Remembering Robert E. Lee: American Patriot and Southern Hero

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

He was defending Washington against those wild and crazy southerners. The US had an army duh.

He was defending Washington from states that were attempting to secede peacefully? I guess Hitler was just defending Germany from those crazy French and British people. Amazing how far you lying Leftists will go to make the aggressor into a victim and rewrite history.

Well, Poland did attack a German radio station . . . . . according to Hitler.

I sense a Pollack joke....

 

[bripat9643]

NEITHER Lee nor Lincoln WANTED a war. Only ignoramuses think they did.

Wrong. Lincoln wanted war.

 

[MaxGrit]

You mean court historians have published the government approved version of history. .

No, I mean the scumbag traitors were brought to heel, and only pathetic fools like you would play the apologist for evil, murderous traitors like the confederate pieces of shit who led too many good men to their deaths.

Lincoln did all the murdering, ...

Wrong, wannabe traitor, wrong. The traitorous rebels wanted a war and were determined to have one. They got one and got beaten down.

What does a Jap piece of shit (what your name literally means) care about this issue anyway?

unkotare \ woon-ko-ta-re \ , noun;

Japanese. Roughly translated as dripping poop. This word is used to describe a pornographic genre commonly known as Scat.
"Hey Bro checkout this sweet unkotare video I found... it is super kawaii-desu"

You got to wonder about a buy who choose that as his avatar name.

nasty

 

[Unkotare]

No, I mean the scumbag traitors were brought to heel, and only pathetic fools like you would play the apologist for evil, murderous traitors like the confederate pieces of shit who led too many good men to their deaths.

Lincoln did all the murdering, ...

Wrong, wannabe traitor, wrong. The traitorous rebels wanted a war and were determined to have one. They got one and got beaten down.

Absolutely wrong. The states that seceded did not want war. Nothing could be more obvious than that. You logic is identical to that of an abusive husband who says his wife deserved the beating he gave her because she tried to leave.

Lincoln did everything possible to instigate hostilities. He refused to negotiate on the transfer of federal property back to the host states. He attempted to resupply Ft Sumter despite being told not to. Furthermore, he invaded Virginia.

Then they shouldn't have attacked a federal fort.

ROFL! We've already been over this 100 times. Your side lost every time.

You lying and fantasizing 100 times doesn't change reality, wannabe traitor scum.

 

[bripat9643]

NEITHER Lee nor Lincoln WANTED a war. Only ignoramuses think they did.

Right. How was Lincoln forced to marshal 75,000 troops and order them on an invasion course? Did somebody stick a gun to his head?

Wait........................that comes later........................... v v v v v v v v

BWAHAHAHAHA! I love that!

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Lincoln did all the murdering, ...

Wrong, wannabe traitor, wrong. The traitorous rebels wanted a war and were determined to have one. They got one and got beaten down.

Absolutely wrong. The states that seceded did not want war. Nothing could be more obvious than that. You logic is identical to that of an abusive husband who says his wife deserved the beating he gave her because she tried to leave.

Lincoln did everything possible to instigate hostilities. He refused to negotiate on the transfer of federal property back to the host states. He attempted to resupply Ft Sumter despite being told not to. Furthermore, he invaded Virginia.

Then they shouldn't have attacked a federal fort.

ROFL! We've already been over this 100 times. Your side lost every time.

You lying and fantasizing 100 times doesn't change reality, wannabe traitor scum.

Jap scat, answer the damn question.

 

[bripat9643]

Lincoln did all the murdering, ...

Wrong, wannabe traitor, wrong. The traitorous rebels wanted a war and were determined to have one. They got one and got beaten down.

Absolutely wrong. The states that seceded did not want war. Nothing could be more obvious than that. You logic is identical to that of an abusive husband who says his wife deserved the beating he gave her because she tried to leave.

Lincoln did everything possible to instigate hostilities. He refused to negotiate on the transfer of federal property back to the host states. He attempted to resupply Ft Sumter despite being told not to. Furthermore, he invaded Virginia.

Then they shouldn't have attacked a federal fort.

ROFL! We've already been over this 100 times. Your side lost every time.

You lying and fantasizing 100 times doesn't change reality, wannabe traitor scum.

How ironic.

 

[Faun]

No, I mean the scumbag traitors were brought to heel, and only pathetic fools like you would play the apologist for evil, murderous traitors like the confederate pieces of shit who led too many good men to their deaths.

Lincoln did all the murdering, ...

Wrong, wannabe traitor, wrong. The traitorous rebels wanted a war and were determined to have one. They got one and got beaten down.

Absolutely wrong. The states that seceded did not want war. Nothing could be more obvious than that. You logic is identical to that of an abusive husband who says his wife deserved the beating he gave her because she tried to leave.

