Remember Bill Clinton

Both house and Senate republicans had the majority, and they voted to impeach an affair with Monica Lewinsky, The only saving his grace the Clinton offered privatized Medicare. I can't prove it but I know it's true.

What is different about tramp hiring a whore to get his nuts after his wife had a baby. A republican.
Slick Willy was (is) a piece of shit.
 
What? Clinton lied under oath. Then you loons told us a man's sex life is none of our business.
A man's sex life isn't anyone's business, Clinton, Trump or Edwards.
Teabaggers made it their business, especially the hypocrite, NOOT.
They made it their business, even before Clinton gave his deposition.
Now all a sudden you're worried about a man's sex. That's the definition of a hypocrite.
Clinton shouldn't have lied about it, he got caught and paid the price.
I don't care if Trump had an affair with a porn star, that's between Malaria and him.
Paying Daniels, like Edwards with campaign cash, is the people's business.
I wouldn't have voted for any of them, if they cheat on their spouse, why wouldn't they cheat their constituents?
 
Both house and Senate republicans had the majority, and they voted to impeach an affair with Monica Lewinsky, The only saving his grace the Clinton offered privatized Medicare. I can't prove it but I know it's true.

What is different about tramp hiring a whore to get his nuts after his wife had a baby. A republican.

The difference...
1) The people who voted for Trump claim to follow a book which said adulterers should be stoned to death
2) Trump paid the woman off and diddled the funding to make it look like something else, which is illegal.
Clinton lied, but it was nonsense, it would have been nonsense had Trump not broken NY laws by paying her off in the manner he did, even just paying her off with cash and writing "for my paid biatch" would have been fine, for everyone, but the religious right...... cough, splutter, cough.
 
A man's sex life isn't anyone's business, Clinton, Trump or Edwards.
Teabaggers made it their business, especially the hypocrite, NOOT.
They made it their business, even before Clinton gave his deposition.

Clinton shouldn't have lied about it, he got caught and paid the price.
I don't care if Trump had an affair with a porn star, that's between Malaria and him.
Paying Daniels, like Edwards with campaign cash, is the people's business.
I wouldn't have voted for any of them, if they cheat on their spouse, why wouldn't they cheat their constituents?
the allegations aren’t that trump used campaign cash. geez you all can’t even get the basics

you can make an argument that using campaign cash is rhe people’s business like edwards…but that wasn’t a crime
 
the allegations aren’t that trump used campaign cash. geez you all can’t even get the basics
You're FOS, Q-NUT.

May 16 2018
Pesident Donald Trump acknowledged paying off his personal lawyer – presumably for a payoff to porn star Stormy Daniels – through something relatively mundane: a mandatory financial disclosure filing.

The President said in his financial disclosure form, which was released by the the Office of Government Ethics on Wednesday, that he had incurred a debt to his longtime personal attorney Michael Cohen in 2016 – but he did not specify what that debt was for.

Under the Ethics in Government Act, the President must include in his financial disclosure form any liabilities that exceed $10,000 from the previous calendar year. That would presumably include his $130,000 to Cohen, who he reimbursed for paying off Daniels, whose real name is Stephanie Clifford.

In a letter to Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein, David J. Apol, who is the acting director of the Office of Government Ethics, said it was requirement to report this payment – which experts say means that Trump could potentially have violated federal law if he knew about the payment last year and still omitted it from the report .

Teabaggers think Trump used his OWN $$$?

Trump's cult is SOOOOOOOOOOO ............gullible.
you can make an argument that using campaign cash is rhe people’s business like edwards…but that wasn’t a crime
YES, it is, dumbass.

www.fec.gov › making-disbursements › personal-useFEC | Candidate | Personal use


Using campaign funds for personal use is prohibited. FEC guidance on which expenses are considered to be personal use and which expenses are considered on a case-by-case basis,
 
Last edited:
You're FOS, Q-NUT.

May 16 2018
Pesident Donald Trump acknowledged paying off his personal lawyer – presumably for a payoff to porn star Stormy Daniels – through something relatively mundane: a mandatory financial disclosure filing.

