up a short flight of stairs to their child’s bedroom to say, honey, I’m sorry. We have to move. You can’t go back to your school. You won’t see your friends because Daddy or Mommy lost their job.”

And he doesn’t understand that the longest walk a parent can make is up a short flight of stairs to their child’s bedroom to say, honey, I’m sorry. We have to move. You can’t go back to your school. You won’t see your friends because Daddy or Mommy lost their job.

— Joe Biden (joebiden) May 21, 2019

In order to help eliminate such a situation, the Biden administration promised to — you guessed it — “fight like hell.”

Now, I want to be perfectly clear here. I have no issue with the phrase “fight like hell” being used by any politician — because I don’t believe the phrase incites violence.

The problem lies in the double standard that Democrats are applying. If Trump should be impeached for using the phrase, why shouldn’t every Democrat who said the same words face the same condemnation?

The logical answer is that none of these people should face impeachment, including Trump. Yet for the Democrats, to admit that truth would be to admit the error of their ways — which they have no interest in doing.
I showed you some on that crowd yelling "take the Capitol" and "Storm the Capitol" as Trump was saying "because you'll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength and you have to be strong."

Show me a similar response to Raskin or Lieu or Biden saying "fight like hell."

And you didn't answer. If Trump didn't incite that crowd to chant "fight for Trump" and "stop the steal," who did?

You also didn't answer, why was that crowd so mad at Pence?
 
Trump knew exactly what he was doing. He had been grooming the Proud Boys, Oath Keepers, and all his other rabid MAGAts for insurrection as far back as summer 2020 when he refused to commit to the peaceful transfer of power unless he "considered" the election "fair."
The Proud Boys were more democrat than republican and minority fringe groups supporting Trump do not negate the fact that tens of millions of Americans voted for Trump and wanted the many examples of voter fraud honestly examined by officials, not simply brushed aside on unproven false democrat claims of fake news and conspiracy theories.
 
Actually, they were proven beyond a preponderance of the evidence in court.
That's on appeal and is likely to be struck down by the big guys at SCOTUS because the judge allowed prejudicial commentary that was derogatory to the defendant and which had nothing to do with this case.
 
What was her failure? She had plenty of cameras arranged to film the show but failed to ensure the Capitol security teams had properly prepared for the increased flow of protesters like Trump had warned them about.
According to her, her failure was underestimating the viciousness of Trump's supporters and not have the Capitol police prepared enough to handle that.
 
15th post
What did Trump tell them,

“Stand back and stand bye “?
Who knows what Trump meant by "stand back and stand by", but it sounded like he was telling fringe groups to stop inciting or committing violence like leftist barbarian savages.
 
When democrats use the word "fight" to incite violence that is ok for democrats, but when Trump uses the word like a high school cheerleader would then to democrats that is an unforgiveable use of the word.
It all depends on the response elicited. Trump said that and some of his supporters said they believed he was telling them what to do, so they did to serve their president. Now show Democrats responding violently to words like that.
 
It's fact. It is in the congressional record. Argue your alternate reality all yoi want it wom't change history.
There is a lot in the congressional record that democrats don't want to talk about.
 
Democrats had violent protesters inciting the violence that day so they could blame Trump as if the issue was not widespread voter fraud but about so-called republican efforts to overthrow the election that democrats falsely claimed was honest.
You keep repeating that but failing every time to prove it.
 
Back
Top Bottom