MagicMike
Platinum Member
Not at all.No, I said your 14th amendment assertion is full of holes.
Up against the wall and you change your narrative, 'eh?
For 49 years Roe was the constitutional law of the land.
Roe was based upon the SCOTUS'
interpretation of the 14th Amendment in 1973.
Likewise since 2008 (24 years) the SCOTUS' interpretation of the 2nd Amendment has been the constitutional law of the land.
No difference.
Now if you want to try to argue that the two cases are different because one is more "constitutional" than the other then that is not sensible or logical because you would be saying that two conflicting things are both true at the same time.
Either you ACCEPT and respect the SCOTUS' ability to interpret the U.S. Constitution and make laws accordingly.....or you don't.
If your opinion is that the SCOTUS' opinions are only valid and constitutional whenever YOU agree with them well then.....
You can see the problem there.