Lincoln did everything possible to instigate hostilities. He refused to negotiate on the transfer of federal property back to the host states. He attempted to resupply Ft Sumter despite being told not to. Furthermore, he invaded Virginia.

Then they shouldn't have attacked a federal fort.

ROFL! We've already been over this 100 times. Your side lost every time.

In your deranged mind perhaps. Meanwhile, in reality, confederates attacked a U.S. fort and started the war.

Encyclopedia Britannica: Fort Sumter

By early 1861 the seven Southern states that had already seceded from the Union claimed possession of all U.S. forts and arsenals within their territory. Only two forts remained under federal jurisdiction: Fort Pickens, Florida, and Fort Sumter, which was garrisoned by U.S. troops under Major Robert Anderson.​

 

[candycorn]

Still love what we did to his house. We should do it to Bush's ranch too.

 

[Unkotare]

Still love what we did to his house. We should do it to Bush's ranch too.

Only if you and the idiot wannabe traitor here are the only two occupants at the time.

 

[Jarlaxle]

NEITHER Lee nor Lincoln WANTED a war. Only ignoramuses think they did.

Are you stoned, or just really, really stupid?

 

[bripat9643]

Lincoln did all the murdering, ...

Wrong, wannabe traitor, wrong. The traitorous rebels wanted a war and were determined to have one. They got one and got beaten down.

Absolutely wrong. The states that seceded did not want war. Nothing could be more obvious than that. You logic is identical to that of an abusive husband who says his wife deserved the beating he gave her because she tried to leave.

Lincoln did everything possible to instigate hostilities. He refused to negotiate on the transfer of federal property back to the host states. He attempted to resupply Ft Sumter despite being told not to. Furthermore, he invaded Virginia.

Then they shouldn't have attacked a federal fort.

ROFL! We've already been over this 100 times. Your side lost every time.

In your deranged mind perhaps. Meanwhile, in reality, confederates attacked a U.S. fort and started the war.

Encyclopedia Britannica: Fort Sumter

By early 1861 the seven Southern states that had already seceded from the Union claimed possession of all U.S. forts and arsenals within their territory. Only two forts remained under federal jurisdiction: Fort Pickens, Florida, and Fort Sumter, which was garrisoned by U.S. troops under Major Robert Anderson.​

Neither of the forts were under U.S. jurisdiction. Ft Sumter was under the jurisdiction of South Carolina. Fort Pickens was under the jurisdiction of Florida. I proved that over and over again.

No matter how many times you bleat that the Confederacy started the war by firing on Ft Sumter, you're wrong. The federal government had no more right to station troops in Ft Sumter than did France or Britain.

 

[Jarlaxle]

Still love what we did to his house. We should do it to Bush's ranch too.

Get sued and lose?

 

[francoHFW]

#121- Master's in History, just read the new book on Lee. You're a moron. Link to Lincoln wanted war? He made NO moves to eliminate slavery, Lee was forced to fight by his self ID as a Virginian despite his hopes for peace and union.- Southern conservatives have always been fear mongered , duped fools. Great soldiers though.

 

[candycorn]

Still love what we did to his house. We should do it to Bush's ranch too.

Get sued and lose?

No, plant the dead he was responsible for at his doorstep.

They are still there...are they not? he he he

 

[Faun]

Wrong, wannabe traitor, wrong. The traitorous rebels wanted a war and were determined to have one. They got one and got beaten down.

Absolutely wrong. The states that seceded did not want war. Nothing could be more obvious than that. You logic is identical to that of an abusive husband who says his wife deserved the beating he gave her because she tried to leave.

Lincoln did everything possible to instigate hostilities. He refused to negotiate on the transfer of federal property back to the host states. He attempted to resupply Ft Sumter despite being told not to. Furthermore, he invaded Virginia.

Then they shouldn't have attacked a federal fort.

ROFL! We've already been over this 100 times. Your side lost every time.

In your deranged mind perhaps. Meanwhile, in reality, confederates attacked a U.S. fort and started the war.

Encyclopedia Britannica: Fort Sumter

By early 1861 the seven Southern states that had already seceded from the Union claimed possession of all U.S. forts and arsenals within their territory. Only two forts remained under federal jurisdiction: Fort Pickens, Florida, and Fort Sumter, which was garrisoned by U.S. troops under Major Robert Anderson.​

Neither of the forts were under U.S. jurisdiction. Ft Sumter was under the jurisdiction of South Carolina. Fort Pickens was under the jurisdiction of Florida. I proved that over and over again.

No matter how many times you bleat that the Confederacy started the war by firing on Ft Sumter, you're wrong. The federal government had no more right to station troops in Ft Sumter than did France or Britain.

The only thing you've proven is that you're a complete ******* retard.

