You - intentionally, I am sure - forgot this part:Fewer guns.
Demonstrate your response to be true.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You - intentionally, I am sure - forgot this part:Fewer guns.
The United Kingdom has a yearly murder rate per 100,000 inhabitants of 1.2. In the United States it is 6.3.
Not fewer in criminals hands and no ban will keep firearms out of the Country so all that happens is citizens are defenseless while criminals are not and emboldened.Fewer guns.
Working as intended.Not fewer in criminals hands and no ban will keep firearms out of the Country so all that happens is citizens are defenseless while criminals are not and emboldened.
I'm UK conservative and there's no problem owning a gun, as long as the person was checked as suitable (police check, driving licence check, medical check, referees check, valid reason/need to own one). Also, the model/features of the gun are suitable for society and they're locked away in a secure cabinet when not in use. And illegal to carry guns in a public place, unless unloaded in a gun case/bag to go to the gun shop or gun range.In civilized countries even conservatives ask, "Why would anyone want to own a gun?"
Poor little precious thinks their will be less gunsFewer guns.
wrong they just dont murder as much but that is increasing. as to crime the UK is much higher then the USThe UK has a low murder rate because there are not so many gun loving goons over there.
Demonstrate your ckaim to be true.The UK has a low murder rate because there are not so many gun loving goons over there.
Fallacy: Argumentum ad populumAP-NORC poll: Most in US say they want stricter gun laws
Few guns = few murders
The prison population grew. Also, the high rate of abortion meant that many potential criminals were aborted,
You cannot demonstrate this to be true.
Disagree?
If more guns = more murders, how then did the number of guns in the US, 1993-2017 increased by ~25%, while the numbe of gun related murders fell 55%?
In other words:The prison population grew. Also, the high rate of abortion meant that many potential criminals were aborted,
It reduces the number in circulation and therefore the ease with which children killers may obtain them.
Yes.That's hilarious.
My guns aren't "in circulation", and there's a snowball's chance in Hell that a child killer would ever get a hold of them.
But, since you brought up killing: Had I not been armed, trained and willing to use deadly force, I would be dead right now. Your position essentially says that it would be better that I be dead than have a gun.
Is that your position?
Yes.
Their fear about what you might do even without any evidence whatsoever that it is justified means that they can erase a constitutionally held right without cause.
That really is the position. And reasoning with that position is essentially pointless. A valid argument will never be made.
I cannot go that far only because it seems that the majority if the electorate does have that opinion. It is all over both political parties and their goals. It is the ugly side of democracy.Anyone who holds that opinion is a piece of shit...