Regarding laws and government policies related to artificial intelligence.

[Supposn]

Regarding laws and government policies related to artificial intelligence.

For your information: My interests regarding economic concepts, on some occasions lead me to encounter and consider mentions of the European Parliament (i.e. EP) or (on more often occasions), some concepts or practices directly or indirectly derived from that, [the European Union's, (EU) parliament]. Respectfully, Supposn

Referring to the link, Opinion| Why Europe is leading the way on AI - The Washington Post :
“CharlesE. Schumer, Mike Rounds, Martin Heinrich and Todd Young — the [U.S.] Senate’s bipartisan AI group of four... … Dragos Tudorache, chair of the EP committee on AI”.

…“For the past five years, Tudorache has spent most of his time contemplating how to regulate artificial intelligence in a way that prioritizes safety while shedding Europe’s well-earned reputation for fining Big Tech first and asking questions later. In September, Tudorache visited Capitol Hill to brief the group of four’s collective staff members on Europe’s plans. … While the United States was congratulating itself for starting the regulatory process, Europe was basically finished. And its package of rules was so good that Congress would soon be forced to choose between spending years trying to top it or copying the homework of an obviously superior student”.

 

[White 6]

Regarding laws and government policies related to artificial intelligence.

For your information: My interests regarding economic concepts, on some occasions lead me to encounter and consider mentions of the European Parliament (i.e. EP) or (on more often occasions), some concepts or practices directly or indirectly derived from that, [the European Union's, (EU) parliament]. Respectfully, Supposn

Referring to the link, Opinion| Why Europe is leading the way on AI - The Washington Post :
“CharlesE. Schumer, Mike Rounds, Martin Heinrich and Todd Young — the [U.S.] Senate’s bipartisan AI group of four... … Dragos Tudorache, chair of the EP committee on AI”.

…“For the past five years, Tudorache has spent most of his time contemplating how to regulate artificial intelligence in a way that prioritizes safety while shedding Europe’s well-earned reputation for fining Big Tech first and asking questions later. In September, Tudorache visited Capitol Hill to brief the group of four’s collective staff members on Europe’s plans. … While the United States was congratulating itself for starting the regulatory process, Europe was basically finished. And its package of rules was so good that Congress would soon be forced to choose between spending years trying to top it or copying the homework of an obviously superior student”.

They need to get on the stick. If Europe has good laws on the books, they may serve as a guide, but regulation needs to be addressed quickly.

 

[1srelluc]

What concerns me is that old-ass politicians that have just figured out a flip-phone will be making the laws.

 

[Not That Guy]

AI is what hangs up on you when you call any corporation with more than 100 employees.

 

[fncceo]

They need to get on the stick. If Europe has good laws on the books, they may serve as a guide, but regulation needs to be addressed quickly.

Why? Artificial Intelligence as defined by people who actually understand it isn't even on the horizon.

Clever programming on the part of human intelligence is behind what is commonly referred to as artificial today.

The ability of machines to actually learn on their own and make autonomous decisions outside of pre-programmed parameters, the actual definition of intelligence, remains the stuff of science fiction far into our future.

This panic over a potential uprising by our machine overlords, while entertaining fiction since the 1950s, is no more a imminent threat than an invasion from space.

 

[White 6]

Why? Artificial Intelligence as defined by people who actually understand it isn't even on the horizon.

Clever programming on the part of human intelligence is behind what is commonly referred to as artificial today.

The ability of machines to actually learn on their own and make autonomous decisions outside of pre-programmed parameters, the actual definition of intelligence, remains the stuff of science fiction far into our future.

This panic over a potential uprising by our machine overlords, while entertaining fiction since the 1950s, is no more a imminent threat than an invasion from space.

That sounds like a semantic debate, but does not alter the fact, that the level of processing and output affect possible at this time, require restrictions in place to avoid pitfalls of the technology applications, we are already seeing.

 

[fncceo]

That sounds like a semantic debate, but does not alter the fact, that the level of processing and output affect possible at this time, require restrictions in place to avoid pitfalls of the technology applications, we are already seeing.

The same argument has been made about EVERY technological innovation from fire and the wheel.

Things change, lean into it and don't fret about Amazon getting rid of all the book stores.