Registration of firearms leads to confiscation

[bigrebnc1775]

This is a lie.

There is nothing in the letter that references or authorizes ‘confiscation’ – business owners retain ownership of their firearms.

The letter clearly states that business owners may relocate their firearms to another venue – again, retaining ownership and possession.

More lies and demagoguery from the dishonest right.

Bring your firearms to the police or have them stored at a FFL if they don't do that what will happen?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Do you oppose registering fully automatic machine guns? What about RPGs?

I oppose the NFA it must be repealed

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

If you KNEW that a government effort to confiscate firearms would lead to tens of thousands of deaths in that process, would you still think it was the correct move?

Another lie.

Obviously you didn’t bother to read the letter.

“Alternatively, you may bring your firearm(s) to another location where you are lawfully allowed to possess and store it.”

No firearms are being ‘confiscated.’

 

[bigrebnc1775]

I don’t really care if it does or not. In my opinion the fewer guns in the hands of white folks the better.

So you believe your guns are safe?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Another lie.

Obviously you didn’t bother to read the letter.

“Alternatively, you may bring your firearm(s) to another location where you are lawfully allowed to possess and store it.”

No firearms are being ‘confiscated.’

If you don't follow the directions of the NYPD what will happen?

 

[skews13]

Spoken

The only time you need to know is when you see them. Why are you a fascist pig?

like a true criminal. All soldiers, police and national guard weapons are clearly displayed, and registered. Only a criminal hides their weapons until they use them.

So much for responsible legal ownership of firearms. I won’t even try to explain how the gun is already registered with the state police, when it was purchased, and the background check was done.

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

Dude!
It is LITERALLY the FIRST four words of 2A!!!!

No where does the 2nd Amendment say anything about anyone having to be a member of the militia to own guns

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

State law is not law of the land nor does it supercede the US Cinstitution

No one said it did.

The law prohibiting firearms in sensitive places is perfectly Constitutional, in no manner in violation of the Second Amendment:

“The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.”

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. HELLER

www.law.cornell.edu

 

[Hellbilly]

So you believe your guns are safe?

Yep

 

[okfine]

LOL!

Gosh, yeah, I guess you can't simply ask people "What kind of guns do you have?"

I truly suspect that would be far too burdensome for someone so intellectually challenged as you...

It's a valid question when it comes to determining what ammo will be needed.

 

[the other mike]

None of my weapons are registered except
my 2 Rottweilers.

Shhhhh.
Don't tell them they're part Maltese

 

[ClaireH]

How can we keep our well regulated militia if we don’t know who has guns and what type they have?

Don‘t you realize that well regulated militias are necessary for a free state?

Why do you hate America?

Lol your obvious assumption that any thug walking around with unregistered or stolen guns, including guns with serial numbers erased to be used like a burner phone hard to trace, is ludicrous. Requiring honest folks to register their guns while the criminals at large couldn’t care less about legalities and the like isn’t even rational.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Bring your firearms to the police or have them stored at a FFL if they don't do that what will happen?

Obviously you didn’t bother to read the letter, either, in your reckless, irresponsible rush to propagate your lie.

From the letter:

“Alternatively, you may bring your firearm(s) to another location where you are lawfully allowed to possess and store it.”

Or you did read the letter and decided to ignore the facts and post a lie anyway, typical of the dishonest, reprehensible right.

No firearms are being ‘confiscated’ – the registration of firearms does not result in ‘confiscation’ – the thread premise is a lie; this is just more lies and demagoguery about guns from the right.

 

[BlackSand]

If you don't follow the directions of the NYPD what will happen?

.

They are simply ignoring the ambiguity of referring to something as "Lawfully Allowed" ...
In a circumstance where the reason it is used is already based in an attempt to further circumvent a Constitutionally Protected Right.

It's a completely ignorant rebuttal to present the exception of what is Lawfully Allowed ...
In a circumstance that might suggest any protection for your rights, because they are changing the current law in the first place.

They might as well say something as stupid as ...
"We have no desire to make you do something that isn't unlawful while we are already in the middle of writing this new Law" ...


It's pretending there is some meaning in "lawfully allowed" in a circumstance,
when all they are going to have to do is write another law to restrict that.

.​

 

[the other mike]

Lol your obvious assumption that any thug walking around with unregistered or stolen guns, including guns with serial numbers erased to be used like a burner phone hard to trace, is ludicrous. Requiring honest folks to register their guns while the criminals at large couldn’t care less about legalities and the like isn’t even rational.

He's talking about the army of the future since all the good soldiers are quitting or being discharged for not taking the vaccine.

 

[ClaireH]

I'll remind you of your remark the next time you rant about states rights.

Please do, BD. I’ll be watching for that post as well because a large majority of us state rights supporters do not place the US Constitution under state rights. Source your assumption or stay on the porch.

 

[the other mike]

Please do, BD. I’ll be watching for that post as well because a large majority of us state rights supporters do not place the US Constitution under state rights. Source your assumption or stay on the porch.

Shhhhhh.
Don't piss off the feds..... they're liable to unleash the DEA and close all our pot stores.

87,000 armed IRS ?
Try to guess how many of the DEA, FBI , DHS has.

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

Spoken

like a true criminal. All soldiers, police and national guard weapons are clearly displayed, and registered. Only a criminal hides their weapons until they use them.

So much for responsible legal ownership of firearms. I won’t even try to explain how the gun is already registered with the state police, when it was purchased, and the background check was done.

The weapons you listed all belong to the government...lol

 

[skews13]

Lol your obvious assumption that any thug walking around with unregistered or stolen guns, including guns with serial numbers erased to be used like a burner phone hard to trace, is ludicrous. Requiring honest folks to register their guns while the criminals at large couldn’t care less about legalities and the like isn’t even rational.

Those legalities are what separates you from the criminals. It’s not like you can tell the difference between a gun that is registered or not. That legal one you use is not any less effective because it was purchased legally.

So I guess using your logic, if some fool decides to drive his vehicle on a public road at 125 miles per hour. You should be able to do the same, because if criminals that drive wrecklessly aren’t going abide by the speed limit, why should you have to, right?

 

[AZrailwhale]

No dumb ass. Guns are not allowed in special sensative areas. The NYPD telling them the guns have to be kept somewhere else, and giving them the option of storing them for the business owners. The business owners are free to store them any other place that is legal. They just can't keep them in those sensitive areas.
From your link
The letter reads: “If this applies to your place of business, please bring your applicable firearm(s) to your local precinct in order for it to be safeguarded for you. Alternatively, you may bring your firearm(s) to another location where you are lawfully allowed to possess and store it. Lastly, you may contract with a Federally Licensed Firearms dealer (FFL) to store the firearm(s) for you – they may, however, charge for this service.”

The only problem with your statement is that the new law makes pretty much the whole state a “special sensitive area”. That’s why it will be overturned as soon as anyone can get it in front of a judge.