Lord Long Rod
Diamond Member
- Jan 17, 2023
- 7,706
- 8,122
- 2,138
- Banned
- #1
There are endless stories in the media these days about people (usually of diversity background) shoplifting large amounts of merchandise and then simply walking out of the store with it. A lot of these retailers will not allow an employee to stop theft. If they get caught, they are regularly being let off with reduced charges, especially in certain Democrat cities. This is absolutely absurd, and is essentially anarchy. However, it is not surprising given how today’s Dems are largely Marxist, and such filth are fundamentally opposed to individual property rights.
In many states individuals have a right to defend themselves with deadly force if they feel their lives, or other’s lives, are in immediate jeopardy of death or seriously bodily injury. There are some ass-backward Democrat states that impose a duty to retreat before using deadly force. But these are shit hole blue states where the Dem leaders do not give a shit about their citizens. These are also usually very “diverse” areas, thus creating the inference that these blue state, degenerate Democrat leaders are racist as fuck (they are) because their naïve and stupid regulations disparately impact certain minorities. But I digress.
Most states that allow you to legally defend yourself restrict it to personal threats. That is, you cannot use deadly force to protect property, real or personal. Thus, you cannot simply pull your sidearm and mag-dump on a skeevy shoplifter, unfortunately. But what if we could?
I suspect that if states granted immunity from criminal prosecution for retail theft deterrent deaths, then we would get this problem under control very quickly. There will be all sorts of dumb uproar over alleged racism and other nonsensical tripe. But the fact is that disparate impact is irrelevant when the perps CHOOSE to engage in criminal acts. Everybody has the free will to decide whether to engage in criminality (i.e., deviant social behavior contra civil society). So fuck them.
Sure, some perps will get whacked with such an immunity regime. But honestly, who cares? But once word gets out, thefts will drop substantially and, therefore, less offenders will be placing themselves in harms way. It’s like if we put machine gun nests on our southern border to enforce a zero tolerance policy. You have to break some eggs to make an omelet. But in the long run the deterrent effect will actually save lives because immigrants will stop coming here to file their frivolous asylum claims and, therefore. No longer be subjected to all the deadly dangers they now face. Sure, some will be machine-gunned down. Who cares? They are trying to enter our country illegally to steal our resources. Why should you care about this when nobody cares about them losing their lives now? Not even the Dems care. Democrats could not care less about the lives and welfare of illegal immigrants. All the Dems care about is their power.
Thus, I propose that trespass to chattel (for the Dems, this means stealing shit) should be treated exactly the same as a threat of death or severe bodily harm to a person for the purpose of using deadly force. Why the hell not? They choose to engage in criminal conduct. They assume the risk of the consequences. If they are willing to risk their lives to steal stuff, then they do not value their lives very much, do they? And if they do not value their own lives, then they sure as hell do not value anyone else’s lives. This make them particularly dangerous. Such people are not the sort of people we need in civil society. They are un/anti civil and, therefore, expendable (with extreme prejudice).
Once we start blasting these thieving scumbags en mass, eventually it will sink in to these stupid fucking criminals that maybe they ought to change course in life. It may even cause some of them to start valuing their lives, and the lives of others. In other words, this immunity plan will be good for us AND the criminal class, and will most likely enable a much more peaceful and thoughtful society to blossom.
In many states individuals have a right to defend themselves with deadly force if they feel their lives, or other’s lives, are in immediate jeopardy of death or seriously bodily injury. There are some ass-backward Democrat states that impose a duty to retreat before using deadly force. But these are shit hole blue states where the Dem leaders do not give a shit about their citizens. These are also usually very “diverse” areas, thus creating the inference that these blue state, degenerate Democrat leaders are racist as fuck (they are) because their naïve and stupid regulations disparately impact certain minorities. But I digress.
Most states that allow you to legally defend yourself restrict it to personal threats. That is, you cannot use deadly force to protect property, real or personal. Thus, you cannot simply pull your sidearm and mag-dump on a skeevy shoplifter, unfortunately. But what if we could?
I suspect that if states granted immunity from criminal prosecution for retail theft deterrent deaths, then we would get this problem under control very quickly. There will be all sorts of dumb uproar over alleged racism and other nonsensical tripe. But the fact is that disparate impact is irrelevant when the perps CHOOSE to engage in criminal acts. Everybody has the free will to decide whether to engage in criminality (i.e., deviant social behavior contra civil society). So fuck them.
Sure, some perps will get whacked with such an immunity regime. But honestly, who cares? But once word gets out, thefts will drop substantially and, therefore, less offenders will be placing themselves in harms way. It’s like if we put machine gun nests on our southern border to enforce a zero tolerance policy. You have to break some eggs to make an omelet. But in the long run the deterrent effect will actually save lives because immigrants will stop coming here to file their frivolous asylum claims and, therefore. No longer be subjected to all the deadly dangers they now face. Sure, some will be machine-gunned down. Who cares? They are trying to enter our country illegally to steal our resources. Why should you care about this when nobody cares about them losing their lives now? Not even the Dems care. Democrats could not care less about the lives and welfare of illegal immigrants. All the Dems care about is their power.
Thus, I propose that trespass to chattel (for the Dems, this means stealing shit) should be treated exactly the same as a threat of death or severe bodily harm to a person for the purpose of using deadly force. Why the hell not? They choose to engage in criminal conduct. They assume the risk of the consequences. If they are willing to risk their lives to steal stuff, then they do not value their lives very much, do they? And if they do not value their own lives, then they sure as hell do not value anyone else’s lives. This make them particularly dangerous. Such people are not the sort of people we need in civil society. They are un/anti civil and, therefore, expendable (with extreme prejudice).
Once we start blasting these thieving scumbags en mass, eventually it will sink in to these stupid fucking criminals that maybe they ought to change course in life. It may even cause some of them to start valuing their lives, and the lives of others. In other words, this immunity plan will be good for us AND the criminal class, and will most likely enable a much more peaceful and thoughtful society to blossom.