Not only have you been shown that SC ceded the land so the U.S. government could build a fort...

Not only have you been shown that SC's "jurisdiction" was limited to arresting law breakers in criminal matters and serving process documents on civil matters...

But now you've been shown, with Encyclopedia Britannica, the fort was under U.S. jurisdiction when the confederates attacked.

And your stupidity is even double that of being a ******* retard if you think anyone in their right mind is going to take the word of a nutcase like you, who thinks he can rewrite history, over that of the Encyclopedia Britannica.

Sucks to be you.

 

[bripat9643]

Absolutely wrong. The states that seceded did not want war. Nothing could be more obvious than that. You logic is identical to that of an abusive husband who says his wife deserved the beating he gave her because she tried to leave.

Lincoln did everything possible to instigate hostilities. He refused to negotiate on the transfer of federal property back to the host states. He attempted to resupply Ft Sumter despite being told not to. Furthermore, he invaded Virginia.

Then they shouldn't have attacked a federal fort.

ROFL! We've already been over this 100 times. Your side lost every time.

In your deranged mind perhaps. Meanwhile, in reality, confederates attacked a U.S. fort and started the war.

Encyclopedia Britannica: Fort Sumter

By early 1861 the seven Southern states that had already seceded from the Union claimed possession of all U.S. forts and arsenals within their territory. Only two forts remained under federal jurisdiction: Fort Pickens, Florida, and Fort Sumter, which was garrisoned by U.S. troops under Major Robert Anderson.​

Neither of the forts were under U.S. jurisdiction. Ft Sumter was under the jurisdiction of South Carolina. Fort Pickens was under the jurisdiction of Florida. I proved that over and over again.

No matter how many times you bleat that the Confederacy started the war by firing on Ft Sumter, you're wrong. The federal government had no more right to station troops in Ft Sumter than did France or Britain.

The only thing you've proven is that you're a complete ******* retard.

Not only have you been shown that SC ceded the land so the U.S. government could build a fort...

Not only have you been shown that SC's "jurisdiction" was limited to arresting law breakers in criminal matters and serving process documents on civil matters...

But now you've been shown, with Encyclopedia Britannica, the fort was under U.S. jurisdiction when the confederates attacked.

And your stupidity is even double that of being a ******* retard if you think anyone in their right mind is going to take the word of a nutcase like you, who thinks he can rewrite history, over that of the Encyclopedia Britannica.

Sucks to be you.

I'm not going to waste my time posting the evidence that proves you're full of shit. The lurkers can read back through the threat to find it. All you've done here is the same shit you posted 2 dozen times previously and that I shot down two dozens times.

You're immune to logic, so it's pointless to debate you. Ridicule is all your good for.

 

[bripat9643]

Still love what we did to his house. We should do it to Bush's ranch too.

Get sued and lose?

No, plant the dead he was responsible for at his doorstep.

They are still there...are they not? he he he

In other words, **** his constitutional rights.

That is so beautifully liberal!

 

[candycorn]

Still love what we did to his house. We should do it to Bush's ranch too.

Get sued and lose?

No, plant the dead he was responsible for at his doorstep.

They are still there...are they not? he he he

In other words, **** his constitutional rights.

You got it.

That's what you get when you mess with the Good Ol USA buddy.... My only regret was that we didn't pile them into a pyramid Abu Grahib style with some black chick giving a big thumbs up to.

 

[candycorn]

Absolutely wrong. The states that seceded did not want war. Nothing could be more obvious than that. You logic is identical to that of an abusive husband who says his wife deserved the beating he gave her because she tried to leave.

Lincoln did everything possible to instigate hostilities. He refused to negotiate on the transfer of federal property back to the host states. He attempted to resupply Ft Sumter despite being told not to. Furthermore, he invaded Virginia.

Then they shouldn't have attacked a federal fort.

ROFL! We've already been over this 100 times. Your side lost every time.

In your deranged mind perhaps. Meanwhile, in reality, confederates attacked a U.S. fort and started the war.

Encyclopedia Britannica: Fort Sumter

By early 1861 the seven Southern states that had already seceded from the Union claimed possession of all U.S. forts and arsenals within their territory. Only two forts remained under federal jurisdiction: Fort Pickens, Florida, and Fort Sumter, which was garrisoned by U.S. troops under Major Robert Anderson.​

Neither of the forts were under U.S. jurisdiction. Ft Sumter was under the jurisdiction of South Carolina. Fort Pickens was under the jurisdiction of Florida. I proved that over and over again.

No matter how many times you bleat that the Confederacy started the war by firing on Ft Sumter, you're wrong. The federal government had no more right to station troops in Ft Sumter than did France or Britain.

The only thing you've proven is that you're a complete ******* retard.

.
.100% correct.