Renowned attorney comments on new indictment against Trump

[Chillicothe]

32 hand picked Trump haters met unannounced and in secret and delivered the goods that Jackass Smith directed them to

Prove it.
Or quit this unmanly whining and complaining. You, too often, post like a snowflake.
Don't do that. Your avatar looks fatuous and ineffective when you do that.
Be better.
Good luck.

-----------------------------------------------

Nope Carroll let Trump bend her over in a changing room thirty years ago thinking she bagged a millionaire playboy.

Prove it.
If you can't ---then quit posting.
You bring the forum down when you post corrosive allegations with no proof, no vetting, no verification.
As such you make MAGA look unserious and frivolous.
You shouldn't do that if you want folks to think that you have an education and can be relied upon to be a mature dependable adult.

Good luck.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Turdly is a shill. He is paid for his opinion.

All attorneys are paid for their opinion. That's what they have to sell. All of them.

 

[Nobody911]

Jonathan Turley: The Supreme Court will have problems with this indictment | Fox News Video

Fox News contributor Jonathan Turley reacts to the special filing a new indictment in the election subversion case against former President Trump on 'Special Report.'

www.foxnews.com

I just now heard of this a couple hours ago. Basically, this nut Jack Smith (who was not supposed to be bringing the original case!) re-did the old indictment after the Supreme Ct ruled that presidents have immunity from lawsuits when they are (my words) working in their capacity as a president.

US Bureaucracy + Blue media vs. Red media + Trump & teams

It's increasingly likely Trump will not win this presidential election. Those US bureaucrats just don't like Trump. Here are some stories of what did happen...

During his presidency, Donald Trump frequently clashed with intelligence agencies and the FBI. Some of the key conflicts included Trump disputing the intelligence community's assessment of Russian interference in the 2016 election, which led to strained relations with agencies such as the CIA and FBI. Trump also accused the FBI of bias and a "witch hunt" in the investigation into possible collusion between his campaign and Russia. One significant event was the firing of FBI Director James Comey in 2017, which raised concerns about potential obstruction of justice. Trump's criticism of the intelligence community and his public disagreements with agencies over issues like North Korea and Iran also added to the tensions.

Overall, the conflicts between Trump and intelligence agencies highlighted the challenges of maintaining a productive relationship between the executive branch and the intelligence community. The disputes often revolved around differing assessments of national security threats, political interference in investigations, and questions about the independence and credibility of intelligence agencies under the Trump administration.

During his presidency, there were several conflicts between former President Donald Trump and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). One notable conflict occurred in 2020 when Trump expressed frustration with the leadership of DHS, particularly regarding immigration policies and border security.There were disagreements over issues such as the construction of the border wall, the handling of asylum seekers, and the implementation of immigration enforcement measures. Trump's administration also faced criticism for its controversial policies such as family separations at the border and the travel ban targeting predominantly Muslim countries.These conflicts sometimes led to high-profile resignations within the DHS leadership, including former Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen and former Acting Secretary Chad Wolf.

Overall, the relationship between Trump and DHS was characterized by tensions over immigration policies, border security, and the balance between enforcement and humanitarian concerns.

But...it will be tough in the coming years if Trump wins the White House! Amen...

 

[Shareprofit]

Yep. Your admitted dementia adds nothing to the conversation.

Next?

So you've got nothing, that's pretty weak pal.

 

[hadit]

Wow, the minute I saw the headline, I knew it was Turley putting on his red dress and fishnets and whoring himself out.

Your mind would go there.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

"Renowned attorney."

Seriously.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

It’s actually double or triple jeopardy done with a secret grand jury of all Trump haters so crazy eyes Jackass Smith can continue his obsessive, compulsive , zealot riddled persecutions.

well, that's all hilariousl;y stupid and wrong, which is why none of that exists outside of Trumper fever dreams.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Fallacy time. It’s not who says it that matters. It’s what he or she says that does matter.

Think so?

okay, let's hear the awesome, stand alone argument made here.

See you in never.

 

[krichton]

This attempt by Smith will be thwarted by a higher court... and this time Smith will be warned to not do this again... he is trying to weasel his way around a supreme court decision and the courts do not like that...

How? Why? What higher court?