The President said in his financial disclosure form, which was released by the the Office of Government Ethics on Wednesday, that he had incurred a debt to his longtime personal attorney Michael Cohen in 2016 – but he did not specify what that debt was for.

Under the Ethics in Government Act, the President must include in his financial disclosure form any liabilities that exceed $10,000 from the previous calendar year. That would presumably include his $130,000 to Cohen, who he reimbursed for paying off Daniels, whose real name is Stephanie Clifford.

In a letter to Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein, David J. Apol, who is the acting director of the Office of Government Ethics, said it was requirement to report this payment – which experts say means that Trump could potentially have violated federal law if he knew about the payment last year and still omitted it from the report .

Teabaggers think Trump used his OWN $$$?

Trump's cult is SOOOOOOOOOOO ............gullible.

YES, it is, dumbass.

www.fec.gov › making-disbursements › personal-useFEC | Candidate | Personal use


Using campaign funds for personal use is prohibited. FEC guidance on which expenses are considered to be personal use and which expenses are considered on a case-by-case basis,
nothing in that quote says anything about urn being campaign money…it’s talking about his personal fin disclosure…he used his own money to pay his attorney for legal fees…his attorney paid the money first out of his pocket

nope john edwards was found NG, then there was a hung jury on the rest and the doj dropped the case. So not illegal…if it were he’d be convicted
 
nothing in that quote says anything about urn being campaign money…it’s talking about his personal fin disclosure…he used his own money to pay his attorney for legal fees…his attorney paid the money first out of his pocket
Sure he did...............
The orange grifter doesn't USE, HIS own $$$ for ANYTHING.
nope john edwards was found NG, then there was a hung jury on the rest and the doj dropped the case. So not illegal…if it were he’d be convicted
You're so FOS.
Following his 2008 presidential campaign, Edwards was indicted by a federal grand jury on June 3, 2011, on six felony charges of violating multiple federal campaign contribution laws to cover up an extramarital affair to which he eventually admitted. He was found not guilty on one count, and the judge declared a mistrial on the remaining five charges, as the jury was unable to come to an agreement.
 
Sure he did...............
The orange grifter doesn't USE, HIS own $$$ for ANYTHING.

You're so FOS.
Following his 2008 presidential campaign, Edwards was indicted by a federal grand jury on June 3, 2011, on six felony charges of violating multiple federal campaign contribution laws to cover up an extramarital affair to which he eventually admitted. He was found not guilty on one count, and the judge declared a mistrial on the remaining five charges, as the jury was unable to come to an agreement.
1) the allegation is that he or the trump organization paid for it....the DOJ and FEC said there was no campaign funds...hence why he wasn't fined or charged...unlike Hilliary who was fined by the FEC for violating campaign fin laws by claiming paying Michael Steele was "legal fees"
The Federal Election Commission has agreed to a fine of over $100,000 against the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign over an investigation into alleged misreporting of spending related to the now-infamous Steele dossier.
2) how am I FOS? Your quote says what I said.....he was found NG (ie what he did by using campaign funds to pay off his mistress and baby momma) wasn't illegal....there was a mistrial on the rest, and the DOJ didn't pursue it...hence they agreed he was innocent.
 
1) the allegation is that he or the trump organization paid for it....the DOJ and FEC said there was no campaign funds...hence why he wasn't fined or charged...unlike Hilliary who was fined by the FEC for violating campaign fin laws by claiming paying Michael Steele was "legal fees"
No, they didn't, a Trumptard is on the committee.

October 28 2020
Debbie Chacona oversees the division of the Federal Election Commission that serves as the first line of defense against illegal flows of cash in political campaigns. Its dozens of analysts sift through billions of dollars of reported contributions and expenditures, searching for any that violate the law.

But Chacona’s open support of President Donald Trump and her close ties to a former Republican FEC commissioner, Donald McGahn, who went on to become the 2016 Trump campaign’s top lawyer, have raised questions among agency employees and prompted at least one formal complaint.
Chacona, a veteran agency staffer who has run the FEC’s Reports Analysis Division, or RAD, since 2010, has made her partisan allegiance clear in a series of public Facebook posts that include a photo of her family gathered around a “Make America Great Again” sign while attending Trump’s January 2017 inauguration.

