skookerasbil
Platinum Member
Ummmmm......how about the gap is HUGE!!!
Really? I don’t think so. Let's look at the potential of solar energy, which is easiest to quantify. According to NASA data, "the average intensity of solar energy reaching the top of the atmosphere directly facing the Sun is about 1,360 watts per square meter. Averaged over the entire planet [including night], the amount of sunlight arriving at the top of Earth’s atmosphere is only one-fourth of the total solar irradiance, or approximately 340 watts per square meter." Further, there is loss of about 25% from the top of the atmosphere down to the surface due to clouds, pollution, and other factors—and there's no way that improved efficiency on the surface will change that.
The gap between renewable energy promises and reality
This is eye opening stuff even for me.......we see these AGW people throwing out these "renewables are our future" threads yet its laughable when you look at some simple realities!!
Who's not winning?
Really? I don’t think so. Let's look at the potential of solar energy, which is easiest to quantify. According to NASA data, "the average intensity of solar energy reaching the top of the atmosphere directly facing the Sun is about 1,360 watts per square meter. Averaged over the entire planet [including night], the amount of sunlight arriving at the top of Earth’s atmosphere is only one-fourth of the total solar irradiance, or approximately 340 watts per square meter." Further, there is loss of about 25% from the top of the atmosphere down to the surface due to clouds, pollution, and other factors—and there's no way that improved efficiency on the surface will change that.
The gap between renewable energy promises and reality
This is eye opening stuff even for me.......we see these AGW people throwing out these "renewables are our future" threads yet its laughable when you look at some simple realities!!
Who's not winning?