 

[Nostra]

So you've got nothing, that's pretty weak pal.

You are the one who just admitted you can't remember your past, Simp.

 

[Lakhota]

Jonathan Turley: The Supreme Court will have problems with this indictment | Fox News Video

Fox News contributor Jonathan Turley reacts to the special filing a new indictment in the election subversion case against former President Trump on 'Special Report.'

www.foxnews.com

I just now heard of this a couple hours ago. Basically, this nut Jack Smith (who was not supposed to be bringing the original case!) re-did the old indictment after the Supreme Ct ruled that presidents have immunity from lawsuits when they are (my words) working in their capacity as a president.

Funny. Squirrelly Turley is a joke!

 

[bdtex]

Jonathan Turley: The Supreme Court will have problems with this indictment | Fox News Video

Fox News contributor Jonathan Turley reacts to the special filing a new indictment in the election subversion case against former President Trump on 'Special Report.'

www.foxnews.com

I just now heard of this a couple hours ago. Basically, this nut Jack Smith (who was not supposed to be bringing the original case!) re-did the old indictment after the Supreme Ct ruled that presidents have immunity from lawsuits when they are (my words) working in their capacity as a president.

He's not ""renowned". He's seldom right either.

 

[scruffy]

It's intentionally done so they can create a 'head line' and 'report' on it, expect more of this bullshit the closer to November we get.

More astroturfing from the leftards.

Not surprised.

If they spent as much time on the country as they don't themselves maybe we'd be in better shape.

 

[Clipper]

Nope Carroll let Trump bend her over in a changing room thirty years ago thinking she bagged a millionaire playboy.
Trump doesn’t even remember who she is . Hahahahaahhaaha what a dumb slut.

He remembers her. Big time. Especially when he writes that check.

 

[Clipper]

You’re positing a civil jury’s “findings” from a NY trial as though that means that their “findings” are right.

That’s not what their findings mean.

And a finger fuck is not a rape anyway. Although I doubt he ever touched that weird woman.

It is when it's forced, which is what your boy did. There are people rotting in prison for the same thing that degenerate Trump did.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

Prove it.
Or quit this unmanly whining and complaining. You, too often, post like a snowflake.
Don't do that. Your avatar looks fatuous and ineffective when you do that.
Be better.
Good luck.

-----------------------------------------------

Prove it.
If you can't ---then quit posting.
You bring the forum down when you post corrosive allegations with no proof, no vetting, no verification.
As such you make MAGA look unserious and frivolous.
You shouldn't do that if you want folks to think that you have an education and can be relied upon to be a mature dependable adult.

Good luck.

You’re funny.

 

[BackAgain]

Think so?

okay, let's hear the awesome, stand alone argument made here.

See you in never.

I already exposed the fallacy of attack the messenger, you pathetic dildo.

 

[forkintheroad7]

I'm not sure that's accurate... the left is a vengeful lot today... mess with them and they never let up... its one of the reasons they must be beaten and taken out of power...
They wanted to make an example of Trump of what happens when an outsider comes in and has the nerve to beat them....

I get the feeling if we don't do that now.. it will never happen

 

[Lesh]

Jonathan Turley: The Supreme Court will have problems with this indictment | Fox News Video

Fox News contributor Jonathan Turley reacts to the special filing a new indictment in the election subversion case against former President Trump on 'Special Report.'

www.foxnews.com

I just now heard of this a couple hours ago. Basically, this nut Jack Smith (who was not supposed to be bringing the original case!) re-did the old indictment after the Supreme Ct ruled that presidents have immunity from lawsuits when they are (my words) working in their capacity as a president.

Jonathan Turdley again??

Fuck him

 

[surada]

Jonathan Turley: The Supreme Court will have problems with this indictment | Fox News Video

Fox News contributor Jonathan Turley reacts to the special filing a new indictment in the election subversion case against former President Trump on 'Special Report.'

www.foxnews.com

I just now heard of this a couple hours ago. Basically, this nut Jack Smith (who was not supposed to be bringing the original case!) re-did the old indictment after the Supreme Ct ruled that presidents have immunity from lawsuits when they are (my words) working in their capacity as a president.

Turkey sold out to Fox News several years ago.