asterism
Congress != Progress
No need. You can't.
So you admit you can't demonstrate the similarities between Muslim Jihadists and Christian literalists?
Good.
What was your point again?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No need. You can't.
You ask if anyone is prohibiting the display of religious symbols on private property, I cite a case that is doing that, and you say it has nothing to do with your question.
Color me not surprised.
That is not private property.
It has been sold to private parties twice. Both times people went to court to have the cross removed anyway because they didn't get a chance to tear it down.
That more than counters your argument that no one is trying to remove religious symbols from private property because they clearly succeeded in doing so.
That is not private property.
It has been sold to private parties twice. Both times people went to court to have the cross removed anyway because they didn't get a chance to tear it down.
That more than counters your argument that no one is trying to remove religious symbols from private property because they clearly succeeded in doing so.
The Courts recognize this kind of tactic as an attempt to circumvent the constitutional issue.