Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Ok. 2 Black men. Not 2 minorities. So, what's the right number of black men on the list for SCOTUS?And that number is exactly two. Out of 46 potential nominees.
Complete list of Donald Trump's potential nominees to the U.S. Supreme Court
Ballotpedia: The Encyclopedia of American Politicsballotpedia.org
it comes down to your perspectives and experiences in life
When all decisions are made by White Males, you get a very limited point of view
Who cares? Up until a certain point in time NO black MEN or WOMEN were considered for any of the Justice roles in the USSC.I do believe the point I was making went over your head, Grump.
Could you link me to where a standing president said he was going to
pick a Black male for the SC position?
Could you link me to where a standing president said he was going to
pick a White female for the SC position?
I'll wait here for you while you find those links, thanks in advance.
What was the right number of white men before Marshall?Ok. 2 Black men. Not 2 minorities. So, what's the right number of black men on the list for SCOTUS?
Biden's pledge to appoint Black woman back in spotlight amid Breyer retirement — The Hill
President Biden's pledge to nominate a Black woman to the Supreme Court is receiving renewed attention in the wake of reports [](https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/560353-justice-breyer-announces-retiremen)apple.news
I think this is the EXACTLY way we should choose jurists. You know: solely on the basis of gender and race.
I suspect Justice William O. Douglas will be spinning in his grave — like a top.
Im sure that it did. Do you think using those characteristics as qualifiers vs disqualifiers somehow fixes that past wrong?You mean prior to Marshall they didn't care about race?
You mean prior to Day O'coonor they didn't care about gender?
What does bad policy or societal norms in the past have to do with today?What was the right number of white men before Marshall?
What was the right number of women before O'Connor?
Trump looked at qualifications. Not skin color as you do.How many minority Judges did Trump consider in his THREE picks?
Trump only looked at whites
The law is the law. I shouldnt be making decisions about the law based on my skin color or whether or not I have a penis. If I am Im probably not qualified to be a local judge let alone on the SCOTUS..it comes down to your perspectives and experiences in life
When all decisions are made by White Males, you get a very limited point of view
Introducing Supreme Court Justice Kaniqua Maloon.
Proving once again that Biden is a racist and the Democrat party is racist because the color of one's skin, and not their accomplishments, is what's paramount to them.Biden's pledge to appoint Black woman back in spotlight amid Breyer retirement — The Hill
President Biden's pledge to nominate a Black woman to the Supreme Court is receiving renewed attention in the wake of reports [](https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/560353-justice-breyer-announces-retiremen)
I think this is the EXACTLY way we should choose jurists. You know: solely on the basis of gender and race.
I suspect Justice William O. Douglas will be spinning in his grave — like a top.
No it doesn't. But are you telling me out of all the those qualified when Trump was in office, there wasn't one person of colour - any colour other than white - who wasn't more qualified than the three he put on the bench? Not one? If those 'past' wrongs were decades ago, sure. But over the past 2-6 years? Uh-uh. I'm not buying it.Im sure that it did. Do you think using those characteristics as qualifiers vs disqualifiers somehow fixes that past wrong?
How many minority Judges did Trump consider in his THREE picks?
Trump only looked at whites
no, not at all. Just saying it's not their party of choice.
Proving once again that Biden is a racist and the Democrat party is racist because the color of one's skin, and not their accomplishments, is what's paramount to them.
As if the repubmican party arent racist with their policies. Give me a break.Biden's pledge to appoint Black woman back in spotlight amid Breyer retirement — The Hill
President Biden's pledge to nominate a Black woman to the Supreme Court is receiving renewed attention in the wake of reports [](https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/560353-justice-breyer-announces-retiremen)
I think this is the EXACTLY way we should choose jurists. You know: solely on the basis of gender and race.
I suspect Justice William O. Douglas will be spinning in his grave — like a top.
It's because Joe and the Democrat Party are racists who always use skin color as criteria.The issue is with FJB advertising he's picking a black woman. He's the one to make the decision on who gets nominated, so why the need to get pander points?
If he knows he's picking a black woman he can do that without announcing it. Announcing he picking a black woman makes it so qualifications are only made between black women.
If he announced he was picking a woman and people were comparing qualifications does he think white women would be more qualified making the case of picking a black woman harder?
Total poppycock. He looked at their political affiliations.Trump looked at qualifications. Not skin color as you do.
Which racist policy have the Republicans put in place?As if the repubmican party arent racist with their policies. Give me a break.