The election commission, split between three Republicans and three Democratic-aligned commissioners, dropped the proceeding in a closed-door meeting in February, per the New York Times.

  • "There is ample evidence in the record to support the finding that Trump and the Committee knew of, and nonetheless accepted, the illegal contributions at issue here," they write.
  • "To conclude that a payment, made 13 days before Election Day to hush up a suddenly newsworthy 10- year-old story, was not campaign-related, without so much as conducting an investigation, defies reality."
Yes, but: Two Republican-leaning commissioners released their own statement saying the dismissal was a matter of "prosecutorial discretion."
The Federal Election Commission has agreed to a fine of over $100,000 against the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign over an investigation into alleged misreporting of spending related to the now-infamous Steele dossier.
2) how am I FOS? Your quote says what I said.....he was found NG (ie what he did by using campaign funds to pay off his mistress and baby momma) wasn't illegal....there was a mistrial on the rest, and the DOJ didn't pursue it...hence they agreed he was innocent.
Just because a person isn't found guilty of murder doesn't mean it's legal, Q-NUT.
 
No, they didn't, a Trumptard is on the committee.

October 28 2020
Debbie Chacona oversees the division of the Federal Election Commission that serves as the first line of defense against illegal flows of cash in political campaigns. Its dozens of analysts sift through billions of dollars of reported contributions and expenditures, searching for any that violate the law.

But Chacona’s open support of President Donald Trump and her close ties to a former Republican FEC commissioner, Donald McGahn, who went on to become the 2016 Trump campaign’s top lawyer, have raised questions among agency employees and prompted at least one formal complaint.
Chacona, a veteran agency staffer who has run the FEC’s Reports Analysis Division, or RAD, since 2010, has made her partisan allegiance clear in a series of public Facebook posts that include a photo of her family gathered around a “Make America Great Again” sign while attending Trump’s January 2017 inauguration.

The election commission, split between three Republicans and three Democratic-aligned commissioners, dropped the proceeding in a closed-door meeting in February, per the New York Times.

  • "There is ample evidence in the record to support the finding that Trump and the Committee knew of, and nonetheless accepted, the illegal contributions at issue here," they write.
  • "To conclude that a payment, made 13 days before Election Day to hush up a suddenly newsworthy 10- year-old story, was not campaign-related, without so much as conducting an investigation, defies reality."
Yes, but: Two Republican-leaning commissioners released their own statement saying the dismissal was a matter of "prosecutorial discretion."

Just because a person isn't found guilty of murder doesn't mean it's legal, Q-NUT.
No, she actually was fined, so was the DNC....it's amazing how you claim they didn't..even though there is clear proof....


Of course it doesn't mean murder is legal...it means the person is innocent of the crime charged. Edwards used campaign donations to pay and hide his love child and baby momma...that apparently isn't against the law. Trump, never used any campaign funds, isn't charged by the Feds for it, nor the FEC....there is not an allegated campaign fin issue with Trump here. What the NYC DA is saying is that he didn't really pay his legal fees, even though he was billed by his lawyer....
 
No, she actually was fined, so was the DNC....it's amazing how you claim they didn't..even though there is clear proof....
NEVER stated it, liar.
Of course it doesn't mean murder is legal...it means the person is innocent of the crime charged. Edwards used campaign donations to pay and hide his love child and baby momma...that apparently isn't against the law.
WTF, retard?
You just stated it was.

"how am I FOS? Your quote says what I said.....he was found NG (ie what he did by using campaign funds to pay off his mistress and baby momma) wasn't illegal".
Trump, never used any campaign funds, isn't charged by the Feds for it, nor the FEC....there is not an allegated campaign fin issue with Trump here.
The Trumptards over-ruled the normal people on the committee.

  • "There is ample evidence in the record to support the finding that Trump and the Committee knew of, and nonetheless accepted, the illegal contributions at issue here," they write.
  • "To conclude that a payment, made 13 days before Election Day to hush up a suddenly newsworthy 10- year-old story, was not campaign-related, without so much as conducting an investigation, defies reality."
Just like both impeachment of the orange traitor.
Teabaggers didn't listen to the evidence, so there WAS no evidence, as well as no investigation.
What the NYC DA is saying is that he didn't really pay his legal fees, even though he was billed by his lawyer....
No, he wasn't.

Back on ignore for you.

You're too stupid and lying too much, to converse with.
 
That’s not what I am arguing. When people make the false claim that Clinton was impeached over his relationship with Monica Lewinsky, they need to be corrected.
Clinton was all about his sex life, unless you maybe have a link to prove otherwise. Quite unlike this trump character who tried to over throw our government. He came pretty close. His vice president was even at risk of his life.
 
NEVER stated it, liar.

WTF, retard?
You just stated it was.

"how am I FOS? Your quote says what I said.....he was found NG (ie what he did by using campaign funds to pay off his mistress and baby momma) wasn't illegal".

The Trumptards over-ruled the normal people on the committee.

  • "There is ample evidence in the record to support the finding that Trump and the Committee knew of, and nonetheless accepted, the illegal contributions at issue here," they write.
  • "To conclude that a payment, made 13 days before Election Day to hush up a suddenly newsworthy 10- year-old story, was not campaign-related, without so much as conducting an investigation, defies reality."
Just like both impeachment of the orange traitor.
Teabaggers didn't listen to the evidence, so there WAS no evidence, as well as no investigation.

No, he wasn't.

Back on ignore for you.

You're too stupid and lying too much, to converse with.
yep....it was Clinton, not Trump that violated campaign fin laws...so why isn't the DA in NYC going after her?

I didn't say that there are ways to violate campaign fin laws, I said using campaign fund to pay off your mitress apparently doesn't violate the law. Geez, man...way is this so hard for you?

I have no idea where your points about Trump are coming from...not from my link, do you have some link to support what you are talking about?

haha the impeachment was based on Adam Shifty parody...he admitted it was parody...that's not evidence. That's why he looked like such a full at the trial.

of course he was billed by his lawyer...Cohen already said he billed him for it
 
yep....it was Clinton, not Trump that violated campaign fin laws...so why isn't the DA in NYC going after her?
Really?
You have a link?
I didn't say that there are ways to violate campaign fin laws, I said using campaign fund to pay off your mitress apparently doesn't violate the law. Geez, man...way is this so hard for you?
You added that retard.

Post 70
"nope john edwards was found NG, then there was a hung jury on the rest and the doj dropped the case. So not illegal…if it were he’d be convicted".

I have no idea where your points about Trump are coming from...not from my link, do you have some link to support what you are talking about?

FEC drops Trump hush-money investigation​

1679561250665.png
Axios
https://www.axios.com › Politics & Policy




May 6, 2021 — The Federal Election Commission announced Thursday that it won't proceed with a case examining whether former President Trump violated ...


haha the impeachment was based on Adam Shifty parody...he admitted it was parody...that's not evidence. That's why he looked like such a full at the trial.
The parody was republicans blocking witnesses.

Republicans Vote to Block New Evidence in Impeachment ...​

1679561427876.png
Time Magazine
https://time.com › Politics › Impeachment




Jan 31, 2020 — Senate Republicans on Friday evening succeeded in blocking new evidence from being considered in President Donald Trump's impeachment trial.


Senate rejects witnesses in Trump impeachment trial ...​

1679561427947.png
Reuters
https://www.reuters.com › us-usa-trump-impeachment




Jan 31, 2020 — By a vote of 51-49, the Republican-controlled Senate stopped Democrats' drive to hear testimony from witnesses like former national security ...


Republicans defeat Democratic bids to hear witnesses in ...​

1679561428023.png
Politico
https://www.politico.com › news › 2020/01/31 › murk...




Jan 31, 2020 — The Senate on Friday narrowly rejected motions to call new witnesses in Donald Trump's impeachment trial, paving the way for a final vote to ...
THAT's what the orange liar and Gulliani claim, NOT Cohen.
 

Forum List

Back
Top